Next Article in Journal
“Got Milk Alternatives?” Understanding Key Factors Determining U.S. Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Plant-Based Milk Alternatives
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Interspecific Yeast Hybrids for Secondary In-Bottle Alcoholic Fermentation of English Sparkling Wines
Previous Article in Journal
Shaping the Physicochemical, Functional, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Yoghurts Using Plant Additives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Volatile Compound Abundance Correlations Provide a New Insight into Odor Balances in Sauce-Aroma Baijiu
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Impact of Dilution on Whisky Aroma: A Sensory and Volatile Composition Analysis

Foods 2023, 12(6), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061276
by P. Layton Ashmore 1, Aubrey DuBois 2,3, Elizabeth Tomasino 3, James F. Harbertson 4 and Thomas S. Collins 4,*
Reviewer 2:
Foods 2023, 12(6), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12061276
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 13 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 March 2023 / Published: 17 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Research on Aroma Interactions of Alcoholic Beverages)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.        Why there are no mention of multifactor analysis, PLS and correlograms performed in this study in the abstract?

2.        “volatile composition” keyword should be included.

3.        The GC column dimension should be presented as “30 m x 0.250 mm ID, 0.25 mm film thickness” under section 2.3.

4.        The volatile profiling by GC in terms of GC chromatogram and analysis data should be provided in the main text.

5.        All the labels in Table 1-3, 5, 6 should be enhanced for clarity and visibility.

6.        Some more discussion elucidating the proximity of data in the biplots shown in Figure 5 and 6. There are only 3-4 lines as discussion.

7.        Figure 5 and Figure 6 should be combined as A and B parts of a single figure with a common caption.

8.        Some discussion by comparing the data and/or results with that of similar type of reported papers dealing with impact on dilution of aroma beverages.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Title: " Impact of dilution on whisky aroma: a sensory and volatile composition analysis ".

 

This paper provides important insight into how dilution of whisky during consumption changes consumer perception. It also shows the usefulness of HS-SPME-GC/MS as a proxy for human olfaction, which can be used to evaluate complex relationships between aroma and dilution in whiskies. The findings from this research could help distillers better understand their products’ flavor profiles at different levels of water concentration, allowing them to make more informed decisions about product development or marketing strategies.

 

I think it is an interesting work. However, it still requires a few improvements which are listed as below.

 

1.      Lines 103-104, why did you choose to add 10 ml of solution to the 20 ml sample bottle? Please give a reasonable explanation. We know that the gas-to-liquid volume ratio between the volume of solution in the sample bottle and the gas above the liquid in the bottle is highly dependent on the aroma release. At thermodynamic equilibrium, different gas-liquid volume ratios correspond to different partition coefficients.

2.      Line 110, to investigate the release of volatile compounds in the headspace, SPME is a convenient method, However, for the solution with small dilution ratio, that is, high alcohol content, it may be difficult to overcome the overload of fiber head on ethanol, which has a great impact on the results.

3.      Line 116, why does this experimental analytical method require a split? Is it still representative for the detection of some trace compounds?

4.      Line 164, what is the concentration and intensity of the corresponding standard reference when evaluating the intensity of these ten aroma attributes?l

5.      Line 222, the total sum of the two principal components derived from the experimental results is only 24.7%, which is not sufficiently representative.

6.      Line 260, the figure 3 looks terrible, not clear and concise, suggesting that the name of the compound could be adjusted to a code or something else.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have satisfactorily addressed all the comments raised by reviewers and therefore I recommend acceptance of this article for publication. 

 

Back to TopTop