Human Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media as a Regenerative Cosmetic Ingredient: A Preclinical Characterization and Exploratory Topical Evaluation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ingredient Synthesis and Testing
2.1.1. MSC Acquisition, Flow Cytometry and hSCCM Synthesis
2.1.2. Proliferative Assays
Concentration–Response Assay
Shelf Life
Temperature Stability Assay
2.1.3. HRM Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Analysis
2.1.4. Hair Follicle Assessment
2.2. Cosmetic Testing
2.2.1. Microbiological Quality Assessment
2.2.2. Stability Assessment
2.2.3. Single-User Retrospective Observational Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Ingredient Testing
3.1.1. Flow Cytometry
3.1.2. Proliferative Assays
Concentration–Response Assay
Shelf Life
Temperature Stability Assay
3.1.3. Third-Party Proteomics
3.1.4. Histological Follicular Assessment
3.2. Cosmetic Testing—Early-Stage Safety and Efficacy Exploratory Observational Analysis
3.2.1. Microbiological Quality Assessment
3.2.2. Stability Assessment
3.2.3. Single-User Retrospective Observational Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. Ingredient Testing
4.1.1. Flow Cytometry
4.1.2. Proliferative Assays
Concentration–Response Assay
Shelf Life
Temperature Stability Assay
4.1.3. Third-Party Proteomics
4.1.4. Histological Follicular Assessment
4.2. Cosmetic Testing
4.2.1. Scientific Rationale for hSCCM-Enriched Topical Cosmetic Lotion
4.2.2. Early-Stage Safety and Efficacy Retrospective Observational Analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AATB | Association for Advancing Tissue and Biologics |
| BMSC/BM-MSC | Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell |
| BSC | Biological safety cabinet |
| RB | Rose Bengal Agar |
| CCN | CYR61/CTGF/NOV protein family |
| CD | Cluster of differentiation |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| CoA | Certificate of Analysis |
| CV | Coefficient of variation |
| DMEM | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
| ELISA | Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay |
| ESC | Embryonic stem cell |
| FBS | Fetal bovine serum |
| FDA | Food and Drug Administration |
| FN1 | Fibronectin |
| hAMSC | Human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell |
| HDFn | Human dermal neonatal fibroblast |
| H&E | Hematoxylin and eosin |
| HA | Hyaluronic acid |
| HLA | Human leukocyte antigen |
| HRM | Hyper Reaction Monitoring |
| hSCCM | Human stem cell-conditioned media |
| iPSC | Induced pluripotent stem cell |
| ISCT | International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy |
| LC–MS/MS | Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry |
| MMP2 | Matrix metalloproteinase-2 |
| MSC | Mesenchymal stem cell |
| NUT | Nutrient TTC agar |
| PG | Passage group |
| rpm | Revolutions per minute |
| SERPINE1 | PAI-1 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| SEM | Standard error of the mean |
| TOST | Two one-sided test |
| TSPSC | Tissue-specific progenitor stem cell |
| TGF-β1 | Transforming growth factor beta 1 |
| THBS1 | Thrombospondin-1 |
| UCSC | Umbilical cord stem cell |
References
- Tian, Z.; Yu, T.; Liu, J.; Wang, T.; Higuchi, A. Introduction to stem cells. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2023, 199, 3–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poliwoda, S.; Noor, N.; Downs, E.; Schaaf, A.; Cantwell, A.; Ganti, L.; Kaye, A.D.; Mosel, L.I.; Carroll, C.B.; Viswanath, O.; et al. Stem cells: A comprehensive review of origins and emerging clinical roles in medical practice. Orthop. Rev. 2022, 14, 667–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prodinger, C.M.; Reichelt, J.; Bauer, J.W.; Laimer, M. Current and future perspectives of stem cell therapy in dermatology. Ann. Dermatol. 2017, 29, 667–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahla, R.S. Stem cells applications in regenerative medicine and disease therapeutics. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 2016, 6940283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzyński, M.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z. Stem cells: Past, present, and future. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Laorden, E.H.; Rodilla, B.L.; Arroyo-Hernández, M.; Iglesias, M. Advances in human amniotic placenta membrane-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hAMSCs) for regenerative medicine: Enhancing therapeutic potential with biomaterials and scaffolds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2025, 13, 1590393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wen, J.; Jiang, F.; Xia, Y. Human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells promote endogenous bone regeneration. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 543623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.W.; Koo, H.C.; Hwang, S.Y.; Kang, S.K.; Ra, J.C.; Lee, M.H.; Park, Y.H. Immunomodulatory effects of human amniotic membrane-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Vet. Sci. 2012, 13, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muntiu, A.; Papait, A.; Vincenzoni, F.; Vitali, A.; Lattanzi, W.; Romele, P.; Cargnoni, A.; Silini, A.; Parolini, O.; Desiderio, C. Disclosing the molecular profile of the human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cell secretome by filter-aided sample preparation proteomic characterization. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2023, 14, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, D.; Cheng, Y.; Lv, H.; Geng, A.; Zheng, J.; Dang, L.; Li, P. Proteomic profiling of the human amniotic stem cell-highly abundant secreted proteins. PeerJ 2025, 13, e19449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chouaib, B.; Haack-Sørensen, M.; Chaubron, F.; Cuisinier, F.; Collart-Dutilleul, P.Y. Towards the standardization of mesenchymal stem cell secretome-derived product manufacturing for tissue regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuto, S.; Lo Iacono, M.; Baiamonte, E.; Lo Re, R.; Maggio, A.; Cavalieri, V. An optimized procedure for preparation of conditioned medium from Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from umbilical cord. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023, 10, 1273814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asgharnezhad, G.; Mohamadi, S.; Mohseni, M.M.; Mousvi-Niri, N.; Naseroleslami, M. Conditioned Medium from Human Amniotic Membrane-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulates Inflammatory and Myofibrotic Factors in Vivo. J. Tehran Heart Cent. 2024, 19, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danieli, P.; Malpasso, G.; Ciuffreda, M.C.; Cervio, E.; Calvillo, L.; Copes, F.; Pisano, F.; Mura, M.; Kleijn, L.; de Boer, R.A.; et al. Conditioned medium from human amniotic mesenchymal stromal cells limits infarct size and enhances angiogenesis. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2015, 4, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noh, C.H.; Park, S.; Seong, H.R.; Lee, A.Y.; Tsolmon, K.E.; Geum, D.; Hong, S.C.; Kim, T.M.; Choi, E.K.; Kim, Y.B. An exosome-rich conditioned medium from human amniotic membrane stem cells facilitates wound healing via increased reepithelization, collagen synthesis, and angiogenesis. Cells 2023, 12, 2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Li, T.; Jin, J.; Xie, C.; Zhu, J. Human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium inhibited LPS-induced cell injury and inflammation by modulating CD14/TLR4-mediated signaling pathway in monocytes. Mol. Immunol. 2023, 158, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putri, W.E.; Widyaswari, M.S.; Prakoeswa, C.R.S.; Muhammad, D.S.; Romadhani, D.F.; Nisaussholihah, N. The effect of human adipose stem cell-conditioned medium (hASC-CM) in photoaged skin. J. Stem Cells Regen. Med. 2024, 20, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.J.; Jung, M.S.; Hur, Y.K.; Jung, A.H. A study on clinical effectiveness of cosmetics containing human stem cell conditioned media. Biomed Dermatol. 2020, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazarinia, D.; Aboutaleb, N.; Gholamzadeh, R.; Nasseri Maleki, S.; Mokhtari, B.; Nikougoftar, M. Conditioned medium obtained from human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells attenuates focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats by targeting mTOR pathway. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2019, 102, 101707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miceli, V.; Bertani, A.; Chinnici, C.M.; Bulati, M.; Pampalone, M.; Amico, G.; Carcione, C.; Schmelzer, E.; Gerlach, J.C.; Conaldi, P.G. Conditioned medium from human amnion-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells attenuating the effects of cold ischemia-reperfusion injury in an in vitro model using human alveolar epithelial cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essendoubi, M.; Gobinet, C.; Reynaud, R.; Angiboust, J.F.; Manfait, M.; Piot, O. Human skin penetration of hyaluronic acid of different molecular weights as probed by Raman spectroscopy. Ski. Res. Technol. 2016, 22, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Draelos, Z.D.; Diaz, I.; Namkoong, J.; Wu, J.; Boyd, T. Efficacy evaluation of a topical hyaluronic acid serum in facial photoaging. Dermatol. Ther. 2021, 11, 1385–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jegasothy, S.M.; Zabolotniaia, V.; Bielfeldt, S. Efficacy of a new topical nano-hyaluronic acid in humans. J. Clin. Aesthetic Dermatol. 2014, 7, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
- Bravo, B.; Correia, P.; Gonçalves Junior, J.E.; Sant’Anna, B.; Kerob, D. Benefits of topical hyaluronic acid for skin quality and signs of skin aging: From literature review to clinical evidence. Dermatol. Ther. 2022, 35, e15903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukhari, S.N.A.; Roswandi, N.L.; Waqas, M.; Habib, H.; Hussain, F.; Khan, S.; Sohail, M.; Ramli, N.A.; Thu, H.E.; Hussain, Z. Hyaluronic acid, a promising skin rejuvenating biomedicine: A review of recent updates and pre-clinical and clinical investigations on cosmetic and nutricosmetic effects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 120, 1682–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schild, J.; Kalvodová, A.; Zbytovská, J.; Farwick, M.; Pyko, C. The role of ceramides in skin barrier function and the importance of their correct formulation for skincare applications. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2024, 46, 526–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mijaljica, D.; Townley, J.P.; Hondros, A.; Hewson, C.; Harrison, I.P.; Spada, F. Considering phytosphingosine-based ceramide formulations for atopic skin care. Dermato 2024, 4, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominici, M.; le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.C.; Krause, D.S.; Deans, R.J.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.J.; Horwitz, E.M. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Madorran, E.; Ambrož, M.; Knez, J.; Sobočan, M. An overview of the current state of cell viability assessment methods using OECD classification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Labarca, C.; Paigen, K. A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal. Biochem. 1980, 102, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bohari, S.P.; Grover, L.M.; Hukins, D.W.L. Pulsed low-intensity ultrasound increases proliferation and extracellular matrix production by human dermal fibroblasts in three-dimensional culture. J. Tissue Eng. 2015, 6, 2041731415615777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Masson-Meyers, D.S.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Caetano, G.F.; Guimarães, F.R.; Leite, M.N.; Leite, S.N.; Frade, M.A.C. Experimental models and methods for cutaneous wound healing assessment. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2020, 101, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michaels, J.; Churgin, S.S.; Blechman, K.M.; Greives, M.R.; Aarabi, S.; Galiano, R.D.; Gurtner, G.C. db/db mice exhibit severe wound-healing impairments compared with other murine diabetic strains in a silicone-splinted excisional wound model. Wound Repair Regen. 2007, 15, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galiano, R.D.; Michaels, J.; Dobryansky, M.; Levine, J.P.; Gurtner, G.C. Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2004, 12, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 16212; Cosmetics—Microbiology—Enumeration of yeast and mold. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- ISO 18811; Cosmetics—Guidance on the Stability Testing of Cosmetic Products. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
- Zhou, Y.; Li, H.; Liang, X.; Du, H.; Suo, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, W.; Duan, R.; Huang, X.; Li, Q. The CCN1 (CYR61) protein promotes skin growth by enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition during skin expansion. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 1460–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cárdenas-León, C.G.; Mäemets-Allas, K.; Klaas, M.; Lagus, H.; Kankuri, E.; Jaks, V. Matricellular proteins in cutaneous wound healing. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 1073320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Z.; Fan, T.; Xiao, C.; Tian, H.; Zheng, Y.; Li, C.; He, J. TGF-β signaling in health, disease, and therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pakyari, M.; Farrokhi, A.; Maharlooei, M.K.; Ghahary, A. Critical role of transforming growth factor beta in different phases of wound healing. Adv. Wound Care 2013, 2, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Cañada, C.; Bernabé-García, Á.; Liarte, S.; Rodríguez-Valiente, M.; Nicolás, F.J. Chronic wound healing by amniotic membrane: TGF-β and EGF signaling modulation in re-epithelialization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 689328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweetwyne, M.T.; Murphy-Ullrich, J.E. Thrombospondin1 in tissue repair and fibrosis: TGF-β-dependent and independent mechanisms. Matrix Biol. 2012, 31, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murphy-Ullrich, J.E.; Suto, M.J. Thrombospondin-1 regulation of latent TGF-β activation: A therapeutic target for fibrotic disease. Matrix Biol. 2018, 68–69, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandhwal, M.; Behl, T.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Arora, S.; Bhatia, S.; Al-Harrasi, A.; Sachdeva, M.; Bungau, S. Role of matrix metalloproteinase in wound healing. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2022, 14, 4391–4405. [Google Scholar]
- Bajbouj, K.; Ramakrishnan, R.K.; Hamid, Q. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in angiogenesis and its implications in asthma. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 6645072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patten, J.; Wang, K. Fibronectin in development and wound healing. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 170, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gimeno-Lluch, I.; Benito-Jardón, M.; Guerrero-Barberà, G.; Burday, N.; Costell, M. The role of the fibronectin synergy site for skin wound healing. Cells 2022, 11, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, P.; Yang, C.; Zhang, S.; Ke, Z.X.; Chen, D.X.; Li, Y.Q.; Li, Q. The imbalance of MMP-2/TIMP-2 and MMP-9/TIMP-1 contributes to collagen deposition disorder in diabetic non-injured skin. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 734485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, N.; Hu, M.; Khalil, R.A. Biochemical and biological attributes of matrix metalloproteinases. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2017, 147, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naomi, R.; Ridzuan, P.M.; Bahari, H. Current insights into collagen type I. Polymers 2021, 13, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, C.K.; Friday, A.; Khanna, S.; Roy, S. Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care. Adv. Wound Care 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, G.; Curriden, S.A.; Hu, G.; Czekay, R.P.; Loskutoff, D.J. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 regulates cell adhesion by binding to the somatomedin B domain of vitronectin. J. Cell. Physiol. 2001, 189, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Providence, K.M.; Higgins, S.P.; Mullen, A.; Battista, A.; Samarakoon, R.; Higgins, C.E.; Wilkins-Port, C.E.; Higgins, P.J. SERPINE1 (PAI-1) is deposited into keratinocyte migration trails and required for optimal monolayer wound repair. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2008, 300, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iorio, V.; Troughton, L.D.; Hamill, K.J. Laminins: Roles and utility in wound repair. Adv. Wound Care 2015, 4, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsuruta, D.; Hashimoto, T.; Hamill, K.J.; Jones, J.C.R. Hemidesmosomes and focal contact proteins: Functions and cross-talk in keratinocytes, bullous diseases and wound healing. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2011, 62, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- von Mering, C.; Jensen, L.J.; Snel, B.; Hooper, S.D.; Krupp, M.; Foglierini, M.; Jouffre, N.; Huynen, M.A.; Bork, P. STRING: Known and predicted protein–protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D433–D437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szklarczyk, D.; Kirsch, R.; Koutrouli, M.; Nastou, K.; Mehryary, F.; Hachilif, R.; Gable, A.L.; Fang, T.; Doncheva, N.T.; Pyysalo, S.; et al. The STRING database in 2023: Protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D638–D646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, C.S.; Xin, Z.C.; Dai, J.; Lue, T.F. Commonly used mesenchymal stem cell markers and tracking labels: Limitations and challenges. Histol. Histopathol. 2013, 28, 1109–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belinskaia, D.A.; Voronina, P.A.; Goncharov, N.V. Integrative role of albumin: Evolutionary, biochemical and pathophysiological aspects. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 2021, 57, 1419–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weichhart, T. Transferrin: The iron transporter takes control. Blood 2024, 144, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voegele, A.F.; Jerković, L.; Wellenzohn, B.; Eller, P.; Kronenberg, F.; Liedl, K.R.; Dieplinger, H. Characterization of the vitamin E-binding properties of human plasma afamin. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 14532–14538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noh, J.Y.; Shin, J.U.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, B.M.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, S.; Kim, T.G.; Shin, K.O.; Park, K.; et al. ZAG regulates the skin barrier and immunity in atopic dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1648–1657.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.Q.; Hayes, M.T.; Kempf, M.; Fraser, J.F.; Liu, P.Y.; Cuttle, L.; Friend, L.R.R.; Rothnagel, J.A.; Saunders, N.A.; Kimble, R.M. Fetuin-A: A major fetal serum protein that promotes “wound closure” and scarless healing. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fournier, T.; Medjoubi-N, N.; Porquet, D. Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1482, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, A.; McCulloh, R.J. Hemopexin and haptoglobin: Allies against heme toxicity from hemoglobin not contenders. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, N.U.; Reddy, S.T. Role of hemoglobin/heme scavenger protein hemopexin in atherosclerosis and inflammatory diseases. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2015, 26, 384–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Takeo, M.; Lee, W.; Ito, M. Wound healing and skin regeneration. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a023267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Cui, J.; Cang, Z.; Pei, J.; Zhang, X.; Song, B.; Fan, X.; Ma, X.; Li, Y. Hair follicle stem cells promote epidermal regeneration under expanded condition. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1306011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.; Bae, S. Whitening and moisturizing enhancing effects of three-dimensional human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned medium-containing cream. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 3352–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verrecchia, F.; Mauviel, A. Transforming growth factor-β signaling through the Smad pathway: Role in extracellular matrix gene expression and regulation. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2002, 118, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liarte, S.; Bernabé-García, Á.; Nicolás, F.J. Role of TGF-β in skin chronic wounds: A keratinocyte perspective. Cells 2020, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raghow, R.; Postlethwaite, A.E.; Keski-Oja, J.; Moses, H.L.; Kang, A.H. Transforming growth factor β increases steady state levels of type I procollagen and fibronectin messenger RNAs posttranscriptionally in cultured human dermal fibroblasts. J. Clin. Investig. 1987, 79, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Sample | Run | % Live Cells | Sample | Run | % Live Cells |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 1 | 94.86 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 1 | 95.55 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 2 | 95.05 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 2 | 96.34 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 3 | 94.55 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 3 | 95.41 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 4 | 95.52 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 4 | 96.49 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 5 | 94.90 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 5 | 96.10 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 6 | 95.57 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 6 | 96.97 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 7 | 95.95 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 7 | 96.46 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 8 | 95.75 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 8 | 96.71 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 9 | 95.35 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 9 | 96.69 |
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | Average | 95.28 | hAMSC (614.1.1C) | Average | 96.30 |
| SD | 0.46 | SD | 0.53 | ||
| % CV | 0.49 | % CV | 0.55 |
| Cell Group | CD73+ | CD105+ | CD90+ | CD31+ | CD45+ | CD34+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BM-MSC, PSG 3 | 96.20% | 98.40% | 99.20% | 0.50% | 0.10% | 43.70% |
| hAMSC (614.1.1C) | 95.90% | 96.60% | 99.60% | 0.60% | 0.10% | 23.10% |
| Concentration % | Number of Wells | Mean DNA ng | SD DNA ng | SEM DNA ng |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12 | 22.66 | 10.87 | 3.14 |
| 1 | 11 | 27.61 | 13.26 | 4.00 |
| 2 | 12 | 31.61 | 10.16 | 2.93 |
| 5 | 12 | 50.13 | 17.32 | 5.00 |
| 10 | 12 | 55.32 | 13.46 | 3.89 |
| 20 | 12 | 121.73 | 29.66 | 8.56 |
| Comparison | Estimate ng DNA Difference | SE ng | df | t Value | Adjusted p-Value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1% vs. 0% | 4.07 | 5.27 | 64 | 0.77 | 0.8557 | ns |
| 2% vs. 0% | 6.79 | 5.15 | 64 | 1.32 | 0.5398 | ns |
| 5% vs. 0% | 26.55 | 5.15 | 64 | 5.15 | <0.0001 | *** |
| 10% vs. 0% | 33.01 | 5.15 | 64 | 6.41 | <0.0001 | *** |
| 20% vs. 0% | 91.15 | 5.15 | 64 | 17.69 | <0.0001 | *** |
| Age | Average % Increase Relative to Control | SEM |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Month | 422% | 56% |
| 14 Month | 342% | 14% |
| 16 Month | 451% | 73% |
| 17 Month | 418% | 35% |
| 18 Month | 526% | 20% |
| 29 Month | 278% | 20% |
| Comparison | Estimate ng DNA Difference | SE | df | t Value | Adjusted p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4C vs. 15C | 7.11 | 22 | 210 | 0.32 | 0.9999 |
| 4C vs. 22C | −23.95 | 22 | 210 | −1.09 | 0.9311 |
| 4C vs. 30C | 30.51 | 22 | 210 | 1.39 | 0.8087 |
| 4C vs. 40C | −23.82 | 22 | 210 | −1.08 | 0.9328 |
| 4C vs. 50C | −2.08 | 22 | 210 | −0.1 | 1 |
| 15C vs. 22C | −31.06 | 22 | 210 | −1.41 | 0.7955 |
| 15C vs. 30C | 23.4 | 22 | 210 | 1.06 | 0.9381 |
| 15C vs. 40C | −30.93 | 22 | 210 | −1.41 | 0.7986 |
| 15C vs. 50C | −9.2 | 22 | 210 | −0.42 | 0.9996 |
| 22C vs. 30C | 54.46 | 22 | 210 | 2.47 | 0.1742 |
| 22C vs. 40C | 0.13 | 22 | 210 | 0.01 | 1 |
| 22C vs. 50C | 21.86 | 22 | 210 | 0.99 | 0.955 |
| 30C vs. 40C | −54.33 | 22 | 210 | −2.47 | 0.1764 |
| 30C vs. 50C | −32.6 | 22 | 210 | −1.48 | 0.756 |
| 40C vs. 50C | 21.74 | 22 | 210 | 0.99 | 0.9563 |
| Group | Sample ID | Lot | # Proteins | # Peptides | # Peptide Ion Variants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prime | Prime-1 | Prime XV Lot 9114910902 | 684 | 3277 | 4229 |
| Amb | Amb-1 | Ambient-1050092221010100264 | 1049 | 5513 | 6680 |
| Amb | Amb-6 | Ambient-1046021422010101067 | 1052 | 5485 | 6684 |
| Prime | Prime-2 | Prime XV Lot 9114910902 | 768 | 3984 | 5020 |
| Amb | Amb-3 | Ambient-1050092221010200142 | 1034 | 5468 | 6659 |
| Amb | Amb-4 | Ambient-10460513210103895 | 1330 | 8089 | 9396 |
| Prime | Prime-3 | Prime XV Lot 9114910902 | 682 | 3504 | 4406 |
| Amb | Amb-2 | Ambient-1050092321010100497 | 1279 | 7066 | 8380 |
| Amb | Amb-5 | Ambient-1046012422010100233 | 944 | 5208 | 6292 |
| AxoAmbient Average | 1114.666 | 6138.166 | 7348.5 | ||
| Prime Average | 711.3333 | 3588.333 | 4551.666667 |
| Protein | Impact on Dermal/Integumentary System | Source | log2 Ratio | Fold Increase | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCN1 | Supports keratinocyte proliferation and migration; plays a role in angiogenesis; influences inflammatory signaling | [37,38] | 11.25 | 2433 | 0.01 |
| TGF-β1 | Key regulator of wound repair phases; drives fibroblast proliferation; implicated in wound re-epithelialization and angiogenesis | [39,40,41] | 2.12 | 4.35 | 0.036 |
| THBS1 | Matricellular regulator that activates latent TFG-β; stimulates cell migration, collagen expression, and matrix deposition | [42,43] | 7.05 | 132 | 0.03 |
| MMP2 | ECM remodeling enzyme involved in cell migration, angiogenesis and matrix turnover; plays a critical role in each phase of wound healing | [44,45] | 4.59 | 24.12 | 0.02 |
| FN1 | Major component in provisional wound matrix; FN matrices form the initial ECM structure in wounds, eventually replaced by collagen | [46,47] | 6.31 | 79.5 | ~0 |
| TIMP1 | Balance MMP activity; supports orderly ECM remodeling; prevents excessive MMP activity | [48,49] | 2.59 | 6.03 | 0.03 |
| TIMP2 | 1.69 | 3.22 | 0.03 | ||
| COL1A1 | Type 1 collagen chains; major structural component of the dermis; crucial for tensile strength during repair and scar maturation | [50,51] | 4.31 | 19.9 | 0.03 |
| COL1A2 | 5.66 | 50.7 | 0.05 | ||
| SERPINE1 | Initiates activation of “wound repair” transcriptional program; influences keratinocyte migration and adhesion; regulates pericellular remodeling | [52,53] | 6.23 | 75.3 | ~0 |
| LAMB1 | Key basement membrane ECM components; regulators of cell proliferation, adhesion, and migration; key for tissue homeostasis | [54,55] | 1.86 | 3.62 | 0.2 |
| LAMC1 | 1.35 | 2.56 | ~0 |
| Welch’s t-Test—Follicular Count | Control Group | hSCCM | Welch’s t-Test—Follicular Count/Area | Control Group | hSCCM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.333333333 | 22 | Mean | 9.72 × 10−8 | 9.56 × 10−6 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.577 | 20.314 | Standard Deviation | 1.68 × 10−7 | 8.61 × 10−6 |
| Observations | 3 | 4 | Observations | 3 | 4 |
| T-Statistic | −2.132007 | T-Statistic | −2.196523 | ||
| One-Tailed p-Value | 0.06129179 | One-Tailed p-Value | 0.05772792 |
| Formulation ID | Production Date | Ambient Concentration | Preservative | Preservative Concentration | Growth Indication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COS-004 | 17 May 2023 | 10% | Liquid Germall Plus | 0.20% | No Growth |
| COS-005 | 21 December 2023 | 10% | Benzyl Alcohol–DHA | 0.20% | No Growth |
| COS-006 | 6 February 2024 | 10% | Germall Plus | 0.20% | No Growth |
| COS-007 | 16 February 2024 | 10% | None | No Growth | |
| COS-008 | 16 February 2024 | 10% | None, Aloe-containing formulation | No Growth |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cajthaml, D.; Ingraldi, A.; Tabor, A.J. Human Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media as a Regenerative Cosmetic Ingredient: A Preclinical Characterization and Exploratory Topical Evaluation. Cosmetics 2026, 13, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics13020091
Cajthaml D, Ingraldi A, Tabor AJ. Human Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media as a Regenerative Cosmetic Ingredient: A Preclinical Characterization and Exploratory Topical Evaluation. Cosmetics. 2026; 13(2):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics13020091
Chicago/Turabian StyleCajthaml, David, Alison Ingraldi, and Aaron J. Tabor. 2026. "Human Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media as a Regenerative Cosmetic Ingredient: A Preclinical Characterization and Exploratory Topical Evaluation" Cosmetics 13, no. 2: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics13020091
APA StyleCajthaml, D., Ingraldi, A., & Tabor, A. J. (2026). Human Stem Cell-Derived Conditioned Media as a Regenerative Cosmetic Ingredient: A Preclinical Characterization and Exploratory Topical Evaluation. Cosmetics, 13(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics13020091

