You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
BiomedicinesBiomedicines
Download PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

20 January 2026

Menin Inhibition in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Pathobiology, Progress and Promise

and
Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines2026, 14(1), 219;https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010219
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements and Challenges in Anticancer Targeted Therapy with Small Molecules
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly aggressive malignancy defined by significant biological diversity and variable patient outcomes. A key subset of AML is driven by abnormalities that lead to the overexpression of the oncogenic transcription factors HOXA9 and MEIS1. These abnormalities include KMT2A (formerly MLL) rearrangements and NPM1 mutations, as well as other rare lesions such as NUP98 rearrangements. This review focuses on the biology of the KMT2A, NPM1, and HOX/MEIS1 pathways, dissecting their molecular mechanisms of leukemogenesis. A central theme is the role of the scaffolding protein menin in the epigenetic regulation of this pathway, which ultimately drives malignant transformation. Currently, the clinical landscape is being transformed by the emergence of menin inhibitors as promising therapeutic agents for AML harboring these specific genetic anomalies. We evaluate the latest data on various menin inhibitors—both as monotherapy and in combinations—emphasizing their efficacy and safety profiles. As new evidence continues to accumulate with recent drug approvals and ongoing randomized, phase 3 studies, menin inhibitors are rapidly becoming a component of the AML treatment paradigm for relapsed/refractory and likely newly diagnosed disease.

1. Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic progenitors characterized by impaired maturation, expansion of leukemic blasts, and suppression of normal hematopoiesis [1]. Historically, treatment of AML relied largely on the use of chemotherapy for all patients irrespective of a disease biology that, amongst human tumors that have been extensively appraised, is one of the most heterogeneous. Advances in molecular genetics and disease mechanisms have reshaped this model, opening multiple avenues for targeted therapies. Among these, menin inhibitors have emerged as a promising option for AML driven by histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) rearrangements (KMT2A-r), nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutations, and other rarer lesions characterized by oncogenic homeobox (HOX) A9/myeloid ecotropic virus insertion site 1 gene (MEIS1) overexpression (e.g., NUP98 rearrangements, UBTF tandem duplications, RUNX1/SETD1 or CEPBA/RUNX1 co-mutations) [2]. This review summarizes the pharmacologic basis of menin inhibition, examines current therapeutic strategies, and offers a perspective on future directions for treating this distinct form of AML.

2. KMT2A Function and Aberrancy

KMT2A, formerly known as mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL), is central to normal hematopoiesis, and its rearrangements account for roughly 3–6% of adult de novo AML and up to 10% of cases arising out of prior cytotoxic therapy [3]. The KMT2 family includes a group of methyltransferases that catalyzes the methylation of histone three lysine 4 (H3K4) through their conserved SET domain (Su(var)3–9, Enhancer of zester and Trithorax), playing an important role in epigenetic regulation [4]. The mature KMT2A protein, encoded by the gene located on chromosome 11q23, is produced via proteolytic cleavage of nascent KMT2A by taspase-1 into N-terminal (KMT2A-N) and C-terminal (KMT2A-C) fragments. KMT2A-N contains domains critical for chromatin interactions with menin-binding sites, AT-hooks and CpG islands, while KMT2A-C contains the SET domain responsible for H3K4 methylation [4,5,6]. These two subunits interact with other proteins such as WD repeat protein 5 (WDR5), retinoblastoma binding protein 5 (RbBP5), ASH2L, and DPY30, together forming a KMT2A complex [7]. KMT2A plays an important role as a transcriptional coactivator, especially in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal and differentiation, by interacting with HOX gene clusters [8,9].
KMT2A rearrangements represent the more common form of genomic aberrations when compared with tandem duplications, copy number alterations, and mutations in KMT2A [8,10]. Most KMT2A rearrangements are balanced translocation involving 11q23 that results in the production of in-frame gain-of-function oncogenic fusion proteins [8,11]. In an analysis of 3401 cases of acute leukemia, greater than 100 KMT2A fusion partner genes were identified. The most common KMT2A fusion partners in AML include AF9 (MLLT3), AF10 (MLLT10), KMT2A-PTDs, ELL, AF6 (AFDN), ENL (MLLT1), and MLLT11 [11]. Besides AML, ENL (Eleven Nineteen Leukemia)-associated protein (EAP) complex169 also accounts for approximately 90% of KMT2A-r acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [12]. The breakpoints for these fusions mostly occur distal to exon 9 in hematologic malignancies (KMT2A N-fusion) resulting in the loss of PHD and SET domains (contrast with sarcoma where KMT2A C-fusion mostly occurs) [4,11]. KMT2A fusion proteins interact with H3K79 methyltransferase DOT1L or components of the super elongation complex through their C-terminal partners subsequently enhancing transcription elongation and upregulation of gene mechanisms responsible for inhibition of apoptosis and cellular differentiation [13,14]. These epigenetic interactions also drive abnormal activity of key KMT2A targets such as HOX A/B, MEIS1 and PBX3, which are normally active in early stem cells and gradually phase out during hematopoietic maturation. When their expression remains high, maturation arrest and leukemogenesis follows [13,14,15].

3. NPM1 Structure and Mutations

NPM1 mutations define another major molecular subset, occurring in about one-third of adults with AML [16,17]. The NPM1 gene encodes for a multifunctional chaperone and shuttling nucleolar protein. NPM1 protein is composed of a hydrophobic N-terminal core containing two nuclear export signals (NES), a central acidic core containing bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS), and a basic C-terminal core containing two tryptophan residues (W288 and W290) and nucleolar localization signal (NoLS) [18,19]. The N terminus acts as a chaperone by preventing protein misfolding in the nucleolus. The negatively charged aspartic and glutamic acids in the central region promote histone chaperone activity, while the NLS mediates nuclear transportation of NPM1 protein. The C-terminus enables interactions with nucleic acid and TP53 and drives nucleolar localization of NPM1 [18,20]. NPM1 also associates with the centrosome and prevents excessive duplication during the cell cycle resting phase [21]. Under nucleolar stress, NPM1 is exported out of the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, inhibits E3 ligase human double minute 2 (HDM2) activity, raises TP53 levels, and triggers cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [22].
NPM1 mutations commonly arise within a background of replication errors due to aberrant terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase activity [23]. This results in a frameshift mutation in C-terminus with subsequent loss of W288 and W290 and formation of a new NES. Both events (as well as rare NPM1 fusion proteins), coupled with increased recognition of NES by XPO1, upregulate the delocalization of mutant NPM1 from the nucleoplasm to the cytoplasm, forming the basis for leukemogenesis [18,24,25].

4. Menin Pathobiology

Menin is a scaffold or adaptor protein that is encoded by MEN1 gene and plays an important role in epigenetic regulation via its interaction with multiple partner genes [26]. Menin serves as a bridge between KMT2A (wild type or rearranged) and lens-epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF) and interacts with other transcription factors such as arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and the H3K9 methyltransferase SUV39H1 (suppressor of variegation 3–9 homolog 1) [27,28]. Through these interactions, menin has been shown to upregulate prooncogenic transcriptional mechanisms mediated by KMT2A and support downstream maintenance of HOXA, MEIS1, and PBX3 clusters (Figure 1) [26,27]. Preclinical studies on KMT2A-r leukemia models have shown the inhibition of menin to result in the elimination of the leukemia phenotype and restoration of normal hematopoietic maturation [29].
Figure 1. Menin and KMT2A interaction. KMT2A binds with menin to form a complex that upregulates the expression of HOX genes and their cofactor MEIS1 resulting in leukemogenesis. Mutated NPM1 interacts with the menin–KMT2A complex to promote similar downstream effects. Created in BioRender. Joshi, U. (2026) https://BioRender.com/kmznz3i.
Notably, the gene expression profile of NPM1-m AML mimics that of KMT2A-r AML, with increased expression of HOXA/B and MEIS1 [30]. This stems from the interaction between mutant NPM1 protein and the menin–KMT2A complex. As a result, mutant NPM1 protein nuclear relocation or targeted degradation, as well as inhibition of menin, can all reduce HOX/MEIS1 expression and inhibit leukemogenesis [30,31].
Beyond KMT2A-r and NPM1-m disease, there are other subsets of AML that may respond to menin inhibitors. NUP98-fusion proteins have been shown to interact with KMT2A and associate with a high HOXA-expressing AML [32]. When applied to this genomic subgroup, menin inhibition can similarly disrupt the menin–KMT2A interaction, NUP98-fusion protein, and chromatin. Other genetic subsets where menin inhibitors have shown some promise in preclinical studies include AML with UBTF tandem duplication, RUNX1/SETD1 co-mutation, and CEBPA/RUNX1 co-mutation [33].

5. Menin Inhibition

5.1. Mechanism of Action

Menin inhibitors are small molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interaction that selectively bind to menin binding motif 1 pocket and block interaction between menin and KMT2A (and other proteins like NPM1) [34]. This results in the downregulation of the HOXA/MEIS1/PBX3 gene cluster responsible for leukemogenesis and the upregulation of CD11b/CD14 genes responsible for differentiation (Figure 2) [35]. Revumenib is a first-in-class, orally administered small molecule menin inhibitor, and our discussion of the pharmacology of this drug class will be based on revumenib as the reference agent.
Figure 2. Mechanism of action of menin inhibitors. Disruption of the menin–KMT2A complex by menin inhibitors leads to downregulation of the HOX genes. Created in BioRender. Joshi, U. (2026) https://BioRender.com/ogfch57.

5.2. Pharmacokinetics

The available menin inhibitors and those currently under study differ in their pharmacokinetic properties. As discussed below, revumenib has been thoroughly studied in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute leukemia with KMT2A-r or NPM1-m. Revumenib has a steady-state volume of distribution of 63 L and is approximately 90% protein bound, independent of plasma concentration. Elimination occurs primarily via feces (approximately 52%, with 7% as unchanged drug) and the urine (approximately 25%, with 6% as unchanged drug) [36]. Metabolism is strongly dependent on the concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors [37]. When administered with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor at 160 mg twice daily, revumenib reaches a maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 3028 ng/mL, a median time to peak (Tmax) of 2 h, a half-life of 6.4 h, and a clearance of 7 L/hour. Without CYP3A4 inhibition, at a dose of 270 mg twice daily, the Cmax is 2344 ng/mL, Tmax is 1 h, the half-life is 3 h, and clearance is 20 L/hour [35,36,37]. These interactions are particularly relevant in patients receiving triazole antifungals such as posaconazole or voriconazole, which are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and can increase the Cmax and area under curve (AUC) of revumenib by roughly two-fold [36]. In addition, patients weighing under 40 kg exhibit higher drug exposure; therefore, dosing is adjusted according to body surface area in this group [37]. Pharmacokinetic parameters are otherwise consistent across age, race, sex, and mild to moderate hepatic or renal impairment [34,36]. Data are lacking for patients with severe hepatic (total bilirubin > 3× upper limit of normal and any AST) or renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 15 mL/min). There are no data on the central nervous system (CNS) drug penetration or efficacy, so continuation of standard intrathecal therapy is recommended for individuals with known CNS involvement or elevated risk, in keeping with institutional practice.
Ziftomenib is another menin inhibitor with a comparable mechanism of action but distinctive pharmacokinetic features. It has a median Tmax of 3.5 h and an elimination half-life of 61.5 h, indicating rapid absorption and supporting once-daily dosing. Its absolute bioavailability is 12.9%. Ziftomenib undergoes limited metabolism through oxidation, N-demethylation, and N-dealkylation, and is predominantly excreted unchanged in the feces [38].
Enzomenib (DPS-5336) was specifically designed to be different than other currently available/studied menin inhibitors, namely with a short half-life of 2–5 h, low lipophilicity and high clearance; these properties are hypothesized to predict a different therapeutic window for relevant patient populations [39].

5.3. Mechanisms of Resistance

The development of resistance represents a significant therapeutic challenge for menin inhibitor therapy (Figure 3). Leukemia cells with KMT2A-r or NPM1-m can acquire somatic changes in MEN1 that reduce the effectiveness of menin inhibitors. These alterations commonly affect residues M327, G331, T349, and S160, which subsequently weaken the ability of menin to bind small-molecule inhibitors, but without affecting its interaction with KMT2A. As a result, the menin–KMT2A complex continues to engage with chromatin and drive leukemogenic gene expression, despite menin inhibitor exposure [40]. Additional resistance mechanisms have been described, including TP53 alterations and their influence on dysregulated BH3 family proteins such as BCL-2 and MCL-1, as well as epigenetic adaptations driven by KMT2A fusion oncoproteins, although the understanding of these pathways requires further study [41,42]. The activation of alternative transcriptional programs driven by the MLL3/4–UTX complex leads to dynamic shifts in KMT2A oncoprotein binding, promotes lineage plasticity, and induces a consequent reduction in susceptibility to menin inhibition [43]. In addition, leukemic cells can reduce their reliance on KMT2A by becoming dependent on the histone acetyltransferase KAT6A, which helps sustain high levels of transcription, supports hematopoietic differentiation, drives cell cycle progression, and maintains leukemogenic potential [44]. Resistance is further promoted by disruptions in Polycomb repressive complexes, particularly PRC1.1 and PRC2.2. Loss of PRC1.1 components such as PCGF1, BCOR, and RYBP results in the inappropriate activation of oncogenic pathways, including MYC, a key gene regulated by both the menin–KMT2A axis and PRC1.1 [45,46]. Particular menin inhibitors appear to have activity and efficacy in the presence of specific MEN1 mutations, as well as mutations in FLT3 and IDH1/2, as discussed below.
Figure 3. Mechanism of resistance to menin inhibitors. Overview of key mechanisms of resistance, including transcriptional reprogramming via MLL3/4–UTX, shift to KAT6A dependency, Polycomb complex dysregulation with MYC activation, TP53-driven apoptosis resistance, and MEN1 mutations that impair inhibitor binding. Created in BioRender. Joshi, U. (2026) https://BioRender.com/o3yaq58.

6. Revumenib

6.1. Efficacy of Monotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Disease

Revumenib (Revuforj®, Syndax Pharmaceuticals) is the most extensively studied menin inhibitor and has now been approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for management of R/R acute leukemia with KMT2A rearrangement or NPM1 mutation [36]. The efficacy of revumenib was demonstrated in the phase I/II AUGMENT-101 study, which evaluated patients with KMT2A-r or NPM1-m disease [35,47]. The efficacy cohort of KMT2A-r acute leukemia (N = 57) included heavily pretreated patients with approximately 70% treated with ≥2 prior lines of treatment and 45% with prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), 86% with AML and 12% with ALL, and 80% with R/R disease. The overall response rate (ORR) was 63.2%, with a median time to first response of just under one month. The rate of complete response (CR) or complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) was 22.8%, achieved at a median of 1.9 months. The median duration of CR/CRh was 6.4 months. Of 10 evaluable patients with CR/CRh who had minimal residual disease (MRD) data available, 70% were MRD negative at a median of 1.08 months. Of those who achieved composite complete response (CRc), 68% (15/22) were MRD negative. The median overall survival (OS) was eight months, and 38.9% subsequently received allogeneic HCT [35].
The efficacy cohort of NPM1-m AML (N = 64) also included heavily pretreated R/R patients, with 36% having received ≥3 prior therapy. in total, 75% were treated with venetoclax, 47% with FLT3 inhibitors, and 22% had undergone HCT (4% had >1 prior HCT). The ORR was 46.9%, with a median time to first response of 1.84 months. The rate of CR/CRh was 23.4%, with a median time to first CR/CRh of 2.7 months and a median duration of CR/CRh of 4.7 months. Among responders, 16.7% (5/30) subsequently received allogeneic HCT. Median event-free survival (EFS) and OS of the entire cohort were three and four months, respectively. For those who achieved CR/CRh, median OS was 23.3 months. Patients with venetoclax-naïve disease and those with IDH1/2 co mutations achieved higher rates of CR/CRh [47].

6.2. Efficacy of Combination Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Disease

Revumenib has also shown encouraging activity in combination regimens. In the pediatric AUGMENT-102 study (N = 27), which paired revumenib with fludarabine and cytarabine in patients with R/R acute leukemia with KMT2A-r, NPM1-m, or NUP98 rearrangement, CRc was achieved in 55.6% at dose level 1 (113 mg twice daily) and 50% at dose level 2 (163 mg twice daily). The median duration of response was 2.6 months at dose level 1, while it had not yet been reached at dose level 2. Among those with CRc, 71.4% achieved MRD negativity [48].
The SAVE trial is evaluating the efficacy of combination treatment with revumenib, venetoclax and decitabine/cedazuridine, including in R/R AML (N = 26). The ORR was 88%, CR/CRh was 58%, and MRD negativity by flow cytometry among those with CR/CRh was 93%. After a median follow-up period of 6.6 months, 6-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were 59% and 74%, respectively [49]. Lastly, the combination of revumenib and the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib is being studied with initial results demonstrating QTc prolongation as would be expected given the combination, but surmountable with avoidance of concurrent strong CYP3A4 inhibition [50].

6.3. Efficacy in the Frontline Setting

The SAVE trial (NCT05360160) is also studying the less-intensive triplet combination of revumenib, decitabine/cedazuridine, and venetoclax as a frontline approach for patients who are ineligible for high-intensity chemotherapy. The cohort (N = 17) presented with a high-risk profile: 35% had adverse-risk disease, and 24% were diagnosed with secondary or therapy-related disease. Furthermore, most patients exhibited co-mutations in signaling or myelodysplasia-related genes. The efficacy data are highly encouraging, with an ORR of 94% and a CR rate of 88%. Notably, all patients achieving CR also attained MRD negativity via flow cytometry. After a median follow-up of six months, the median OS and EFS had not yet been reached [51].
Similarly, the Beat AML Master Trial (BAMT) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of revumenib in combination with azacitidine and venetoclax in adults older than 60 years with newly diagnosed KMT2A-r or NPM1-m AML (N = 43). The ORR, CRc, and CR rates were 88.4%, 81.4%, and 67.4%, respectively. All these rates were numerically superior in the KMT2A-r group compared to the NPM1-m group. Median time to first response was 28 days, and 84% achieved a marrow remission during the first cycle of treatment. All patients who underwent MRD assessment were negative according to flow MRD, whereas 31% of NPM1-m AML patients evaluable for NPM1 MRD via next generation sequencing (NGS) were MRD negative. With a median follow-up period of 6.9 months, median EFS, median OS, and one-year OS were 13.3 months, 15.5 months, and 62.9%, respectively. Median OS for NPM1-m and KMT2A-r groups were 15.5 months and 18 months, respectively [52].
The addition of revumenib to intensive frontline chemotherapy regimens is currently being explored in the single-arm SNDX-5613-0708 trial (NCT06226571). Initial data from the seven patients enrolled at Dose Level 1 of this Phase I study show that both the ORR and CR rates were 100% at the time of data cutoff. Furthermore, all patients who achieved CR were found to be MRD negative based on local assessment. A significant proportion of the patients (4/7) have successfully proceeded to HCT [53].
These preliminary data with combination strategies in both newly diagnosed and R/R leukemia are very impressive and suggest the need to further pursue large-scale randomized trials of doublet or triplet combinations of revumenib and chemotherapy.

6.4. Safety and Toxicity Profile

The safety profile of revumenib is primarily characterized by differentiation syndrome (DS) and QTc prolongation. Revumenib had DS rates of 27.7% (grade ≥3 16%) in the KMT2A-r cohort and 19% (grade ≥3 13.1%) in the NPM1-r cohort of the AUGMENT-101 trial, 19% (grade ≥3 5%) in BAMT, and 4% (grade ≥3 4%) in the SAVE trial [35,47,49,52]. Median time to initial onset and median duration of the initial event of DS were 5–10 days and 12–15 days, respectively [35,47,52]. QTc prolongation was another notable concern with revumenib, reported in 42.9% (grade ≥3 22.6%) of patients in NPM1-m cohort and 25.5% (grade ≥3 16%) in KMT2A-r cohort of the AUGMENT-101 trial, 58% (grade ≥3 8%) in the SAVE trial, and 44% (grade ≥3 12%) in BAMT [35,47,49,52]. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 98% of patients in AUGMENT-101, with 91% experiencing grade ≥3 TEAEs. Most common grade ≥3 TEAEs apart from DS and QTc prolongation included febrile neutropenia, cytopenia, sepsis including pneumonia, hypokalemia, acute kidney injury, and transaminase elevations [35,47,48,49,52].

7. Ziftomenib

7.1. Monotherapy for Relapsed/Refractory Disease

Ziftomenib (Komzifti®, Kura Oncology) is another menin inhibitor that blocks the formation of menin–KMT2A complex and suppresses the oncogenic activity associated with NPM1-m. Its clinical development has been led by the phase I/II KOMET-001 trial in adults with R/R AML harboring KMT2A-r or NPM1-m. In the phase I sub-study, patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of three prior lines of therapies; 69% had prior venetoclax exposure and 31% had previously undergone allogeneic HCT. In the NPM1-m cohort (200 mg or 600 mg doses), the ORR was 42%, CR/CRh rate was 31%, and median duration of CR/CRh was 6.6 months. Median OS was 3.5 months (2.7 months with 200 mg dose and 5.6 months with 600 mg dose). In the KMT2A-r cohort, the ORR was 9%, CR/CRh rate was 6%, and median duration of CR/CRh was 2.1 months. In post hoc analysis, frequency of DS was noted to be higher in KMT2A-r than NPM1-m group, and often of a worse grade [54]. Accordingly, the phase II portion focused solely on NPM1-m AML. The ORR was 33%, with a median time to first response of 1.9 months. The CR/CRh rate was 22%, with a median time to first CR/CRh of 2.8 months and a median duration of CR/CRh of 3.7 months. Among CR/CRh responders with samples available for central NGS, 61% achieved MRD negativity. Median OS was 6.6 months and reached 18.4 months among responders. Prior venetoclax exposure did not significantly alter CR/CRh rates [55]. FLT3-ITD co mutations were associated with lower CR/CRh rates, whereas IDH1/2 co mutations correlated with higher CR/CRh rates, mirroring observations from revumenib studies [47,55].

7.2. Combination Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Disease

The ongoing Phase I KOMET-007 study (NCT05735184) is evaluating ziftomenib in combination with standard, less-intensive therapy (azacitidine and venetoclax) for patients with R/R NPM1-m and KMT2A-r AML. Interim analysis, utilizing the 600 mg daily dose of ziftomenib, demonstrated encouraging clinical activity across both cohorts. The NPM1-m cohort showed particularly robust results, achieving an ORR of 65% and a CRc rate of 49%. In comparison, the KMT2A-r cohort had an ORR of 33% and a CRc rate of 22%. The depth of response was significant, with a high proportion of tested CRc responders achieving MRD negativity (50% for NPM1-m and 60% for KMT2A-r). At data cutoff, median OS was not yet estimable for the NPM1-m group but was 21.1 weeks for the KMT2A-r cohort [56].

7.3. Frontline Combination Therapy

Beyond the R/R setting, KOMET-007 study also includes a phase Ib cohort investigating ziftomenib as a component of frontline, non-intensive therapy. Specifically, patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy received ziftomenib (600 mg once daily) combined with standard doses of azacitidine and venetoclax. Initial data (N = 39 total; N = 31 evaluable for response as of 25 June 2025) demonstrate robust activity with an ORR of 94%, CR rate of 58% and a CRc rate of 84%. A significant proportion of tested CRc responders achieved MRD negativity (54%). After a median follow-up of 16.3 weeks, the median OS has not yet been reached [57].
These encouraging results have directly led to the launch of the placebo-controlled, randomized, phase III KOMET-017 trial (NCT07007312), which is currently recruiting patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m or KMT2A-r AML to study the clinical benefit of adding ziftomenib to standard frontline treatment with “7 + 3” (amongst intensive-induction-eligible patients) or azacitidine + venetoclax (amongst intensive-induction-inappropriate patients). For the intensive induction group, primary endpoints include EFS and the rate of MRD-negative CR (NPM1-m cohort only). In the non-intensive treatment group, primary endpoints focus on OS and CR rate per European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria.
Ziftomenib is also current being studied in combination with quizartinib (NCT06769490) and as a monotherapy (NCT06930352) in patients with newly diagnosed AML deemed to be “unfit” to receive other forms of AML-directed therapy [58,59].

7.4. Safety and Toxicity Profile

TEAEs were reported in all patients treated with ziftomenib, with grade ≥ 3 events reported in 93%. Common grade ≥3 TEAEs included febrile neutropenia, cytopenia, pneumonia, DS, sepsis, and hypokalemia. DS occurred in 25% of patients in the phase II cohort (grade ≥3 15%). Ziftomenib was associated with lower rates of QTc prolongation (13%, grade ≥3 9%) and myelosuppression compared with revumenib, an attribute that may make it particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with cardiac comorbidities [54,55].

8. Bleximenib

Bleximenib (JNJ-75276617, Johnson & Johnson) is another selective small molecule that disrupts the menin–KMT2A complex and has shown potent antileukemia activity against AML and ALL cell lines in vitro. In mouse models, bleximenib exerted synergistic effects with gilteritinib and with azacitidine/venetoclax in KMT2A-r AML cells and, more importantly, it has also demonstrated activity in models harboring MEN1 mutations such as M327I and T349M that confer resistance to revumenib [60]. In a first-in-human, phase I study enrolling 56 adults with R/R acute leukemia and KMT2A-r or NPM1-m, grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 29% of patients, primarily neutropenia (10%), anemia and thrombocytopenia (7%), DS (5%) and transaminase elevations (3%). Among evaluable patients, 39% had a ≥50% reduction in bone marrow blasts. At a dose of 90 mg twice daily (N = 8), the ORR was 50%, including CR/CRh and complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in four patients. Among those receiving ≥45 mg twice daily (N  =  20), the ORR was 40%, including CR/CRh/CRi in seven patients. The average time to response (PR or better) was 1.81 months, and time to CR/CRh/CRi was 1.77 months [61].
Bleximenib is being studied in combination with venetoclax as a doublet therapy on the phase Ib ALE1002 dose-finding study (NCT05453903). Early results from 13 patients (including 3 KMT2A-r and 10 NPM1-m AML cases) demonstrated promising activity, with an ORR of 69.2% and a CR/CRh rate of 23.1%. A notable difference was observed based on prior treatment exposure: venetoclax-naïve patients achieved substantially better CRc rates compared to venetoclax-exposed patients (57.1% vs. 16.7%) [62].
Bleximenib is also being studied in the frontline setting with intensive “7 + 3” in a phase 1b trial (NCT05453903). Preliminary data from 24 evaluable patients indicate high rates of response, with an ORR of 95.8%, a CRc rate of 87.5%, and a CR/CRh rate of 75%. At the time of data cutoff, the median duration of response had not yet been reached [63].
These early phase results were promising enough to prompt the launch of the randomized, phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled cAMeLot-2 trial (NCT06852222), which will evaluate the addition of bleximenib to azacitidine and venetoclax, with OS and CR rate serving as the primary endpoints [64]. The sister trial for intensive therapy-eligible patients is evaluating the combination of bleximenib with “7 + 3” in the phase 3 HOVON 181 AML/AMLSG 37-25 study (NCT07223814), with EFS selected as the primary endpoint [65].

9. Enzomenib

Enzomenib (DSP-5336, Sumitomo Pharma) is a menin inhibitor under investigation in a phase I/II monotherapy study in patients with R/R acute leukemia. As of March 2025, 116 heavily pre-treated patients (2 median prior treatment, 36 patients with prior HCT) with KMT2A-r, NPM1-m, or HOXA9/MEIS1-driven leukemia groups had been treated. There was no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or grade > 3 QTc prolongation, and DS occurred in 12.9% without associated mortality. Among patients with KMT2A-r (treated concomitantly with azoles), the ORR and CR/CRh rates at various doses of 200, 300, and 400 mg twice daily were 50% and 16.7%, 72.7% and 45.5%, and 75% and 25%, respectively. Median OS for all patients with KMT2A-r and treated with enzomenib at a dose of ≥200 mg twice daily was 11.4 months. Among 17 patients with NPM1-m AML, the ORR was 58.8% and CR/CRh was 47%. Median OS for all patients treated at 200–400 mg twice daily was 8.5 months [39]. Recent cell line experiments have also elucidated possible synergistic enzomenib-inclusive combinations that may inform phase I trial design(s). Specifically, the data demonstrated that enzomenib exhibits significant synergistic anti-leukemic activity when co-administered with a CDK9 inhibitor (e.g., BAY1251152). This combination is particularly compelling as it maintained high efficacy against menin-inhibitor-resistant AML models [66].

10. BN104

An emerging product is BN104 (Servier/BioNova Pharmaceuticals). This agent is being studied in a phase I/II study with initial results from the first 20 patients with R/R AML (3 median prior lines of treatment, 20% with prior HCT) and KMT2A-r, NPM1-m or NUP98 rearrangement demonstrating that 35% of patients had grade ≥3 adverse events, most commonly febrile neutropenia (15%) and pneumonia (10%). Grade 1 QT prolongation and grade 2 DS were each observed in 10% patients. Among 11 evaluable patients, the ORR was 88.9% and the CR/CRh was 33.3%, supporting further clinical investigation [67].

11. BMF-219

BMF-219 (Biomea Fusion) was the first agent developed associated with covalent and irreversible menin inhibition. It was evaluated in the phase I COVALENT-101 study, which includes patients with R/R acute leukemia, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. As of 26 July 2023, patients with R/R acute leukemia (24 AML and 2 ALL) had been treated. Patients were heavily pre-treated, with a median of four prior therapies and 11 having undergone HCT. The drug was well tolerated with no DLT or treatment discontinuations. DS was the only grade ≥3 toxicity, occurring in 13%. Of five evaluable patients for efficacy, one each achieved CR and CRi [68]. The study was eventually terminated and BMF-219 is no longer being studied in hematology/oncology indications.
Comprehensive clinical data for the individual agents and their combinations are presented in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1. Response rate and survival outcomes with Menin inhibitors monotherapy.
Table 2. Response rate and survival outcomes with menin inhibitors in combination.

12. Future Directions

The advent of menin inhibitors represents one of the most pivotal periods of AML drug development and their application has favorably impacted many patients with the disease. Akin to most other AML products, efficacy in the R/R setting has eventually beget studies in earlier lines, typically in combination with reference standards of care. The striking rates and depths of remission are associating with survival estimates that have confidently fostered the launch of several randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III studies in combination with standard intensive induction (i.e., “7 + 3”) or less-intensive therapy (i.e., azacitidine + venetoclax). Pending the results of these phase III studies, the impressive efficacy observed in single-arm studies will increase the use of menin inhibitors, not only in the R/R setting as monotherapy, but also in off-label combinations in both the R/R and frontline settings. The latter being more likely for patients with KMT2A-r AML for whom lesser rates of higher-quality remission and higher rates of relapse may warrant accepting more risk of being exposed to off-label combinations that may eventually be proven to be no better than standard therapy upon phase III read outs. Further study of resistance mechanisms and how to overcome them or sequence menin inhibitors is necessary. We expect more menin inhibitor combinations with other targeted agents (e.g., FLT3 and IDH inhibitors) to be studied given the non-low rates of co-mutation amongst patients with NPM1-m disease and lack of clarity about which lesion/interaction is best targeted in the R/R setting for such patients. As menin inhibitor use increases, particularly without myelosuppressive backbones and in the community, awareness, vigilance and early intervention for DS is necessary to navigate patients through the critical risk period so that patients destined for response may realize it.

13. Conclusions

Menin inhibition has emerged as a novel strategy for leukemias driven by KMT2A rearrangements and NPM1 mutations, as well as other rarer lesions associated with HOX/MEIS overexpression. Revumenib, ziftomenib, bleximenib, enzomenib and newer agents (e.g., BN104) have shown meaningful activity across this disease spectrum, with combination approaches being further studied to improve response depth. At the same time, resistance, particularly through MEN1 mutations, remains a significant therapeutic challenge and has already informed the development of next-generation compounds. Taken together, current data position menin inhibitors as an important addition to targeted therapy in AML, with ongoing trials expected to define their role in routine frontline and salvage treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.J. and R.M.S.; methodology, U.J. and R.M.S.; literature review, U.J. and R.M.S.; data curation, U.J.; writing—original draft preparation, U.J. and R.M.S.; writing—review and editing, U.J. and R.M.S.; supervision, R.M.S.; project administration, U.J. and R.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AMLAcute myeloid leukemia
KMT2AHistone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A
KMT2A-rKMT2A rearrangements
NPM1Nucleophosmin 1
NPM1-mNPM1 mutated
HOX Homeobox
MEIS1Myeloid ecotropic virus insertion site 1
MLLMixed-lineage leukemia
H3K4Histone three lysine 4
SETSu(var)3–9, Enhancer of zester and Trithorax
WDR5WD repeat protein 5
RbBP5Retinoblastoma binding protein 5
HSCHematopoietic stem cell
EAPEleven Nineteen Leukemia-associated protein
ALLAcute lymphoblastic leukemia
NESNuclear export signals
NLSNuclear localization signal
NoLSNucleolar localization signal
HDM2Human double minute 2
LEDGFLens epithelium-derived growth factor
SUV39H1Suppressor of variegation 3–9 homolog 1
R/RRelapsed/refractory
CYP3A4Cytochrome P450 3A4
CmaxMaximum plasma concentration
TmaxTime to peak
AUCArea under curve
CNSCentral nervous system
FDAFood and Drug Administration
HCTHematopoietic cell transplant
ORROverall response rate
CRComplete response
CRhComplete response with partial hematologic recovery
MRDMinimal residual disease
OSOverall survival
CRcComposite complete response
EFSEvent free survival
RFSRelapse free survival
BAMTBeat AML Master Trial
NGSNext generation sequencing
TEAETreatment emergent adverse events
DSDifferentiation syndrome
ELNEuropean Leukemia Net
DLTDose limiting toxicity
MLFSMorphologic leukemia free state
DLDose level
NRNot reached

References

  1. Döhner, H.; Weisdorf, D.J.; Bloomfield, C.D. Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1136–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Candoni, A.; Coppola, G. A 2024 Update on Menin Inhibitors. A New Class of Target Agents against KMT2A-Rearranged and NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Hematol. Rep. 2024, 16, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zehtabcheh, S.; Soleimani Samarkhazan, H.; Asadi, M.; Zabihi, M.; Parkhideh, S.; Mohammadi, M.H. Insights into KMT2A rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia: From molecular characteristics to targeted therapies. Biomark. Res. 2025, 13, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ogino, J.; Dou, Y. Histone methyltransferase KMT2A: Developmental regulation to oncogenic transformation. J. Biol. Chem. 2024, 300, 107791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Milan, T.; Celton, M.; Lagace, K.; Roques, E.; Safa-Tahar-Henni, S.; Bresson, E.; Bergeron, A.; Hebert, J.; Meschinchi, S.; Cellot, S.; et al. Epigenetic changes in human model KMT2A leukemias highlight early events during leukemogenesis. Haematologica 2022, 107, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van, H.T.; Xie, G.; Dong, P.; Liu, Z.; Ge, K. KMT2 Family of H3K4 Methyltransferases: Enzymatic Activity-dependent and -independent Functions. J. Mol. Biol. 2024, 436, 168453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dou, Y.; Milne, T.A.; Ruthenburg, A.J.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.W.; Verdine, G.L.; Allis, C.D.; Roeder, R.G. Regulation of MLL1 H3K4 methyltransferase activity by its core components. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rao, R.C.; Dou, Y. Hijacked in cancer: The KMT2 (MLL) family of methyltransferases. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qiu, Y.; Xu, M.; Huang, S. Long noncoding RNAs: Emerging regulators of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Blood 2021, 138, 2327–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ayton, P.M.; Cleary, M.L. Molecular mechanisms of leukemogenesis mediated by MLL fusion proteins. Oncogene 2001, 20, 5695–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Meyer, C.; Larghero, P.; Almeida Lopes, B.; Burmeister, T.; Gröger, D.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.C.; Cazzaniga, G.; Corral Abascal, L.; Tsaur, G.; et al. The KMT2A recombinome of acute leukemias in 2023. Leukemia 2023, 37, 988–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mueller, D.; Bach, C.; Zeisig, D.; Garcia-Cuellar, M.-P.; Monroe, S.; Sreekumar, A.; Zhou, R.; Nesvizhskii, A.; Chinnaiyan, A.; Hess, J.L.; et al. A role for the MLL fusion partner ENL in transcriptional elongation and chromatin modification. Blood 2007, 110, 4445–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Biswas, D.; Milne, T.A.; Basrur, V.; Kim, J.; Elenitoba-Johnson, K.S.J.; Allis, C.D.; Roeder, R.G. Function of leukemogenic mixed lineage leukemia 1 (MLL) fusion proteins through distinct partner protein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 15751–15756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yi, Y.; Ge, S. Targeting the histone H3 lysine 79 methyltransferase DOT1L in MLL-rearranged leukemias. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Min, J.; Feng, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, R.M. Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase. Cell 2003, 112, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Borer, R.A.; Lehner, C.F.; Eppenberger, H.M.; Nigg, E.A. Major nucleolar proteins shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm. Cell 1989, 56, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Papaemmanuil, E.; Gerstung, M.; Bullinger, L.; Gaidzik, V.I.; Paschka, P.; Roberts, N.D.; Potter, N.E.; Heuser, M.; Thol, F.; Bolli, N.; et al. Genomic Classification and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 2209–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falini, B.; Brunetti, L.; Sportoletti, P.; Martelli, M.P. NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: From bench to bedside. Blood 2020, 136, 1707–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grisendi, S.; Mecucci, C.; Falini, B.; Pandolfi, P.P. Nucleophosmin and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Falini, B.; Sorcini, D.; Perriello, V.M.; Sportoletti, P. Functions of the native NPM1 protein and its leukemic mutant. Leukemia 2025, 39, 276–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Okuda, M.; Horn, H.F.; Tarapore, P.; Tokuyama, Y.; Smulian, A.G.; Chan, P.-K.; Knudsen, E.S.; Hofmann, I.A.; Snyder, J.D.; Bove, K.E.; et al. Nucleophosmin/B23 Is a Target of CDK2/Cyclin E in Centrosome Duplication. Cell 2000, 103, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Colombo, E.; Marine, J.C.; Danovi, D.; Falini, B.; Pelicci, P.G. Nucleophosmin regulates the stability and transcriptional activity of p53. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Borrow, J.; Dyer, S.A.; Akiki, S.; Griffiths, M.J. Molecular roulette: Nucleophosmin mutations in AML are orchestrated through N-nucleotide addition by TdT. Blood 2019, 134, 2291–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arregi, I.; Falces, J.; Olazabal-Herrero, A.; Alonso-Mariño, M.; Taneva, S.G.; Rodríguez, J.A.; Urbaneja, M.A.; Bañuelos, S. Leukemia-Associated Mutations in Nucleophosmin Alter Recognition by CRM1: Molecular Basis of Aberrant Transport. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Grummitt, C.G.; Townsley, F.M.; Johnson, C.M.; Warren, A.J.; Bycroft, M. Structural consequences of nucleophosmin mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 23326–23332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Huls, G.; Woolthuis, C.M.; Schuringa, J.J. Menin inhibitors in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2025, 145, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Feng, Z.; Ma, J.; Hua, X. Epigenetic regulation by the menin pathway. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2017, 24, T147–T159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yokoyama, A.; Cleary, M.L. Menin Critically Links MLL Proteins with LEDGF on Cancer-Associated Target Genes. Cancer Cell 2008, 14, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yokoyama, A.; Somervaille, T.C.P.; Smith, K.S.; Rozenblatt-Rosen, O.; Meyerson, M.; Cleary, M.L. The Menin Tumor Suppressor Protein Is an Essential Oncogenic Cofactor for MLL-Associated Leukemogenesis. Cell 2005, 123, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Salman, M.Y.; Stein, E.M. Revumenib for patients with acute leukemia: A new tool for differentiation therapy. Haematologica 2024, 109, 3488–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brunetti, L.; Gundry, M.C.; Sorcini, D.; Guzman, A.G.; Huang, Y.-H.; Ramabadran, R.; Gionfriddo, I.; Mezzasoma, F.; Milano, F.; Nabet, B.; et al. Mutant NPM1 Maintains the Leukemic State through HOX Expression. Cancer Cell 2018, 34, 499–512.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, H.; Valerio, D.G.; Eisold, M.E.; Sinha, A.; Koche, R.P.; Hu, W.; Chen, C.-W.; Chu, S.H.; Brien, G.L.; Park, C.Y.; et al. NUP98 Fusion Proteins Interact with the NSL and MLL1 Complexes to Drive Leukemogenesis. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wenge, D.V.; Armstrong, S.A. Menin inhibition for the treatment of acute leukemia. Semin. Hematol. 2025, 62, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lynch, E.J.; Faro, S.J.E.; Lindstrom, A.M.; Sethi, N.A.; Wang, W.Y.; Seligson, N.D. Revumenib for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia With a KMT2A Translocation. Ann. Pharmacother. 2025, 59, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Issa, G.C.; Aldoss, I.; Thirman, M.J.; DiPersio, J.; Arellano, M.; Blachly, J.S.; Mannis, G.N.; Perl, A.; Dickens, D.S.; McMahon, C.M.; et al. Menin Inhibition With Revumenib for KMT2A -Rearranged Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia (AUGMENT-101). J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Syndax Pharmaceuticals. Revuforj (Revumenib) [Prescribing Information]; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: New York, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  37. Issa, G.C.; Aldoss, I.; DiPersio, J.; Cuglievan, B.; Stone, R.; Arellano, M.; Thirman, M.J.; Patel, M.R.; Dickens, D.S.; Shenoy, S.; et al. The menin inhibitor revumenib in KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutant leukaemia. Nature 2023, 615, 920–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mitra, A.; Ahsan, J.M.; Tabachri, M.; El-Shahat, T.; Leoni, M.; Dale, S. Pharmacokinetics and ADME Characterization After Oral and Intravenous Administration of [14C]-Ziftomenib in Healthy Male Participants. Clin. Transl. Sci. 2025, 18, e70153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Daver, N.; Zeidner, J.; Watts, J.; Yuda, J.; Levis, M.; Montesinos, P.; Papayannidis, C.; Fukushima, K.; Shima, T.; Raffoux, E.; et al. Monotherapy update from Phase 1 portion in Phase1/2 trial of the menin-MLL inhibitor enzomenib (DSP-5336) in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia. Blood 2025, 146, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perner, F.; Stein, E.M.; Wenge, D.V.; Singh, S.; Kim, J.; Apazidis, A.; Rahnamoun, H.; Anand, D.; Marinaccio, C.; Hatton, C.; et al. MEN1 mutations mediate clinical resistance to menin inhibition. Nature 2023, 615, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. D’Souza, J.; Leung, C.J.; Ballapuram, A.C.; Lin, A.S.; Batingana, A.R.; Lamble, A.J.; Ries, R.E.; Morales, C.E.; Cottonham, C.; Gona, P.; et al. TP53 Inactivation Confers Resistance to the Menin Inhibitor Revumenib in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood 2025, 146, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Janssens, D.H.; Duran, M.; Otto, D.J.; Wu, W.; Xu, Y.; Kirkey, D.; Mullighan, C.G.; Yi, J.S.; Meshinchi, S.; Sarthy, J.F.; et al. KMT2A oncoproteins induce epigenetic resistance to targeted therapies. bioRxiv 2024. bioRxiv:2023.12.29.573681. [Google Scholar]
  43. Soto-Feliciano, Y.M.; Sánchez-Rivera, F.J.; Perner, F.; Barrows, D.W.; Kastenhuber, E.R.; Ho, Y.-J.; Carroll, T.; Xiong, Y.; Anand, D.; Soshnev, A.A.; et al. A Molecular Switch between Mammalian MLL Complexes Dictates Response to Menin–MLL Inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2023, 13, 146–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Perner, F.; Rahnamoun, H.; Wenge, D.V.; Xiong, Y.; Apazidis, A.; Anand, D.; Hatton, C.; Wen, Y.; Gu, S.; Liu, X.S.; et al. S125: Non-Genetic Resistance to Menin Inhibition in AmL Is Reversible by Perturbation of KAT6A. Hemasphere 2023, 7, e6233123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, X.; Zhang, L.; Aryal, S.; Moreira, S.; Veasey, V.; Hope, K.J.; Lu, R. Decoding the Epigenetic Drivers of Menin-MLL Inhibitor Resistance in KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood 2023, 142, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fleischmann, M.; Bechwar, J.; Voigtländer, D.; Fischer, M.; Schnetzke, U.; Hochhaus, A.; Scholl, S. Synergistic Effects of the RARalpha Agonist Tamibarotene and the Menin Inhibitor Revumenib in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells with KMT2A Rearrangement or NPM1 Mutation. Cancers 2024, 16, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Arellano, M.L.; Thirman, M.J.; DiPersio, J.F.; Heiblig, M.; Stein, E.M.; Schuh, A.C.; Žučenka, A.; de Botton, S.; Grove, C.S.; Mannis, G.N.; et al. Menin inhibition with revumenib for NPM1-mutated relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: The AUGMENT-101 study. Blood 2025, 146, 1065–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shukla, N.; Guest, E.; Tasian, S.K.; Breese, E.; Schafer, J.; DiPersio, G.; Issa, G.C.; Silverman, B.; Stieglitz, B.; Pollard, J. Safety and activity of revumenib in combination with fludarabine/cytarabine (FLA) in patients with relapsed/refractory acute leukemias. HemaSphere 2024, 8, e104. [Google Scholar]
  49. Issa, G.C.; Cuglievan, B.; Daver, N.; DiNardo, C.D.; Farhat, A.; Short, N.J.; McCall, D.; Pike, A.; Tan, S.; Kammerer, B.; et al. Phase I/II Study of the All-Oral Combination of Revumenib (SNDX-5613) with Decitabine/Cedazuridine (ASTX727) and Venetoclax (SAVE) in R/R AML. Blood 2024, 144, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Borate, U.; Jain, J.; Huang, Y.; Dvorak-Kornaus, K.; Perl, A.; Zeidner, J.; Mims, A. Preliminary Results of A phase 1 study of the safety and tolerability of the combination of revumenib (REV) with gilteritinib (GILT) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood 2025, 146, 3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jen, W.-Y.; DiNardo, C.; Short, N.; Farhat, A.; El Hajjar, G.; Zhang, B.; Duose, D.; Daver, N.; Kadia, T.; Cuglievan, B.; et al. Phase II Study of the all-oral combination of revumenib (SNDX-5613) with decitabine/cedazuridine (ASTX727) and venetoclax (SAVE) in newly diagnosed AML. Blood 2025, 146, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zeidner, J.F.; Lin, T.L.; Welkie, R.L.; Curran, E.; Koenig, K.; Stock, W.; Madanat, Y.F.; Swords, R.; Baer, M.R.; Blum, W.; et al. Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Revumenib for Newly Diagnosed NPM1 -Mutated or KMT2A -Rearranged AML. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, 2606–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aldoss, I.; Shultz, C.; Hunter, B.; Swoboda, D.; Montesinos, P.; Assouline, S.; Fleming, S.; Grove, C.; Schuh, A.; Taussig, D.; et al. Phase 1 study of revumenib in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) in patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed (ND) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) harboring genetic alterations in KMT2A, NPM1, or NUP98: SNDX-5613-0708. Blood 2025, 146, 3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, E.S.; Issa, G.C.; Erba, H.P.; Altman, J.K.; Montesinos, P.; DeBotton, S.; Walter, R.B.; Pettit, K.; Savona, M.R.; Shah, M.V.; et al. Ziftomenib in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (KOMET-001): A multicentre, open-label, multi-cohort, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, 1310–1324, Erratum in Lancet Oncol. 2024, 25, e542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, E.S.; Montesinos, P.; Foran, J.; Erba, H.; Rodríguez-Arbolí, E.; Fedorov, K.; Heiblig, M.; Heidel, F.H.; Altman, J.K.; Baer, M.R.; et al. Ziftomenib in Relapsed or Refractory NPM1-Mutated AML. J. Clin. Oncol. 2025, 43, 3381–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Issa, G.; Fathi, A.; Zeidan, A.; Erba, H.; Roboz, G.; Altman, J.; Pratz, K.; Juckett, M.; Lin, T.; Balasubramanian, S.K.; et al. Ziftomenib in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine in relapsed/refractory NPM1-m or KMT2A-r acute myeloid leukemia: Updated phase 1a/b safety and clinical activity results from KOMET-007. Blood 2025, 146, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Roboz, G.; Wang, E.; Fathi, A.; Erba, H.; Pratz, K.; Guru Murthy, G.S.; Alsfeld, L.; Blachly, J.; Naqvi, K.; Issa, G.; et al. Ziftomenib in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine in newly diagnosed NPM1-m acute myeloid leukemia: Phase 1b results from KOMET-007. Blood 2025, 146, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Issa, G.; Kantarjian, H.; Yilmaz, M.; Short, N.; Kadia, T.; El Hajjar, G.; DiNardo, C.; Alvarado, Y.; Jabbour, E.; Borthakur, G.; et al. Phase l dose escalation and expansion of ziftomenib in combination with quizartinib in AML. Blood 2025, 146, 3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jain, J.; Huang, Y.; Dvorak-Kornaus, K.; Hirkane, P.; Corum, D.; Borate, U. Trial in progress: A phase II study of ziftomenib monotherapy in unfit patients with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with NPM1 mutation or KMT2A rearrangement. Blood 2025, 146, 5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kwon, M.C.; Thuring, J.W.; Querolle, O.; Dai, X.; Verhulst, T.; Pande, V.; Marien, A.; Goffin, D.; Wenge, D.V.; Yue, H.; et al. Preclinical efficacy of the potent, selective menin-KMT2A inhibitor JNJ-75276617 (bleximenib) in KMT2A-and NPM1-altered leukemias. Blood 2024, 144, 1206–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jabbour, E.; Searle, E.; Abdul-Hay, M.; Abedin, S.; Aldoss, I.; Alfonso Piérola, A.; Alonso-Dominguez, J.M.; Chevallier, P.; Cost, C.; Daskalakis, N.; et al. A First-in-Human Phase 1 Study of the Menin-KMT2A (MLL1) Inhibitor JNJ-75276617 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Leukemia Harboring KMT2A or NPM1 Alterations. Blood 2023, 142, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. O’Nions, J.; Wei, A.; Esteve, J.; Aldoss, I.; Alfonso-Pierola, A.; Allred, A.; Alonso-Dominguez, J.M.; Barreyro, L.; Bories, P.; Daskalakis, N.; et al. Phase 1b study of bleximenib in combination with venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with KMT2A or NPM1 alterations. Blood 2025, 146, 5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Döhner, H.; Schuh, A.; Recher, C.; O’Nions, J.; Aldoss, I.; Alfonso-Pierola, A.; Allred, A.; Alonso-Dominguez, J.M.; Barreyro, L.; Bories, P.; et al. Bleximenib in combination with intensive chemotherapy: A phase 1b study in newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with KMT2A or NPM1 alterations. Blood 2025, 146, 5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jabbour, E.; Sallman, D.; Briseno-Toomey, D.; Drenberg Guttke, C.; Huang, X.; Dillon, R.; Ferrante, L.; Ikezoe, T.; Langlois, A.; Loefgren, C.; et al. Camelot-2: A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study of bleximenib, venetoclax and azacitidine for the treatment of participants with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia harboring KMT2A rearrangements or NPM1 mutations, who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Blood 2025, 146, 3429. [Google Scholar]
  65. Raaijmakers, M.; Döhner, H.; Breems, D.; Byrd, J.; Döhner, K.; Esteve, J.; Gjertsen, B.; Gradowska, P.; Huls, G.A.; Kaare, A.; et al. Bleximenib or placebo in combination with standard induction and consolidation therapy followed by maintenance for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia eligible for intensive chemotherapy: A double-blind Phase 3 study (HOVON 181 AML / AMLSG 37-25). Blood 2025, 146, 1654. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fiskus, W.; Mill, C.; Birdwell, C.; Davis, J.; Das, K.; Hou, H.; Sharma, S.; Warner, S.; Ye, Z.; Matthews, A.; et al. Preclinical activity of investigational menin inhibitor DSP-5336 (Enzomenib)-based combinations against MLL1-rearranged (MLL-r) or mutant-NPM1 AML models. Blood 2025, 146, 1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, D.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Huang, R.; Ren, J.; Guo, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, M.; Wei, X.; et al. A First-in-Human Phase 1/2 Study of the Menin-KMT2A(MLL1) Inhibitor BN104 in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Leukemia. Blood 2024, 144, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lancet, J.; Ravandi, F.; Montesinos, P.; Barrientos, J.C.; Badar, T.; Alegre, A.; Bashey, A.; Bergua Burgues, J.M.; Brunetti, L.; Curran, E.K.; et al. Covalent Menin Inhibitor Bmf-219 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Acute Leukemia (AL): Preliminary Phase 1 Data from the Covalent-101 Study. Blood 2023, 142, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Download PDF
Polypharmacy and Drug–Drug Interaction Architecture in Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients: Insights from Real-World Analysis
Previous
Stigmasterol Decreases Oncostatin M Production Through Suppressing PI3K/Akt/NF-κB Signaling Processes in Neutrophil-like Differentiated HL-60 Cells
Next