Next Article in Journal
Gene Expression, Histology and Histochemistry in the Interaction between Musa sp. and Pseudocercospora fijiensis
Next Article in Special Issue
Adaptation of a Potyvirus Chimera Increases Its Virulence in a Compatible Host through Changes in HCPro
Previous Article in Journal
Hairy Root Cultures as a Source of Polyphenolic Antioxidants: Flavonoids, Stilbenoids and Hydrolyzable Tannins
Previous Article in Special Issue
High-Throughput Sequencing Discloses the Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV) Diversity in Slovakia and Reveals New Hosts of CMV from the Papaveraceae Family
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhanced Apiaceous Potyvirus Phylogeny, Novel Viruses, and New Country and Host Records from Sequencing Apiaceae Samples

Plants 2022, 11(15), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151951
by Adrian Fox 1,*, Adrian J. Gibbs 2, Aimee R. Fowkes 1, Hollie Pufal 3, Sam McGreig 1, Roger A. C. Jones 4, Neil Boonham 3 and Ian P. Adams 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Plants 2022, 11(15), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11151951
Submission received: 30 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant Viral Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Since numerical citation has been used throughout the manuscript there is no need to include the author names,Thus, on line 132 replace "Martin et al 2015" with a numerical citation. In line 252 delete "Wu, Liu, Liu, Li and Li" On line 302 delete

 

"by Gaafer and Ziebelle". On line 418 delete "in Adam et al". On line 421 delete "in Fox et al"

Author Response

Please see attached document.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper "Enhanced apiaceous potyvirus phylogeny, novel viruses, and new country and host records from sequencing Apiaceae samples" reported the high throughtput sequencing of historical and recent Apiaceae samples. The research is interesting and well conducted the results clear and all the paper carfully written and revised by the authors. 

In my opinion only two information lack from the article: 

1. Are the sample been previuosly tested from the viruses retrieved?

2. AAs should include some information (i.e. as table in the supplementary materials) about the quality of the NGS sequence, like the coverage etc..

Author Response

Please see attached document

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop