Next Article in Journal
Peer Verbal Encouragement Enhances Offensive Performance Indicators in Handball Small-Sided Games
Next Article in Special Issue
Kawasaki Disease, MIS-C and COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Antenatal Care and Health Behavior of Pregnant Women—An Evaluation of the Survey of Neonates in Pomerania
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reappraisal of VEGF in the Pathogenesis of Kawasaki Disease
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

Incomplete Kawasaki Disease with Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy and Lung Nodules: A Case Report and Literature Review

Children 2023, 10(4), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040679
by Marco Maglione 1, Annalisa Barlabà 2, Michela Grieco 3, Rosaria Cosimi 3, Giangiacomo Di Nardo 3, Giovanni Maria Di Marco 3, Monica Gelzo 4,5, Giuseppe Castaldo 4,5, Celeste Tucci 6, Raffaella Margherita Iodice 1, Maria Concetta Lonardo 1, Vincenzo Tipo 1 and Antonietta Giannattasio 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Children 2023, 10(4), 679; https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040679
Submission received: 22 February 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 3 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kawasaki Disease, MIS-C and COVID-19)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is a good manuscript, I suggest small changes.

Incomplete Kawasaki disease with peripheral facial nerve palsy and lung nodules: a case report and literature review

I have reviewed the case, it is well-written and comprehensive.

In the abstract, you must add the purpose of the study.

Table 1 you can adjust values and explain better Positive test (HUS) . I suggest creating a graphic series of laboratory parameters, with values from all the hospitalization periods expressed and you can compare better.

A time-line evolution and treatment is also a good idea, for results.

Fig 2 B, do you have a better one? And please add arrows, for a better understanding.

Add the imagistic in dinamics, please.

I suggested that you point out the particularity of your case in the conclusions and reformulate it. congratulations for the case and the article

 

Best regards

 

Author Response

In the abstract, you must add the purpose of the study.

Aim of the study has been added in the Abstract, as suggested (“Here we describe a case of lower motor neuron facial nerve palsy complicating KD and we performed an extensive literature review to better characterize clinical features and treatment of patients with KD-associated facial nerve palsy”).

Table 1 you can adjust values and explain better Positive test (HUS) . I suggest creating a graphic series of laboratory parameters, with values from all the hospitalization periods expressed and you can compare better. A time-line evolution and treatment is also a good idea, for results.

We thanks the reviewer for useful suggestion. The most relevant laboratory results (WBC, plt and ferritin values) have been removed from Table 1 and described in a time-line figure (Figure 2) including treatmentsstarted or stopped.

Fig 2 B, do you have a better one? And please add arrows, for a better understanding.

Arrows have been added, as suggested.

Add the imagistic in dinamics, please.

A picture comparing right FNP features at hospital admission with closed and open eyes has been added (Figure 1).

I suggested that you point out the particularity of your case in the conclusions and reformulate it.

Conclusions have been reformulated, as suggested.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors reported the case of a 4-month-old boy with Kawasaki disease who concurred with facial nerve palsy. Unfortunately, he was complicated with coronary arterial aneurysms in spite of appropriate diagnosis and treatments. As the authors described, FNP associated with KD indicates the risk of development of CAL.  Although the issues about cardiac involvements were well described, but the issues about FNP was unsatisfied. I think that the authors should strengthen the neurological issues.

1. The authors have to describe more clinical courses of FNP in detail. It should be reported whether FNP persisted at discharge or at the last follow-up.

2. Did you perform brain MRI or lumber puncture test?

Author Response

  1. The authors have to describe more clinical courses of FNP in detail. It should be reported whether FNP persisted at discharge or at the last follow-up.

FNP was completely resolved at discharge.This is reported in the last paragraph of case presentation (page 4:” His left facial weakness was unappreciable at discharge”). 

  1. Did you perform brain MRI or lumber puncture test?

Brain MRI and lumbar puncture were not performed in our case. This data has been added in Case presentation.

Back to TopTop