Next Article in Journal
Computational Analysis of Compressed Stiffened Composite Panels with Impact Damage
Next Article in Special Issue
Structured Control Design for a Highly Flexible Flutter Demonstrator
Previous Article in Journal
Process Development for Integrated and Distributed Rotorcraft Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Bandwidth Morphing Actuator for Aeroelastic Model Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain

by
Jared A. Grauer
1,* and
Matthew J. Boucher
2
1
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA
2
NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center, Edwards, CA 93523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aerospace 2019, 6(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020024
Submission received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 1 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 February 2019 / Published: 22 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aeroelasticity)

Abstract

System identification from measured flight test data was conducted using the X-56A aeroelastic demonstrator to identify a longitudinal flight dynamics model that included the short period, first symmetric wing bending, and first symmetric wing torsion modes. Orthogonal phase-optimized multisines were used to simultaneously excite multiple control effectors while a flight control system was active. Non-dimensional stability and control derivatives parameterizing an aeroelastic model were estimated using the output-error approach to match Fourier transforms of measured output response data. The predictive capability of the identified model was demonstrated using other flight test data with different inputs and at a different flight conditions. Modal characteristics of the identified model were explored and compared with other predictions. Practical aspects of the experiment design and system identification analysis, specific to flexible aircraft, are also discussed. Overall, the approach used was successful for identifying aeroelastic flight dynamics models from flight test data.
Keywords: aeroelasticity; flight dynamics; X-56A; system identification; output error; parameter estimation; frequency domain; multisine inputs aeroelasticity; flight dynamics; X-56A; system identification; output error; parameter estimation; frequency domain; multisine inputs

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grauer, J.A.; Boucher, M.J. Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain. Aerospace 2019, 6, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020024

AMA Style

Grauer JA, Boucher MJ. Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain. Aerospace. 2019; 6(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grauer, Jared A., and Matthew J. Boucher. 2019. "Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain" Aerospace 6, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020024

APA Style

Grauer, J. A., & Boucher, M. J. (2019). Identification of Aeroelastic Models for the X-56A Longitudinal Dynamics Using Multisine Inputs and Output Error in the Frequency Domain. Aerospace, 6(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace6020024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop