Previous Issue
Volume 93, April
 
 
arm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Adv. Respir. Med., Volume 93, Issue 3 (June 2025) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1366 KiB  
Article
Changes in Lung Ultrasound in Systemic Sclerosis Before and After Rehabilitation: A Comparative Study Between People with and Without Interstitial Lung Disease
by Samantha Gomes de Alegria, Matheus Mello da Silva, Jéssica Gabriela Messias Oliveira, Beatriz Luiza Pinheiro Alves de Azevedo, Nathália Alves de Oliveira Saraiva, Isabelle da Nóbrega Ferreira, Joana Acar Silva, Thiago Thomaz Mafort, Cláudia Henrique da Costa and Agnaldo José Lopes
Adv. Respir. Med. 2025, 93(3), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/arm93030009 - 20 May 2025
Viewed by 122
Abstract
There is limited research on the impact of a physiotherapy-guided rehabilitation program (PGRP) on lung structure in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been used for over a decade to identify interstitial lung disease associated with SSc (SSc-ILD). This study aims to [...] Read more.
There is limited research on the impact of a physiotherapy-guided rehabilitation program (PGRP) on lung structure in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been used for over a decade to identify interstitial lung disease associated with SSc (SSc-ILD). This study aims to evaluate the impact of a PGRP on LUS signals in women with SSc-ILD and women without ILD (SSc-wILD). This is a longitudinal quasi-experimental study that included 33 women with SSc. The results show that changes in LUS were observed in 22 participants, especially B-lines > two. Before the PGRP the median of B-lines > two was three (0–7), while after the PGRP it was three (0–6) (p = 0.020). The aeration score was eight (0–16.5) pre-PGRP and three (0–16) post-PGRP (p = 0.013). Analyzing the impact of the PGRP on LUS signals in SSc-ILD and SSc-wILD groups, the main change observed was a reduction in B-lines > two between pre-PGRP and post-PGRP in the SSc-ILD group (p = 0.0004). The SSc-ILD group had a higher aeration score than the SSc-wILD group both pre-PGRP (p < 0.0001) and post-PGRP (p = 0.0001)]. In conclusion, LUS may be a complementary tool for assessing pre- and post-PGRP changes in people with SSc-ILD and SSc-wILD. Our data also suggest that the PGRP can elicit measurable changes in LUS findings in SSc, particularly in SSc-ILD. These findings support the inclusion of LUS in the routine monitoring of SSc and the use of a PGRP as a non-pharmacologic adjunctive strategy in SSc. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop