Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Genistein-Loaded Zein/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Nanoparticles with Improved Water Dispersibility, Enhanced Antioxidant Activity, and Controlled Release Property
Previous Article in Journal
Isolation of Microalgae from Mediterranean Seawater and Production of Lipids in the Cultivated Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/foods9111602
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Could Global Intensification of Nitrogen Fertilisation Increase Immunogenic Proteins and Favour the Spread of Coeliac Pathology?

by
Josep Penuelas
1,2,3,*,
Albert Gargallo-Garriga
1,2,3,
Ivan A. Janssens
4,
Philippe Ciais
5,
Michael Obersteiner
6,
Karel Klem
3,
Otmar Urban
3,
Yong-Guan Zhu
7,8 and
Jordi Sardans
1,2,3
1
CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Catalonia, Spain
2
CREAF, Cerdanyola del Valles, 08193 Catalonia, Spain
3
Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-60300 Brno, Czech Republic
4
Research Group Plants and Ecosystems (PLECO), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
5
Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, Institute Pierre Simon Laplace (PSL), 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
6
Ecosystems Services and Management, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
7
Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China
8
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(11), 1602; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111602
Received: 9 October 2020 / Revised: 30 October 2020 / Accepted: 2 November 2020 / Published: 4 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Food Nutrition)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fertilisation of cereal crops with nitrogen (N) has increased in the last five decades. In particular, the fertilisation of wheat crops increased by nearly one order of magnitude from 1961 to 2010, from 9.84 to 93.8 kg N ha−1 y−1. We hypothesized that this intensification of N fertilisation would increase the content of allergenic proteins in wheat which could likely be associated with the increased pathology of coeliac disease in human populations. An increase in the per capita intake of gliadin proteins, the group of gluten proteins principally responsible for the development of coeliac disease, would be the responsible factor. We conducted a global meta-analysis of available reports that supported our hypothesis: wheat plants growing in soils receiving higher doses of N fertilizer have higher total gluten, total gliadin, α/β-gliadin, γ-gliadin and ω-gliadin contents and higher gliadin transcription in their grain. We thereafter calculated the per capita annual average intake of gliadins from wheat and derived foods and found that it increased from 1961 to 2010 from approximately 2.4 to 3.8 kg y−1 per capita (+1.4 ± 0.18 kg y−1 per capita, mean ± SE), i.e., increased by 58 ± 7.5%. Finally, we found that this increase was positively correlated with the increase in the rates of coeliac disease in all the available studies with temporal series of coeliac disease. The impacts and damage of over-fertilisation have been observed at an environmental scale (e.g., eutrophication and acid rain), but a potential direct effect of over-fertilisation is thus also possible on human health (coeliac disease).

1. Introduction

The demand for, and application of, nitrogen (N) fertilizer in cropland at a global scale has been continuously increasing. The global use of N fertilizers has increased substantially from 11.3 Tg N y−1 (0.9 g N m−2 y−1) in 1961 to 107.6 Tg N y−1 (7.4 g N m−2 y−1) in 2013 [1]. The data provided in the last International Nitrogen Initiative Conference indicated that the global consumption of N fertilizers increased 33% from 2000 to 2013 [2]. FAOstat data [3] indicated that the recent (2014–2018) intensification of N fertilisation at global and regional scales has affected most of the world, but with regional differences, with increases, from highest to lowest, of 29.1, 24.5, 17.6, 9.0, 5.4, 4.8, 4.1, 2.5 and 1.3% in eastern Asia, southern Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, eastern Europe and central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, North America, western Asia, northern Africa and Oceania, respectively, and a decrease of 1.5% in western Europe [4]. Although continuous N fertilisation reduces nitrogen use efficiency on wheat yield production [5], this large increase in N fertilisation of wheat crops is the effective driver of the increased wheat yield [6,7]. This effect is especially important in wheat because it comes associated with a positive relationship between N fertilisation and wheat protein concentration [7,8].
Wheat (Triticum sp.) is currently the most widely planted crop and continues to be the most important food grain for humans [9]. Furthermore, despite a decrease of direct flour food products intake has occurred in some countries such as the United States of America, there is still a net increase in per capita annual wheat flour intake due to an additional flour intake from the extra flour used as food additive that has increased the net gluten annual intake per person from 4.1 kg in 1970 to 5.4 kg in 2000 [10]. Wheat crops currently cover an area of 217 × 106 ha globally [11]. Global wheat yield in recent decades (1961–2015) has continuously increased despite representing a similar area of land (Figure 1) [3,12,13]. The annual amounts of N fertilizer applied to wheat crops have increased globally in the same period from approximately 10 to 100 kg N ha−1 y−1. This increase in N fertilisation is associated with an increase in the production of wheat grains and flour per hectare. The fertilisation (kg ha−1) to yield (t ha−1) ratio, however, increased from 0.9 to 3.1 kg N t grains−1 during 1961–2010, i.e., the yield-to-fertilisation ratio is now only 3.5-fold what it was 50 years ago.
The protein composition of wheat grains varies depending on genotype and environmental conditions, but wheat proteins are generally deficient in some fundamental amino acids, such as lysine and threonine [16]. Structural proteins of wheat grains are mostly albumins, globulins and amphiphilic proteins [16], whereas storage proteins are gliadins (monomeric proteins) and glutenins (polymeric proteins) [17]. N fertilisation generally influences the quantity and quality type of storage proteins (gliadins and glutenins) [18,19], but has little effect on structural proteins [20]. Martre et al. (2006) [21] modelled N-gliadin contents in wheat grains as a function of N partitioning among plant-protein groups and validated the model using 18 experimental studies. They observed a positive relationship between N-fertilisation rates and the amount of N allocated to gliadins after sowing.
Ingestion of wheat gluten can trigger several intolerances and allergic diseases, among which coeliac disease (CD) is the most widespread in humans [22]. The mean prevalence of CD in the general population in Europe and the United States of America (USA) is approximately 1% [23,24], with some regional differences, e.g., the prevalence of CD is as high as 2–3% in Finland and Sweden but is only 0.2% in Germany. The overall prevalence of CD is now clearly increasing everywhere. The prevalence of CD in the USA was only 0.2% in 1975 but increased 5-fold during the next 25 years [25]. The causes remain elusive but are likely linked to the environmental components of CD (e.g., changes in the quantity and quality of ingested gluten, patterns of infant feeding, the spectrum of intestinal infections and colonization by gut microbiota) [25].
Among the components of gluten, glutenins have been also associated with coeliac disease [26], but the group of gliadin proteins appears to be the primary cause of coeliac disease by gluten intake [22,27] in genetically susceptible individuals [28]. All three gliadin families, α/β, γ and ω, have been associated with allergic reactions to gluten and with the development of CD in humans [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. The autoimmune response is due to the deamidation of glutamine residues in gliadins by human transglutaminase 2 (tTG2) produced in the gut mucosa [22,28,38,39]. These deamidated peptides can bind to histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II in some humans, which stimulates lymphocyte T cells and triggers an inflammatory response in the gut [22,23]. Most studies have reported that gliadins are most responsible for CD [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37], but some studies have reported that the high-molecular-weight glutenins can also induce these autoimmune responses in some people [26,40,41]. Glutenins, however, are easily degraded by digestive enzymes, providing mostly di- and tripeptides, whereas gliadins are more resistant to enzymatic degradation, producing mostly oligopeptides that are the main cause of inflammatory responses [27]. We hypothesize that the increase in N fertilisation could be related to a potential increase of gluten in wheat grains and flours and thus to the spread of coeliac disease. More detailed information is now available from experimental data in field conditions including studies with a great variety of wheat genotypes growing in distinct areas of world. By gathering all this information, we aimed to analyse the gluten and gliadin concentrations in the grains and flour of wheat as a function of N-fertilisation levels and their potential association with higher coeliac disease prevalence at global scale.

2. Methods

We collected these data searching PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar using the following terms spanning 1960–2019: coeliac, coeliac disease, nitrogen, fertilisation, gliadins, gluten, glutenin grain, wheat, and flour. We selected only studies providing information of the concentrations of these compounds in grain and/or flour and data on N-fertilizer doses that could be expressed in Kg ha−1 y−1. To obtain the data of the prevalence (percentage of coeliac cases in the total population) or incidence (new cases per 1000 inhabitants and year) of coeliac disease from studies with large and representative sets of population data, adjusted for age and sex, from 1961 to 2019, we have also searched PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar using the following terms spanning 1960–2019: celiac, coeliac, celiac disease, coeliac disease, gluten, health, time, incidence and prevalence. We also used the FAO data: FAOSTAT http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. (2019a) and the other sources cited in each figure caption. In the first bibliographic exploration, we gathered 172 articles. After data quality selection, we finally used the information provided by 47 articles (Table 1).
We examined the effects of the intensification of N fertilisation by a meta-analysis of the studies reporting the differences of total contents of gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts (operational taxonomic units) in wheat grains and/or flour under different levels of N fertilisation by calculating the response ratios from each study (Table 1), as described by Hedges et al. [42]. The natural-log response ratio (lnRR) was calculated as ln (Xi/Xn) = lnXi − lnXn, where Xi and Xn are the values of each observation in treated and control plants, respectively. The sampling variance for each lnRR was calculated as ln[(1/ni) × (Si/Xi)2 + (1/nn) × (Sn/Xn)2] using the R package metafor 1.9–2 [43], where ni and nn, Si and Sn and Xi and Xn are the sample sizes, standard deviations and mean response values of the treatments and controls, respectively. The natural-log response ratios were determined by specifying studies as random factors using the rma model in metafor. The differences of contents of total gluten, gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains and/or flour under different levels of N-fertilisation were considered significant if the 95% confidence interval of lnRR did not overlap zero. All statistical analyses were performed in R 3.6.0 (2019) (Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmarck). We analyzed only the variables with >30 observations available at the global scale. We then examined the sensitivities of contents of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains and/or flour under different levels of N-fertilisation using REML estimation in the rma.unl model for metafor. We also analysed the relationship between the prevalence of coeliac disease and the per capita wheat intake at country level using a regression type II analysis conducted with the package lmodel2 [44] (R-Forge, Vienna, Austria).
Table
Table 1. Responses of the concentrations of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins and ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains after an experimental increase in N fertilisation rates.
Table 1. Responses of the concentrations of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins and ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains after an experimental increase in N fertilisation rates.
Bibliographic SourceExperimental TraitsResult
ReferenceSiteType of ExperimentTested
N-Fertilisation Rates (Kg N ha−1 y−1 if not Specified) 		GenotypesChanges in Concentrations in Grain and/or Flour in Response to Increasing N-Fertilisation
[45] Experimental Farm Shiraz University (Iran)Field0, 120, 240, 360Shiraz variety of winter wheatIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[46] Bezek experimental station (Poland)Field0, 50, 80Triticum aesticum ssp. speltaIncreases in total protein and gluten concentrations in grain
[47]Two field areas of TunisField0, 67Chili, Biskri, Mahmoudi, INRAT69, Karim, Razzak, Omrabiaa and Khiar varietiesIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[48]Experimental Station J. Hirschhorn (Argentina)Field0, 70, 140 Increases in gluten concentrations in grain
[49]Upland crop experimental farm of National Institute of crop Science (Korea)Field25, 50, 75Five Korean wheat varietiesIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour. Increases in α + β-gliadin and decreases in ω and γ-gliadin concentrations
[50]Replicates in five field sites in U.K.Field100, 200, 350Five breadmaking wheat varieties (Cordial, Hereward, Malacca, Marksman and Xi19)Increases in total gliadin concentrations in grain
[50]CanadaField0, 100Neepawa varietyIncreases in total gliadin concentrations in grain
[51]CanadaField0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400Neepawa varietyIncreases in total protein and total gliadin concentrations in grain
[30]Eight different site sourcesField0, 105, 165, 225Triticum aesticum ssp. speltaIncreases of total epipodes expression of a-gliadin in grain
[52]Plant Breeding Station of Sladkovicovo-Novy (Slovakia)Field120, 140Winter wheatIncreases in total protein and gluten concentrations in grain
[53]Experimental Station J. Hirschhorn (Argentina)Field0, 70, 140 Increases in total gluten concentrations in flour
[54]Alava (Spain)Field0, 100, 140, 180Soissons varietyIncreases in total gliadin concentrations in grain
[55]SpainPot experiment37, 48 mg ammonium or nitrate per potCezanne varietyIncreases in total protein and gliadins concentrations in flour
[56]Experimental field station Teramo University (Italy)Field50, 100, 150, 250Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durumIncreases in total protein, gluten and gliadins concentrations in flour
[57]SpainGreenhouse0, 22.2, 66.7, 200Bobwhite varietyIncreases in total, α, ω and γ-gliadin and total protein concentrations in flour
[58]National Center of Irrigation Technology station (Spain)Field0, 120Winter wheatIncreases in total gliadins concentrations in flour
[59]Field (Sweden)Field0, 70, 140Sport, Dacke, Dragon and Thasos varietiesIncreases in total proteins and gliadins concentrations in flour
[60]UKField0, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240Option and Riband varietiesIncreases in total proteins and gliadins concentrations in grain
[61]Malice (Poland)Field0, 40, 80, 120Tybalt varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[62]Agricultural experimental Staion of University of Technology and Life Sciences of Minikowo (Poland)Field80, 120Spring wheatIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[6]Peterlauki research and Study Farm (Latvia)Field0, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240Skagen varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[63]Henan Agricultural University Experimental Satation (China)Field0, 90, 180, 270, 360, 450Yumai and Lanko Aizao varietiesIncreases in total gliadins concentrations in flour
[64]Swadzim Experimental Station (Poland)Field0, 50, 100, 150Durabon, Durabonus, Duraprimus and Rusticano varietiesIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour
[65]Lincoln Research Farm (New Zealand)Field0, 50, 100Batten, Kotare, Oroua, Rongotea, Ruapuna and Tui varietiesIncreases in total gliadins concentrations in flour
[66] Mira (Italy)Field70, 120, 130, 160, 180, 200, 240Biensur varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour
[67]Two different sites (Austria)Field0, 180Three varieties: Capo, Renan and LindosIncreases in total, α, ω and γ gliadin concentrations in flour
[68]Experimental Farm of Helsinki University (Finland)Field0, 110Scandinavian, Kadett, Ruso and Reno wheat varietiesIncreases in total proteins concentrations but not changes in gliadin concentrations in flour
[69]HungaryField30–300Winter wheatIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour
[70]ChileField0, 220, 250 Increases in gluten concentrations in flour
[71]FranceField40, 60Seedling from INRAIncreases in total gliadins concentrations in flour
[72]Minokowo (Poland)Field0, 60, 90, 120Zebra varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour
[73]Field experimental Station of Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (Italy)Field30, 40, 50, 70Triticum turgidum subsp. durumIncreases in total gluten concentrations in grain and flour
[74]BrazilField0, 50, 100, 150Quartzo varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[75]Experimental farm of INRA, Grignon, FranceField40, 60, 120Soissons varietyIncreases in total gliadin concentrations in grain
[76]Research field sation of Faculty of Agriculture (Croatia)Field0–194Marija and Soissons varietiesIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[77]Rothamsted Research station (UK)Field100, 200, 350Cordiale, Hereward, Istabraq, Malacca, Marksman
and Xi 19 varieties		Increases in γ-gliadin gene expression
[78]Rothamsted Research station (UK)Field100, 200, 350Cordiale, Hereward, Istabraq, Malacca, Marksman
and Xi 19 varieties		Increases in ω-gliadin gene expression
[17]GermanyField0, 40, 120, 180, 200Dozent, Monopol, Rektor, Apollo, Ares, Astron, Basalt, Bussard, Herzog, Ignaz, Kanzler, Monopol, Obelisk, Sperber varietiesIncreases of α/β -gliadin, ω- and γ-gliadins, total gliadins and gluten concentrations in flour
[79]Johann
Heinrich von Thunen-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural
Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, in Braunschweig, Germany		Field84, 168Batis varietyIncreases of α/β -gliadin, ω- and γ-gliadins, total gliadins and gluten concentrations in flour
[80]Research Station of Warmia and Mazury University (Poland)Field80, 120Spring triticale cv. AndrusIncreases of α/β -gliadin, no clear effects on ω- and γ-gliadins in grain
[81] Research Station of Warmia and Mazury University (Poland)Field80, 120Spring triticale cv. AndrusIncreases of total gliadins concentrations in in grain
[82]Uhrusk Experimental
Station belonging to the University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)		Field90, 150Opatka varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[83]Fields research stations of Idaho and Monatana state Universities (USA)Field168, 224, 280Spring wheatIncreases in gluten concentrations in flour
[84]Futterkamp
and Sonke-Nissen-Koog
Northern Germany		Field220, 260Tobak and Asano varietiesIncreases in total gliadin and gluten concentrations in flour
[85] Grains Research Centre Kragujevac (Serbia) Field60, 90, 120 Increases in gluten concentrations in grain
[86]China Agricultural University
Research Center field station, Hebei province, China		Field180, 240Zhongmai varietyIncreases in gluten concentrations in grain
[87]Chongzhou and Renshou experimental stations of Sichuan Agricultural University, ChinaField0, 75, 150, 225Shumai 969, Shumai 482, Chuannong 16 and Mianmai 51 varietiesIncreases of total, α/β-gliadin and ω-gliadins and gluten concentrations, no clear effects on ω-gliadins in flour
[88]GermanyPot experiment 0.25, 1.0 and 2.5 g N/pot Privileg varietyIncreases of total gliadin concentrations

3. Increasing Gluten and Gliadin Contents with N-Fertilisation

Our meta-analysis found that the increase in N-fertilisation rates was associated with increased content of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins, ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains (Figure 2). Our analyses also identified a significant relationship (R2 = 0.30, p < 0.001) between the increase in N fertilisation and the increase in total gliadin content in wheat grains (Figure 3). Although the analysis has been conducted with very different genotypes of wheat growing under different soil types and climates, and therefore under very diverse conditions, the level of N fertilisation explained 30% of the change in gliadin content. These results are consistent with several studies observing a positive link of nutrient availability with the expression of gliadin genes [19,77,78,89] and all gluten proteins [17,90,91,92]. Furthermore, the results are also consistent with common farmer knowledge on protein concentration in wheat grain being strongly affected by N availability, which leads farmers to adjust the level of nitrogen fertilisation to obtain the required protein concentration in grain for bread making [93].
The per capita annual increase in gliadin intake from wheat and derived foods during 1961–2010 was estimated to be approximately 1.4 kg y−1 (+58% ± 7.5%) (Mean ± SE; Figure 4). This estimation took into account the annual intake of wheat and derivatives at the global scale, [3] the increase in N fertilisation in wheat crops and the relationships between N fertilisation and gliadin increase (Figure 3 and Table 1). The increase in N-fertilisation from approximate 10 to 100 kg N ha−1 corresponded to an increase in gliadin contents in grains/flour from 44 to 59 mg g−1, respectively) (Figure 3 and Table 1).

4. Increased Prevalence of Coeliac Disease

Part of the increase in CD prevalence in populations in recent decades has frequently been attributed to improved diagnosis [94], with some studies suggesting that the increase in diagnoses was due to increased awareness [95]. Some studies of populations over time, however, have reported an actual increase in CD development in recent decades beyond the improvement of diagnostic efficiency [96]. The increase in diagnosed cases of new coeliac patients may thus be due to more efficient diagnosis and higher awareness, but also to changes in environmental variables associated with this increase in the percentage of a population affected by CD. Our study provides good evidence of a strong potential increase in the average human intake of gliadins by associating the changes in global per capita intakes of wheat and derivatives with the empirical effects of a global 10-fold increase in intensification of N fertilisation during 1961–2010. The contents of digested peptides derived from gliadin in the gut have been demonstrated to be a determinant for the appearance of autoimmunological responses and CD manifestation [97,98], and the amount of gluten/gliadin necessary to trigger CD in susceptible people can vary [99].
A comparison of the changes in global per capita intake of gliadins from 1961 to 2010, with data for CD prevalence (percentage of coeliac cases in the total population) or incidence (new cases per 10,000 inhabitants per year) provided by studies of large and representative sets of population data, adjusted for age and sex is shown in Figure 5. The increases in prevalence/incidence during this period coincided with the per capita increase in gliadin intake associated to the increase in the application of N fertilizer per tonne of wheat grains produced and with the per capita increase in gliadin intake (Figure 5). The higher per capita ingestion of gluten/gliadin globally in recent decades could thus account for, at least partially, the spread of coeliac pathology in the global human population. New research is though warranted to test this possibility and to figure out why instead the prevalence of CD is comparable between countries in which the intake of gluten is much higher, e.g., Italy with its high consumption of pasta, than in other EU countries where the intake is much lower [100]. Long-term evolutionary adaptation may play a role there. However, several studies have demonstrated the link between probability of coeliac disease development and gluten intake. For example, Makharia et al. [101] observed that northern Indian populations had much higher rates of CD than southern Indian populations despite having similar predisposing HLA susceptibility genes across the country. This was primarily attributed to the mainly wheat-based diet in the North and the rice-based diet in the South. We have checked the available data at country level for the period 2001–2017 and found a positive relationship between prevalence of coeliac disease and per capita wheat intake across 38 countries (Figure 6).
The modern procedures of management and processing (shortening the fermentation time, use of non-acid dough, add protein fortification and use of refined white flour) could have also increased the exposure to immunoreactive compounds [109]. The use of different genotypes of wheat may be involved too since the gluten and gliadin composition are highly determined by environmental effects but also by genetic differences among wheat varieties. The genotypes and varieties of cultivated wheat have also changed in these last 60 years. Breeding practices in wheat genotypes have been mainly addressed to achieve higher yield, rheological conditions and gluten quality and high protein concentration for better baking and also for better livestock foods [7,110,111], providing stronger glutens rich in glutenins [89,112] but with scarce effects on gliadins and coeliac disease prevalence [10].
Some studies have reported that breeding activities in the last decades have contributed to increase the prevalence of coeliac disease [113], but there are more studies reporting no contribution of modern wheat breeding practices to coeliac disease prevalence during the last decades [109,112,114]. Most studies have reported that both modern and ancient wheat genotypes have similar concentrations of the pathogenic peptides responsible of inflammatory diseases [115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122], similar quantities of immunostimulatory epitopes [109,115,119,123], similar human T cell immunological responses [124,125,126,127] and similar immunogenic peptide sequences [128]. Some studies have even concluded that old varieties produced larger amounts of peptides containing immunogenic and toxic sequences than modern ones [129] and also that old varieties trigger more inflammatory processes in gut [130]. The current literature does not thus sustain the hypothesis that the shift in wheat genotypes could be a significant potential explanation for the rise in coeliac disease at global scale. Furthermore, breeding is now aiming to produce new wheat genotypes with less gliadin epitopes but without clear success yet [30]. The research to find wheat genotypes with less capacity to produce coeliac disease, i.e., less immune-reactive wheat genotypes, is very recent [116]. Independently of wheat subspecies, our results show that the increase in N fertilisation is related with increasing levels of gluten and gliadin concentrations in wheat grain and flour in all types of wheat genotypes and varieties studied, that the average per capita intake of wheat flour and grain food derivatives has been kept more or less constant in the last 60 years, and therefore the per capita ingest of gluten and gliadins has substantially increased.
There are, moreover, other possible factors predisposing to the development of CD such as the many substances emitted by humans into the environment. For instance, some studies have reported significant relationships between the ingestion of glyphosate, an increasingly used herbicide, and the predisposition to the development of CD [39,131]. In fact, CD is a very complex pathology, whose development involves not only environmental factors (gluten) but also genetic factors. Recently, a gene Inc13 has been identified that encodes for a noncoding RNA that blocks and represses the expression of certain inflammatory genes under normal conditions. The Inc13 expression can be inhibited by stimulation and increased expression of inflammatory genes favoring CD [132]. Moreover, the inflammatory over-expression of T cells could be also favoured under the infestation of certain reovirus that would suppress peripheral regulatory T cell [133]. In any case, though, we now know that autoimmune responses are generally triggered by gliadin peptides [39], and we have shown here that these gliadin peptides increase their concentration in grains in response to the intensification of N fertilisation (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

5. Conclusions

The intensification of N fertilisation of wheat crops has been very high (ten-fold since 1961). Our meta-analysis of the literature has demonstrated that wheat growing under higher soil N availability produces not only higher yield but also grains and flours with higher gliadin concentrations in all type of wheat genotypes. Since gliadins are the main direct responsible triggering coeliac disease and the per capita intake of wheat products in the last decades has remained more or less constant, there has been a rise in per capita intake of gliadins at the global scale. We suggest that the rise in coeliac disease reported in several human populations around the world could be related, at least in part, to N fertilisation intensification of wheat crops. If this suggested link between N fertilisation intensification and coeliac disease expansion is demonstrated in future experimental studies, we will have an important tool to control and prevent the expansion of coeliac disease.

Author Contributions

J.P. and J.S. conceived the idea and designed the research, J.S. and J.P. gathered and analysed the data. A.G.-G., I.A.J., P.C., M.O., K.K., Y.-G.Z. and O.U. assisted in the analyses. All authors contributed substantially to the writing and discussion of the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Government grant PID2019-110521GB-I00, the Catalan Government grant SGR 2017-1005, the Czech SustEs project (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797) and the European Research Council Synergy grant ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, C.; Tian, H. Global nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use for agriculture production in the past half century: Shifted hot spots and nutrient imbalance. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2017, 9, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  2. Heffer, P.; Prud’homme, M. Global Nitrogen Fertilizer Demand and Supply: Trend, Current Level and Outlook. In Proceedings of the International Fertilizer Association (IFA), 7th International Nitrogen Initiative Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 4–8 December 2016; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  3. FAOSTAT. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on 11 July 2019).
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2022; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu, A.; Li, L.; Xie, J.; Wang, X.; Coulter, J.A.; Liu, C.; Wang, L. Effect of long-term nitrogen addition on wheat yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and esidual soil nitrate in a semiarid area of the loess Plateau of China. Sustainability 2019, 12, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  6. Litke, L.; Gaile, Z.; Ruza, A. Effect of nitrogen fertilisation on winter wheat yield and yield quality. Agron. Res. 2018, 16, 500–509. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zörb, C.; Ludewig, U.; Hawkesford, M.J. Perspective on Wheat Yield and Quality with Reduced Nitrogen Supply. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  8. Ierna, A.; Lombardo, G.M.; Mauromicales, G. Yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain Quality in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen fertilisation under a Mediterranean Environment. Exp. Agric. 2015, 1, 314. [Google Scholar]
  9. Curtis, B.C. Wheat in the World. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/y4011e/y4011e04.htm#TopOfPage (accessed on 13 September 2019).
  10. Kasarda, D.D. Can an Increase in Celiac Disease Be Attributed to an Increase in the Gluten Content of Wheat as a Consequence of Wheat Breeding? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 1155–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. USDA, United States Department of Agriculture. 2019. Available online: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2019/index.php (accessed on 13 September 2019).
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Fertilizer Requirements in 2015 and 2030; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ladha, J.K.; Tirol-Padre, A.; Reddy, C.K.; Cassman, K.G.; Verma, S.; Powlson, D.S.; Van Kessel, C.; Richter, D.D.B.; Chakraborty, D.; Pathak, H. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice and wheat production systems. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  14. DESA, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Dinamics. World Population Prospects. 2019. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/tag/2019/ (accessed on 13 September 2019).
  15. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Data. 2019. Available online: www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 13 July 2019).
  16. Garcia Del Moral, L.F.; Rharrabti, Y.; Martos, V.; Royo, C. Environmentally Induced Changes in Amino Acid Composition in the Grain of Durum Wheat Grown under Different Water and Temperature Regimes in a Mediterranean Environment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8144–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wieser, H.; Seilmeier, W. The influence of nitrogen fertilisation on quantities and proportions of different protein types in wheat flour. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998, 76, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chope, G.A.; Wan, Y.; Penson, S.P.; Bhandari, D.G.; Powers, S.J.; Shewry, P.R.; Hawkesford, M.J. Effects of Genotype, Season, and Nitrogen Nutrition on Gene Expression and Protein Accumulation in Wheat Grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4399–4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhen, S.; Deng, X.; Xu, X.; Liu, N.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Z.; Yan, Y. Effect of high-nitrogen fertilizer on gliadin and glutenin subproteomes during kernel development in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop. J. 2020, 8, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Triboi, A.-M.; Martre, P.; Triboï-Blondel, A. Environmentally-induced changes in protein composition in developing grains of wheat are related to changes in total protein content. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1731–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martre, P.; Jamieson, P.D.; Semenov, M.A.; Zyskowski, R.F.; Porter, J.R.; Triboi, E. Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 2006, 25, 138–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Piston, F.; Gil-Humanes, J.; Barro, F. Integration of promoters, inverted repeat sequences and proteomic data into a model for high silencing efficiency of coeliac disease related gliadins in bread wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Fasano, A.; Berti, I.; Gerarduzzi, T.; Not, T.; Colletti, R.B.; Drago, S.; Elitsur, Y.; Green, P.H.R.; Guandalini, S.; Hill, I.D.; et al. Prevalence of Celiac Disease in At-Risk and Not-At-Risk Groups in the United States. Arch. Intern. Med. 2003, 163, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mustalahti, K.; Catassi, C.; Reunanen, A.; Fabiani, E.; Heier, M.; McMillan, S.; Murray, L.; Metzger, M.-H.; Gasparin, M.; Bravi, E.; et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann. Med. 2010, 42, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Catassi, C.; Kryszak, D.; Bhatti, B.; Sturgeon, C.; Helzlsouer, K.; Clipp, S.L.; Gelfond, D.; Puppa, E.; Sferruzza, A.; Fasano, A. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann. Med. 2010, 42, 530–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Howdle, P. Gliadin, glutenin or both? The search for the Holy Grail in coeliac disease. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 18, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Beaudoin, K.; Willourhby, D.S. The role of the gluten-derived peptide gliadina in celíac disease. J. Nutr. Health Food Eng. 2014, 1, 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liester, M.G.; Liester, M. Drought’s potential influence on the increasing prevalence of celiac disease. Cogent Med. 2018, 5, 1529848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Denery-Papini, S.; Nicolas, Y.; Popineau, Y. Efficiency and Limitations of Immunochemical Assays for the Testing of Gluten-free Foods. J. Cereal Sci. 1999, 30, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dubois, B.; Bertin, P.; Hautier, L.; Muhovski, Y.; Escarnot, E.; Mingeot, D. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the expression of α-gliadin canonical epitopes involved in celiac disease in a wide collection of spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta) cultivars and landraces. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Dupont, F.; Vensel, W.H.; Encarnacao, T.; Chan, R.; Kasarda, D.D. Similarities of omega gliadins from Triticum urartu to those encoded on chromosome 1A of hexaploid wheat and evidence for their post-translational processing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ensari, A.; Marsh, M.N.; Moriarty, K.J.; Moore, C.M.; Fido, R.J.; Tatham, A.S. Studies in vivo of ω-gliadins in gluten sensitivity (coeliac sprue disease). Clin. Sci. 1998, 95, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Morita, E.; Matsuo, H.; Mihara, S.; Morimoto, K.; Savage, A.; Tatham, A. Fast ω-gliadin is a major allergen in wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2003, 33, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Morrell, K.; Melby, M.K. Celiac Disease: The Evolutionary Paradox. Int. J. Celiac Dis. 2017, 5, 86–94. [Google Scholar]
  35. Palosuo, K.; Varjonen, E.; Kekki, O.-M.; Klemola, T.; Kalkkinen, N.; Alenius, H.; Reunala, T. Wheat ω-5 gliadin is a major allergen in children with immediate allergy to ingested wheat. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2001, 108, 634–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Petersen, J.; Van Bergen, J.; Loh, K.L.; Kooy-Winkelaar, Y.; Beringer, D.X.; Thompson, A.; Bakker, S.F.; Mulder, C.J.J.; Ladell, K.; McLaren, J.E.; et al. Determinants of Gliadin-Specific T Cell Selection in Celiac Disease. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 6112–6122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Salentijn, E.M.; Mitea, D.C.; Goryunova, S.V.; Van Der Meer, I.M.; Padioleau, I.; Gilissen, L.J.W.J.; Koning, F.; Smulders, M.J.M. Celiac disease T-cell epitopes from gamma-gliadins: Immunoreactivity depends on the genome of origin, transcript frequency, and flanking protein variation. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Green, P.H.; Cellier, C. Celiac Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1731–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Samsel, A.; Seneff, S. Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: Celiac sprue and gluten intolerance. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2013, 6, 159–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Vader, W.; Kooy, Y.; Van Veelen, P.A.; De Ru, A.; Harris, D.; Benckhuijsen, W.; Peña, S.; Mearin, L.; Drijfhout, J.W.; Koning, F. The gluten response in children with celiac disease is directed toward multiple gliadin and glutenin peptides. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 1729–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Van De Wal, Y.; Kooy, Y.M.C.; Van Veelen, P.; Vader, W.; August, S.A.; Drijfhout, J.W.; Peña, S.A.; Koning, F. Glutenin is involved in the gluten-driven mucosal T cell response. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29, 3133–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hedges, L.V.; Gurevitch, J.; Curtis, P. The Meta-Analysis of Response Ratios in Experimental Ecology. Ecology 1999, 80, 1150–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Viechtbauer, W.R. The Metafor Package: A Meta-Analysis Package for R. 2012. Available online: www.metafor-project.org/doku.php.MetaforPackage_2012 (accessed on 15 September 2019).
  44. Legendre, P. 2018 Packege “Lmodel2”. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmodel2/lmodel2.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2019).
  45. Abedi, T.; Alemzadeh, A.; Kazemeini, S.A. Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 330–336. [Google Scholar]
  46. Andruszczak, S. Spelt wheat grain yield and nutritional value response to sowing rate and nitrogen fertilisation. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2018, 28, 1476–1484. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bouacha, O.D.; Nouaigui, S.; Rezgui, S. Effects of N and K fertilizers on durum wheat quality in different environments. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Castro, A.; Constanza, M.; Schierenbeck, M.; Sebastián, G.; Rosa, M. Evaluation of di ff erent fungicides and nitrogen rates on grain yield and bread-making quality in wheat a ff ected by Septoria tritici blotch and yellow spot. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 83, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cho, S.-W.; Kang, C.-S.; Kang, T.-G.; Cho, K.-S.; Park, C.S. Influence of different nitrogen application on flour properties, gluten properties by HPLC and end-use quality of Korean wheat. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Daniel, C.; Triboi, E. Effects of Temperature and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Grain Composition of Winter Wheat: Effects on Gliadin Content and Composition. J. Cereal Sci. 2000, 32, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dubetz, S.; Gardiner, E.E.; Flynn, D.; De La Roche, A.I. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen fractions and amino acid composition of spring wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1979, 59, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ducsay, L.; Ložek, O. Effect of topdressing with nitrogen on the yield and quality of winter wheat grain. Plant Soil Environ. 2011, 50, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  53. Fleitas, M.C.; Schierenbeck, M.; Gerard, G.S.; Dietz, J.I.; Golik, S.I.; Campos, P.E.; Simón, M.R. How leaf rust disease and its control with fungicides affect dough properties, gluten quality and loaf volume under different N rates in wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 80, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fuertes-Mendizábal, T.; Aizpurua, A.; González-Moro, M.; Estavillo, J. Improving wheat breadmaking quality by splitting the N fertilizer rate. Eur. J. Agron. 2010, 33, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fuertes-Mendizábal, T.; González-Torralba, J.; Arregui, L.M.; González-Murua, C.; González-Moro, M.B.; Estavillo, J.M. Ammonium as sole N source improves grain quality in wheat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2162–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Galieni, A.; Stagnari, F.; Visioli, G.; Marmiroli, N.; Speca, S.; Angelozzi, G.; D’Egidio, S.; Pisante, M. Nitrogen fertilisation of durum wheat: A case of study in Mediterranean area during transition to conservation agriculture. Ital. J. Agron. 2016, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. García-Molina, M.D.; Barro, F. Characterization of Changes in Gluten Proteins in Low-Gliadin Transgenic Wheat Lines in Response to Application of Different Nitrogen Regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  58. Guardia, G.; Sanz-cobena, A.; Sanchez-martín, L.; Fuertes-mendizábal, T.; González-murua, C.; Manuel, J.; Chadwick, D.; Vallejo, A. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment Urea-based fertilisation strategies to reduce yield-scaled N oxides and enhance bread-making quality in a rainfed Mediterranean wheat crop. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Johansson, E.; Prieto-Linde, M.L.; Svensson, G. Influence of nitrogen application rate and timing on grain protein composition and gluten strength in Swedish wheat cultivars. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2004, 167, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kindred, D.R.; Verhoeven, T.M.; Weightman, R.M.; Swanston, J.S.; Agu, R.C.; Brosnan, J.M.; Sylvester-Bradley, R. Effects of variety and fertiliser nitrogen on alcohol yield, grain yield, starch and protein content, and protein composition of winter wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 2008, 48, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Klikocka, H.; Cybulska, M.; Barczak, B.; Narolski, B.; Szostak, B.; Kobiałka, A.; Nowak, A.; Wójcik, E. The effect of sulphur and nitrogen fertilization on grain yield and technological quality of spring wheat. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Knapowski, T.; Ralcewicz, M.; Barczak, B.; Kozera, W. Effect of Nitrogen and Zinc Fertilizing on Bread-Making Quality of Spring Triticale Cultivated in Noteć Valley. Pol. J. Environ. Sustain. 2009, 18, 227–233. [Google Scholar]
  63. Ma, D.; Guo, T.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y. Influence of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) flour quality and Chinese noodle quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Makowska, A.; Obuchowski, W.; Sulewska, H.; Koziara, W.; Paschke, H. Agricultural University of Poznań. Acta Sci. Pol. 2008, 7, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  65. Martin, R.; Sutton, K.; Moyle, T.; Hay, R.; Gillespie, R. Effect of nitrogen fertiliser on the yield and quality of six cultivars of autumn-sown wheat. N. Z. J. Crop. Hortic. Sci. 1992, 20, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Morari, F.; Zanella, V.; Sartori, L.; Visioli, G.; Berzaghi, P.; Mosca, G. Optimising durum wheat cultivation in North Italy: Understanding the effects of site-specific fertilization on yield and protein content. Precis. Agric. 2018, 19, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pechanek, U.; Karger, A.; Gröger, S.; Charvat, B.; Schöggl, G.; Lelley, T. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilisation on Quantity of Flour Protein Components, Dough Properties, and Breadmaking Quality of Wheat. Cereal Chem. 1997, 74, 800–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peltonen, J.; Virtanen, A. Effect of Nitrogen fertilizers differing in release characteristics on the quantity of storage proteins in wheat. Cereal Chem. 1994, 71, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pepo, P.; Sipos, P.; Gyori, Z. Effects of fertilizer application on the baking quality of winter wheat varieties in a long term experiment under continental climatic conditions in Hungary. Cereal Res. Commun. 2005, 33, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pinilla-Quezada, H.; Herrera-Floody, L.E. Efecto de la fertilización nitrogenada tardía en aspectos de calidad panadera en trigo (Triticum aestivum L.). Idesia (Arica) 2008, 26, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  71. Plessis, A.; Ravel, C.; Bordes, J.; Balfourier, F.; Martre, P. Association study of wheat grain protein composition reveals that gliadin and glutenin composition are trans-regulated by different chromosome regions. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3627–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  72. Ralcewicz, M.; Knapowski, T.; Kozera, W.; Barczak, B. Technological value of spring wheat of zebra cultivar as related to the way of nitrogen and magnesium application. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2009, 10, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  73. Rizzello, C.G.; Cavoski, I.; Turk, J.; Ercolini, D.; Nionelli, L.; Pontonio, E.; De Angelis, M.; De Filippis, F.; Gobbetti, M.; Di Cagno, R. Organic Cultivation of Triticum turgidum subsp. durum Is Reflected in the Flour-Sourdough Fermentation-Bread Axis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 3192–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  74. Rodrighero, M.B.; Caires, E.F.; Lopes, R.B.; Zielinski, A.A.; Granato, D.; Demiate, I.M. Wheat technological quality as affected by nitrogen fertilization under a no-till system. Acta Sci. Technol. 2015, 37, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tea, I.; Genter, T.; Naulet, N.; Boyer, V.; Lummerzheim, M.; Kleiber, D. Effect of Foliar Sulfur and Nitrogen Fertilisation on Wheat Storage Protein Composition and Dough Mixing Properties. Cereal Chem. 2004, 81, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Varga, B.; Svečnjak, Z.; Jurković, Z.; Pospíšil, M. Quality responses of winter wheat cultivars to nitrogen and fungicide applications in Croatia. Acta Agron. Hung. 2007, 55, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wan, Y.; Shewry, P.R.; Bitonti, M.B. A novel family of γ -gliadin genes induces are highly regulated by In Posidonia oceanica cadmium changes in DNA nitrogen supply developing wheat grain methylation and in chromatin patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wan, Y.; Gritsch, C.S.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Shewry, P. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on the synthesis and deposition of the ω-gliadins of wheat. Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  79. Wieser, H.; Manderscheid, R.; Erbs, M.; Weigel, H.-J. Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on the Quantitative Protein Composition of Wheat Grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6531–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wojtkowiak, K.; Stępień, A.; Warechowska, M.; Konopka, I.; Klasa, A. Effect of fertilisation technique on some indices of nutritional value of spring triticale grain. J. Elem. 2014, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wojtkowiak, K.; Stępień, A.; Tańska, M.; Konopka, I. Impact of nitrogen fertilization on the yield and content of protein fractions in spring triticale grain. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2013, 8, 3778–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Woźniak, A.; Makarski, B. Content of minerals, total protein and wet gluten in grain of spring wheat depending on cropping systems. J. Elem. 2012, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, R.; Liang, X.; Torrion, J.A.; Christiaens, R.J.; O’Brien, K.; Liu, Q. The Influence of Water and Nitrogen Availability on the Expression of End-Use Quality Parameters of Spring Wheat. Agronomy 2018, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  84. Xue, C.; Erley, G.S.A.; Rücker, S.; Koehler, P.; Obenauf, U.; Mühling, K.H. Late nitrogen application increased protein concentration but not baking quality of wheat. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2016, 179, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zecevic, V.; Knežević, D.S.; Boskovic, J.; Milenkovic, S. Effect of nitrogen and ecological factors on quality of winter triticale cultivars. Genetika 2010, 42, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhen, S.; Zhou, J.; Deng, X.; Zhu, G.; Cao, H.; Wang, Z.; Yan, Y. Metabolite pro fi ling of the response to high-nitrogen fertilizer during grain development of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Cereal Sci. 2016, 69, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zheng, T.; Qi, P.-F.; Cao, Y.-L.; Han, Y.-N.; Ma, H.-L.; Guo, Z.-R.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, Y.-Y.; Hua, S.-Y.; Yu, H.-Y.; et al. Mechanisms of wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain storage proteins in response to nitrogen application and its impacts on processing quality. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zörb, C.; Grover, C.; Steinfurth, D.; Mühling, K.H. Quantitative proteome analysis of wheat gluten as influenced by N and S nutrition. Plant Soil 2009, 327, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shewry, P.; Halford, N.G.; Tatham, A.S.; Popineau, Y.; Lafiandra, D.; Belton, P.S. The high molecular weight subunits of wheat glutenin and their role in determining wheat processing properties. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2003, 45, 219–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Altenbach, S.B.; Allen, P.V. Transformation of the US bread wheat ‘Butte 86’ and silencing of omega-5 gliadin genes. GM Crop. 2011, 2, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ma, D.; Gao, H.; Du, C.; Li, L.; Sun, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, C.; Xie, Y.; Kang, G. Transcriptomic and Metabolomics Analysis of Different Endosperm Region under Nitrogen Treatments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  92. Wang, D.; Li, F.; Cao, S.; Zhang, K. Genomic and functional genomics analyses of gluten proteins and prospect for simultaneous improvement of end-use and health-related traits in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1521–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  93. Shewry, P.R.; Pellny, T.K.; Lovegrove, A. Is modern wheat bad for health? Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Cichewicz, A.B.; Mearns, E.S.; Taylor, A.; Boulanger, T.; Gerber, M.; Leffler, D.A.; Drahos, J.; Sanders, D.S.; Craig, K.J.T.; Lebwohl, B. Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns in Celiac Disease. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2019, 64, 2095–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Grode, L.; Bech, B.H.; Jensen, T.M.; Humaidan, P.; Agerholm, I.E.; Plana-Ripoll, O.; Ramlau-Hansen, C.H. Prevalence, incidence, and autoimmune comorbidities of coeliac disease: A nation-wide, population-based study in Denmark from 1977 to 2016. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 30, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Levinson-Castiel, R.; Eliakim, R.; Shinar, E.; Perets, T.-T.; Layfer, O.; Levhar, N.; Schvimer, M.; Marderfeld, L.; Ben-Horin, S.; Shamir, R. Rising prevalence of celiac disease is not universal and repeated testing is needed for population screening. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2019, 7, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Maiuri, L.; Troncone, R.; Mayer, M.; Coletta, S.; Picarelli, A.; De Vincenzi, M.; Pavone, V.; Auricchio, S. In vitro Activities of A-Gliadin-Related Synthetic Peptides Damaging Effect on the Atrophic Coeliac Mucosa and Activation of Mucosal Immune Response in the Treated Coeliac Mucosa. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1996, 31, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Monguzzi, E.; Marabini, L.; Elli, L.; Vaira, V.; Ferrero, S.; Ferretti, F.; Branchi, F.; Gaudioso, G.; Scricciolo, A.; Lombardo, V.; et al. Gliadin effect on the oxidative balance and DNA damage: An in-vitro, ex-vivo study. Dig. Liver Dis. 2019, 51, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gil-Humanes, J.; Pistón, F.; Altamirano-Fortoul, R.; Real, A.; Comino, I.; Sousa, C.; Rosell, C.M.; Barro, F. Reduced-Gliadin Wheat Bread: An Alternative to the Gluten-Free Diet for Consumers Suffering Gluten-Related Pathologies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  100. FAO; FAOSTAT. DATA. Food Balance. 2020. Available online: http://doi.org/www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/ (accessed on 6 June 2019).
  101. Makharia, G.K.; Verma, A.K.; Amarchand, R.; Bhatnagar, S.; Das, P.; Goswami, A.; Bhatia, V.; Ahuja, V.; Gupta, S.D.; Anand, K. Prevalence of celiac disease in the northern part of India: A community based study. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 26, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lohi, S.; Mustalahti, K.; Kaukinen, K.; Laurila, K.; Collin, P.; Rissanen, H.; Lohi, O.; Bravi, E.; Gasparin, M.; Reunanen, A.; et al. Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 26, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ludvigsson, J.F.; Rubio-Tapia, A.; Van Dyke, C.T.; Melton, L.J.; Zinsmeister, A.R.; Lahr, B.D.; Murray, J.A. Increasing Incidence of Celiac Disease in a North American Population. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 108, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  104. Lindfors, K.; Cavallo, P.; Kurppa, K.; Lundin, K.E.A.; Makharia, G.; Mearin, M.L.; Murray, J.A.; Verdu, E.F.; Kaukinen, K. Coeliac disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Riskó, T.C.; Péntek, Á.; Wiwczaroski, T. Bread consumption habits in the gluten free diet. Appl. Stud. Agribus. Commer. 2017, 11, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Abadie, V.; Sollid, L.M.; Barreiro, L.B.; Jabri, B. Integration of Genetic and Immunological Insights into a Model of Celiac Disease Pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 493–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  107. Cummins, A.G.; Roberts-Thomson, I.C. Prevalence of celiac disease in the Asia-Pacific region. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 24, 1347–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kang, J.Y.; Kang, A.H.Y.; Green, A.; Gwee, K.A.; Ho, K.Y. Systematic review: Worldwide variation in the frequency of coeliac disease and changes over time. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 38, 226–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kucek, L.K.; Veenstra, L.D.; Amnuaycheewa, P.; Sorrells, M.E. A Grounded Guide to Gluten: How Modern Genotypes and Processing Impact Wheat Sensitivity. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Del Pozo, A.; Matus, I.; Serret, M.D.; Araus, J.L. Agronomic and physiological traits associated with breeding advances of wheat under high-productive Mediterranean conditions. The case of Chile. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 103, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Xynias, I.N.; Mylonas, I.; Korpetis, E.G.; Ninou, E.; Tsaballa, A.; Avdikos, I.D.; Mavromatis, A.G. Durum Wheat Breeding in the Mediterranean Region: Current Status and Future Prospects. Agronomy 2020, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  112. Ribeiro, M.; Rodríguez-Quijano, M.; Giraldo, P.; Pinto, L.; Vázquez, J.F.; Carrillo, J.M.; Igrejas, G. Effect of allelic variation at glutenin and puroindoline loci on bread-making quality: Favorable combinations occur in less toxic varieties of wheat for celiac patients. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016, 243, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Van den Broeck, H.C.; De Jong, H.C.; Salentijn, E.M.J.; Dekking, L.; Bosch, D.; Hamer, R.J.; Gilissen, L.J.W.J.; Van Der Meer, I.M.; Smulders, M.J.M. Presence of celiac disease epitopes in modern and old hexaploid wheat varieties: Wheat breeding may have contributed to increased prevalence of celiac disease. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  114. Spisni, E.; Imbesi, V.; Giovanardi, E.; Petrocelli, G.; Alvisi, P.; Valerii, M.C. Differential Physiological Responses Elicited by Ancient and Heritage Wheat Cultivars Compared to Modern Ones. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  115. Di Francesco, A.; Saletti, R.; Cunsolo, V.; Svensson, B.; Muccilli, V.; De Vita, P.; Foti, S. Qualitative proteomic comparison of metabolic and CM-like protein fractions in old and modern wheat Italian genotypes by a shotgun approach. J. Proteom. 2019, 211, 103530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pilolli, R.; Gadaleta, A.; Mamone, G.; Nigro, D.; De Angelis, E.; Montemurro, N.; Monaci, L. Scouting for Naturally Low-Toxicity Wheat Genotypes by a Multidisciplinary Approach. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Prandi, B.; Bencivenni, M.; Faccini, A.; Tedeschi, T.; Dossena, A.; Marchelli, R.; Galaverna, G.; Sforza, S. Composition of peptide mixtures derived from simulated gastrointestinal digestion of prolamins from different wheat varieties. J. Cereal Sci. 2012, 56, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Prandi, B.; Mantovani, P.; Galaverna, G.; Sforza, S. Genetic and environmental factors affecting pathogenicity of wheat as related to celiac disease. J. Cereal Sci. 2014, 59, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ribeiro, M.; Nunes, F.M. We might have got it wrong: Modern wheat is not more toxic for celiac patients. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 820–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shewry, P.R. Do ancient types of wheat have health benefits compared with modern bread wheat? J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 79, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sievers, S.; Rohrbach, A.; Beyer, K. Wheat-induced food allergy in childhood: Ancient grains seem no way out. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2693–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Simsek, S.; Budak, B.; Schwebach, C.S.; Ovando-Martínez, M. Historical vs. modern hard red spring wheat: Analysis of the chemical composition. Cereal Chem. J. 2019, 96, 937–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Pronin, D.; Börner, A.; Scherf, K.A. Old and modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and their potential to elicit celiac disease. Food Chem. 2021, 339, 127952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Colomba, M.S.; Gregorini, A. Are Ancient Durum Wheats Less Toxic to Celiac Patients? A Study ofα-Gliadin from Graziella Ra and Kamut. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  125. Grover, J.; Chhuneja, P.; Midha, V.; Ghia, J.E.; Deka, D.; Mukhopadhyay, C.S.; Sood, N.; Mahajan, R.; Singh, A.; Verma, R.; et al. Variable Immunogenic Potential of Wheat: Prospective for Selection of Innocuous Varieties for Celiac Disease Patients via in vitro Approach. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  126. Malalgoda, M.; Meinhardt, S.W.; Simsek, S. Detection and quantitation of immunogenic epitopes related to celiac disease in historical and modern hard red spring wheat cultivars. Food Chem. 2018, 264, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Šuligoj, T.; Gregorini, A.; Colomba, M.; Ellis, H.J.; Ciclitira, P.J. Evaluation of the safety of ancient strains of wheat in coeliac disease reveals heterogeneous small intestinal T cell responses suggestive of coeliac toxicity. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 32, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Boukid, F.; Prandi, B.; Sforza, S.; Sayar, R.; Seo, Y.W.; Mejri, M.; Yacoubi, I. Understanding the Effects of Genotype, Growing Year, and Breeding on Tunisian Durum Wheat Allergenicity. 2. The Celiac Disease Case. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5837–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  129. Prandi, B.; Tedeschi, T.; Folloni, S.; Galaverna, G.; Sforza, S. Peptides from gluten digestion: A comparison between old and modern wheat varieties. Food Res. Int. 2017, 91, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Keirns, B.H.; Anderson, K.L.; Ojo, B.A.; Washburn, K.F.; El Rassi, G.D.; Lightfoot, S.A.; Carver, B.F.; Lucas, E.A.; Smith, B.J. A Comparative Study of Modern and Heirloom Wheat on Indicators of Gastrointestinal Health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 14027–14037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Swanson, N.L.; Leu, A.; Abrahamson, J.; Wallet, B. Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. J. Org. Syst. 2014, 9, 6–37. [Google Scholar]
  132. Castellanos-Rubio, A.; Fernandez-Jimenez, N.; Kratchmarov, R.; Luo, X.; Bhagat, G.; Green, P.H.R.; Schneider, R.; Kiledjian, M.; Bilbao, J.R.; Ghosh, S. A long noncoding RNA associated with susceptibility to celiac disease. Science 2016, 352, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  133. Bouziat, R.; Hinterleitner, R.; Brown, J.J.; Stencel-Baerenwald, J.E.; Ikizler, M.; Mayassi, T.; Meisel, M.; Kim, S.M.; Discepolo, V.; Pruijssers, A.J.; et al. Reovirus infection triggers inflammatory responses to dietary antigens and development of celiac disease. Science 2017, 356, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
Foods 09 01602 g001 550
Figure 1. Global N-fertilisation rates (kg N ha−1 y−1) in wheat crops. Wheat grain yield (t ha−1 y−1) and global annual area of wheat crops (107 ha) during 1961–2016 (1961–2010 for N-fertilisation rates) (A). Efficiency of N fertilisation (kg−1 N ha−1 per tonne of wheat grains (t wheat-1)) (B). Sources: [3,13,14,15]
Figure 1. Global N-fertilisation rates (kg N ha−1 y−1) in wheat crops. Wheat grain yield (t ha−1 y−1) and global annual area of wheat crops (107 ha) during 1961–2016 (1961–2010 for N-fertilisation rates) (A). Efficiency of N fertilisation (kg−1 N ha−1 per tonne of wheat grains (t wheat-1)) (B). Sources: [3,13,14,15]
Foods 09 01602 g001
Foods 09 01602 g002 550
Figure 2. Response ratios (±95% CI) of contents of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins and ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains after an increase in N fertilisation. See Table 1 and References therein for the sources. The number into parenthesis indicates the number of studies. *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 2. Response ratios (±95% CI) of contents of total gluten, total gliadins, α/β-gliadins, γ-gliadins and ω-gliadins and gliadin transcripts in wheat grains after an increase in N fertilisation. See Table 1 and References therein for the sources. The number into parenthesis indicates the number of studies. *** p < 0.0001.
Foods 09 01602 g002
Foods 09 01602 g003 550
Figure 3. Increases in total gliadin contents in wheat grains as a function of the increases in N-fertilisation rates (kg N ha−1 y−1). See Table 1 for the sources.
Figure 3. Increases in total gliadin contents in wheat grains as a function of the increases in N-fertilisation rates (kg N ha−1 y−1). See Table 1 for the sources.
Foods 09 01602 g003
Foods 09 01602 g004 550
Figure 4. Per capita gliadin intake (g y−1) and per capita wheat and derivates intake (kg y−1).
Figure 4. Per capita gliadin intake (g y−1) and per capita wheat and derivates intake (kg y−1).
Foods 09 01602 g004
Foods 09 01602 g005 550
Figure 5. Changes in global per capita intake of gliadins, global per capita intake of gliadins per kg of N fertilisation, amount of N fertilizer applied per tonne of harvested wheat grains and the prevalence (percentage of coeliac cases in the total population) or incidence (new cases per 1000 inhabitants and year) of coeliac disease from studies with large and representative sets of population data, adjusted for age and sex, from 1961 to 2010 [23,25,102,103].
Figure 5. Changes in global per capita intake of gliadins, global per capita intake of gliadins per kg of N fertilisation, amount of N fertilizer applied per tonne of harvested wheat grains and the prevalence (percentage of coeliac cases in the total population) or incidence (new cases per 1000 inhabitants and year) of coeliac disease from studies with large and representative sets of population data, adjusted for age and sex, from 1961 to 2010 [23,25,102,103].
Foods 09 01602 g005
Foods 09 01602 g006 550
Figure 6. Relationship between the prevalence of coeliac disease and the per capita wheat intakes at country level. DZA = Argelia. ARG = Argentina. AUS = Australia. AUT = Austria. BFA = Burkina Faso. BRA = Brazil. CZE = Czech Republic. DNK = Denmark. EGY = Egypt. EST = Estonia. CUB = Cuba. FIN = Finland. DEU = Germany. GRC = Greece. HUN = Hungary. IND = India. ISL = Iceland. IRN = Iran. IRL = Ireland. ISR = Israel. ITA = Italy. JPN = Japan. MEX = Mexico. NLD = Netherland. NZL = New Zealand. NOR = Norway. POL = Poland. PRT = Portugal. RUS = Russia. SVN = Slovenia. ESP = Spain. SWE = Sweden. CHE = Switzerland. TUN = Tunisia. TUR = Turkey. GRB = United Kingdom. USA = United States of America. URY = Uruguay. Data from [3,15,104,105,106,107,108].
Figure 6. Relationship between the prevalence of coeliac disease and the per capita wheat intakes at country level. DZA = Argelia. ARG = Argentina. AUS = Australia. AUT = Austria. BFA = Burkina Faso. BRA = Brazil. CZE = Czech Republic. DNK = Denmark. EGY = Egypt. EST = Estonia. CUB = Cuba. FIN = Finland. DEU = Germany. GRC = Greece. HUN = Hungary. IND = India. ISL = Iceland. IRN = Iran. IRL = Ireland. ISR = Israel. ITA = Italy. JPN = Japan. MEX = Mexico. NLD = Netherland. NZL = New Zealand. NOR = Norway. POL = Poland. PRT = Portugal. RUS = Russia. SVN = Slovenia. ESP = Spain. SWE = Sweden. CHE = Switzerland. TUN = Tunisia. TUR = Turkey. GRB = United Kingdom. USA = United States of America. URY = Uruguay. Data from [3,15,104,105,106,107,108].
Foods 09 01602 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Penuelas, J.; Gargallo-Garriga, A.; Janssens, I.A.; Ciais, P.; Obersteiner, M.; Klem, K.; Urban, O.; Zhu, Y.-G.; Sardans, J. Could Global Intensification of Nitrogen Fertilisation Increase Immunogenic Proteins and Favour the Spread of Coeliac Pathology? Foods 2020, 9, 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111602

AMA Style

Penuelas J, Gargallo-Garriga A, Janssens IA, Ciais P, Obersteiner M, Klem K, Urban O, Zhu Y-G, Sardans J. Could Global Intensification of Nitrogen Fertilisation Increase Immunogenic Proteins and Favour the Spread of Coeliac Pathology? Foods. 2020; 9(11):1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Penuelas, Josep, Albert Gargallo-Garriga, Ivan A. Janssens, Philippe Ciais, Michael Obersteiner, Karel Klem, Otmar Urban, Yong-Guan Zhu, and Jordi Sardans. 2020. "Could Global Intensification of Nitrogen Fertilisation Increase Immunogenic Proteins and Favour the Spread of Coeliac Pathology?" Foods 9, no. 11: 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop