Hydrogel Microcapsules for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles
1
Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
2
Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fibers 2026, 14(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14020022
Submission received: 17 January 2026
/
Revised: 1 February 2026
/
Accepted: 5 February 2026
/
Published: 9 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Review Papers of Fibers)
Highlights
What are the main findings?
- Our review analyzes design, synthesis, and textile integration of stimuli-responsive hydrogels and microcapsules with a special emphasis on how moisture, pH, temperature, light, and chemical triggers are leveraged to produce adaptive, multifunctional textile systems at the intersection of these technologies.
What are the implications of the main findings?
- Our findings highlight key opportunities for advancing smart textiles in healthcare, comfort regulation, controlled release, and filtration applications, with particular focus on underutilized properties of hydrogel and microcapsule systems, in the context of key challenges in durability, scalability, and sustainability.
Abstract
Stimuli-responsive textiles are a rapidly evolving class of functional fiber-based materials that sense and adapt to environmental triggers. Within these enabling technologies, hydrogels and microcapsules are very illustrative, as they offer complementary mechanisms for moisture management, controlled release, and adaptive performance. Hydrogels provide soft, water-rich polymer networks with modifiable swelling, permeability, and mechanics, while microcapsules offer protection and targeted delivery of active agents through engineered shell structures. When integrated into fibrous networks, they impart dynamic detection responses for moisture, temperature, pH, mechanical stress, light, and chemical or biological agents. This review critically examines progress in design, synthesis, and textile integration of hydrogel- and microcapsule-based systems, with emphasis on materials that exhibit stimuli-responsive behavior rather than passive or extended-release functionality. Strategies for incorporating bulk hydrogels, micro- and nanogels, and stimuli-responsive microcapsules into fibers, yarns, and fabrics are discussed in addition to applications such as smart apparel, medical and hygienic textiles, controlled drug delivery, antimicrobial fabrics, and adaptive filtration media. Existing challenges for durability, washability, response kinetics, scalability, and sustainability are highlighted, while future research directions are proposed to advance the development of robust and intelligent textile systems at the nexus of soft matter science and fiber engineering.
1. Introduction
Hydrogels and microcapsules represent two especially robust “soft” (U~kT) platforms that are increasingly integrated into fiber-based materials for advanced functionality, responsiveness, biocompatibility, sustainability, and biodegradability. Hydrogels are three-dimensional polymer motifs that can absorb and retain significant amounts of water (superabsorbent hydrogels can even absorb 100s–1000× their mass), which endows them with the superior capacity for applications requiring moisture control, potential biocompatibility (due to “soft” character), and stimuli responsiveness (can be triggered easily by ionicity, pH, pressure, etc.). A list of polymers used for hydrogels, both synthetic and natural, is included in Table 1. When incorporated into fibrous systems, they may provide tailored swelling behavior, controlled drug release, and even self-healing. Such versatility is further enhanced by the ability to tune mechanical strength, degradation rate, and interaction with biological tissues, which can be particularly valuable in biomedical fabrics and wound healing.
Microcapsules offer a complementary strategy by encapsulating active agents within polymeric shells, which have the potential to be embedded into or onto fibers. These capsules, similar to hydrogels, enable controlled release mechanisms triggered by subtle environmental changes, mechanical stress, or chemical stimuli. A summary of microcapsule synthesis techniques is included in Table 2. In fiber-based systems, microcapsules have been used to deliver fragrances, antimicrobials, and therapeutics, while protecting sensitive guest molecules from degradation. Techniques such as coaxial electrospinning and layer-by-layer assembly have allowed precise control over size, shell thickness, and permeability, making them ideal candidates for advanced functionality in smart textiles and filtration media.
Many advanced materials today have been labeled with the moniker of “smart”, but its meaning requires careful dissection to ensure its meaningfulness. In the context of textiles, “smart” refers to an ability to “sense” environmental parameters and generate a logical response; for example, a textile embedded with temperature-sensitive hydrogel fibers may be able to detect higher-than-normal skin temperature and respond by releasing a cooling agent or changing porosity to increase breathability. Similarly, fabrics integrated with microcapsules containing antimicrobial agents might rupture upon sensing increased acidity resulting from a bacterial load for targeted protection. These examples clearly demonstrate how “smart” is a term that encompasses an activity in health monitoring, environmental adaptation, and therapeutic delivery beyond passive wearables.
Smart textiles are therefore engineered to sense, react, and adapt to external stimuli. This responsiveness is achieved through integration of hydrogels, microcapsules, conductive polymers, or shape-memory alloys, resulting in a new class of materials capable of dynamic behavior such as self-cleaning, drug release, or real-time feedback. In biomedical applications, smart textiles are developed for monitoring the healing progress of wounds, tracking vital signs, and releasing medication in response to inflammation. In sports and fitness, they enable real-time performance tracking and thermal regulation. Environmental uses include filtration fabrics that adjust porosity.
Smart textiles, nevertheless, face challenges in durability, washability, power management, and comfort. Research is continually attempting to develop energy-efficient sensing mechanisms, biodegradable responsivity, and manufacturing scalability. In general, they are poised to redefine the interface between materials and human experience, transforming garments into intelligent systems for optimized health.
Hydrogels, though inherently stimuli-responsive due to their dynamic behavior, are not always leveraged for their stimuli-responsive properties. For example, hydrogels are commonly utilized in extended-release systems in which the hydrogel experiences slow dissolution or mechanical rupture, releasing loaded material without taking advantage of the intelligent behavior of the hydrogel. Within this latter context, many hydrogel systems lacking environmental sensing and response behavior in their design are inaccurately labeled as “smart”. However, hydrogels can be utilized for tailored responsive release of loaded materials in response to many different stimuli, as explored in this review. Therefore, highly intelligent systems are possible using hydrogel materials.
In a similar manner, microcapsules are not necessarily stimuli-responsive or “smart”. A list of microcapsule shell materials is provided in Table 3, and it may be noted that many of these materials are not responsive. Microencapsulation is often used for the protection of active agents using non-permeable shells that are designed not to rupture. Additionally, microencapsulation is commonly used for extended release by the gradual degradation of the microcapsule shells, not necessarily in response to specific stimuli. Often, the driving mechanism of active compound release from microcapsules is mechanical rupture caused by friction or pressure encountered during the product lifetime. While mechanical force could be considered an environmental stimulus, it is non-specific, often resulting in the premature release of encapsulated ingredients. For more tailored release activity, microcapsules must be designed to respond to specific environmental stimuli that the microcapsules will not be exposed to until active ingredient release is desired. Herein lies the importance of stimuli-responsive microcapsules.
Figure 1 depicts the relationships between the areas of microcapsules, hydrogels, textiles, and stimuli-responsive behavior. Evidently, there are many areas of overlap, and these fields of research are intertwined. These research areas each offer great potential and cutting-edge research. However, much research falls in the outer lobes of the diagram, while very few works fall into the very inner category of stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules for textiles. This review aims to provide an overview of the broad research areas, delve into the areas of overlap, and eventually come to a crux at the area of research where all areas intersect. At its core, as explored in this review, resides much potential for innovation.
2. Current Research
2.1. Hydrogels
2.1.1. Hydrogel Theory
Hydrogels are three-dimensional networks of crosslinked hydrophilic polymeric chains that swell in water to a defined water/mass equilibrium, depending on the strength of the interaction [1]. Indeed, they have been known to swell up to thousands of times their dry weight [2]. When these hydrogels are dehydrated to a collapsed state, they may be referred to as “xerogels”, which provide some unique functionality that we will discuss further in our review [3].
Long-term integrity may be encouraged in hydrogels with crosslinking network junctions, which may be observed during polymerization, as is the case with interpenetrating polymeric networks (IPNs), or post-polymerization, as in the gelation process of polyelectrolytes with multivalent ions. Hydrogels can be categorized by various crosslink types, which can be broadly grouped into chemical and physical categories as shown in Figure 2.
Chemical Gels
Hydrogels crosslinked by chemical, i.e., covalent, bonds are referred to as “chemical gels”. The covalent bonding in chemical gels constitutes strong network interactions that yield strong gels, which generally exhibit superior mechanical properties and are more resistant to degradation than physical gels [4]. The synthesis of chemical gels involves modification of the polymer chemical structure and usually utilizes toxic agents that must be washed from the material to remove residue.
The covalent crosslinks may be non-dynamic, irreversible bonds formed by addition, condensation, free radical, anionic, or cationic polymerization, or via electromagnetic radiation [5]. This can involve a variety of reaction types, including, but not limited to, Michael addition, amidation (as shown in Figure 3), and click chemistry [6]. Traditional chemical gels are crosslinked with permanent covalent bonds, and as such, chemical gels are often referred to as “irreversible gels”. However, chemical gels may also be crosslinked by dynamic, reversible covalent bonds such as those formed through Diels–Alder, Schiff base, disulfide, boronic ester, and other reactions [6]. This constitutes a subcategory of chemical gels not correctly described as “irreversible gels” due to their dynamic covalent crosslinks. These gels are useful for self-healing applications due to their adaptable nature [7].
Chemical gels are generally more heterogeneous than physical gels due to several factors. The first source of heterogeneity in chemical gels is the formation of clusters of high crosslinking density during gelation, which experience relatively low degrees of swelling. Another source of inconsistent composition is voids or macropores, filled with water, within the network structure, which result from phase separation during gelation. Thirdly, defects in the hydrogel structure are caused by polymeric free chain ends and chain loops [2].
Physical Gels
“Physical gels” are hydrogels crosslinked by additive physical interactions, including ionic bonds, intermolecular forces, and other interactions. The interactions in physical gels are thermally reversible and are strongly dependent on environmental conditions, making these materials more suitable for applications such as self-healing, where the crosslinks must rearrange over a short time scale [7]. These gels generally exhibit poorer mechanical properties than chemical gels and are less resistant to degradation due to weaker network interactions constituted by lower energy bonds [4]. The synthesis of physical gels does not involve chemical structure alteration and is generally a less toxic process than the synthesis of chemical gels.
Hydrogels with ionic crosslinks are held together by electrostatic attraction between charged species and can be referred to as “ionomers”. Common types of ionic crosslinking in hydrogels are ion coordination, complex coacervation, and block copolymer aggregation. Ion coordination occurs between charged polymers and oppositely charged metal ions or small molecules such as polyoxoanions, low-molecular-weight organic acids, or multicarboxylates [8]. Ionotropic gels, such as alginate crosslinked by calcium ions, are examples of hydrogels crosslinked by metal ion coordination. Ionotropic gels are composed of a polyelectrolyte (a polymer containing repeating ionic moieties) mixed with an oppositely charged multivalent ion [2]. Complex coacervates, also known as polyion complexes or polyelectrolyte complexes, are crosslinked by complex coacervation. These gels are mixtures of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes that exhibit liquid–liquid phase separation and coalesce into a polymer-rich phase in water [9]. The crosslinking in ionotropic gels and complex coacervates is depicted in Figure 4. Block copolymer aggregation occurs in triblock or multiblock gels, where ionic blocks aggregate into micelle-like domains with bridges or interlocking loops that serve as crosslinks in the gel network [10].
Hydrogels can also be crosslinked by intermolecular forces such as hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, or hydrophobic interactions between polymer chains. Other possible physical interactions include crystalline domain association, stereo-complexation, guest–host inclusion complexation, π-π stacking, and protein interactions [11,12]. Crystalline domain association occurs due to strong cooperative intermolecular forces within crystalline domains that serve as junctions, as observed in freeze–thawed PVA hydrogels [13]. Stereo-complexation involves stereoselective interactions between sterically complementary stereoregular polymers, such as two opposite enantiomeric polymers or a pair of isotactic and syndiotactic polymers [14]. Guest–host inclusion complexation occurs when a guest molecule binds to the internal cavity of a macrocyclic host, and these interactions serve as physical crosslinks, as observed in cyclodextrin-PEG inclusion complex gels [12,15]. In π-π stacking, structures containing aromatic groups, such as graphene oxide sheets, self-assemble to promote interactions between overlapping π clouds [16]. Protein interactions encompass a wide range of associative effects that can occur between proteins in hydrogels synthesized with artificial proteins. Secondary structures can experience ordered association between β-sheets or α-helices, or collapse based on environmental conditions, resulting in the aggregation of disordered proteins into soft networks [17,18]. Self-interacting domains such as coiled-coil motifs or leucine zippers, as well as specific binding sites, can act as junctions in protein hydrogels [12,19,20].
Physical gels are generally more homogenous than chemical gels, but heterogeneity can result from domains of chain entanglements or strong ionic/intermolecular associations, hydrophilic and hydrophobic regions, or the presence of free chain ends and chain loops that also cause defects in chemical gels [2,4].
Hydrogel Composition
Hydrogels may be homopolymeric, copolymeric, physical blends, or IPNs (crosslinked polymeric networks formed in the presence of another crosslinked polymeric network) [1]. The morphology of hydrogel networks can range from amorphous to semicrystalline, supramolecular, and colloidally aggregated. The structure of hydrogels depends on many factors, including monomers, solvents, and the synthesis method [1]. Therefore, hydrogels are a broad class of materials that can exhibit a variety of crosslinking types, compositions, structures, and morphologies, resulting in diverse, tailorable behavior and a breadth of potential applications.
Hydrogels are usually synthesized with a hydrophilic monomer reacted via bulk, solution, or inverse dispersion with some kind of initiator and crosslinking agent [21]. Many different monomers have been used to create hydrogels; a summary of common hydrogel monomers is shown in Table 1. It is possible to incorporate other monomers, including hydrophobic monomers if copolymerized with hydrophilic ones.
Table 1.
Polymers used for hydrogels, including synthetic and natural.
| Synthetic | Natural | |
|---|---|---|
| Anionic | Poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) Poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) | Alginate Hyaluronan Pectin Carrageenan Albumin Carboxymethyl cellulose |
| Cationic | Poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) Poly(2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDEAEMA) Poly(N,N-dimethylallylamine) (PDMAAm) | Chitosan Poly(lysine) |
| Neutral | Poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) Poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) Poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (PHPMA) Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) Polyacrylamide (PAM) Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) | Agarose Dextran Pullulan Methylcellulose |
| Amphipathic | Pluronic F127 | Collagen Gelatin Fibrin |
The properties of hydrogels vary greatly, but in general, they can be described as soft, hydrated, superabsorbent, and viscoelastic materials that are insoluble in water. They may be neutral, cationic, anionic, or ampholytic, depending on the polymer used and the pH of the environment. They experience low interfacial tension with aqueous media and good diffusion, usually containing macropores greater than 50 nm in size [6,22]. Hydrogels are non-toxic, biocompatible, bioadhesive, and mucoadhesive, making them suitable for medical use.
Water in Hydrogels
The water present in hydrogels can be classified as bound water, free water, or semi-bound water. Bound water consists of primary bound water, which is attached via hydrogen bonding to polar moieties on the polymer chains, and secondary bound water, which interacts with the hydrophobic moieties on the polymer chains [23]. Primary bound water is the first interaction formed when hydrating a xerogel, followed by secondary bound water [2]. Bound water may only be removed with high temperature [23]. Free water fills the voids and macropores in the polymeric network, and the space in between polymer chains (water physically entrapped between hydrated polymer chains is often referred to as interstitial water) [2,23]. Free water is easily removable with mechanical force—for example, compression or centrifugation [23]. Semi-bound water exhibits intermediate characteristics of both free and bound water [23]. The water molecules in hydrogels rapidly interchange between bound and free states [2].
The swelling capacity of a hydrogel is dependent on the space available within the polymer network [21]. The forces responsible for the swelling behavior of hydrogels can be categorized into three driving forces: polymer–water interactions, osmotic forces, and electrostatic forces. Polymer–water interactions are attractive forces that occur between hydrophilic groups on the polymer chains and water molecules [21]. More hydrophilic polymers experience stronger polymer–water interactions and, therefore, form stronger bonds with water [21]. Osmotic forces are generated by the free counterions present in ionic hydrogels, which create an ion concentration differential between the hydrogel and the external environment [21]. This results in osmotic pressure that drives the hydrogel towards a state of infinite dilution [2]. Electrostatic forces are repulsive forces between ionic groups of polyelectrolytes, which cause an expansion in volume that results in the absorption of water [21]. These swelling forces sum to balance the elastic forces created by crosslinking, resulting in an equilibrium that explains the insolubility of hydrogels in water [21].
The swelling mechanism of hydrogels can be described as a two-step process involving diffusion of water followed by relaxation of the polymer chains. The rate of swelling is influenced by the rate of diffusion of water, which depends on solvent molecular weight, solution temperature, and hydrogel porosity [21]. In the relaxation step, amorphous regions of hydrogels undergo stress relaxation induced by osmotic swelling pressure. Water molecules form hydrogen bonds with the polymer chains, reducing the attractive forces between adjacent chains and thereby plasticizing the polymer network such that the polymer chains can slide past each other to accommodate swelling [24]. Limited relaxation can occur in highly crosslinked hydrogels due to limited chain movement, and therefore, relaxation becomes the rate-determining step for the swelling mechanism of these hydrogels [21].
Xerogels are dehydrated hydrogels that have collapsed into dense, porous networks upon ambient evaporative drying. The properties of xerogels, including moderate porosity, high surface area, tunability, biocompatibility, and mechanical stability, provide unique functionality [25]. For example, in biomedicine, their porosity can be leveraged for active ingredient loading for drug delivery and is optimal for cell proliferation in tissue engineering scaffolds [26]. The properties of xerogels have also made them materials of interest for catalysts, adsorbents, and sensors [27].
History and Applications
Early research on crosslinked polymeric networks, focused on reaction kinetics and mechanical property analysis, began in the mid-1930s in Germany, and work on “natural hydrocolloids” began in the late-1930s [1]. The first commercial application of hydrogels was hard contact lenses made with poly(methyl methacrylate) in the late 1930s [28]. The pioneer of hydrogel theory was Paul Flory (Nobel Prize 1974), who focused on thermodynamic and statistical mechanical analysis [29]. For example, Flory–Rehner theory describes hydrogel equilibrium swelling behavior by ascribing two contributors to Gibbs free energy: a mixing term resulting from polymer–solvent interactions and an elastic term resulting from network chain stretching [30]. This theory has since been modified, for example, to include an ionic interaction term, but has served as the basis for the modern study of hydrogel swelling behavior along with other aspects of Flory’s work [31]. In 1960, Wichterle and Lim pioneered the study of crosslinked poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels, specifically for biomedical uses such as contact lenses [32]. The first application of hydrogels for wound dressings was crosslinked collagen–glycosaminoglycan seeded with dermal and epidermal cells as an extracellular matrix analog by Yannas et al. in 1989 [33].
Nowadays, hydrogels are popular materials used for many common applications, including surface coatings; hygiene products such as diapers and sanitary products; cosmetics; gelling agents in food; biosensors for biomedical, pharmaceutical, and environmental applications; water treatment; and soil amendment [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. They are still used for contact lenses and wound dressings [41,42]. They are also widely used for tissue engineering, including soft tissue fillers for breast reconstruction, artificial corneal substitutes, and composite living fibers [43,44,45]. Additionally, hydrogels are popular materials for advanced drug delivery, enhancing oral, transdermal, and in situ drug delivery technology [46,47,48].
2.1.2. Responsive Behavior of Hydrogels
Hydrogels exhibit responsive behavior that can be triggered by a wide range of stimuli, depending on the polymer used. Hydrogels may be responsive to one or more stimuli and therefore represent highly dynamic systems that can be tailored to respond to various environmental conditions. This adaptability can be leveraged for many different applications, including those requiring feedback-adaptive behavior or “on-off” switchability. A summary of stimuli that have been demonstrated to elicit a response in hydrogels or hydrogel composite materials is shown in Figure 5. In some cases, dual-responsive or multi-responsive hydrogels have also been developed to respond to two or more of these stimuli. For example, IPNs can display dual responsivity due to independent responses from each individual network.
Under ideal conditions, stimulus responses in hydrogels are reversible [28]. There are two mechanisms that are largely responsible for all stimulus responses in hydrogels: shrinkage or swelling, and a change in crosslinking density. These two mechanisms are shown in Figure 6. Shrinkage or swelling in hydrogels may be isotropic, i.e., a direct and uniform decrease or increase in volume, or anisotropic, which can result in shape morphing of the hydrogel (rolling, twisting, bending, folding, etc.). Anisotropic shrinking or swelling can be caused by layers or zones of different polymers with different sensitivities or thresholds for swelling [49]; for example, polymers with different swelling rates, or shape-memory polymers combined with non-shape-memory polymers. Anisotropic shrinking or swelling behavior can also result from gradients of crosslinking density, which influences the swelling rate [50]. The latter aforementioned mechanism of stimulus response—a change in crosslinking density—can be caused by reversible bond formation or breakage, or isomerization of chains or groups involved in crosslinking. Crosslinking density is proportional to mesh size, a measure of porosity in hydrogels, equal to the average linear distance between crosslinks [1].
Moisture
Moisture is the most obvious stimulus that causes a response in hydrogels. The swelling behavior of hydrogels is described in Section 2.1.1. In short, absorption of water swells the hydrogel network, and desorption of water shrinks the network. The moisture-responsivity of hydrogels causes a high susceptibility of hydrogel materials to respond to environmental humidity changes, which can be a challenge for material and product development [51]. However, many hydrogel materials are developed specifically for their moisture-responsive behavior, which can be desirable in many applications, including moisture-management materials, humidity sensors, soft actuators, and drug delivery [52,53,54,55].
pH
pH-responsive behavior is observed in ionic hydrogels as ionization of pendant groups creates a build-up of charge along polymer chains [1,56]. This generates electrostatic repulsion between the charged groups [57]. pH-responsive behavior can also occur in nonionic hydrogels containing hydrogen-bonded crosslinks, as ionization of hydrogen bond donor and/or acceptor groups causes dissociation of the crosslinks [58]. In both systems, electrostatic repulsive forces and osmotic pressure are generated that swell or shrink the hydrogel and absorb or expel water to reduce the osmotic pressure differential [1,56]. This phenomenon is depicted for both anionic and cationic hydrogels in Figure 7.
Temperature
Temperature-responsive behavior is observed in hydrogels made with thermoresponsive polymers. These hydrogels experience a shift in aqueous solubility of the polymer backbone in water, resulting in shrinking/swelling of the network [1]. In its hydrated coil state, the polymer backbone is hydrated by water molecules to increase its aqueous solubility. The hydration shells come at a high entropic cost since water molecules must coordinate with hydrophobic groups on the polymer backbone. As temperature increases, these hydrogen bonds are disrupted until the network collapses into a dehydrated globular state, expelling water from within [1]. For inverse temperature-responsive polymers, the temperature at which this occurs is referred to as the “lower critical solution temperature” (LCST).
This conformational change is depicted in Figure 8. Common examples of inverse temperature-responsive polymers are N-alkyl substituted polymers such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) and poly(N,N-dimethylallylamine) (PDEAAm). The LCST of these polymers can be increased by copolymerization with hydrophilic monomers or decreased by copolymerization with hydrophobic monomers [59]. Other inverse temperature-responsive polymers include chitosan, poly(vinyl methyl ether), poly(vinyl caprolactones), poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(propylene oxide), and poly(ethylene glycol).
Responsive PNIPAAm hydrogels have been widely applied for responsive release in drug delivery systems since the 1990s, the technology of which has since been applied to the development of self-regulating insulin delivery systems and targeted laser-triggered cancer treatment [60,61,62]. PNIPAAm hydrogels can undergo thermally induced in situ gelation, a behavior which has been utilized in injectable scaffolding systems for drug delivery and tissue engineering [63]. PNIPAAm hydrogels have also been applied to interfaces for cell sheet engineering applications, providing thermo-switchable adhesion for cell culturing [64]. The responsive behavior, driven by temperature-induced hydrophilicity changes, of such a culture surface is shown in Figure 9 [65]. Beyond biomedicine, PNIPAAm hydrogels have been used for sensors and indicators for a wide variety of small molecules, macromolecules, and biomolecules, and more recently, volatile organic compounds in gaseous environments [66,67]. Emerging applications in soft actuators and robotics are also being developed using PNIPAAm hydrogels [68,69].
Normal temperature-responsive polymers are much less common but include polyacrylamide (PAM) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA). In this case, the hydrogen bonds between acrylamide and acrylic acid do not allow the formation of a hydrated gel, so the network collapses. There is a high entropic cost of the separation of water and polymer phases in this dehydrated state, so as temperature increases, the network “unzips” to allow the absorption of water [1]. The temperature at which this occurs is referred to as the “upper critical solution temperature” (UCST).
In addition to the temperature response mechanism described above, physical hydrogels can experience a sol–gel phase transition in response to temperature [57]. The liquid (sol) phase is hydrated and hydrophilic in nature, and the solid (gel) phase is dehydrated and hydrophobic [28]. Phase separation occurs, i.e., the polymer solution transitions from isotropic to anisotropic, at the critical solution temperature [22].
Chemicals and Biomolecules
Hydrogels can be tailored to interact with many different chemicals or biomolecules. Hydrogels are commonly developed to behave in response to glucose because of its biological significance and the potential medical applications of these hydrogels. There are several methods of creating glucose-responsive hydrogels. Hydrogels containing glucose oxidase will oxidize glucose to gluconic acid, causing a localized change in pH that can swell the hydrogel [20]. Alternatively, hydrogels containing phenylboronic acid will complex with glucose, generating negatively charged boronic esters that can result in swelling of the hydrogel [1]. Another method involves incorporating concanavalin A into a hydrogel with glucose-containing polymer chains, causing crosslinking that results in a reversible sol–gel transition controlled by glucose concentration [57].
Enzyme-responsive hydrogels can be created by incorporating peptide chains as crosslinks in the hydrogel network or as bonds between the core and shell of a microcapsule. The peptides are digested by specific enzymes, resulting in responsive degradation of the hydrogel [1]. Additionally, products of enzymatic degradation can trigger swelling or shrinking of a hydrogel [23].
Responsivity to other chemicals can be created with the use of molecularly imprinted polymers, wherein binding sites are created in the hydrogel by synthesizing the network in the presence of a template molecule [1]. An alternative method involves electron donor–acceptor complex formation between specific chemical species and the hydrogel [23].
Ionic Strength and Polyions
Hydrogels can exhibit ionic strength responsivity due to ionization of the polymer backbone or pendant groups, causing a change in the swelling equilibrium [71]. At high ionic strengths, gelators in the hydrogel can bind preferentially with salt ions, resulting in a decrease in crosslinking density in the hydrogel network [72]. In cases of solute-loaded hydrogels, e.g., for drug delivery, increased ionic strength shields charges in the polymer network, reducing electrostatic repulsion or attraction between the hydrogel and the solute. This leads to diffusion of the solute into the environment [1].
Polyelectrolyte gels, in addition to ionic strength, exhibit responsive behavior to the presence of polyions. Immersing a polyelectrolyte gel, which is a charged hydrogel network, into a polyionic solution of opposite charge results in electrostatic complexation that expels water from the network, causing shrinking of the hydrogel network [73].
Light
Incorporating photosensitive monomers into hydrogels as pendant groups or crosslinkers, or incorporating photosensitive nanoparticles into the hydrogel structure, can yield light-responsive hydrogels. Photosensitive compounds undergo changes in response to light that disrupt the hydrogel network. These changes can include isomerization, such as a cis–trans shift, cyclization, or ring-opening. Azobenzene and spiropyran, discussed in Section 2.2.4, undergo photoinduced isomerization. The photosensitive response of hydrogels containing azobenzene crosslinker is visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in Figure 10 [74]. Other changes include degradation, which involves the breaking of covalent bonds, or dimerization, which involves the formation of a bond between two units. Photolabile moieties include o-nitrobenzyl ether derivatives, coumarin derivatives, allyl disulfides, and Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes [75,76]. Another mechanism of photo-responsivity is photothermal conversion, whereby light-absorbing compounds convert photo energy into thermal energy, resulting in thermoresponsive shrinking or swelling of the hydrogel. The compounds can include near-infrared absorbers such as polydopamine (PDA) or ultraviolet absorbers such as metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, e.g., SiO2 and TiO2 [77,78].
Electric Current
All polyelectrolyte gels are electrically responsive. Nonionic hydrogels can be coupled with dielectric liquids or electrically responsive particles to create electrically responsive hydrogels [1]. The electric response of a hydrogel is proportional to its charge density and inversely proportional to its degree of crosslinking, and it is influenced by the properties of the surrounding medium (dielectric constant, pH, ionic strength, etc.) [1]. An applied electric field attracts the charged moieties in the hydrogel network and the free counterions in the surrounding media in opposite directions. This stress gradient causes the hydrogel network to contract, constrained by crosslinking, and the movement of counterions creates both local pH changes and osmotic potential that carries water molecules with the counterions, further shrinking the hydrogel network [79].
Magnetic Field
Magnetic-responsive hydrogels can be created by incorporating magnetic microparticles or nanoparticles into hydrogels. Magnetic hydrogels can induce several response modes, including locomotion, deformation, and thermogenesis [80].
Ultrasound
Ultrasound-responsive hydrogels can result from the transfer of acoustic energy into thermal or non-thermal energy. In the thermal response mechanism, ultrasound waves can cause localized heating that results in swelling or shrinking of thermoresponsive hydrogels [23]. The non-thermal response mechanism involves the generation of mechanical energy as oscillations or forces that create acoustic cavitation or acoustic radiation [81].
Shear Stress
2.1.3. Bulk Hydrogels for Smart Textiles
Hydrogels can be applied to fabrics to incorporate stimuli-responsive behavior into textile materials. Hydrogels can undergo gelation directly on the surface of the fabric by soaking the fabric in a polymer solution, followed by soaking in a crosslinking solution [3]. Other methods of incorporating hydrogels into textile systems include coating or finishing fabrics with hydrogels, incorporating hydrogel micro- or nanoparticles (micro- or nanogels) into fabrics, or functionalizing fibers with hydrogels. Textile surface modification is reviewed in more detail in Section 2.3.2.
A common application of hydrogel textiles is comfort textiles, which leverage the shrinking and swelling or sol–gel transition of hydrogels to regulate the temperature of the wearer. In its swollen state, the hydrogel blocks pores in the textile material, thereby trapping body vapor and retaining heat under the garment [23]. Conversely, when the hydrogel is in its shrunken state, the textile material is more porous and breathable, allowing the release of body vapor and heat into the external environment. An example of a thermoregulating textile material is the cotton material finished with PNIPAAm/chitosan microgels by Kulkarni et al., using a simple pad–dry–cure application method [83]. The material demonstrated dual-responsive behavior towards temperature and pH. At high temperatures, the hydrogel microparticles collapsed and allowed increased water uptake. This behavior was modulated by pH due to the incorporation of chitosan into the hydrogel. Another example is the PEG–PCL–PEG copolymer-coated absorbent nonwoven fabric developed by Bin Fei’s group at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, which exhibited a thermoresponsive sol–gel transition [84]. Gelation was triggered around skin temperature, causing the coating to transition from hydrophilic to hydrophobic and creating pores that served as capillary channels for water transport. This system facilitated unidirectional moisture wicking away from the skin at body temperature.
Another common application for hydrogel textiles is active compound delivery in a variety of product types, including medical textiles, cosmetotextiles, and hygiene textiles [22]. Hydrogels serve to allow controlled or extended release in these systems, whereby the active compounds are incorporated into the hydrogel network, and exposure of the hydrogel to stimuli triggers shrinking of the hydrogel network, causing release of the active compounds [23]. An example of such a system is the cellulose fabric grafted with PNIPAAm/PU hydrogel and chitosan developed by Hu et al. at Hong Kong Polytechnic University for antibacterial facial masks [85]. The masks were loaded with functional components, such as vitamins and aloe extract, that released at body temperature upon shrinking of the hydrogel network. Additionally, rinsing of the masks allowed for purification and subsequent reabsorption of nutrients for reuse. Another example is the Pluronic F127/carboxymethylcellulose sodium composite hydrogel developed by Chi-Wai Kan’s group at Hong Kong Polytechnic University for hydrogel-functionalized fabrics to treat atopic dermatitis [86]. The material served dual functionality of moisture supply and controlled transdermal drug delivery of Cortex Moutan (CM) extract, a traditional Chinese medicine. Thermoresponsive sol–gel transition of the porous hydrogel structure facilitated diffusional release of CM while the hydrogel’s high moisture content provided moisture to skin.
Antibacterial fabrics are another common application of hydrogel textiles. For example, Wang et al. at Eastern Liaoning University developed cotton fabric modified with PNIPAAm/chitosan hydrogel IPN with a double-dip–double-nip process [87]. The fabric demonstrated antibacterial activity, with bacterial reduction against E. coli and S. aureus of more than 99%, and thermoresponsive hydrophobicity. Chitosan has natural antibacterial properties and is therefore a useful natural polysaccharide for medical textile applications [88]. Reversible wettability can also be achieved with hydrogel textile systems, as demonstrated by Jiang et al. at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, who developed cotton fabric grafted with PNIPAAm and 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane [89]. The fabric showed temperature-responsive superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic behavior.
Hydrogel textiles can also be used for water filtration, including oil/water separation and pollutant adsorption. For example, Lin Feng’s group at Tsinghua University developed temperature- and pH-responsive mesh coated with PDMAEMA for oil/water separation [90]. The mesh allowed water to permeate at temperatures below 55 °C (pH 7) or pH < 13 (T = 25 °C) and allowed oil to permeate at temperatures above 55 °C or pH > 13, enabling orderly permeation and separate collection of water and oil. Li et al. at Zhejiang Ocean University developed cotton fabric coated with PDA/chitosan that functioned as an oil and heavy-metal ion removal membrane [91]. The superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic material adsorbed Cu(II) from wastewater with 99% efficiency.
Evidently, the applications of hydrogel-treated textiles are broad. However, bulk hydrogel treatments such as coating can negatively influence the original properties of the textile material such as stiffness or tensile strength [28]. Additionally, textiles treated with bulk hydrogels experience slow solvent diffusion, and therefore, slow swelling kinetics that can result in slow response times in smart textiles [3]. This has prompted a diversification of hydrogel application methods for textiles, expanding into other forms such as micro/nanogels and microcapsules.
2.2. Microencapsulation
2.2.1. Introduction to Microencapsulation
Microencapsulation is the process of entrapping active substances in solid, liquid, or gaseous form within an inert shell, producing particles within which the core material is protected from the external environment [92,93]. By definition, the size of microparticles is 1–999 µm, but the term is often used to refer to particles of up to mm scale [94]. Microcapsules can be classified as reservoir, including monocore and polycore structures, or monolithic matrix, which contain evenly dispersed encapsulating and encapsulated phases and are sometimes referred to as microspheres [94]. These microcapsule types are shown in Figure 11. Microcapsules can display a range of release characteristics, such as permeation, dissolution, mechanical rupture, thermal release, pH and osmotic release, photolytic release, biodegradation, delayed release, and isolation (non-release) [94]. Microcapsule shells can be permeable, allowing core material release to be controlled by shell thickness and pore size, semi-permeable, whereby the shell is impermeable to the core material but permeable to low-molecular-weight compounds, or impermeable, which requires shell rupture for core material release [93]. Smart microcapsules utilize stimuli-responsive material as shell materials or grafted onto pores in the shells to allow for stimuli-controlled release of core material.
Microencapsulation has a multitude of benefits in industrial or commercial applications. An inherent advantage of microencapsulation is that the core material is shielded from contact with the environment that may otherwise cause unwanted chemical reactions, such as degradation, oxidation, or polymerization, and exposure to conditions such as moisture, heat, alkalinity, or acidity is prevented [95,96]. Microcapsules can control the release of the active compound from a product, resulting in better performance, lower costs, enhanced shelf-life, and other benefits [94]. Stimuli-responsive and location-targeted release are also possible for highly specific and tailorable delivery systems. In addition to customizable release profiles, microencapsulation can be used for permanent encapsulation, which can improve the solubility and dispersibility of the core material for better processability [93]. Microcapsules can convert liquid compounds to free-flowing solids that are easier to handle, reducing clumping, improving mixing, increasing production speed, and expanding production capabilities [94,95]. The smaller size of microparticles allows for higher dispersion and, therefore, better control over the encapsulated material in a formulation [94]. Additionally, microencapsulation can offer protection against hazardous or toxic materials for employees, users, and the environment [94]. Encapsulating compounds in a shell material can mask unpleasant odors or tastes in food or pharmaceutical formulations or provide enzyme or microorganism immobilization capabilities [93]. The multitude of benefits of microencapsulation technology has resulted in the utilization of this technique across food, agriculture, cosmetic, biomedical, and textile industries.
The first commercial instance of microencapsulation in a coating formulation was for the development of carbonless copy paper by Green and Lowell at National Cash Register Co. in the 1950s [97]. The transfer film coating contained hydrocolloid microcapsules filled with oil that was released by rupture of the capsules. Nowadays, microencapsulation technology is widespread across textiles, agricultural formulations, paints and coatings, bulk chemicals, cosmetics, hygiene products, medical textiles, home care products, foods, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals [92,98]. Most people unknowingly benefit from microencapsulation technology daily—laundry detergents and fabric softeners contain microencapsulated fragrances for long-lasting scent, oral medications use microencapsulation for extended drug release or protection of labile ingredients such as probiotic bacteria, and many food products contain microencapsulated ingredients for consumer nutrition or food stability and preservation [99,100,101].
2.2.2. Microencapsulation Techniques
The process of microencapsulation involves three general steps: capsule formation, capsule wall hardening, and isolation of the capsules [94]. There are many possible techniques, which can be broadly categorized into chemical and physical processes. Physical processes can be further categorized into physico-chemical and physico-mechanical processes. A summary of microencapsulation techniques is shown in Table 2. The techniques vary in process conditions and demands, encapsulation efficiency, shell thickness and permeability, capsule stability and release kinetics, and scalability. The appropriate technique for a certain application depends on the wall and core materials and the desired capsule properties, as well as production constraints.
Table 2.
Microencapsulation techniques, including chemical and physical processes [93].
Table 2.
Microencapsulation techniques, including chemical and physical processes [93].
| Chemical Processes | Physical Processes | |
|---|---|---|
| Physico-chemical | Physico-mechanical | |
|
|
|
Chemical microencapsulation processes involve covalent bond formation and include in situ and interfacial polymerization techniques. In situ polymerization is characterized by a lack of reactants in the core material [102]. Suspension, dispersion, and emulsion polymerization are examples of radical in situ polymerization techniques, whereby polymer shells are formed directly onto dispersed core particles by carrying out a polymerization reaction in the surrounding continuous phase. In suspension polymerization, the core material is dispersed in an immiscible aqueous continuous phase with monomer and initiator droplets, stabilized by macromolecular stabilizers, and vigorous agitation promotes polymerization to form capsules [103]. In dispersion polymerization, the continuous phase is a poor solvent, such that swollen polymer particles precipitate to form capsules. In emulsion polymerization, an insoluble monomer is emulsified above the critical micelle concentration in an aqueous continuous phase containing a soluble initiator and a surfactant, producing monomer-swollen micelles that form latex particles. Polycondensation can be an in situ or interfacial process. This technique involves step-growth polymerization, whereby a polymer shell forms around liquid or dispersed core material, either by deposition from a homogeneous solution (dispersion polycondensation) or by reaction at the interface between two immiscible phases (interfacial polycondensation) [104].
Physico-chemical processes involve physical forces and phase changes rather than covalent bonds for the formation of capsule coatings. Coacervation is the first reported industrially adopted microencapsulation technique and involves phase separation of a polymer solution by concentration of coacervated particles into a polymer-rich phase (coacervate) and a poor polymer phase (coacervation medium) [93,105]. In simple coacervation, a single polymer and a desolvation agent are used, while in complex coacervation, two oppositely charged polymers form a complex to create the shell. Layer-by-layer assembly involves repeated immersion of the core material into electrically charged particles, such as a polyelectrolyte solution, nanoparticles, ionic dyes, or metal ions, to build a shell [93]. Sol–gel encapsulation forms a polymeric network shell through staged polymerization of a liquid-phase precursor that transitions to a solid phase, trapping core material in the process [106]. Supercritical fluid processes utilize supercritical fluids as solvent, anti-solvent, or solute (swelling agent) of the shell material to induce controlled precipitation around the core material [93]. Various techniques can be used, including rapid expansion of a supercritical fluid, gas anti-solvent, or particles from gas-saturated solution.
Physico-mechanical processes are equipment-driven and rely on mechanical forces. In spray-drying, an emulsion of core material particles in a solution of shell material is sprayed into a hot chamber such that the aqueous component evaporates and the shell material dries onto the core material particles [105]. In fluid-bed coating, a coating material is sprayed onto a fluidized bed containing solid core material particles [93]. The spinning-disk process involves a polymer solution containing suspended core material particles being poured into a rotating apparatus, from which coated particles are cast out by centrifugal force [93]. Centrifugal extrusion involves co-extruding liquid core and wall materials through concentric nozzles on a rotating extrusion head to form a material rod, from which droplets break off as it is passed through a heat exchanger [105].
Another method of microencapsulation is liposome entrapment. Fatty acid-based vesicles can self-assemble from lipids (commonly phospholipids) using various techniques, such as thin-film hydration, sonication, and extrusion [95,102]. Hydrophilic compounds are trapped within the core, and hydrophobic material is trapped within the bilayer.
2.2.3. Materials
It is possible to use many different materials to produce microcapsules, and the appropriate material depends on the desired properties and applications of the product. The shell material must be able to form a stable film that is chemically compatible and non-reactive (inert) with the core material and facilitates the release of the core material under specific conditions. Properties of a good shell material include low viscosity, pliability, non-toxicity, and water/solvent solubility or meltability. Additionally, the material should be economical, and the formed capsule should be easy to isolate from the reaction medium. A summary of synthetic and natural materials used in microencapsulation is shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Microcapsule shell materials, including synthetic and natural polymers and inorganic materials.
Table 3.
Microcapsule shell materials, including synthetic and natural polymers and inorganic materials.
| Synthetic Polymers | Natural Polymers | Inorganic Materials |
|---|---|---|
Melamine resins
| Polysaccharides
| Metals, Oxides, and Hydroxides
|
Natural polymers can offer environmental benefits such as biodegradability, renewability, and non-toxicity. Additionally, many natural polymers offer higher selectivity, reactivity, and efficiency compared to synthetic polymers [96]. They can also have superior properties with regard to high surface area, ease of synthesis, and high elasticity. Many are also bioactive or naturally antibacterial, and their biocompatibility and high bioadhesivity makes them suitable for medical applications [107]. Additionally, when applied to textiles, biopolymeric microcapsules do not change textile properties such as breathability, softness, or structural integrity [96]. However, biopolymeric microcapsules are more susceptible to unwanted degradation via natural media, mechanical agitation, photodegradation, or other mechanisms.
The core material of microcapsules can contain many active compounds. These include perfumes, fragrances, deodorants, and laundry compounds for sustained scent release in functional fabrics [108,109]; dyes, inks, and pigments to prevent leaching or allow active coloration [102,110]; insect repellents for protective textiles [111]; flame retardants to enhance fire safety in materials [112]; fertilizers and pesticides for slow-release in agriculture [77]; and antimicrobials, antioxidants, antibiotics, antiseptics, antibodies, and drugs for bioactive textiles or intelligent packaging [113,114,115]. Cosmetic ingredients, such as vitamins, moisturizers, retinoids, steroids, caffeine, and plant extracts, can be encapsulated to improve stability and skin penetration in cosmetic formulations or for application to cosmetotextiles [98]. Catalysts, monomers, crosslinkers, curing agents, and plasticizers can be used for self-healing materials and advanced manufacturing [116]. Phase-change materials, like paraffins, are also commonly microencapsulated to regulate temperature by absorbing or releasing heat through phase changes and to control heat flux [94,117].
2.2.4. Release Mechanisms
Release of the core material from microcapsules can be the result of a wide range of mechanisms. In general, release can be triggered by a change in the shell material or by a change in the core material. There are different release mechanisms depending on the nature of the shell—non-permeable, semi-permeable, or permeable—and these are summarized in Figure 12. Exposure to various stimuli can trigger the occurrence of one or more of these release mechanisms, allowing the core material to release into the external environment. Microcapsules that respond to specific stimuli with appropriate sensitivity, reaction rate, and release profile are desirable for commercial applications such as fragrance release, drug delivery, smart sensors, self-healing coatings, and functional textiles.
Mechanical Force
External applied mechanical forces, such as friction, shear, or pressure, can cause shell rupture. Additionally, internal pressure can be generated by contraction of the shell material or decomposition, evaporation, or swelling of the core material. Internal pressure created by any of these mechanisms can cause microcapsules to burst, releasing contents to the environment.
Figure 12.
Microcapsule release mechanisms, including shell and core mechanisms.
Chemicals and Biomolecules
Exposure to solvent can cause dissolution of a non-permeable shell or diffusion through a semi-permeable shell that causes core swelling and subsequent shell rupture. A change in pH can cause hydrolysis of pH-sensitive moieties in the shell, such as hydrazone, acetal, and β-carboxylic amide functional groups [59]. This can alter crosslinking density and degrade the shell material. Additionally, pH can cause swelling or shrinking in hydrogel materials, as discussed in Section 2.1.2. Therefore, microcapsules with hydrogel shells can experience a change in shell permeability based on pH. Similarly, high ionic strength can cause shrinking of polyelectrolyte shells [118]. Swollen permeable and semi-permeable shells have a higher rate of release/diffusion, while the permeability of shrunken shells is decreased [57]. Enzymatic activity can trigger the release of core material from microcapsules via enzymatic reduction, dissociation, or digestion that causes degradation of the shell [119,120]. Shell degradation can also be caused by oxidative cleavage of certain functional groups, such as boronic esters/acids and thioketals/thioacetals, by reactive oxygen species as shown in Figure 13 [59].
Temperature
Shells composed of thermosensitive polymers undergo changes in permeability depending on temperature. For example, a shell made of PNIPAAm will be permeable below LCST when it is swollen, but above LCST, the chains will collapse, such that the shell shrinks and its permeability decreases [121]. This can be attributed to a change in the hydration state of PNIPAAm, which has a hydrophilic character below LCST and a hydrophobic character above LCST [59]. Another approach is to graft thermosensitive polymers onto the pores of permeable shells, which will lead to the inverse response. Below the LCST, the polymer chains will be swollen, acting as a barrier to block diffusion through the pores. Above the LCST, the polymer will collapse, opening the pores and allowing diffusion/release of the core material [122]. Other temperature-related responses are the melting or burning of the shell material [105,123].
Figure 13.
Example of chemical degradation of a polymer shell material by reactive oxygen species—oxidative cleavage of boronic ester crosslinks by hydrogen peroxide.
Figure 13.
Example of chemical degradation of a polymer shell material by reactive oxygen species—oxidative cleavage of boronic ester crosslinks by hydrogen peroxide.
Light
Shells composed of photosensitive compounds can undergo various release mechanisms. Upon exposure to UV light, azobenzene photoisomerizes from trans (nonpolar) to cis (polar) conformation. Shells containing azobenzene dissociate upon UV exposure [59]. Spiropyran (nonpolar) photoisomerizes to merocyanine (Zwitterionic) under UV light; therefore, shells containing spiropyran rupture or increase in permeability when exposed to UV [124]. Photolabile moieties such as o-nitrobenzyl ether derivatives, coumarin derivatives, allyl disulfides, and Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes will undergo bond cleavage in response to light, resulting in degradation of the shell [75,76]. Temperature-induced changes in shells made of thermosensitive polymers can be triggered by photothermal conversion by light-absorbing compounds or localized heating from laser irradiation [77,78,125].
Electric and Magnetic Fields
Directional movement or oscillation of charged/magnetic species in shell materials can cause disintegration of the shells, releasing core material [126].
2.2.5. Modifying Release Behavior
Responsive release behavior can be tailored to fit specific applications by altering the composition of the microcapsules. Shells with higher porosity will have higher rates of release because the core compound can diffuse through the pores. Shells composed of higher-molecular-weight polymers contain denser polymeric networks and therefore smaller pores, resulting in slower release of core material [127]. Increased shell thickness, achieved by increasing the mass of shell material or by using layer-by-layer assembly, will also lower release rate [92]. Chemical interactions can also modify release behavior. For example, chemical incompatibility between shell and core materials will reduce permeation of the core material and will preferentially lead to wetting of the shell wall by the external continuous phase. Additionally, microcapsules with core conditions similar to the environmental conditions to which the capsules are exposed will exhibit higher release rates [117]. In microcapsules with responsive polymers grafted onto pores in the shell material, a higher graft density will result in a slower rate of release.
For shells composed of hydrogel, higher crystallinity or crosslinking density will result in lower rates of release due to the limited swelling capacity of the hydrogel [117]. The hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the hydrogel network impacts its affinity towards water, influencing the release rate in aqueous systems [1]. The choice and ratio of crosslinking agent also influence the swelling behavior of the shell; for example, alginate crosslinked with calcium ions will have stronger crosslinks than alginate crosslinked with magnesium ions due to stronger interactions with the guluronic acid groups in the polymer chains [128].
2.3. Microencapsulation in Textiles
2.3.1. Role of Microcapsules in Textiles
Microencapsulation can extend the useful life of active textiles by controlling the release of active compounds. Furthermore, fibers can directly absorb microcapsules without impacting the original feel or properties of the material, unlike bulk coatings and finishes. These reasons, combined with the many benefits of microencapsulation discussed in Section 2.2.1, have led to the development of microcapsules for textile applications over the past several decades.
In 1971, Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. was contracted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to evaluate microencapsulated phase-change materials (PCMs) for thermoregulating spacesuits [129]. PCM textile coatings and fibers were later developed for NASA by the Triangle Research and Development Corporation (TRDC), and this technology was adopted by Outlast Technologies in the 1990s for thermoregulating consumer apparel, including ski gear and bedding [130]. Academic research on microencapsulation for textile materials was pioneered by Gordon Nelson in the 1990s, who developed microcapsules using yeast for textile treatment [131]. Meanwhile, microencapsulation was adopted to encapsulate fragrances and skin softeners in clothing, then expanded to include vitamins, dyes, insect repellents, medicinal ingredients, mothproofing agents, and more [132,133]. A summary of application areas of microcapsules in functional textile materials is shown in Figure 14 [96].
2.3.2. Integration of Microcapsules into Textile Materials
Microcapsules can be applied to many different textile substrates, including natural fibers such as cotton, wool, silk, or flax, and synthetic fibers such as polyester or polyamides [117]. The most common method of integrating microcapsules into textile materials is surface application, which includes various processes, such as coating, spraying, padding, printing, stamping, impregnation, and exhaustion [96]. Coating involves the deposition of microcapsules onto fabric using a coating medium, which can be a solution, foam, paste, melt, powder, or granulate. Spraying involves the application of microcapsules through a spray nozzle. In the padding process, fabric is placed into a bath containing microcapsules, then passed through squeeze rolls to remove excess solution—this process is shown in Figure 15 [113]. In printing, fabric is passed through a rotary screen attached to a rotary roll with printing paste containing microcapsules. Microcapsules can also be applied to fabric during the rinse cycle when washing [117].
To improve bonding between the fabric substrate and microcapsules, crosslinkers are often added to the application medium. Crosslinkers—commonly polycarboxylic acids—form covalent bonds between the fibers and microcapsule walls [94]. Another method is pre-activation of the fabric so that reactive shells can bond covalently or ionically to the fibers [117]. Pre-activation is suitable for charged fibers like chitosan and can impart ionic character to uncharged fibers. This can be achieved through chemical functionalization or plasma pretreatment. Chemical functionalization is a chemical method whereby charged functional groups are imparted onto the fibers. Anionic character can be introduced through carboxymethylation via treatment with caustic soda, then an aqueous sodium salt of monochloroacetic acid [134]. Cationic character can be generated through aminisation, which involves dying the fabric with a reactive dye and a subsequent reductive cleavage of the dye molecules to form aromatic amines. Alternatively, plasma pretreatment is a physical method of forming active sites (radicals, ions, etc.) on the fiber surface using gases such as air, nitrogen, or argon [28,135]. Etches are created in the fabric, increasing the roughness and surface area of the fibers to increase uptake [23]. This method is generally regarded as more environmentally friendly than chemical pre-activation methods because there are no chemicals or solvents involved and the process is conducted at low temperatures.
Binders, including starch, acrylic, polyurethane, or silicone, can be used to increase the longevity of the microcapsules through wear and wash cycles [117]. A binder acts as a film that forms atop the textile substrate, within which the microcapsules are embedded. Therefore, the microcapsules do not bind directly to the fabric, which can help preserve the surface characteristics of the fabric [133]. When the microcapsules are fully embedded within the film, a sustained release profile is achieved, while partial embedment increases susceptibility of the microcapsules to mechanical or environmental triggers and results in a more “burst”-like release profile [117]. Binders, however, can hinder the release of the core compound from microcapsules [94].
Surface application of microcapsules to textiles requires curing of the application medium. This process traditionally uses heat, exposing the fabric to temperatures of 130–170 °C for 1–10 min [136]. However, high temperatures can damage microcapsules, particularly if the core material swells or volatilizes, causing rupture of the microcapsule walls. An alternative curing method is UV curing, whereby a UV-curable resin containing oligomers, monomers, photoinitiators, and microcapsules is applied to the fabric. UV light polymerizes the resin components to fix the capsules within a continuous film layer on the fabric. This method is generally more durable than heat curing.
Functionalized fibers are an alternative method of incorporating microcapsules into textile materials, involving direct incorporation of the microcapsules between fibers or within the fibrous structure, rather than surface application. Various techniques can be used to achieve functionalized fibers. Microcapsules can be incorporated into the fibers during the spinning process, for example, by mixing them into the spinning dope or polymer melt during wet or melt spinning [133]. Composite fibers can also be accomplished with electrospinning or microfluidic techniques [137,138]. A common functionalized fiber structure is core–sheath, with either the core or the sheath containing microcapsules. Fiber diameter and microcapsule loading rate influence the release behavior of microcapsules from functionalized fibers.
2.3.3. Microencapsulation for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles
Microcapsules have been applied to textiles in a broad range of applications. Specifically, microcapsules with stimuli-responsive release behavior are reviewed in a textile context. A summary of the main applications and materials is provided in Table 4, including references to studies that explicitly outline the stimuli-responsive behavior of their microcapsules. As discussed in Section 2.3.1, one of the earliest applications of microcapsules to textiles was for thermoregulating fabrics. In an early academic publication using this technology, Kim and Cho at Yonsei University applied octadecane-containing microcapsules with urea shells to polyester fabrics [139]. This continues to be a common use of microencapsulation technology for smart textiles, utilizing microencapsulated PCMs to absorb, store, release, and deposit thermal energy from the textiles during phase changes [140]. This technology has been applied to sportswear, extreme weather gear, ski boots, motorcycle helmets, automotive seat covers, protective garments, firefighter suits, medical textiles, bandages, and bedding [141].
Another type of stimuli-responsive microcapsules, in which the active compound itself is stimuli-responsive, rather than demonstrating stimuli-responsive release, is utilized in thermochromic and photochromic textiles. In such applications, thermochromic or photochromic dyes/pigments are encapsulated and applied to fabrics for stimuli-responsive coloration. This can be useful in environmental or healthcare monitoring, as well as smart fashion applications. Chowdhury et al. applied four encapsulated thermochromic pigments with different activation temperatures to conductive fabrics and applied voltage to increase temperature, yielding gradual color changes with the shifting reflectance spectra [142]. More recently, Yang et al. at Xi’an Polytechnic University developed reversible dual-responsive color-changing fabrics using thermochromic microcapsules that responded to color and humidity changes due to the inclusion of humidity-sensitive discoloration materials [143].
Fragrance release is a common application of stimuli-responsive microcapsule release technology in textiles, with patented processes first emerging in the early 1990s. In 2009, Rodrigues et al. produced abrasion-release PUU microcapsules that retained fragrance for up to 9000 abrasion cycles in laboratory impregnated fabrics and 3000 abrasion cycles in industrially impregnated fabrics [99]. A recent study by Huo et al. developed dual-responsive microcapsules for thermal regulation and controlled fragrance release in textiles [144]. The microcapsules contained PCMs and essential oils within a lotus seedpod-like dual-chamber structure that allowed stable fragrance diffusion through its micropores due to its thermoregulating ability. Extended release of fragrances in textiles has been thoroughly researched and adopted, but stimuli-responsive release is less common.
In 2020, Lu et al., at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, developed cationic liposomes with thermosensitive fragrance release behavior for application to silk [145]. The liposomes, synthesized from self-assembly of poly[N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate-phenylboronic acid], lipid molecules, cholesterol, and eugenol, interacted electrostatically with silk’s negative surface character. Chen et al. at Jiangnan University developed ethyl cellulose/silica hybrid microcapsules loaded with fragrance oil and grafted with UV absorbers and methacrylic acid [146]. The microcapsules were added to waterborne polysiloxane resins for fabric coating, yielding fabrics with slow aromatic release and UV-resistant properties.
Cosmetotextiles have also adopted microencapsulation technology to improve product lifetime. Among pioneering commercial cosmetotextiles utilizing microcapsules was the Skintex® line from German textile chemical company Cognis. The Skintex® range included moisturizing, cooling, energizing, relaxing, and mosquito-repelling agents encapsulated with chitosan, with release triggered by friction with skin and enzymes present on skin [98]. Other companies with early adoption of similar technology include Specialty Textile Product (BioCap biocapsule products) and Woolmark Development International Ltd. (Sensory Perception Technology). Microencapsulation technology is now widely used throughout moisturizers, sunscreens, retinoids, antioxidants, and products aimed at anti-aging, depigmenting, and fighting inflammation, with cosmetotextiles being used to deliver such formulations [147]. Many of these products are mechanically responsive, but systems responding to other environmental triggers, such as pH, temperature, and humidity, have been developed [123,148]. Academic studies are not included in Table 4 because this area is dominated by product research and development in the industrial sector.
Drug-delivery textiles are another area of application for microcapsules, for products such as medical fabrics, wound dressings, sutures, and tissue scaffolds [147]. Electrospun functionalized fibers are particularly appropriate for tissue engineering due to the high level of control over fiber orientation and material properties afforded by electrospinning [137]. Surface application of microcapsules to hospital garments can deliver antibacterial or other beneficial agents to patients or healthcare professionals during wear. Özsevinç and Alkan developed mechanical-responsive PU microcapsules containing medicinal lavender oil for neurological damage prevention for application to fabrics for palliative care or cancer patients [149]. Zhao et al. at Tiangong University coated cotton fabric with hollow poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate) microcapsules loaded with Rhodamine B as a model drug for pH-responsive release, based on the increased permeability of the polyelectrolyte shells at low pH [150]. The microcapsule-coated cotton fabric and its pH-dependent release are shown in Figure 16.
Table 4.
Summary of textile applications using stimuli-responsive microencapsulation technology.
| Application | Active Compounds | Reviews | Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermoregulation | Phase-change materials (PCMs) | [141,151] | [139,144] |
| Colorants | Dyes, pigments, and thermo/photochromic compounds | [102,133] | [142,143] |
| Fragrance release | Fragrance oils, perfumes, and deodorants | [126] | [145,146] |
| Cosmetotextiles | Moisturizers, vitamins, sunscreens, retinoids, antioxidants, cooling agents, antiaging agents, depigmenting agents, anticellulite agents, and subcutaneous fat controllers | [98,147,148] | |
| Drug delivery | Drugs, antibacterials, antifungals, essential oils, pain relief, blood circulation stimulants, itch suppression, and decontamination/self-cleaning agents | [113,152] | [149,150] |
2.4. Hydrogel Microcapsules in Textiles
2.4.1. Introduction to Hydrogel Microcapsules
Hydrogel microcapsules can have hydrogel shells or cores. In either case, the hydrogel imparts stimulus-responsive behavior to the microcapsule. It is important to distinguish between hydrogel microcapsules, which contain a core surrounded by a shell, and microgels or nanogels, which are merely micro/nano-sized hydrogel particles or spheres. In many respects, hydrogel microcapsules behave the same as any other microcapsule, protecting the core material from the environment and allowing for controlled or responsive release. However, traditional microcapsules made with rigid polymers do not exhibit swelling behavior, while hydrogel microcapsules are water-swollen and more sensitive to environmental stimuli. Therefore, hydrogel microcapsules are more responsive and can be more useful for targeted release behavior. In microcapsules with hydrogel shells, solute diffusion across a hydrogel membrane is dependent on solute size and concentration gradient, as well as hydrogel structure, pore size, and degree of swelling [1]. In microcapsules with hydrogel cores, swelling of the core can cause shell rupture and release of active core compounds.
The high biocompatibility of hydrogel materials makes hydrogel microcapsules highly suitable for biomedicine. The first reported application of hydrogel microcapsules was an investigation into the treatment of diabetes with alginate-encapsulated islet cells by Lim and Sun in 1980 [153]. Hydrogel microcapsules are often used for tissue scaffolding by encapsulating cells due to their ability to mimic the composition of the extracellular matrix for cell growth [154]. Stimuli-responsive behavior can then release cells for collection or replating. Hydrogel microcapsules are also used for cell transplantation, isolating implant cells from the external environment while allowing the small molecules needed for cell survival to permeate through the hydrogel membrane [155]. Host antibodies and immune cells cannot permeate the microcapsule membrane, removing the need for patient immunosuppressive therapy during transplantation [154]. Additionally, transplanted cells can express therapeutic bioactive molecules as they remain sustained and protected within the host, avoiding the need to modify the host genome to treat disease [156]. Location-targeted cell or drug delivery is also possible with stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules, protecting the active compound from the harsh environment of the stomach and releasing it in the intestinal tract, for example [157]. Sustained or stimuli-responsive drug delivery with hydrogel microcapsules can improve therapeutic efficiency [158]. Therefore, it is evident that hydrogel microcapsules provide great utility in biomedical applications.
2.4.2. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel Microcapsules
Hydrogel microcapsules display a combination of the stimuli-responsive behavior of hydrogel materials described in Section 2.1.2 and the microcapsule release mechanisms described in Section 2.2.4. This behavior can be leveraged for a variety of applications, including the biomedical applications explored above, and may be tailored to fit specific requirements. This can be done through modifying the permeability of hydrogel shells with crosslinking or by changing the strength of interactions within the shell, for example, by changing polymer hydrophobicity or incorporating polyions into the network [58,118,159]. Many of the approaches for modifying the release behavior of traditional microcapsules can also be applied to hydrogel microcapsules. The tunability of hydrogel microcapsule release behavior is demonstrated in the PNIPAAm/PEGDA hydrogel microcapsules with a thin oil layer developed by Jeong et al. [160]. At high temperature, simultaneous shrinking of the hydrogel shell and expansion of the aqueous core layer increased internal microcapsule pressure, thereby destabilizing the oil layer and allowing the release of core material. The release behavior was customized by modifying the shell thickness and crosslinking density, allowing precise control of release temperature. Furthermore, the incorporation of gold nanorods allowed for non-invasive stimulation of release with near-infrared light illumination through photothermal conversion effects.
Ichikawa and Fukumori developed hydrogel microcapsules for thermosensitive drug release with “on-off” pulsatile controllability [161]. The shells were composed of an ethylcellulose matrix containing nano-sized hydrogel particles with PNIPAAm shells. The hydrogel nanoparticles experienced thermally induced shrinking at high temperatures, leaving voids in the microcapsule shells through which the drug could diffuse. This temperature-dependent release could be switched between “on” and “off” states within the order of a minute and was reversible and reproducible. pH-sensitive release is highly relevant for oral drug delivery applications due to the differences in pH throughout the digestive tract. Jeon et al. at Pohang University of Science and Technology recently achieved pH-responsive release of proteins from hydrogen-bonded PPO/PMAA hydrogel microcapsules [127]. The microcapsules released encapsulated proteins above a pH of 5 upon ionization of PMAA, and consequently, there was a rapid dissociation of the shells. The microcapsules were stable at high salt concentrations, and the release behavior was tunable by modifying the PMAA molecular weight. Micrographs of protein release from these microcapsules, along with release profiles under various conditions, are shown in Figure 17.
Multi-stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules have also been developed for drug delivery. Wei et al. at Sichuan University fabricated microcapsules with shells composed of chitosan with embedded superparamagnetic nanoparticles and PNIPAAm/PAAm sub-microspheres [162]. The chitosan membrane demonstrated pH-responsive behavior that allowed for slow drug release at physiological pH and faster drug release in acidic conditions, such as in chronic wounds. The superparamagnetic nanoparticles enabled location-specific microcapsule aggregation in response to an external magnetic field for targeted drug delivery. The temperature-responsive sub-microspheres underwent thermally induced shrinking around body temperature, thereby behaving as “micro-valves” for drug diffusion through the microcapsule shells. These multi-responsive hydrogel microcapsules represent the great potential for highly intelligent and controllable active compound delivery systems.
Transdermal drug delivery for wound dressings is another area of much interest in hydrogel microcapsule development. Wound dressings can help to advance wound healing and prevent infection by promoting tissue regeneration and restoring the skin’s functional barrier. A moist environment is ideal for wound healing, making hydrogel materials particularly suitable for application to wounds due to their water-swollen nature as well as their ability to absorb tissue exudates and allow oxygen permeation [163]. For example, Gong et al. at Sichuan University developed a thermosensitive PEG–PCL–PEG hydrogel material containing PEG–PCL microcapsules loaded with curcumin for cutaneous wound healing [164]. The release of curcumin was triggered by thermally induced sol–gel transition of the hydrogel matrix at body temperature.
The stimuli-responsive release behavior of hydrogel microcapsules has also been leveraged for the agriculture industry. Responsive release of active agents such as pesticides and fertilizers can help improve utilization efficiency and reduce chemical pollution in waterways from runoff, leaching, evaporation, etc. Xu et al. fabricated microcapsules composed of colloidal PDA microspheres loaded with the pesticide imidacloprid (IMI), encapsulated by PNIPAAm shells [77]. The microcapsules exhibited thermosensitive release triggered by increased temperature and NIR radiation due to the photothermal conversion behavior of PDA. Thermally induced shrinking of the microcapsules, combined with dissociation of the electrostatic interactions between the pesticide and polymer matrix, caused the pesticide to “squeeze out” into the external environment. Pesticide release profiles are shown in Figure 18. Feng et al. at Guangxi University developed composite microcapsules using UiO-66 (a metal–organic framework) and sodium alginate to encapsulate the pesticide clothianidin [165]. The release of clothianidin was triggered by increased temperature, which enhanced molecular diffusion, and increased phosphate concentration, which caused swelling of the microcapsules and destruction of UiO-66.
It is evident that hydrogel microcapsules may be tailored to respond to a wide variety of stimuli and to perform under diverse conditions depending on the needs of the product. The current research explored in this section reveals the strong focus of the field on drug delivery applications over other application areas. While the drug delivery research field is benefiting from the intelligence and customization that stimuli-responsive hydrogels offer, other fields are slow to adopt this technology. The pesticide-release microcapsules described above demonstrate the potential for stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules to be applied to broader application areas. The following section will explore how they may be leveraged for smart textile development.
2.4.3. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel Microcapsules for Smart Textiles
The stimuli-responsive behavior of hydrogel microcapsules has resulted in investigations into their application to textile substrates for various functionalities. One approach has been the development of textiles with stimuli-responsive fragrance release behavior. For example, Yang et al. prepared cotton fabric grafted with chitosan microcapsules containing vanillin [52]. The release of vanillin was accelerated by high temperature and high humidity—conditions that garments are exposed to during wear. Microencapsulation of the vanillin improved washing durability, with 8.6% of vanillin content remaining after 14 wash cycles. Yang et al. at Shanghai University of Engineering Science developed double-walled microcapsules with gelatin inner walls and gum Arabic/PNIPAAm outer walls prepared in the presence of N,N′-methylene bisacrylamide [109]. The microcapsules contained lavender fragrance oil that displayed controlled release at high temperature upon hydrogen bond dissociation, shrinking, and chain collapse of the PNIPAAm, which created porosity in the outer walls.
Porous microgels loaded with active compounds, representing matrix-type microcapsule structure, as opposed to reservoir-type (core–shell), have been developed for drug-delivery textiles. Two release mechanisms, governed by squeezing and diffusion forces respectively, have been proposed to explain active compound loading and unloading in porous microgels. These mechanisms are depicted in Figure 19. Sun et al. applied thermosensitive PVCL-COOH/chitosan oligosaccharide graft copolymer microgels to cotton fabric for potential skincare or sunburn treatment applications [166]. The microgels were loaded with aloin and underwent thermally induced shrinking and swelling that opened and closed pores in the microgels, controlling diffusion of the aloin.
Above the LCST, the microgels collapsed, squeezing the water (and concurrently the aloin) out of the microgels. Petrusic et al. prepared thermosensitive PNIPAAm/maleic anhydride copolymer microgels and PNIPAAm/calcium alginate IPN microgels for encapsulation of local anesthetic procaine hydrochloride, intended for textile-based transdermal drug release applications [167]. The maleic anhydride copolymer microgels showed limited thermosensitivity and largely diffusion-controlled release kinetics of the drug through porous channels in the microgels. The calcium alginate IPN microgels showed strong thermosensitivity, with lower drug release at higher temperatures due to shrinking of the polymer network, in combination with other governing mechanisms such as chain entanglement and relaxation behavior.
Colorimetric sensing, particularly for healthcare applications, offers another avenue for smart textile development utilizing hydrogel microcapsules. Khattab et al. encapsulated urease enzyme and pH-sensitive tricyanofuran hydrazone in calcium alginate for application to cotton gauze [168]. The tricyanofuran hydrazone acted as a spectroscopic probe, binding to the ammonia produced in the enzymatic reaction between urea and urease and undergoing a colorimetric change from yellow to purple. This system demonstrated potential for smart bandages to determine urea concentration in biological fluids like urine and blood, which can indicate conditions such as myocardial infarction and liver/kidney failure. Abdelrahman et al. also investigated the use of hydrazone probes in colorimetric smart textiles, applying calcium alginate microcapsules containing tricyanofuran hydrazone to cotton fabric for sweat pH monitoring and drug detection tests [169].
This section represents the state of the field for research into stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules for textile applications. Therefore, current research encompasses the smart release of fragrance, skincare agents, and drugs from textiles and smart colorimetric sensing textiles. However, studies in these areas that leverage the unique combination of abilities of stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules, as presented above, are limited. Furthermore, the scope of research may be extended to include a myriad of potential smart textile capabilities, such as UV-responsive release of sunscreen agents from clothing, heat-triggered release of fire retardants from furniture coverings, moisture-triggered release of soap from single-use wash cloths for camping or traveling, pressure-sensitive release of pain relief agents from hospital linens, pH-responsive colorimetric wound dressings to monitor for wound infection, moisture-induced release of fertilizers from landscaping ground cover fabrics, and many more possibilities. The level of current research into stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules for smart textiles lays the foundation for future research into many diverse application areas.
3. Challenges and Future Perspectives
As explored in the previous section, there are many possible applications for hydrogel microcapsules in smart textiles. However, much of the research around hydrogel microcapsules for textile applications focuses on controlled and extended release of functional agents [170,171,172,173,174,175]. While sustained activity is desired for many applications, the unique stimuli-responsive capabilities of hydrogel microcapsules are not being fully utilized. Highly intelligent and customizable smart textiles are possible with the use of hydrogel microencapsulation technology through the triggered release of active agents. This is an area with much potential for future development.
Developments in microencapsulation technology are necessary to expand the potential applications of hydrogel microcapsules in smart textiles. Much work has been done to improve the lifetime and stability of microcapsules to prevent premature release or degradation, using methods such as crosslinking, copolymerization, or double walls [109]. However, microcapsule wash durability continues to be a challenge for smart textile materials, as exposure to high temperature, mechanical action, alkali products, etc., can degrade microcapsules or the active compounds retained within [117]. Thermal resistance during washing, ironing, and tumble-drying remains an area for improvement, particularly for thermoresponsive microcapsules that are designed to release active compounds at high temperatures. Improving the strength of bonding between microcapsules and textiles, with methods such as binders or UV-crosslinking, while still maintaining original fabric properties, is another avenue for extending the lifetime of smart textiles.
Hydrogel microcapsules are more sensitive to environmental conditions and therefore face a greater challenge in terms of stability and premature release prevention. Hydrogels display humidity and temperature-dependent swelling behavior that must be controlled to a certain degree in smart textiles to prevent degradation or unwanted release. Balancing the need for microcapsule stability in the open environment with responsive release behavior is a significant challenge in smart hydrogel microcapsule textile development. These technical challenges represent areas for future research in the pursuit of highly intelligent and responsive textile systems.
Additionally, the transfer of these systems from laboratory to commercial scale while seeking cost-effectiveness represents another technical challenge. Compatibility with current industrial equipment and processes must also be considered. This is accompanied by environmental and regulatory considerations concerning biodegradability, leaching risk, user safety, and energy-efficient manufacturing. Reducing the microplastics released into the environment from spent microcapsules is a significant environmental priority [176]. This concern can be mitigated with the use of biobased materials for microencapsulation, representing a critical area for future research to focus on.
4. Conclusions
Hydrogels and microcapsules have emerged as transformative agents in the design of fiber-based smart materials. The convergence of these technologies represents an area of great potential that has remained largely unleveraged to date. Stimuli-responsive hydrogel microcapsules offer, amongst a number of additional benefits, unprecedented control over responsiveness, functionality, and biocompatibility. Their integration into textiles enables dynamic environmental interactions that encompass a gamut of triggers/responses, including moisture/activated drug release, temperature/induced structural changes, or pollutant/filtration. As research continues to refine mechanical robustness, scalability, and regulatory compliance, these systems are poised to redefine the boundaries of wearable technology, biomedical textiles, and environmental sensing. The intersection of material science, fiber engineering, and intelligent design demarcates a promising frontier for the next generation of functional fabrics.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, C.M.T.; writing—review and editing, L.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Koetting, M.C.; Peters, J.T.; Steichen, S.D.; Peppas, N.A. Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels: Theory, Modern Advances, and Applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2015, 93, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoffman, A.S. Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2002, 54, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jocic, D. Smart Textile Materials by Surface Modification with Biopolymeric Systems. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2008, 12, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chelu, M.; Musuc, A.M. Polymer Gels: Classification and Recent Developments in Biomedical Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horkay, F.; Douglas, J.F. Polymer Gels: Basics, Challenges, and Perspectives. In Gels and Other Soft Amorphous Solids; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; Volume 1296, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Neumann, M.; di Marco, G.; Iudin, D.; Viola, M.; van Nostrum, C.F.; van Ravensteijn, B.G.P.; Vermonden, T. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels: The Dynamic Smart Biomaterials of Tomorrow. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 8377–8392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richtering, W.; Saunders, B.R. Gel Architectures and Their Complexity. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 3695–3702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lapitsky, Y. Ionically Crosslinked Polyelectrolyte Nanocarriers: Recent Advances and Open Problems. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.-G.; Surat’man, N.E.B.; Chang, J.J.; Ong, Z.L.; Li, B.; Fan, X.; Loh, X.J.; Li, Z. Polyelectrolyte Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Chem.—Asian J. 2022, 17, e202200604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seitz, M.E.; Burghardt, W.R.; Faber, K.T.; Shull, K.R. Self-Assembly and Stress Relaxation in Acrylic Triblock Copolymer Gels. Macromolecules 2007, 40, 1218–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bustamante-Torres, M.; Romero-Fierro, D.; Arcentales-Vera, B.; Palomino, K.; Magaña, H.; Bucio, E. Hydrogels Classification According to the Physical or Chemical Interactions and as Stimuli-Sensitive Materials. Gels 2021, 7, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appel, E.A.; del Barrio, J.; Loh, X.J.; Scherman, O.A. Supramolecular Polymeric Hydrogels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6195–6214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holloway, J.L.; Lowman, A.M.; Palmese, G.R. The Role of Crystallization and Phase Separation in the Formation of Physically Cross-Linked PVA Hydrogels. Soft Matter 2012, 9, 826–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slager, J.; Domb, A.J. Biopolymer Stereocomplexes. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 549–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Harada, A.; Kamachi, M. Sol–Gel Transition During Inclusion Complex Formation Between A-Cyclodextrin and High Molecular Weight Poly(Ethylene Glycol)s in Aqueous Solution. Polym. J. 1994, 26, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Bai, H.; Shi, G. Three-Dimensional Self-Assembly of Graphene Oxide and DNA into Multifunctional Hydrogels. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7358–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, K.Z.; Jeon, J.; Jiang, B.; Subramani, S.V.; Li, J.; Zhang, F. Protein-Based Hydrogels and Their Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2023, 28, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Jia, X.; Yin, L. Hydrogel: Diversity of Structures and Applications in Food Science. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 37, 313–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Li, H. Engineering Tandem Modular Protein Based Reversible Hydrogels. Chem. Commun. 2008, 35, 4144–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.D.; Charati, M.B.; Kim, I.L.; Burdick, J.A. Injectable Shear-Thinning Hydrogels Engineered with a Self-Assembling Dock-and-Lock Mechanism. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2145–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omidian, H.; Park, K. Introduction to Hydrogels. In Biomedical Applications of Hydrogels Handbook; Ottenbrite, R.M., Park, K., Okano, T., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Chattergjee, S.; Hui, P.C. Review of Stimuli-Responsive Polymers in Drug Delivery and Textile Application. Molecules 2019, 24, 2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Štular, D.; Tomšič, B. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Textile Functionalisation: A Review. Tekstilec 2017, 60, 76–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schott, H. Kinetics of Swelling of Polymers and Their Gels. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 81, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boruah, M.; Sarma, A. Dry Gels: Concept, Current Trends, and New Avenues in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Application. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2025, 14, e00863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Yahya, E.B.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Balakrishnan, V.; Nasution, H. Insights into the Role of Biopolymer-Based Xerogels in Biomedical Applications. Gels 2022, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fiorati, A.; Caridi, F.; Paladini, G. Editorial on the Special Issue: “Advances in Xerogels: From Design to Applications”. Gels 2023, 9, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bashari, A.; Hemmati Nejad, N.; Pourjavadi, A. Applications of Stimuli Responsive Hydrogels: A Textile Engineering Approach. J. Text. Inst. 2013, 104, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flory, P.J.; Rehner, J., Jr. Statistical Mechanics of Cross-Linked Polymer Networks I. Rubberlike Elasticity. J. Chem. Phys. 1943, 11, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flory, P.J.; Tatara, Y.-I. The Elastic Free Energy and the Elastic Equation of State: Elongation and Swelling of Polydimethylsiloxane Networks. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1975, 13, 683–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fennell, E.; Huyghe, J.M. Chemically Responsive Hydrogel Deformation Mechanics: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wichterle, O.; Lím, D. Hydrophilic Gels for Biological Use. Nature 1960, 185, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yannas, I.V.; Lee, E.; Orgill, D.P.; Skrabut, E.M.; Murphy, G.F. Synthesis and Characterization of a Model Extracellular Matrix That Induces Partial Regeneration of Adult Mammalian Skin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 933–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnopeeva, E.L.; Panova, G.G.; Yakimansky, A.V. Agricultural Applications of Superabsorbent Polymer Hydrogels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Völlmecke, K.; Afroz, R.; Bierbach, S.; Brenker, L.J.; Frücht, S.; Glass, A.; Giebelhaus, R.; Hoppe, A.; Kanemaru, K.; Lazarek, M.; et al. Hydrogel-Based Biosensors. Gels 2022, 8, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Qu, S.; Suo, Z.; Yang, W. Functional Hydrogel Coatings. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 8, nwaa254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, S.; Yang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yin, H.; Yu, D. Research Advances in Superabsorbent Polymers. Polymers 2024, 16, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mitura, S.; Sionkowska, A.; Jaiswal, A. Biopolymers for Hydrogels in Cosmetics: Review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2020, 31, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nath, P.C.; Debnath, S.; Sridhar, K.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Nayak, P.K.; Sharma, M. A Comprehensive Review of Food Hydrogels: Principles, Formation Mechanisms, Microstructure, and Its Applications. Gels 2022, 9, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandile, N.G.; Nasr, A.S. Environment Friendly Modified Chitosan Hydrogels as a Matrix for Adsorption of Metal Ions, Synthesis and Characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 78, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasool, A.; Ata, S.; Islam, A. Stimuli Responsive Biopolymer (Chitosan) Based Blend Hydrogels for Wound Healing Application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 203, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saptaji, K.; Iza, N.R.; Widianingrum, S.; Mulia, V.K.; Setiawan, I. Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) Hydrogels for Contact Lens Applications—A Review. Makara J. Sci. 2021, 25, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbari, M.; Tamayol, A.; Laforte, V.; Annabi, N.; Najafabadi, A.H.; Khademhosseini, A.; Juncker, D. Composite Living Fibers for Creating Tissue Constructs Using Textile Techniques. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4060–4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sayed, U.; Deshmukh, I. Hydrogels for Textile Applications—Review. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 1968–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodarzi, H.; Jadidi, K.; Pourmotabed, S.; Sharifi, E.; Aghamollaei, H. Preparation and in Vitro Characterization of Cross-Linked Collagen–Gelatin Hydrogel Using EDC/NHS for Corneal Tissue Engineering Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 620–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Tang, Q. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Thermosensitive Hydrogel Based on Chitosan and Gelatin Blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, V.R.; Amiji, M.M. Preparation and Characterization of Freeze-Dried Chitosan-Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Hydrogels for Site-Specific Antibiotic Delivery in the Stomach. Pharm. Res. 1996, 13, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwon, S.S.; Kong, B.J.; Park, S.N. Physicochemical Properties of pH-Sensitive Hydrogels Based on Hydroxyethyl Cellulose–Hyaluronic Acid and for Applications as Transdermal Delivery Systems for Skin Lesions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 92, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, A.; Jeon, O.; Tang, R.; Lee, Y.B.; Lee, S.J.; Alsberg, E. Cell-Laden Multiple-Step and Reversible 4D Hydrogel Actuators to Mimic Dynamic Tissue Morphogenesis. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2004616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, A.; Jeon, O.; Cleveland, D.; Gasvoda, K.L.; Wells, D.; Lee, S.J.; Alsberg, E. Jammed Micro-Flake Hydrogel for Four-Dimensional Living Cell Bioprinting. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2109394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, X.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Wu, D.; Liang, Q.; Zhu, B.; Fang, W.; Qiu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; et al. Smart Hydrogel Composite for Microenvironmental Humidity Regulation in Cigar Storage. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 24712–24724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Ji, H. Preparation and Controllable Release of Chitosan/Vanillin Microcapsules and Their Application to Cotton Fabric. Flavour Fragr. J. 2014, 29, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delipinar, T.; Shafique, A.; Gohar, M.S.; Yapici, M.K. Fabrication and Materials Integration of Flexible Humidity Sensors for Emerging Applications. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 8744–8753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y. Hydrogel Actuators: From Building Blocks Selection, Anisotropic Structures Design to Multifunctional Applications. Soft Sci. 2025, 5, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pflumm, S.; Wiedemann, Y.; Fauser, D.; Safaraliyev, J.; Lunter, D.; Steeb, H.; Ludwigs, S. Autonomous Adaption of Intelligent Humidity-Programmed Hydrogel Patches for Tunable Stiffness and Drug Release. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2023, 8, 2300937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasche, S.; Angeloni, S.; Ischer, R.; Liley, M.; Luprano, J.; Voirin, G. Wearable Biosensors for Monitoring Wound Healing. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2008, 57, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, Y.; Park, K. Environment-Sensitive Hydrogels for Drug Delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2012, 64, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlovskaya, V.; Sukhishvili, S.A. pH-Controlled Permeability of Layered Hydrogen-Bonded Polymer Capsules. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 5569–5572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijeth, S.; Kariduraganavar, M.Y.; Geetha, B. Heggannavar Encapsulating Wall Materials for Micro-/Nanocapsules. In Microencapsulation—Processes, Technologies and Industrial Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Okano, T.; Bae, Y.H.; Jacobs, H.; Kim, S.W. Thermally On-Off Switching Polymers for Drug Permeation and Release. J. Control. Release 1990, 11, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataoka, K.; Miyazaki, H.; Bunya, M.; Okano, T.; Sakurai, Y. Totally Synthetic Polymer Gels Responding to External Glucose Concentration: Their Preparation and Application to On−Off Regulation of Insulin Release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12694–12695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sershen, S.R.; Westcott, S.L.; Halas, N.J.; West, J.L. Temperature-Sensitive Polymer–Nanoshell Composites for Photothermally Modulated Drug Delivery. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 51, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rana, M.M.; De la Hoz Siegler, H. Tuning the Properties of PNIPAm-Based Hydrogel Scaffolds for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2021, 13, 3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kushida, A.; Yamato, M.; Konno, C.; Kikuchi, A.; Sakurai, Y.; Okano, T. Temperature-Responsive Culture Dishes Allow Nonenzymatic Harvest of Differentiated Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Cell Sheets. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000, 51, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akiyama, Y. Design of Temperature-Responsive Cell Culture Surfaces for Cell Sheet Engineering. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2021, 2021, 5738457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Serpe, M.J. Stimuli-Responsive Assemblies for Sensing Applications. Gels 2016, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Jiao, C.; Gerlach, G.; Körner, J. Porosity Engineering of Dried Smart Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) Hydrogels for Gas Sensing. Biomacromolecules 2024, 25, 2715–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Jiang, L.; He, S.; Zhang, J.; Shao, W. Recent Progress in PNIPAM-Based Multi-Responsive Actuators: A Mini-Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 133496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, X.; Gao, Z.; Feng, X.; Zhu, S.; Yang, W. Photothermal and Magnetic Actuation of Multimodal PNIPAM Hydrogel-Based Soft Robots. Gels 2025, 11, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Z.; Okano, T. Recent Development of Temperature-Responsive Surfaces and Their Application for Cell Sheet Engineering. Regen. Biomater. 2014, 1, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilcox, K.G.; Kozawa, S.K.; Morozova, S. Fundamentals and Mechanics of Polyelectrolyte Gels: Thermodynamics, Swelling, Scattering, and Elasticity. Chem. Phys. Rev. 2021, 2, 041309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ball, V. Specific Ion Effects in Hydrogels. Molecules 2024, 29, 5990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gong, J.; Schuurmans, C.C.L.; van Genderen, A.M.; Cao, X.; Li, W.; Cheng, F.; He, J.J.; López, A.; Huerta, V.; Manríquez, J.; et al. Complexation-Induced Resolution Enhancement of 3D-Printed Hydrogel Constructs. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, I.-N.; Dobre, O.; Richards, D.; Ballestrem, C.; Curran, J.M.; Hunt, J.A.; Richardson, S.M.; Swift, J.; Wong, L.S. Photoresponsive Hydrogels with Photoswitchable Mechanical Properties Allow Time-Resolved Analysis of Cellular Responses to Matrix Stiffening. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7765–7776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cao, Z.; Li, Q.; Wang, G. Photodegradable Polymer Nanocapsules Fabricated from Dimethyldiethoxysilane Emulsion Templates for Controlled Release. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 6817–6823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinstain, R.; Slanina, T.; Kand, D.; Klán, P. Visible-to-NIR-Light Activated Release: From Small Molecules to Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 13135–13272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Bai, B.; Wang, H.; Suo, Y. A Near-Infrared and Temperature-Responsive Pesticide Release Platform through Core–Shell Polydopamine@PNIPAm Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6424–6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Zhou, S. Fabrication of Ultraviolet-Responsive Microcapsules Via Pickering Emulsion Polymerization Using Modified Nano-Silica/Nano-Titania as Pickering Agents. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 13850–13856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murdan, S. Electro-Responsive Drug Delivery from Hydrogels. J. Control. Release 2003, 92, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Cheng, Y. Magnetic-Responsive Hydrogels: From Strategic Design to Biomedical Applications. J. Control. Release 2021, 335, 541–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeingst, T.J.; Arrizabalaga, J.H.; Hayes, D.J. Ultrasound-Induced Drug Release from Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Gels 2022, 8, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Loebel, C.; Rodell, C.B.; Chen, M.H.; Burdick, J.A. Shear-Thinning and Self-Healing Hydrogels as Injectable Therapeutics and for 3D-Printing. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1521–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kulkarni, A.; Tourrette, A.; Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G.; Jocic, D. Microgel-Based Surface Modifying System for Stimuli-Responsive Functional Finishing of Cotton. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1306–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Hu, H.; Yang, Z.; He, L.; Kong, Y.; Fei, B.; Xin, J.H. Smart Hydrogel-Functionalized Textile System with Moisture Management Property for Skin Application. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 125027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, B. Fabric-Supported Chitosan Modified Temperature Responsive PNIPAAm/PU Hydrogel and the Use Thereof in Preparation of Facial Mask. U.S. Patent US7780979B2, 24 August 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Wat, E.; Hui, P.C.L.; Chan, B.; Ng, F.S.F.; Kan, C.-W.; Wang, X.; Hu, H.; Wong, E.C.W.; Lau, C.B.S.; et al. Dual-Functional Transdermal Drug Delivery System with Controllable Drug Loading Based on Thermosensitive Poloxamer Hydrogel for Atopic Dermatitis Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, B.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Hao, X.; Lin, J.; Cheng, D.; Lu, Y.; Wang, B.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; et al. Thermosensitive Behavior and Antibacterial Activity of Cotton Fabric Modified with a Chitosan-Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogel. Polymers 2016, 8, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, B.C.-E.; Kan, C.; Sun, C.; Du, J.; Xu, C. A Review of Chitosan Textile Applications. AATCC J. Res. 2019, 6, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Wang, Q.; Wang, T. Thermoresponsive PNIPAAm-Modified Cotton Fabric Surfaces That Switch Between Superhydrophilicity and Superhydrophobicity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 4888–4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Liu, N.; Fu, C.; Li, K.; Tao, L.; Feng, L.; Wei, Y. Thermo and pH Dual-Responsive Materials for Controllable Oil/Water Separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2026–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, D.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y. Superhydrophilic and Underwater Superoleophobic Cotton Fabric for Oil–Water Separation and Removal of Heavy-Metal Ion. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 30184–30196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lobel, B.T.; Baiocco, D.; Al-Sharabi, M.; Routh, A.F.; Zhang, Z.; Cayre, O.J. Current Challenges in Microcapsule Designs and Microencapsulation Processes: A Review. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 40326–40355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.K. Functional Coatings and Microencapsulation: A General Perspective. In Functional Coatings; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Meirowitz, R. Microencapsulation Technology for Coating and Laminating. In Smart Textile Coatings and Laminates; The Textile Institute Book Series; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 117–154. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, G. Microencapsulation in Textile Finishing. Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Top. 2001, 31, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Umer, M.; Pervez, M.D.N.; Hasan, K.M.F.; Habib, M.A.; Islam, M.D.S.; Lin, L.; Xiong, X.; Naddeo, V.; Cai, Y. Biopolymers-Based Microencapsulation Technology for Sustainable Textiles Development: A Short Review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 7, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, B.K.; Lowell, S. Oil-Containing Microscopic Capsules and Method of Making Them. U.S. Patent US2800457A, 23 July 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, S.Y.; Yuen, C.W.M.; Kan, C.W.; Cheuk, K.K.L. Development of Cosmetic Textiles Using Microencapsulation Technology. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2008, 12, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, S.N.; Martins, I.M.; Fernandes, I.P.; Gomes, P.B.; Mata, V.G.; Barreiro, M.F.; Rodrigues, A.E. Scentfashion®: Microencapsulated Perfumes for Textile Application. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomaro-Duchesneau, C.; Saha, S.; Malhotra, M.; Kahouli, I.; Prakash, S. Microencapsulation for the Therapeutic Delivery of Drugs, Live Mammalian and Bacterial Cells, and Other Biopharmaceutics: Current Status and Future Directions. J. Pharm. 2013, 2013, 103527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calderón-Oliver, M.; Ponce-Alquicira, E. The Role of Microencapsulation in Food Application. Molecules 2022, 27, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, G. Microencapsulated Colourants for Technical Textile Application. In Advances in the Dyeing and Finishing of Technical Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013; pp. 78–104. [Google Scholar]
- Bourgeat-Lami, E.; Duguet, E. Polymer Encapsulation of Inorganic Particles. In Functional Coatings; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 85–152. [Google Scholar]
- Shukla, P.G. Microencapsulation of Liquid Active Agents. In Functional Coatings; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 153–186. [Google Scholar]
- Valdes, A.; Ramos, M.; Beltran, A.; Garrigos, M.C. Recent Trends in Microencapsulation for Smart and Active Innovative Textile Products. Curr. Org. Chem. 2018, 22, 1237–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Driessche, I.; Hoste, S. Encapsulations Through the Sol-Gel Technique and Their Applications in Functional Coatings. In Functional Coatings; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 259–296. [Google Scholar]
- Massella, D.; Giraud, S.; Guan, J.; Ferri, A.; Salaün, F. Manufacture Techniques of Chitosan-Based Microcapsules to Enhance Functional Properties of Textiles. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 35: Chitin and Chitosan: History, Fundamentals and Innovations; Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 303–336. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Ngo, H.V.; Jin, G.; Park, C.; Park, J.-B.; Tran, P.H.L.; Tran, T.T.D.; Nguyen, V.H.; Lee, B.-J. Effect of pH Adjustment and Ratio of Oppositely Charged Polymers on the Mechanistic Performance and Sustained Release of Volatile Perfume in Interpolyelectrolyte Complex Microcapsules. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 604, 120672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Hu, G.; Qiu, H.; Mia, R.; Zhang, H.; Pei, L.; Wang, J. Temperature-Sensitive Fragrance Microcapsules with Double Capsule Walls: A Study on Preparation and Sustained Release Mechanism. Polymers 2023, 15, 3686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelrahman, M.S.; Nassar, S.; Mashaly, H.; Mahmoud, S.; Maamoun, D. Textiles Printing Using Microencapsulated Pigments in Biodegradable Thickeners. J. Adv. Chem. 2018, 15, 6122–6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arslan, D.; Tang, R.; Bouldin, R.; Mosurkal, R.; Sun, Y.; Orbey, N. Investigation of the Synergistic Effect of Combined Antimicrobial Agents and Insect Repellent Microcapsules on Fabrics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2025, 64, 8202–8210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butstraen, C.; Salaün, F.; Devaux, E.; Giraud, S.; Vroman, P. Application of Flame-Retardant Double-Layered Shell Microcapsules to Nonwoven Polyester. Polymers 2016, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Georgievska, T.; Trajkovikj, S.; Atkovska, K.; Lisichkov, K. Recent Advances in Textile Functionalization Using Essential Oil-Based-Microcapsules with Antimicrobial Properties. Tekstilec 2025, 68, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, Q.; Zhong, S.; He, S.; Gao, Y.; Cui, X. Constructing of pH and Reduction Dual-Responsive Folic Acid-Modified Hyaluronic Acid-Based Microcapsules for Dual-Targeted Drug Delivery Via Sonochemical Method. Colloid. Interface Sci. Commun. 2021, 44, 100503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, T.; Ma, S.; Wang, F.; Wang, L. A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Controlled Release Antimicrobial Packaging in Food Preservation. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 32, 1459–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Ding, T. A Review on the Current State of Microcapsule-Based Self-Healing Dental Composites. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Parys, M. Smart Textiles Using Microencapsulation Technology. In Functional Coatings; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 221–258. [Google Scholar]
- Kozlovskaya, V.; Kharlampieva, E.; Mansfield, M.L.; Sukhishvili, S.A. Poly(Methacrylic Acid) Hydrogel Films and Capsules: Response to pH and Ionic Strength, and Encapsulation of Macromolecules. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Xia, S.; Wu, K.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J. A pH/Enzyme-Responsive Tumor-Specific Delivery System for Doxorubicin. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 6309–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuscó, C.; Garcia, J.; Nicolás, E.; Rocas, P.; Rocas, J. Multisensitive Drug-Loaded Polyurethane/Polyurea Nanocapsules with pH-Synchronized Shell Cationization and Redox-Triggered Release. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 6457–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glinel, K.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Möhwald, H.; Khrenov, V.; Tauer, K. Thermosensitive Hollow Capsules Based on Thermoresponsive Polyelectrolytes. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 1784–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okahata, Y.; Noguchi, H.; Seki, T. Thermoselective Permeation from a Polymer-Grafted Capsule Membrane. Macromolecules 1986, 19, 493–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bojana, B.P.; Marica, S. Microencapsulation Technology and Applications in Added-Value Functional Textiles. Phys. Sci. Rev. 2016, 1, 20150003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, G.; Tian, J.; Wang, H.; Gong, M.; Liu, S. Reversibly Switching Bilayer Permeability and Release Modules of Photochromic Polymersomes Stabilized by Cooperative Noncovalent Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15262–15275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Radt, B.; Smith, T.A.; Caruso, F. Optically Addressable Nanostructured Capsules. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 2184–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.; Sun, P.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Niu, Y.; Zhao, D. Stimulus Responsive Microcapsules and Their Aromatic Applications. J. Control. Release 2022, 351, 198–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeon, L.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, J.; Seo, H.; Lee, H. One-Step Synthesis of Hydrogen-Bonded Microcapsules for pH-Triggered Protein Release. Small Struct. 2023, 4, 2300200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Ballester, N.M.; Soulairol, I.; Bataille, B.; Sharkawi, T. Flexible Heteroionic Calcium-Magnesium Alginate Beads for Controlled Drug Release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hale, D.V.; Hoover, M.J.; Oneill, M.J. Phase Change Materials Handbook; Lockheed Missiles and Space Company: Huntsville, AL, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Oulast Technologies, Inc. Named to the “Space Hall of Fame”. Blue. pp. 1–3. Available online: https://www.hollandhart.com/blue/outlast.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2026).
- Sagar, B.; Wales, D.; Nelson, G. Treating Materials. 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, G. Application of Microencapsulation in Textiles. Int. J. Pharm. 2002, 242, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, G. Microencapsulates in Textile Coloration and Finishing. Rev. Prog. Color. Relat. Top. 1991, 21, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jocic, D.; Tourrette, A.; Glampedaki, P.; Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G. Application of Temperature and pH Responsive Microhydrogels for Functional Finishing of Cotton Fabric. Mater. Technol. 2009, 24, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tourrette, A.; De Geyter, N.; Jocic, D.; Morent, R.; Warmoeskerken, M.M.C.G.; Leys, C. Incorporation of Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide)/Chitosan Microgel Onto Plasma Functionalized Cotton Fibre Surface. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 352, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Boyter, H., Jr.; Qian, L. UV Curing for Encapsulated Aroma Finish on Cotton. J. Text. Inst. 2005, 96, 407–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sill, T.J.; von Recum, H.A. Electrospinning: Applications in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 1989–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Hou, T.; Wang, J.; Yan, Y.; Li, W.; Ren, Y.; Yan, S. Phase Change Materials Meet Microfluidic Encapsulation. Adv. Sci. 2023, 11, 2304580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Cho, G. Thermal Storage/Release, Durability, and Temperature Sensing Properties of Thermostatic Fabrics Treated with Octadecane-Containing Microcapsules. Text. Res. J. 2002, 72, 1093–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, Y.; Yoo, D.-I.; Son, K. Development of Thermoregulating Textile Materials with Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials (PCM). II. Preparation and Application of PCM Microcapsules. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 2005–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritom, M.M.; Islam, M.d.A.; Moshwan, M.d.M.; Hossain, A.; Hasan, M.d.Z.; Siddiquee, M.d.A.B.; Ayatullah Hosne Asif, A.K.M. Phase Change Materials in Textiles: Synthesis, Properties, Types and Applications—A Critical Review. Text. Res. J. 2024, 94, 2763–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.A.; Butola, B.S.; Joshi, M. Application of Thermochromic Colorants on Textiles: Temperature Dependence of Colorimetric Properties. Color. Technol. 2013, 129, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Meng, J.; Yu, L.; Gao, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xue, T.; Liu, Y.; Zhi, C. Reversible Dual-Responsive Color-Changing Fabric Based on Thermochromic Microcapsules for Textile Fashion and Intelligent Monitoring. Dye. Pigment. 2024, 231, 112397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huo, Z.; Liu, J.; Yan, J.; Wang, S.; Yang, W.; Shan, J.; Hu, X. A Novel Dual-Chamber Microcapsule Inspired by Lotus Seedpod for Temperature-Controlled Fragrance Release and Thermal-Regulation of Fabrics. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 717, 136739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Shen, J.; Wang, J.; Niu, Y.; Xiao, Z.; et al. Cationic and Temperature-Sensitive Liposomes Loaded with Eugenol for the Application to Silk. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 3139–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Xu, C.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, R.; Gao, Q.; Wang, C. Multifunctional Fabric Coatings with Slow-Releasing Fragrance and UV Resistant Properties from Ethyl Cellulose/Silica Hybrid Microcapsules. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bezerra, F.M.; Zurita, M.E.P.P.; Volante, E.K.T.S.; Moisés, M.P.; Lis, M.J. Microcapsules and Biofunctionality: Enhancing Textile and Dermocosmetic Properties Through Microencapsulation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2025, 142, e57036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez, V.A.; Muñoz, V.; Gonzalez, J.S.; Martinez, M.A. Functional Textiles for Skin Care by Active Substance Encapsulation. J. Text. Eng. Fash. Technol. 2017, 2, 538–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özsevinç, A.; Alkan, C. Ethylene Glycol Based Polyurethane Shell Microcapsules for Textile Applications Releasing Medicinal Lavender and Responding to Mechanical Stimuli. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 652, 129888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Li, Q.; Gong, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J. A Poly(Allylamine Hydrochloride)/Poly(Styrene Sulfonate) Microcapsule-Coated Cotton Fabric for Stimulus-Responsive Textiles. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 17731–17738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keyan, K.; Ramachandran, T.; Shamugasundaram, O.L.; Balasubramaniam, M.; Ragavendra, T. Microencapsulation of PCMs in Textiles: A Review. J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2012, 7. Available online: https://jtatm.textiles.ncsu.edu/index.php/JTATM/article/view/2414 (accessed on 4 February 2026).
- Massella, D.; Argenziano, M.; Ferri, A.; Guan, J.; Giraud, S.; Cavalli, R.; Barresi, A.A.; Salaün, F. Bio-Functional Textiles: Combining Pharmaceutical Nanocarriers with Fibrous Materials for Innovative Dermatological Therapies. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, F.; Sun, A.M. Microencapsulated Islets as Bioartificial Endocrine Pancreas. Science 1980, 210, 908–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brun-Graeppi, A.K.A.S.; Richard, C.; Bessodes, M.; Scherman, D.; Merten, O.-W. Cell Microcarriers and Microcapsules of Stimuli-Responsive Polymers. J. Control. Release 2011, 149, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uludag, H.; De Vos, P.; Tresco, P.A. Technology of Mammalian Cell Encapsulation. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2000, 42, 29–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murua, A.; Orive, G.; Hernández, R.M.; Pedraz, J.L. Xenogeneic Transplantation of Erythropoietin-Secreting Cells Immobilized in Microcapsules Using Transient Immunosuppression. J. Control. Release 2009, 137, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Albertini, B.; Vitali, B.; Passerini, N.; Cruciani, F.; Di Sabatino, M.; Rodriguez, L.; Brigidi, P. Development of Microparticulate Systems for Intestinal Delivery of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 40, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Sui, W.; Wang, Y.; Jiao, Q. Preparation of Chitosan/Chondroitin Sulfate Complex Microcapsules and Application in Controlled Release of 5-Fluorouracil. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 80, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozlovskaya, V.; Shamaev, A.; Sukhishvili, S.A. Tuning Swelling pH and Permeability of Hydrogel Multilayer Capsules. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, H.-S.; Kim, E.; Park, J.P.; Lee, S.-J.; Lee, H.; Choi, C.-H. Broad-Temperature-Range Mechanically Tunable Hydrogel Microcapsules for Controlled Active Release. J. Control. Release 2023, 356, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ichikawa, H.; Fukumori, Y. A Novel Positively Thermosensitive Controlled-Release Microcapsule with Membrane of Nano-Sized Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) Gel Dispersed in Ethylcellulose Matrix. J. Control. Release 2000, 63, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wei, J.; Ju, X.-J.; Zou, X.-Y.; Xie, R.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.-M.; Chu, L.-Y. Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Microcapsules for Adjustable Controlled-Release. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3312–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anumolu, S.S.; Menjoge, A.R.; Deshmukh, M.; Gerecke, D.; Stein, S.; Laskin, J.; Sinko, P.J. Doxycycline Hydrogels with Reversible Disulfide Crosslinks for Dermal Wound Healing of Mustard Injuries. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1204–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, C.; Wu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Luo, F.; Zhao, X.; Wei, Y.; Qian, Z. A Biodegradable Hydrogel System Containing Curcumin Encapsulated in Micelles for Cutaneous Wound Healing. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 6377–6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, P.; Huang, G.; Fan, C.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Fu, L.; Lin, B. A Dual Stimuli-Responsive and Safer Controlled Release Platform of Pesticide Through Constructing UiO-66-Based Alginate Hydrogel. Polym. Test. 2021, 97, 107152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.-Z.; Wang, X.; Wu, J.-Z.; Li, S.-D. Development of Thermosensitive Microgel-Loaded Cotton Fabric for Controlled Drug Release. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 403, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrusic, S.; Jovancic, P.; Lewandowski, M.; Giraud, S.; Grujic, S.; Ostojic, S.; Bugarski, B.; Koncar, V. Properties and Drug Release Profile of Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) Microgels Functionalized with Maleic Anhydride and Alginate. J. Mater. Sci. 2013, 48, 7935–7948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khattab, T.A.; Fouda, M.M.G.; Abdelrahman, M.S.; Othman, S.I.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Alqaraawi, M.A.; Al Fassam, H.; Allam, A.A. Co-Encapsulation of Enzyme and Tricyanofuran Hydrazone into Alginate Microcapsules Incorporated Onto Cotton Fabric as a Biosensor for Colorimetric Recognition of Urea. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 142, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelrahman, M.S.; Fouda, M.M.G.; Ajarem, J.S.; Maodaa, S.N.; Allam, A.A.; Khattab, T.A. Development of Colorimetric Cotton Swab Using Molecular Switching Hydrazone Probe in Calcium Alginate. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1216, 128301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, J.M.; Caldas, A.L.; Tohidi, S.D.; Molina, J.; Souto, A.P.; Fangueiro, R.; Zille, A. Properties and Controlled Release of Chitosan Microencapsulated Limonene Oil. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2014, 24, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharkawy, A.; Fernandes, I.P.; Barreiro, M.F.; Rodrigues, A.E.; Shoeib, T. Aroma-Loaded Microcapsules with Antibacterial Activity for Eco-Friendly Textile Application: Synthesis, Characterization, Release, and Green Grafting. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 5516–5526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ristić, T.; Zabret, A.; Zemljič, L.F.; Peršin, Z. Chitosan Nanoparticles as a Potential Drug Delivery System Attached to Viscose Cellulose Fibers. Cellulose 2017, 24, 739–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehan, M.; Ahmed-Farid, O.A.; Ibrahim, S.R.; Hassan, A.A.; Abdelrazek, A.M.; Khafaga, N.I.M.; Khattab, T.A. Green and Sustainable Encapsulation of Guava Leaf Extracts (Psidium guajava L.) into Alginate/Starch Microcapsules for Multifunctional Finish over Cotton Gauze. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 18612–18623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratiwi, L.; Eddy, D.R.; Anshori, J.A.; Harja, A.; Wahyudi, T.; Mulyawan, A.S.; Julaeha, E. Microencapsulation of Citrus Aurantifolia Essential Oil with the Optimized CaCl2 Crosslinker and Its Antibacterial Study for Cosmetic Textiles. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 30682–30690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.; Sheikh, J. Novel Chitosan-Gelatin Microcapsules Containing Rosemary Essential Oil for the Preparation of Bioactive and Protective Linen. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruyninckx, K.; Dusselier, M. Sustainable Chemistry Considerations for the Encapsulation of Volatile Compounds in Laundry-Type Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 8041–8054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Venn diagram depicting the scope of the field for microcapsules, hydrogels, textiles, and stimuli-responsive behavior. At the intersection of microcapsules and hydrogels are extended-release hydrogel capsules, widely used for controlled oral drug delivery. At the intersection of hydrogels and textiles are hydrogel bulk textile coatings and functionalized fibers, which are used for comfort textiles, active compound delivery, and antimicrobial fabrics, as explored in Section 2.1.3. At the intersection of textiles and stimuli-response are stimuli-responsive non-hydrogel coatings/fibers for textiles, which is a broad category that includes technologies such as phase-change materials (PCMs) and shape-memory polymers (SMPs). At the intersection of stimuli-response and microcapsules are stimuli-responsive non-hydrogel capsules, which are composed of one of the many non-hydrogel polymers outlined in Table 3 and demonstrate responsive behavior. Sections (a), (b), (c), and (d) represent the intersections of the areas described above, and each is explored briefly throughout this work as we outline the state of the field. The center of the Venn diagram is an area of significant research potential and is the focus of this review.
Figure 1.
Venn diagram depicting the scope of the field for microcapsules, hydrogels, textiles, and stimuli-responsive behavior. At the intersection of microcapsules and hydrogels are extended-release hydrogel capsules, widely used for controlled oral drug delivery. At the intersection of hydrogels and textiles are hydrogel bulk textile coatings and functionalized fibers, which are used for comfort textiles, active compound delivery, and antimicrobial fabrics, as explored in Section 2.1.3. At the intersection of textiles and stimuli-response are stimuli-responsive non-hydrogel coatings/fibers for textiles, which is a broad category that includes technologies such as phase-change materials (PCMs) and shape-memory polymers (SMPs). At the intersection of stimuli-response and microcapsules are stimuli-responsive non-hydrogel capsules, which are composed of one of the many non-hydrogel polymers outlined in Table 3 and demonstrate responsive behavior. Sections (a), (b), (c), and (d) represent the intersections of the areas described above, and each is explored briefly throughout this work as we outline the state of the field. The center of the Venn diagram is an area of significant research potential and is the focus of this review.
Figure 2.
Classification of types of crosslinking in hydrogels, including chemical and physical categories.
Figure 2.
Classification of types of crosslinking in hydrogels, including chemical and physical categories.
Figure 3.
Example of a chemical crosslinking reaction between two polymer chains within a hydrogel matrix to highlight an amidation reaction between amine and carboxyl side chains.
Figure 3.
Example of a chemical crosslinking reaction between two polymer chains within a hydrogel matrix to highlight an amidation reaction between amine and carboxyl side chains.
Figure 4.
Examples of ionic crosslinking in physical hydrogels: (a) an ionotropic gel (in this case, involving metal ion coordination) and (b) a complex coacervate.
Figure 4.
Examples of ionic crosslinking in physical hydrogels: (a) an ionotropic gel (in this case, involving metal ion coordination) and (b) a complex coacervate.
Figure 5.
Stimuli response triggers that lead to responsive behavior in hydrogel materials.
Figure 6.
Mechanisms of response in hydrogels: shrinkage and swelling (top) and change in crosslinking density (bottom). Red dots represent broken bonds and green dots represent new bonds.
Figure 6.
Mechanisms of response in hydrogels: shrinkage and swelling (top) and change in crosslinking density (bottom). Red dots represent broken bonds and green dots represent new bonds.
Figure 7.
Mechanisms of pH-dependent shrinking and swelling of hydrogel matrices [28]. The behavior of both anionic and cationic hydrogels in acidic and basic conditions is shown.
Figure 7.
Mechanisms of pH-dependent shrinking and swelling of hydrogel matrices [28]. The behavior of both anionic and cationic hydrogels in acidic and basic conditions is shown.
Figure 8.
Mechanism of temperature-dependent shrinking and swelling in inverse temperature-responsive hydrogels [6]. Below the LCST (left), the polymer chain is hydrated and forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules, adopting a coil conformation. Above the LCST (right), the polymer chain no longer forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules and exists in a dehydrated globular conformation.
Figure 8.
Mechanism of temperature-dependent shrinking and swelling in inverse temperature-responsive hydrogels [6]. Below the LCST (left), the polymer chain is hydrated and forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules, adopting a coil conformation. Above the LCST (right), the polymer chain no longer forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules and exists in a dehydrated globular conformation.
Figure 9.
Temperature-induced cell adhesion and detachment above and below LCST. Above LCST (right), the hydrogel coating is in a dehydrated state, and the sheet has a hydrophobic character, allowing cell adhesion. Below LCST (left), the hydrogel coating is in a hydrated state, and the sheet has a hydrophilic character, facilitating cell detachment. Image from Ref. [70] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2014 Tang & Okano (Author). Published by Oxford University Press.
Figure 9.
Temperature-induced cell adhesion and detachment above and below LCST. Above LCST (right), the hydrogel coating is in a dehydrated state, and the sheet has a hydrophobic character, allowing cell adhesion. Below LCST (left), the hydrogel coating is in a hydrated state, and the sheet has a hydrophilic character, facilitating cell detachment. Image from Ref. [70] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2014 Tang & Okano (Author). Published by Oxford University Press.
Figure 10.
SEM images of hydrogels containing azobenzene (A) prior to irradiation, (B) upon exposure to UV light (365 nm), and (C) after exposure to UV light and subsequent irradiation with blue light (490 nm). Image B shows a smaller pore size from UV light exposure, while irradiation with blue light increases pore size and reorganizes the polymer matrix. Images from Ref. [74] are under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 10.
SEM images of hydrogels containing azobenzene (A) prior to irradiation, (B) upon exposure to UV light (365 nm), and (C) after exposure to UV light and subsequent irradiation with blue light (490 nm). Image B shows a smaller pore size from UV light exposure, while irradiation with blue light increases pore size and reorganizes the polymer matrix. Images from Ref. [74] are under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 11.
Types of microcapsules, including reservoir and matrix types.
Figure 14.
Schematic of microencapsulation application to textile materials and relevant functional textile categories. Image from Ref. [96] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Copyright © 2023 Peng et al. (Author). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 14.
Schematic of microencapsulation application to textile materials and relevant functional textile categories. Image from Ref. [96] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Copyright © 2023 Peng et al. (Author). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 15.
Schematic illustration of microcapsule application to a textile substrate using the padding process. Image from Ref. [113] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2025 Tamara Georgievska, Stefan Trajkovikj, Katerina Atkovska, and Kiril Lisichkov (Author).
Figure 15.
Schematic illustration of microcapsule application to a textile substrate using the padding process. Image from Ref. [113] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2025 Tamara Georgievska, Stefan Trajkovikj, Katerina Atkovska, and Kiril Lisichkov (Author).
Figure 16.
(a) Diagram showing surface application of poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate) microcapsules to cotton fibers crosslinked using a positively charged compound containing ethylene oxide groups. (b) Rhodamine B release profile of single-layered microcapsules at pH = 5.8 (black) and 7.4 (red). Image from Ref. [150] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 16.
(a) Diagram showing surface application of poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate) microcapsules to cotton fibers crosslinked using a positively charged compound containing ethylene oxide groups. (b) Rhodamine B release profile of single-layered microcapsules at pH = 5.8 (black) and 7.4 (red). Image from Ref. [150] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Copyright © 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 17.
pH-responsive behavior of hydrogen-bonded PPO/PMAA hydrogel microcapsules. (a) Confocal laser scanning micrograph and optical micrograph images showing FITC-pepsin release from microcapsules (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) at pH = 6. (b) Microcapsule (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) degradation profiles at varying pH conditions. (c) Microcapsule degradation profiles at pH = 5 with varying PMAA MW. (d) Microcapsule (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) degradation profiles at varying salt concentrations. Image from Ref. [127] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2023 Jeon et al. (Author). Small Structures published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 17.
pH-responsive behavior of hydrogen-bonded PPO/PMAA hydrogel microcapsules. (a) Confocal laser scanning micrograph and optical micrograph images showing FITC-pepsin release from microcapsules (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) at pH = 6. (b) Microcapsule (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) degradation profiles at varying pH conditions. (c) Microcapsule degradation profiles at pH = 5 with varying PMAA MW. (d) Microcapsule (PMAA MW = 9.5 k) degradation profiles at varying salt concentrations. Image from Ref. [127] is under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Copyright © 2023 Jeon et al. (Author). Small Structures published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Figure 18.
(a) IMI release profiles at varying temperatures (15, 25, and 40 °C). (b) IMI release profiles of microcapsules with different PDA:PNIPAAm ratios at 15 °C for 10 h, then 40 °C for 15 h. (c) IMI release profiles with and without on–off NIR light cycles, where shaded regions indicate the NIR light is on and white regions indicate the NIR light is off. (d) Calculated IMI release rate with on–off NIR light cycles. Image from ref. [77] with permission. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
Figure 18.
(a) IMI release profiles at varying temperatures (15, 25, and 40 °C). (b) IMI release profiles of microcapsules with different PDA:PNIPAAm ratios at 15 °C for 10 h, then 40 °C for 15 h. (c) IMI release profiles with and without on–off NIR light cycles, where shaded regions indicate the NIR light is on and white regions indicate the NIR light is off. (d) Calculated IMI release rate with on–off NIR light cycles. Image from ref. [77] with permission. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.
Figure 19.
Active compound loading and unloading behavior in porous microgels; (a) squeezing mechanism shows active compound release upon shrinkage, and (b) diffusion mechanism shows active compound release upon swelling.
Figure 19.
Active compound loading and unloading behavior in porous microgels; (a) squeezing mechanism shows active compound release upon shrinkage, and (b) diffusion mechanism shows active compound release upon swelling.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Taylor, C.M.; Lucia, L.A. Hydrogel Microcapsules for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles. Fibers 2026, 14, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14020022
AMA Style
Taylor CM, Lucia LA. Hydrogel Microcapsules for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles. Fibers. 2026; 14(2):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14020022
Chicago/Turabian StyleTaylor, Chloe M., and Lucian A. Lucia. 2026. "Hydrogel Microcapsules for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles" Fibers 14, no. 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14020022
APA StyleTaylor, C. M., & Lucia, L. A. (2026). Hydrogel Microcapsules for Stimuli-Responsive Textiles. Fibers, 14(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14020022
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
