Next Article in Journal
Fermentation-Driven Biosynthesis of Natural Carotenoids in Rhodotorula glutinis P4M422: Evaluation of Culture Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 as a Probiotic Microbial Cell Factory: From Genetic Engineering to Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
Exogenous Carbohydrate Effects on Thermoadaptation and Thermostress in Ogataea parapolymorpha Under Different Carbon Sources
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Characterisation and Vitamin B12 Production Optimization of P. freudenreichii from Turkish Traditional Kars Gravyer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cloning and Secretory Expression of Aspergillus niger α-amylase with a Novel Synthetic Promoter in Pichia pastoris and Its Application in Apple Juice

1
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye
2
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye
3
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ardahan University, Ardahan 75002, Türkiye
4
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye
5
İzmir International Biomedicine and Genome Institute, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir 35340, Türkiye
6
İzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir 35340, Türkiye
7
Department of Food Processing, Finike Vocational School, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07740, Türkiye
8
Batı Akdeniz Agricultural Research Institute, Antalya 07100, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fermentation 2026, 12(4), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12040200
Submission received: 16 March 2026 / Revised: 10 April 2026 / Accepted: 14 April 2026 / Published: 16 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Metabolism Focusing on Bioactive Molecules)

Abstract

Amylase enzyme catalyzes the breakdown of starch by acting on the α-1,4 glycosidic bond. The use of amylases is common in areas such as baking and fruit juice production in the food industry, as well as in the detergent, textile, and paper industries. Due to their broad industrial applicability, the recombinant production of amylases has received increasing attention in recent years. In this study, the production of Aspergillus niger α-amylase enzyme was investigated for the first time in Pichia pastoris under the control of the ethanol-inducible synthetic ADH2 (SNT5) promoter. A codon-optimized A. niger α-amylase gene was expressed extracellularly in the P. pastoris MK115-PDI strain. Optimal production conditions were 24 °C and pH 6.0. In a 5 L bioreactor, total secreted protein reached 2.2 g/L and enzyme activity reached 44,062 U/mL. The recombinant enzyme was characterized and showed optimal activity at 60 °C and pH 7. In apple juice assays, the enzyme hydrolyzed starch and demonstrated suitability for juice clarification, although performance depended on enzyme concentration. Overall, these results indicate that the SNT5 synthetic promoter enables efficient recombinant α-amylase production in P. pastoris and represents a promising alternative to conventional promoter systems for industrial enzyme manufacturing.

1. Introduction

Amylases are enzymes secreted by animals, plants, and microorganisms that catalyze the hydrolysis of starch [1]. They are divided into three different groups as α, β, and γ [2]. Among these, α-amylase is the most extensively used form in the detergent, paper, and food industries. Amylase is used especially in clear-type fruit juice production processes in the food industry. Juice clarity represents a key quality parameter, particularly for fruits such as apples [3].
In order to meet the demand for amylase enzyme used in industry, studies on recombinant production are being carried out using expression systems such as E. coli, Bacillus lichenifromis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and P. pastoris [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Microorganisms, particularly bacteria, fungi, and yeasts, constitute the primary biological sources of α-amylase. A. niger is frequently selected as a gene source for recombinant amylase production due to its ability to naturally produce high levels of stable and industrially relevant amylases. Enzymes derived from this organism are typically well-suited for industrial conditions, including a broad range of pH and temperature stability [11]. Furthermore, the genetic sequences of amylase genes from A. niger are well characterized, facilitating their cloning and heterologous expression in different host systems. In addition, the commercially available enzyme (Amylase AG 300 L, Novozymes, Bagsværd, Denmark) is produced from A. niger; therefore, in this study, A. niger was selected as the genetic source for amylase enzyme production. A. niger α-amylase consists of a total of 567 amino acids. Its approximate molecular weight is around 58 kDa. Numerous studies have demonstrated the suitability of A. niger as a genetic source for recombinant α-amylase production, particularly in yeast-based expression systems. In P. pastoris, the methanol-inducible alcohol oxidase I (AOX1) promoter is commonly used for recombinant amylase production [8,12].
P. pastoris is a methylotrophic yeast that can grow rapidly in relatively inexpensive media, similar to bacterial systems. However, as a eukaryotic host, it offers additional advantages by enabling post-translational modifications, including polypeptide folding, disulfide bond formation, and glycosylation, which are often required for functional expression of eukaryotic proteins. This makes the Pichia expression system advantageous over bacteria for recombinant protein production. In addition, the availability of vectors harbouring strong promoters such as AOX1 and the constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAP) promoters provides great flexibility and convenience in host-vector design for recombinant protein production. AOX1 and GAP promoters of P. pastoris are frequently used promoters. Their unique strengths and regulation mechanisms provide the host organism with the ability to express foreign proteins. Although the main goal in recombinant protein production is to obtain maximum protein in minimum time, sometimes weaker promoters are preferred to ensure the correct folding of proteins. Therefore, the discovery of alternative promoters and the study of their regulation mechanisms remain ongoing. The P. pastoris alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH2) gene, which shares 74% sequence homology to the S. cerevisiae ADH gene, has been characterized, and its promoter region has been proposed as an alternative to the AOX1 and GAP promoters [13,14]. In a 5 L bioreactor study, the native ADH2 promoter achieved an enzyme activity of 3725 U/mL, whereas AOX1 and GAP promoters resulted in 2095 U/mL and 580 U/mL, respectively. The authors demonstrate that the ADH2 promoter can drive effective protein expression under 30 °C, pH 5, and 30% dissolved oxygen [13]. Subsequent studies have focused on modifying this promoter to enhance its performance. In particular, the regulatory regions of the ADH2 promoter were identified, and five synthetic ADH2 promoter variants were generated by selective deletion or insertion of these elements [15]. These synthetic promoters were tested for ethanol-induced production of extracellular xylanase at the shake flask level and were shown to increase xylanase production at rates ranging from 165% to 200% of the native ADH2 promoter. Among these variants, the synthetic ADH2 promoter 5 (SNT5) exhibited the highest activity and was further validated at the fermentor scale, demonstrating its suitability for industrial processes [15].
Based on these previous studies, the synthetic ADH2 promoter SNT5 represents a promising alternative to traditional promoters [13,15]. It provides advantages such as methanol-free expression and a high-yield product. This makes them particularly valuable for optimizing recombinant protein production in different industrial and experimental settings. Therefore, synthetic promoters can be considered as alternatives to conventional promoters in P. pastoris.
Building on these findings, the present study aimed to develop an expression system for the extracellular production of A. niger α-amylase under the control of the ethanol-inducible SNT5 promoter in P. pastoris. The recombinant expression vector was introduced into the MK155-PDI strain, which overexpresses protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) to support correct protein folding and secretion. Recombinant α-amylase production was subsequently evaluated at the 5 L bioreactor scale, and the biochemical properties and potential application of the produced enzyme were investigated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of A. niger α-amylase expression in P. pastoris driven by an ethanol-inducible synthetic promoter.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Culture Media

P. pastoris MK115-PDI strain [14] and E. coli NEB5-α strains were used for recombinant protein expression and cloning studies, respectively. For routine cultivation and strain development of P. pastoris, YPD media (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose); BMGY (2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 1% glycerol, 1.34% YNB, 4 × 10−5% biotin and 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0); BMEY (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L soytone, 13.4 g/L YNB, 4 × 10−5% biotin, 10% pure ethanol and 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.0) were used. For the cultivation of E. coli cells, LB Miller (0.5% yeast extract, 1% peptone, and 1% NaCl) and/or LB Lennox medium (1% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.5% NaCl) were employed. Appropriate antibiotics were added to both liquid and solid media according to the resistance gene on the plasmid used.

2.2. Gene Source and Expression Vector Construction

A. niger was used as a gene source, and a codon-optimized DNA region for P. pastoris was provided in the pUC57 cloning vector (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). The pUC57-AnAMY plasmid and pSNT5α vector [15] were digested with XhoI-NotI cloning enzymes and then extracted from the agarose gel. Ligation was performed to create the pSNT5α-AnAMY expression vector, and the transformant cells were selected by plating on LB-Lenox agar plates containing zeocin containing. Plasmid DNA isolation was performed from the selected transformant cells, and the plasmid was verified by digesting with restriction enzymes. The confirmed plasmid was linearized with the BsiWI enzyme and transformed into the competent P. pastoris MK115-PDI strain by electroporation (Eppendorf SE, Hamburg, Germany). YPD agar plates containing 100 μg/mL and 500 μg/mL zeocin were used to select transformant cells.

2.3. Genomic DNA Isolation

The selected clones were inoculated in YPD broth and incubated overnight for genomic DNA isolation. 2 mL of culture was taken, and the yeast cells were precipitated. 200 μL of yeast cell lysis buffer (2% Triton X-100, 1% SDS, 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris HCl (pH 8), 1 mM EDTA (pH 8)) was added to dissolve the cells, and the mixture was then frozen at −80 °C for at least 30 min. The frozen mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 2 min and vortexed. After this freeze–thaw process was repeated three times, 200 μL of chloroform was added to the mixture and vortexed again for 2 min. Phase separation was then achieved by centrifugation at 20,000× g for 5 min. Following centrifugation, the upper phase was transferred to a new tube containing 400 μL of cold ethanol and kept at room temperature for 5 min to precipitate the gDNA. The samples were centrifuged again, and the mixture was washed with 500 μL of 70% ethanol. The remaining ethanol was removed using an evaporator (Eppendorf Concantrator Plus-5301, Hamburg, Germany). The obtained gDNAs were dissolved in 20 μL elution buffer (TE buffer: 10 mM Tris, pH 8.5), and 1 μL RNAse enzyme (RNase A, DNase, and protease-free, Thermo Scientific™, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to remove RNAs and kept at 37 °C for 1 h.

2.4. Determination of Gene Copy Number

Gene copy number of the transformant cells was determined by qPCR. To amplify the SNT5 promoter region and actin gene in the PCR reaction, primers ADH2prom-Frt: CCACCCCTCCCCAATCTC and ADH2prom-Rrt: AGCTAGTAGCTGATGGAAGAAGG, ActinrtF: GCTTTGTTCCACCCATCTGT, and ActinrtR: TGCATACGCTCAGCAATACC were used, respectively. The reaction mixture was prepared according to the Maxima SYBR Green/ROX Qpcr master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) protocol and after the initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, the qPCR reaction was completed by repeating the steps of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 30 s 40 times. The gene copy number was determined by relative quantification according to the 2−ΔΔCt method as described before [16].

2.5. Agar Plate Assay

In order to screen α-amylase enzyme activity in the transformant yeast strains, a Lugol iodine assay was employed. Firstly, the clones were developed in YPD broth until they reached 12–13 OD600, and then transferred to BMGY pH 6.0 medium. The developed culture was plated on ME agar (0.34% yeast nitrogen base, 4 × 10−5% biotin, 1% ethanol, 1.5% agar) plates containing 0.4% starch and incubated at 28 °C for 2 days. Since the SNT5 promoter used in protein production is an ethanol-inducible promoter, 100 μL of ethanol was added to the lids of the plates at 24 and 48 h. At the end of the second day, 10 mL of 5% Lugol solution was added to the developing colonies, and a clear zone formation was observed around the colony to confirm the amylase activity.

2.6. Expression of Recombinant Amylase in a Shake Flask

Clones containing a single copy expression cassette were inoculated into 3 mL YPD broth medium and incubated at 225 rpm and at 28 °C until the OD600 reached 6–8. Then, these cultures were inoculated into 30 mL of BMGY (pH 6) medium in 250 mL shake flasks with an initial OD600 of 0.1. The cells with approximately 10–13 OD600 in BMGY medium were centrifuged at +4 °C, 3000× g for 15 min. Supernatants were discarded, and the cell pellet obtained was suspended in 30 mL of BMEY medium with different pHs (pH 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0) and incubation was continued for 96 h at different temperatures (20 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C) with a constant agitation rate. Since protein production was carried out under the control of the ethanol-inducible SNT5 promoter, ethanol was added every 12 h throughout protein expression to a final concentration of 1% in BMEY medium. Samples were taken during 120 h of production. Supernatant samples were passed through a 0.45 PES filter and stored at −80 °C to be used in total protein, enzyme activity, and SDS-PAGE analyses.

2.7. Expression of Recombinant Amylase in a 5 L Bioreactor

To produce recombinant α-amylase enzyme on a large scale, a 5 L bioreactor (Sartorius Stedim BIOSTAT B, Göttingen, Germany) was used. The frozen culture was transferred to 100 mL of BMGY (pH 6.0) medium and incubated for approximately 20 h at 28 °C at 225 rpm (OD600 nm approximately 10). This culture was used for inoculation into 2 L of FM22 medium (42.2 g/L KH2PO4, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.79 g/L CaSO4, 14.9 g/L K2SO4, 4.13 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 40 g/L glycerol, pH 6.0). After FM22 medium was autoclaved, its pH was adjusted to 6.0 using 25% (v/v) NH4OH and 1 mL of PTM4 salt (2 g/L CuSO4·5H2O, 0.08 g/L NaI, 3 g/L MnSO4·H2O, 0.2 g/L Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.02 g/L H3BO3, 0.5 g/L CaSO4·2H2O, 0.5 g/L CoCl2, 7 g/L ZnCl2, 22 g/L FeSO4·7H2O, 0.2 g/L biotin, 1 mL H2SO4) was added for 1 L of medium. The batch phase continued for approximately 20 h and was completed with the peak of DO. After this carbon source depletion signal, the fed-batch phase was started with the solution containing 50% glucose, 10% ethanol, and 0.4% PTM4. During the fed-batch phase, the feed rate was kept constant at 7.3 mL/L/h during the first 2 h of fermentation, and the feed rate was gradually increased to 31.2 mL/L/h and kept constant at 31.2 mL/L/h until the end of fermentation. In the batch phase, temperature and pH were kept constant at 28 °C and 6.0, respectively, and at the beginning of the fed-batch phase, temperature and pH were adjusted to optimal protein production conditions (24 °C and pH 6.0). Fermentation pH was controlled with 25% (v/v) NH4OH. The DO level was controlled at 20% saturation by stirring, adding air (1.5 vvm), and pure oxygen. pH and oxygen concentration were determined with appropriate probes (Hamilton, Reno, NV, USA). Supernatants were collected at different times during fermentation, and these samples were analyzed for wet cell weight (WCW g/L), SDS-PAGE, total protein (g/L), and enzyme activity (U/L). All analyses were performed in triplicate.

2.8. Amylase Activity Measurement

The dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) colorimetric method was used to measure amylase activity. For the measurement of amylase enzyme activity, 200 µL of supernatant sample was incubated with 200 µL 1% soluble starch solution at 50 °C for 5 min. Then, 200 µL of the DNA solution was added and incubated at 95 °C for 15 min, and the samples were kept on ice for 3 min. After the addition of 1800 µL of pure water, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 540 nm. Different dilutions of the 0.3% (w/v) pure maltose solution were used as a standard. One enzyme unit for α-amylase was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1.0 mg of maltose in 1 min at 50 °C and pH 6.9.

2.9. Total Protein Determination

Total protein concentration in supernatant samples was measured according to the Coomassie Plus—The Better Bradford Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) protocol. Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard, and protein concentrations were calculated by measuring absorbance at 595 nm.

2.10. SDS-PAGE Analysis

The supernatant samples were mixed with 4X SDS gel loading buffer (200 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 0.4% Bromphenol Blue, 40% glycerol, 100 mM DTT) at a ratio of 1:3 and incubated at 70 °C for 10 min. 20 μL of the prepared samples were loaded into the 10% polyacrylamide gel. Protein samples were separated by electrophoresis at 120 V for 60 min. The gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (10% Acetic acid, 50% Methanol, 0.1% Coomassie blue staining) for 1 h and washed with wash buffer (10% Acetic acid, 10% Methanol). The acrylamide gel was imaged with the ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.11. Ultrafiltration Process

At the end of protein production in the bioreactor, the culture was harvested, and the protein sample was concentrated by the ultrafiltration technique. For this purpose, a 30 kDa cut-off Sartocon Slice Cassette (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany) was used, and the process was completed by applying 2 bar pressure. The retentate part was collected, and total protein concentration and enzyme activity were subsequently determined.

2.12. Endo-Hf Treatment

In order to see whether the produced recombinant α-amylase enzyme undergoes glycosylation, a reaction was performed with EndoHf enzyme. Approximately 3 μg of protein sample was denatured with denaturation buffer by incubating at 100 °C for 10 min and then kept on ice for 1 min. 0.6 μL of EndoHf enzyme was added, and the final volume was completed to 40 μL and then incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. After incubation, samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

2.13. Determination of Biochemical Properties of Recombinant Amylase

The optimal temperature of α-amylase activity was tested over a range of 30–80 °C by using 1% (w/v) starch solution at pH 6.9. For the thermal stability of α-amylase enzyme, supernatants were incubated at temperatures between 30 and 80 °C for 1 h, and then the enzyme activity was measured immediately under standard conditions.
In order to determine the optimal pH of α-amylase enzyme activity, a substrate solution containing 1% (w/v) starch was prepared using various buffers in the pH range of 5.0–9.0 and tested. To investigate the effect of pH on enzyme stability, supernatant samples were incubated with 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer containing 6.7 mM NaCl adjusted to pH 5.0–9.0 at room temperature for 1 h, and enzyme activity was measured by the standard method after adding 1% soluble starch solution to each buffer. Relative enzyme activities were calculated by assuming the activity of the enzyme as 100% at the temperature and pH specified in the standard method.

2.14. Effect of Metal Ions on Amylase Enzyme Activity

The effect of FeCl2, MgCl2, CuCl2, ZnCl2, and CaCl2 on the amylase enzyme activity was determined at final concentrations of 2 mM, 5 mM, and 10 mM of the metal ions. Relative activities were calculated by assuming the control activity as 100%.

2.15. Application of Recombinant Amylase Enzyme on Apple Juice

The effectiveness of various units of the produced α-amylase enzyme (1400 U–690,000 U) was investigated in raw apple juice. Initially, to gelatinize the starch potentially present in the juice, the samples were heated at 90 °C for 5 min. This process rendered the starch more susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis.
Following this, the juice samples were cooled to 50 °C, and the enzyme treatments at the specified dosages were applied. The samples were then incubated in a water bath for 2 h. To inactivate the enzyme after treatment, the samples were heated again at 90 °C for 5 min. After cooling to room temperature, the samples were centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C and filtered through a coarse filter before analysis.
To detect the presence of residual starch in the apple juice samples, iodine tests were conducted. The iodine solution (10%) was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g iodine in 10 mL of ethanol, adding 2 g of potassium iodide, and diluting to 100 mL with distilled water. For the test, 10 mL of apple juice was placed in a test tube, which was held at a slight angle. A few drops of iodine solution were carefully added along the inner wall of the tube to reach the surface of the liquid. The colour change at the surface was observed to assess the degree of starch hydrolysis.

2.16. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were expressed as the mean, standard deviation, and minimum–maximum values. The normality of the data was assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk test, while homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test. A two-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of pH, temperature, and their interaction on the activity. For significant findings, pairwise comparisons for pH and temperature were performed using Tukey’s post hoc test, and Bonferroni correction was applied for comparisons of temperature levels within each pH group. All statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS software (version 23.0), and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Expression Vector Construction

The codon-optimized DNA sequence of the A. niger α-amylase gene (Gene Accession Number: KU668705.1) was synthesized in the pUC57 vector. Codon optimization was done based on P. pastoris codon usage. pSNT5α plasmid and pUC57 vector containing the codon-optimized amylase gene were digested with XhoI and NotI restriction enzymes and ligated to obtain pSNT5α-AnAmylase expression vector (Figure 1A). The resulting construct was transformed into E. coli NEB5α competent cells, and correct plasmid assembly was confirmed by restriction digestion and DNA sequence analysis. Following confirmation, the expression vector was linearized with the BsiWI enzyme and transformed into P. pastoris MK115-PDI competent cells by electroporation. Transformant cells were selected on YPD agar plates containing 100 μg/mL and 500 μg/mL zeocin.

3.2. Expression of Recombinant Amylase in P. pastoris

Clear zone formation around colonies on starch-containing plates after Lugol staining was used as a qualitative indicator of amylase activity. As shown in Figure 1B, no clear zones were observed for clones 7 and 9, whereas all remaining clones exhibited visible starch degradation. These observations were supported by SDS-PAGE analysis of culture supernatants, which confirmed the absence of recombinant protein expression in clones 7 and 9. Based on qPCR analysis, a single-copy expression cassette containing the clone was selected for further experiments. Selection of a single-copy clone ensured more stable expression characteristics for subsequent optimization and scale-up studies.
In order to determine the optimal production conditions, shake flask cultures were performed at five different pH values (3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and three temperatures (20 °C, 24 °C, 28 °C). During the 96-h fermentation, samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and enzyme activity assays (Figure 2). At 24 °C, higher protein expression levels were observed at pH 6 and pH 7, whereas markedly lower expression was detected under acidic conditions (pH 3–5) (Figure 2A). Enzyme activity measurements showed the same trend, indicating increased recombinant amylase production at higher pH values (Figure 2B). Among all tested conditions, the highest enzyme activity (4640 U/mL) was obtained at pH 7 and 24 °C. Although a statistically significant difference was detected between pH 6 and pH 7 at 24 °C (Figure 2B), pH 6 was selected as the operational production condition for subsequent experiments. In past literature, some studies showed that high pH and low temperature can serve as optimal conditions for the recombinant protein production in P. pastoris [17,18,19]. Nevertheless, it is known that high pH causes precipitation of the salts in the bioreactor medium. Although there was a statistically significant difference in enzyme activities obtained at pH 6 and pH 7 at 24 °C, the optimal conditions for production in the 5 L bioreactor were determined as pH 6 and 24 °C.
Protein production was carried out using a clone containing a single-copy expression cassette in a 5 L bioreactor under optimal amylase production conditions (pH 6.0 and 24 °C). A two-stage fermentation strategy was applied, consisting of a glycerol batch phase followed by a glucose-ethanol fed-batch phase. At the end of the batch phase (24 h), WCW reached 106 g/L. Fed-batch fermentation was completed within 107 h, and the WCW reached 490 g/L (Figure 3), with a maximum value of 539 g/L observed at 65 h. The enzyme activity obtained in shake flask cultures was 4640 U/mL, whereas it reached 44,062 U/mL in bioreactor production, indicating an approximately ten-fold increase in enzyme activity. This result demonstrates that the SNT5 promoter enables efficient recombinant amylase protein expression under controlled fermentation conditions.
The use of ethanol induction instead of methanol may additionally offer operational advantages in terms of process safety and handling, particularly at larger scales. Total protein and enzyme activity measurements and SDS-PAGE analysis were performed on samples taken at different times throughout the fermentation (Figure 3). After 107 h of fermentation, the highest results were found at 65 h. The highest total protein was 2.2 g/L, and the enzyme activity was 44,062 U/mL. The specific activity of the amylase enzyme was calculated as 19,821 U/mg.
In this study, SDS-PAGE gel analysis revealed that the ~58 kDa A. niger amylase protein band intensity increased during fermentation. Following EndoHf treatment, a clear shift in molecular weight was observed, and the deglycosylated enzyme was estimated to have a molecular weight of approximately 55 kDa (Figure 4).

3.3. Ultrafiltration of the Amylase Enzyme

After the 5 L bioreactor production, the culture was harvested, and the 2 L supernatant was subjected to ultrafiltration. A total volume of 250 mL of retentant was obtained. The total protein and enzyme activity of the concentrated sample were determined as 11 g/L and 138,534 U/mL, respectively.

3.4. Biochemical Properties of the Amylase Enzyme

The effect of temperature on amylase activity was evaluated over a temperature range of 20–80 °C. The enzyme showed optimal activity at 60 °C (Figure 5A). α-Amylase activity increased gradually up to 60 °C, followed by a sharp decline at temperatures above this value. Thermal stability analysis showed an approximately 40% reduction in enzyme activity between 20 and 40 °C, while the activity remained constant between 40 and 60 °C. At 70 °C, 15.6% of the initial activity was retained, whereas almost no detectable activity was observed at 80 °C.
The optimal pH was determined under standard test conditions in the range of pH 5–9 at 50 °C. The optimal pH of the enzyme was found to be 7.0 (Figure 5B). As acidity decreased, enzyme activity and stability increased, while lower enzyme activity was observed in the alkaline pH range. Enzyme activity was not detectable at pH 9.0. While recombinant α-amylase maintained its stability in the pH range of 5.0–8.0, it was found that the enzyme lost stability at pH 9.0.

3.5. Effect of Metal Ions on Amylase Enzyme Activity

In order to determine the effect of metal ions on enzyme activity, CaCl2, MgCl2, ZnCl2, CuCl2, and FeCl2 were used at 2 mM and 10 mM concentrations (Table 1). All metals caused an increase in enzyme activity at 2 mM concentration. When CaCl2 and ZnCl2 were applied at 10 mM concentration, enzyme activity increased further compared to 2 mM. Meanwhile, the remaining metals (MgCl2, CuCl2, and FeCl2) inhibited the enzyme activity at 10 mM concentrations.

3.6. Apple Juice Application

Iodine test results obtained for different doses (1400 U–690,000 U) of the recombinant α-amylase enzyme are shown in Figure 6. Our observations show that enzyme concentrations above 70,000 U resulted in effective starch hydrolysis, as evidenced by the disappearance of blue coloration (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

In this study, the use of a codon-optimized gene sequence and a PDI-overexpressing host strain was intended to support efficient secretion and correct folding of the recombinant enzyme, which is particularly relevant for fungal α-amylases expressed in yeast systems.
From examination of past studies using A. niger as a genetic source for recombinant production of amylase enzyme in P. pastoris, it was seen that the methanol-inducible AOX1 promoter is generally used. In these studies, maximum amylase activities reported at shake flask level production were found to be 31.33 U/mL and 2838 U/mL [8,12]. In another study, Bacillus subtilis PY22 was used as a gene source for amylase enzyme, and maximum enzyme activity was reported as 44 U/mL [7]. It has been reported that 603.4 U/mL enzyme activity was obtained from the recombinant production of Thermomyces dupontii α-amylase enzyme in P. pastoris [9]. The codon-optimized Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase gene was expressed in P. pastoris under the control of the AOX1 promoter, and the maximum enzyme activity reached 420 U/mL [20]. Compared to these reports, the enzyme activity obtained in the present study indicated that the synthetic SNT5 promoter supports enhanced α-amylase production at the shake flask level, suggesting that SNT5 constitutes an effective alternative to AOX1 for small-scale expression.
In the literature, there are limited studies about the recombinant production of A. niger amylase enzyme in P. pastoris, and the scale-up production of amylase enzyme was not reported in these studies [8,12]. However, in another study, B. licheniformis amylase enzyme was produced in a 50 L bioreactor, and 11,000 U/mL enzyme activity was obtained [20]. Rhizopus oryzae amylase enzyme was produced in P. pastoris at the bioreactor level and reached 448.6 U/mL enzyme activity at the end of 120 h of fermentation [21]. Furthermore, using Bacillus acidicola as a gene source, it was reported that 750 U/mL enzyme activity was achieved in a bioreactor with eight copies of the expression cassette in a Pichia clone [22]. Comparing the results obtained in this study with those in the literature reveals that we have achieved the highest enzyme activity reported to date. Therefore, it was concluded that the synthetic ADH2 promoter (SNT5) used for the first time in this study is an efficient promoter to produce recombinant A. niger amylase enzyme in the P. pastoris expression system.
The molecular weight of the A. niger amylase protein was determined as 58 kDa, and studies using different gene sources showed that the molecular weight of the amylase protein generally ranges between 50 and 70 kDa [7,8,9,21,23,24,25]. Within this study, the produced enzyme was determined to have a molecular weight of 55 kDa and to undergo glycosylation. The observed N-linked glycosylation is consistent with previous reports on yeast-expressed fungal α-amylases and may contribute to secretion efficiency and stability of the recombinant enzyme [26].
The temperature profile observed in this study is consistent with previously reported characteristics of fungal α-amylases. Eight α-amylase enzymes belonging to the A. niger amylase family have been characterized and reported optimal temperatures of 30–40 °C for seven enzymes, while one enzyme exhibited an optimal temperature of 60 °C [8], in agreement with the findings of the present study. In another study, the optimal temperature of the A. niger amylase enzyme was determined as 70 °C [12]. In addition, the other studies using different gene sources such as B. subtilis PY22, B. licheniformis, and T. dupontii reported that the optimal temperature of amylase enzyme was 60 °C, 90 °C, and 60 °C, respectively. These findings indicate that the temperature optimum of the recombinant enzyme produced in this study falls within the expected range for industrially relevant α-amylases. In the literature, amylase enzymes show the optimal activity in the pH range 2.5–4.5 and 5.0–6.5 according to their acidic or neutral character [27,28]. Based on its pH optimum and stability profile, the recombinant α-amylase produced in this study can be classified as a neutral amylase enzyme.
The stimulatory effect of Ca2+ is consistent with the well-documented Ca2+ dependency of α-amylases, while inhibitory effects observed at higher concentrations of other metal ions agree with previous biochemical studies [29]. Calcium ions are known to stabilize the enzyme structure and enhance catalytic efficiency. In previous studies, 1 mM Ca+2 was reported to activate α-amylase activity, whereas Mg+2, Zn+2, Cu+2, and Fe+2 exhibited inhibitory effects on α-amylases derived from T. dupontii and A. amylolytica [9,24]. In another study expressing the A. oryzae amylase enzyme in P. pastoris, the effect of metal ions on enzyme activity was evaluated by testing 4 mM Ca+2, Mg+2, Fe+2, and Cu+2 [30]. They reported that Ca+2, Mg+2, and Fe+2 had an activating effect on enzyme activity, while Cu+2 had an inhibitory effect. The concentration-dependent effects observed in the present study, particularly the differential behaviour of Ca2+ and Zn2+ at higher concentrations, are therefore in agreement with previous biochemical reports and highlight the metal sensitivity of α-amylase activity.
When the recombinant enzyme was applied to fruit juice, it was observed that it degraded starch in a dose-dependent manner. The requirement for higher enzyme concentrations is likely related to differences in formulation, purification level, and stabilization rather than intrinsic catalytic limitations. Similarly, it has been reported that crude amylase extracts require purification and concentration optimization to achieve comparable hydrolytic performance [31]. At low concentrations, the recombinant α-amylase enzyme displayed a dark blue coloration, suggesting incomplete starch degradation. The effectiveness of enzymatic starch hydrolysis is influenced by multiple parameters, including enzyme concentration, substrate availability, pH, temperature, and incubation time [3].

5. Conclusions

In this study, the A. niger amylase enzyme was successfully produced in P. pastoris under the control of a synthetic ADH2 promoter, SNT5. High-level extracellular expression was achieved at both shake flask and bioreactor scales, with a marked increase in enzyme activity upon scale-up, confirming the stability and robustness of SNT5-driven expression under controlled fermentation conditions. The results of this study indicate that the SNT5 promoter represents a promising alternative to conventional AOX1-based systems for recombinant α-amylase production in P. pastoris, providing a useful framework for further optimization toward industrial enzyme applications. The recombinant enzyme exhibited industrially relevant biochemical properties, including optimal activity at 60 °C and pH 7.0, a Ca2+-dependent activity profile, and N-linked glycosylation characteristic of yeast-expressed fungal enzymes. Application studies in apple juice indicated effective starch hydrolysis at appropriate enzyme concentrations, highlighting the importance of formulation and dosage optimization rather than intrinsic catalytic limitations. Although purification is essential for accurate characterization and reliable evaluation of recombinant enzyme properties, it was not performed in this study and thus represents a limitation; therefore, future studies should prioritize purification to enable more comprehensive and robust analyses.

Author Contributions

Investigation, F.M., A.U., D.Y.-T., O.Ç., and C.D.; methodology, F.E., B.E.T.-Ö., C.D., and A.T.-Ö.; visualization, F.E.; Writing—original draft, B.E.T.-Ö., C.D., and A.T.-Ö.; conceptualization, A.T.-Ö. and M.İ.; data analysis, A.T.-Ö.; writing—review&editing, M.İ., A.T., and M.G.; project administration, A.T.-Ö. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK, Project number 222O454).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Celia Bloom, Creighton University, USA, for critical reading of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
P. pastorisPichia pastoris
A. nigerAspergillus niger
SNT5Ethanol-inducible synthetic ADH promoter
AOX1Alcohol oxidase I 
GAPGlyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 
ADHAlcohol dehydrogenase 
PDIProtein disulfide isomerase 
DNSADinitrosalicylic acid 
WCWWet cell weight

References

  1. Farooq, M.A.; Ali, S.; Hassan, A.; Tahir, H.M.; Mumtaz, S.; Mumtaz, S. Biosynthesis and industrial applications of α-amylase: A review. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gopinath, S.C.; Anbu, P.; Arshad, M.K.; Lakshmipriya, T.; Voon, C.H.; Hashim, U.; Chinni, S.V. Biotechnological processes in microbial amylase production. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hossain, K.M.; Khan, U.; Rahman, S.M.; Khan, M.S. Potential antimicrobial and fruit juice clarification activity of amylase enzyme from Bacillus strains. Biotechnol. Rep. 2024, 44, e00861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Murakami, S.; Nagasaki, K.; Nishimoto, H.; Shigematu, R.; Umesaki, J.; Takenaka, S.; Kaulpiboon, J.; Prousoontorn, M.; Limpaseni, T.; Pongsawadi, P.; et al. Purification and characterization of five alkaline, thermotolerant, and maltotetraose-producing α-amylases from Bacillus halodurans MS-2-5, and production of recombinant enzymes in Escherichia coli. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2008, 43, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Niu, D.; Zuo, Z.; Shi, G.Y.; Wang, Z.X. High yield recombinant thermostable α-amylase production using an improved Bacillus licheniformis system. Microb. Cell Factories 2009, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martínez, J.L.; Meza, E.; Petranovic, D.; Nielsen, J. The impact of respiration and oxidative stress response on recombinant α-amylase production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. Commun. 2016, 3, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karakaş, B.; İnan, M.; Certel, M. Expression and characterization of Bacillus subtilis PY22 α-amylase in Pichia pastoris. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2010, 64, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, F. Molecular cloning and biochemical characterization of an α-amylase family from Aspergillus niger. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 32, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.C.; Zhao, N.; Ma, J.W.; Liu, J.; Yan, Q.J.; Jiang, Z.Q. High-level expression of a novel α-amylase from Thermomyces dupontii in Pichia pastoris and its application in maltose syrup production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karaoğlan, M. Alternative secretory signal sequences for recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2023, 168, 110256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Djekrif-Dakhmouche, S.; Gheribi-Aoulmi, Z.; Meraihi, Z.; Bennamoun, L. Application of a statistical design to the optimization of culture medium for α-amylase production by Aspergillus niger ATCC 16404 grown on orange waste powder. J. Food Eng. 2006, 73, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeng, Q.; Wei, C.; Jin, J.; Wu, C.; Huang, B. Cloning of the gene encoding acid-stable alpha-amylase from Aspergillus niger and its expression in Pichia pastoris. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2011, 5, 668–675. [Google Scholar]
  13. Karaoğlan, M.; Karaoğlan, F.E.; İnan, M. Comparison of ADH3 promoter with commonly used promoters for recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif. 2016, 121, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Karaoğlan, M.; Erden-Karaoğlan, F.; İnan, M. Functional analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Karaoğlan, F.E.; Karaoğlan, M.; Yılmaz, G.; Yılmaz, S.; İnan, M. Deletion analysis of Pichia pastoris alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH2) promoter and development of synthetic promoters. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 17, 2100332. [Google Scholar]
  16. Abad, S.; Kitz, K.; Hörmann, A.; Schreiner, U.; Hartner, F.S.; Glieder, A. Real-time PCR-based determination of gene copy numbers in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Noseda, D.G.; Recúpero, M.N.; Blasco, M.; Ortiz, G.E.; Galvagno, M.A. Cloning expression and optimized production in a bioreactor of bovine chymosin B in Pichia (Komagataella) pastoris under AOX1 promoter. Protein Expr. Purif. 2013, 92, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shi, X.; Karkut, T.; Chamankhah, M.; Alting-Mees, M.; Hemmingsen, S.M.; Hegedus, D. Optimal conditions for the expression of a single-chain antibody (scFv) gene in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif. 2003, 28, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Özçelik, A.T.; Ersöz, F.; İnan, M. Extracellular production of the recombinant bacterial transglutaminase in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif. 2019, 159, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.R.; Li, Y.Y.; Liu, D.N.; Liu, J.S.; Li, P.; Chen, L.Z.; Xu, S.D. Codon optimization significantly improves the expression level of α-amylase gene from Bacillus licheniformis in Pichia pastoris. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 248680. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, S.; Sing, S.; Wang, Z. Improved expression of Rhizopus oryzae α-amylase in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr. Purif. 2011, 79, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parashar, D.; Satyanarayana, T. Production of chimeric acidic α-amylase by the recombinant Pichia pastoris and its applications. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rydberg, E.H.; Sidhu, G.; Vo, C.H.; Hewitt, J.; Cote, H.C.; Wang, Y.; Numao, S.; MacGillivray, R.T.; Overall, C.M.; Brayer, G.D.; et al. Cloning, mutagenesis, and structural analysis of human pancreatic α-amylase expressed in Pichia pastoris. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, H.; Liu, L.; Shin, H.; Chen, R.R.; Li, J.; Du, G.; Chen, J. Comparative analysis of heterologous expression, biochemical characterization and optimal production of an alkaline α-amylase from alkaliphilic Alkalimonas amylolytica in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Du, R.; Song, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, F.; Kim, R.C.; Zhou, Z.; Han, Y. Purification and characterization of novel thermostable and Ca-independent α-amylase produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BH072. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Daly, R.; Hearn, M.T. Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris: A useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production. J. Mol. Recognit. 2005, 18, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anindyawati, T.; Melliawati, R.; Ito, K.; Iizuka, M.; Minamiura, N. Three different types of α-amylases from Aspergillus awamori KT-11: Their purifications, properties, and specificities. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998, 62, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Noguchi, A.; Inohara-Ochiai, M.; Ishibashi, N.; Fukami, H.; Nakayama, T.; Nakao, M. A novel glucosylation enzyme: Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of Trichoderma viride JCM22452 α-amylase and enzymatic synthesis of some flavonoid monoglucosides and oligoglucosides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 12016–12024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gupta, R.; Gigras, P.; Mohapatra, H.; Goswami, V.K.; Chauhan, B. Microbial α-amylases: A biotechnological perspective. Process Biochem. 2003, 38, 1599–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Trabelsi, S.; Sahnoun, M.; Elgharbi, F.; Ameri, R.; Mabrouk, S.B.; Mezghani, M.; Hmida-Sayari, A.; Bejar, S. Aspergillus oryzae S2 AmyA amylase expression in Pichia pastoris: Production, purification and novel properties. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carrín, M.E.; Ceci, L.; Lozano, J. Kinetic studies of an amylase used commercially for the clarification of apple juice. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2002, 26, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Plasmid map of pSNT5α-AnAmylase expression vector. (B) Zone formation around the amylase-producing clones. Numbers 1–10 correspond to clone numbers, while MK115-PDI indicates the negative control.
Figure 1. (A) Plasmid map of pSNT5α-AnAmylase expression vector. (B) Zone formation around the amylase-producing clones. Numbers 1–10 correspond to clone numbers, while MK115-PDI indicates the negative control.
Fermentation 12 00200 g001
Figure 2. Enzyme production at different pHs and temperatures. (A) The SDS-PAGE results of the protein production at different pHs at 24 °C. (B) Enzyme activity at different pHs and temperatures. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of three repetitive results. Two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of temperature and pH. The first set of letters above the columns indicates the effect of pH on enzyme activity within the same temperature condition, while the second set represents the effect of temperature on enzyme activity within the same pH condition. Different letters denote statistically significant differences. (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 2. Enzyme production at different pHs and temperatures. (A) The SDS-PAGE results of the protein production at different pHs at 24 °C. (B) Enzyme activity at different pHs and temperatures. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of three repetitive results. Two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of temperature and pH. The first set of letters above the columns indicates the effect of pH on enzyme activity within the same temperature condition, while the second set represents the effect of temperature on enzyme activity within the same pH condition. Different letters denote statistically significant differences. (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Fermentation 12 00200 g002
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of fed-batch fermentation products and cell growth, total protein concentration, and amylase enzyme activities during fed-batch fermentation. Each value is the mean of three repetitive results.
Figure 3. SDS-PAGE analysis of fed-batch fermentation products and cell growth, total protein concentration, and amylase enzyme activities during fed-batch fermentation. Each value is the mean of three repetitive results.
Fermentation 12 00200 g003
Figure 4. EndoHf treatment of recombinant amylase enzyme.
Figure 4. EndoHf treatment of recombinant amylase enzyme.
Fermentation 12 00200 g004
Figure 5. (A) Optimal working pH and pH stability of recombinant amylase enzyme. (B) Optimal working temperature and temperature stability of recombinant amylase enzyme. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of three repetitive results.
Figure 5. (A) Optimal working pH and pH stability of recombinant amylase enzyme. (B) Optimal working temperature and temperature stability of recombinant amylase enzyme. Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of three repetitive results.
Fermentation 12 00200 g005
Figure 6. Iodine test results of apple juice samples treated with recombinant α-amylase enzyme at different units (1: 1400 U, 2: 14,000 U, 3: 69,000 U, 4:138,000 U, 5: 276,000 U, 6: 414,000 U, 7: 690,000 U, C: Control).
Figure 6. Iodine test results of apple juice samples treated with recombinant α-amylase enzyme at different units (1: 1400 U, 2: 14,000 U, 3: 69,000 U, 4:138,000 U, 5: 276,000 U, 6: 414,000 U, 7: 690,000 U, C: Control).
Fermentation 12 00200 g006
Table 1. Effect of metal ions on amylase enzyme activity.
Table 1. Effect of metal ions on amylase enzyme activity.
Metal IonRelative Activity at 2 mMRelative Activity at 10 mM
Control100 ± 1.2100 ± 1.2
CaCl2317 ± 7.6559 ± 0
MgCl2132 ± 4.50
ZnCl2264 ± 6.3376 ± 0.6
CuCl2155 ± 170
FeCl2158 ± 8.20
Each value is the mean ± standard deviation of three repetitive results.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mavi, F.; Uras, A.; Ersöz, F.; Tefon-Öztürk, B.E.; İnan, M.; Dinçer, C.; Yıldız-Turgut, D.; Çınar, O.; Gölükcü, M.; Topuz, A.; et al. Cloning and Secretory Expression of Aspergillus niger α-amylase with a Novel Synthetic Promoter in Pichia pastoris and Its Application in Apple Juice. Fermentation 2026, 12, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12040200

AMA Style

Mavi F, Uras A, Ersöz F, Tefon-Öztürk BE, İnan M, Dinçer C, Yıldız-Turgut D, Çınar O, Gölükcü M, Topuz A, et al. Cloning and Secretory Expression of Aspergillus niger α-amylase with a Novel Synthetic Promoter in Pichia pastoris and Its Application in Apple Juice. Fermentation. 2026; 12(4):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12040200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mavi, Fatmanur, Ayça Uras, Fatma Ersöz, Burcu Emine Tefon-Öztürk, Mehmet İnan, Cüneyt Dinçer, Demet Yıldız-Turgut, Orçun Çınar, Muharrem Gölükcü, Ayhan Topuz, and et al. 2026. "Cloning and Secretory Expression of Aspergillus niger α-amylase with a Novel Synthetic Promoter in Pichia pastoris and Its Application in Apple Juice" Fermentation 12, no. 4: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12040200

APA Style

Mavi, F., Uras, A., Ersöz, F., Tefon-Öztürk, B. E., İnan, M., Dinçer, C., Yıldız-Turgut, D., Çınar, O., Gölükcü, M., Topuz, A., & Türkanoğlu-Özçelik, A. (2026). Cloning and Secretory Expression of Aspergillus niger α-amylase with a Novel Synthetic Promoter in Pichia pastoris and Its Application in Apple Juice. Fermentation, 12(4), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12040200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop