Next Article in Journal
Narrative Skills in Autistic and Non-Autistic Preschool Children: A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Acquisition of Syntactic Structures in Typical and Atypical Language Development: Insights from Growing Trees and Syntactic Cartography in a New Sentence Repetition Task
Previous Article in Journal
Etymological Principles and Dialectological Lexicography: Revised Etymologies in the Vocabulary of the Dialect of Lesbos
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unstable Boundaries: Phonological Change and Morphosyntactic Ambiguity in Contemporary Sardinian
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphosyntactic Marking of Focus: Subject–Object Asymmetries in Bantu

1
Chaire de Linguistique Générale, Collège de France, 75005 Paris, France
2
Department of Bilingual Studies, University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde P.O. Box 755, Cameroon
3
Department of African Languages and Linguistics, University of Yaounde 1, Yaounde P.O. Box 755, Cameroon
4
CISCL-DISPOC, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Languages 2026, 11(5), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11050092
Submission received: 2 December 2025 / Revised: 9 April 2026 / Accepted: 10 April 2026 / Published: 6 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Morpho(phono)logy/Syntax Interface)

Abstract

In many African languages, there exists a type of subject–object asymmetry by which subject focus must be expressed by A-bar movement to a morphologically marked left peripheral position whereas object focalisation can be expressed by movement and morphological marking in the left periphery, or in situ. In this article, we discuss and analyse this structural asymmetry in the Bantu languages Basaá and Mmaala. We argue that overt and covert movement of the focused object to Spec-FocP in the left periphery is allowed while covert movement of the subject is blocked, so that overt movement is the only possible option. Contrary to previous analyses, which attribute the obligatoriness of subject focus movement and marking to an interpretive conflict, we propose a formal characterisation of this phenomenon by which the blocking of subject focalisation in situ is deduced from criterial freezing, so that overt movement to the left periphery is the only option, through a familiar strategy of overt subject extraction.
Keywords: Bantu; criterial freezing; focus; subject object asymmetries Bantu; criterial freezing; focus; subject object asymmetries

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bassong, P.R.; Ossoko, E.; Rizzi, L. Morphosyntactic Marking of Focus: Subject–Object Asymmetries in Bantu. Languages 2026, 11, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11050092

AMA Style

Bassong PR, Ossoko E, Rizzi L. Morphosyntactic Marking of Focus: Subject–Object Asymmetries in Bantu. Languages. 2026; 11(5):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11050092

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bassong, Paul Roger, Edmond Ossoko, and Luigi Rizzi. 2026. "Morphosyntactic Marking of Focus: Subject–Object Asymmetries in Bantu" Languages 11, no. 5: 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11050092

APA Style

Bassong, P. R., Ossoko, E., & Rizzi, L. (2026). Morphosyntactic Marking of Focus: Subject–Object Asymmetries in Bantu. Languages, 11(5), 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages11050092

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop