Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. tabel 7 - to check the spelling (live and survive ..., scuba ...)

2. figure 3 and figure 4 - I did not understand anything - on X and Y. Please, write more clear

3. please, mention if was the content of the course modified after the study had realized? Or if was  the content of the course influenced by the answers of the students?

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1:

1. Table 7: Changes have been made on p. 11.

2. Figures 2 - 4: Changes have been made on pp. 12-13.

3. Course content changes: No changes will be made to the course content; however, some content delivery will be improved as will communication.  Please see p. 15.

Reviewer 2 Report

The contribution is interesting and well argued with respect to the pre-established objectives. the arguments are well supported by scientific references and the research method respects the criteria necessary to make the procedure adopted understandable.

The contribution is interesting and well argued.
The contents are well supported by scientific references.
The course described in the contribution describes a multidisciplinary approach with an interesting and relevant methodological framework, because it combines theory and practice.
This represents an element of originality. The text is clear and easy to read.
The conclusions are consistent with the argument presented. Even if the research questions are lacking in the contribution.

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 2:

Thank you.  It appears that no further response is necessary.