Abstract
We focus on the improvement of operator Kantorovich type inequalities. Among the consequences, we improve the main result of the paper [H.R. Moradi, I.H. Gümüş, Z. Heydarbeygi, A glimpse at the operator Kantorovich inequality, Linear Multilinear Algebra, doi:10.1080/03081087.2018.1441799].
Keywords:
operator inequality; positive linear map; operator Kantorovich inequality; geometrically convex function MSC:
Primary 47A63; Secondary 46L05; 47A60
1. Notation and Preliminaries
At the beginning of this paper, we cite the following inequality which is called the operator Kantorovich inequality [1]:
where is a normalized positive linear map from to , (we represent and as complex Hilbert spaces throughout the paper) and A is a positive operator with spectrum contained in with . This is a non-commutative analogue of the classical inequality [2],
where is a unit vector.
In recent years, various attempts have been made by many authors to improve and generalize the operator Kantorovich inequality. One may see the basic references [3,4,5] and the excellent survey [6] on this topic. In [7], it was shown that
The main aim of the present short paper is to improve both inequalities in (2). Actually, we prove that
where .
In what follows, an operator means a bounded linear one acting on a complex Hilbert space . As customary, we reserve m, M for scalars and I for the identity operator. A self-adjoint operator A is said to be positive if holds for all . A linear map is positive if whenever . It is said to be normalized if . We denote by the spectrum of the operator A.
2. Main Results
Before we present the proof of our theorems, we begin with a general observation. We say that a non-negative function f on is geometrically convex [8] when
for all and . Equivalently, a function f is geometrically convex if and only if the associated function is convex.
Example 1
([9] Example 2.12). Given real numbers and for , the function is geometrically convex on .
Kittaneh and Manasrah [10] Theorem 2.1 obtained a refinement of the weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality as follows:
where .
Now, if f is a decreasing geometrically convex function, then
where the first inequality follows from the inequality and the fact that f is decreasing function, in the second inequality we used (4), the third inequality is obvious by (3), and the fourth inequality again follows from (4) by interchanging a by and b by .
Of course, each decreasing geometrically convex function is also convex. However, the converse does not hold in general.
The inequality (5) applied to , , , and gives
with whenever .
In order to establish our promised refinement of the operator Kantorovich inequality, we also use the well-known monotonicity principle for bounded self-adjoint operators on Hilbert space (see, e.g., [6] (p. 3)): If is a self-adjoint operator, then
provided that f and g are real-valued continuous functions. Under the same assumptions, implies .
Now, we are in a position to state and prove our main results. We remark that the following theorem can be regarded as an extension of [5] Remark 4.14 to the context of geometrical convex functions.
Theorem 1.
Let be a self-adjoint operator with for some scalars m, M with and Φ be a normalized positive linear map from to . If f is strictly positive decreasing geometrically convex function, then
where and
Proof.
On account of the assumptions, from parts of (6), we have
where
Note that inequality (8) holds for all . On the other hand, , which, by virtue of monotonicity principle (7) for operator functions, yields the series of inequalities
It follows from the linearity and the positivity of the map that
Now, by using [5] Corollary 4.12 we get
This completes the proof. □
As discussed extensively in [6] Cahpter 2, for , we have
Now, the following fact can be easily deduced from Theorem 1 and Example 1.
Corollary 1.
Let be a positive operator with for some scalars m, M with and Φ be a normalized positive linear map from to . Then for any ,
where
In particular,
We note that is the original Kantorovich constant.
Theorem 2.
Let all the assumptions of Theorem 1 hold. Then
Proof.
By applying a standard functional calculus for the operator such that , we get from (8)
We thus have
where at the last step we used the basic inequality [5] Corollary 4.12.
Hence, the proof is complete. □
As a corollary of Theorem 2 we have:
Corollary 2.
Let all the assumptions of Corollary 1 hold. Then for any
Remark 1.
Notice that the inequalities in Corollary 2 are stronger than the inequalities obtained in [11] Corollary 2.1.
Recall that if f is operator convex, the solidarities [12] or the perspective [13] of f is defined by
Using a series of inequalities (6) we have the upper bounds of the perspective for non-negative decreasing geometrically convex function (not necessary operator convex f). We use the same symbol for a simplicity.
Proposition 1.
Let with for some scalars . For a non-negative decreasing geometrically convex function f, we have
where
Author Contributions
The work presented here was carried out in collaboration between all authors. The study was initiated by the first author. The first author played also the role of the corresponding author. All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16K05257.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their hearty thanks to the referees for their valuable comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Marshall, A.W.; Olkin, I. Matrix versions of Cauchy and Kantorovich inequalities. Aequ. Math. 1990, 40, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kantorovich, L.V. Functional analysis and applied mathematics. Uspehi Matem. Nauk 1948, 3, 89–185. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Bourin, J.C. Matrix versions of some classical inequalities. Linear Algebra Appl. 2006, 416, 890–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, M.; Zuo, H.; Cheng, N. Generalization on Kantorovich inequality. J. Math. Inequal. 2013, 7, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mićić, J.; Carić, J.P.; Seo, Y.; Tominaga, M. Inequalities for positive linear maps on Hermitian matrices. J. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2000, 3, 559–591. [Google Scholar]
- Furuta, T.; Mićić, J.; Carić, J.P.; Seo, Y. Mond–Pečarić Method in Operator Inequalities; Element: Guernsey, France, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Moradi, H.R.; Gümüş, I.H.; Heydarbeygi, Z. A glimpse at the operator Kantorovich inequality. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montel, P. Sur les functions convexes et les fonctions sousharmoniques. J. Math. 1928, 9, 29–60. [Google Scholar]
- Bourin, J.C.; Hiai, F. Jensen and Minkowski inequalities for operator means and anti–norms. Linear Algebra Appl. 2014, 456, 22–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kittaneh, F.; Manasrah, Y. Improved Young and Heinz inequalities for matrices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2010, 361, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sababheh, M.; Moradi, H.R.; Furuichi, S. Exponential inequalities for positive linear mappings. J. Funct. Spaces 2018, 2018, 5467413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, J.I.; Fujii, M.; Seo, Y. An extension of the Kubo–Ando theory: Soridarities. Math. Japonica 1990, 35, 387–396. [Google Scholar]
- Ebadian, A.; Nikoufar, I.; Gordji, M.E. Perspectives of matrix convex functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7313–7314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).