Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Load Carrying Capacity of Concrete Pavement Slabs Using Macro Synthetic Fibers
Next Article in Special Issue
Superhydrophobic Al2O3–Polymer Composite Coating for Self-Cleaning Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Can a-C:H-Sputtered Coatings Be Extended to Orthodontics?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Robust Superhydrophobic and Repellent Coatings Based on Micro/Nano SiO2 and Fluorinated Epoxy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Properties of Polypropylene Yarns with a Polytetrafluoroethylene Coating Containing Stabilized Magnetite Particles

by
Natalia Prorokova
1,2,* and
Svetlana Vavilova
1
1
G.A. Krestov Institute of Solution Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademicheskaya St. 1, 153045 Ivanovo, Russia
2
Department of Natural Sciences and Technosphere Safety, Ivanovo State Polytechnic University, Sheremetevsky Ave. 21, 153000 Ivanovo, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(7), 830; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070830
Submission received: 6 May 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 6 July 2021 / Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coatings Imparting Multifunctional Properties to Materials)

Abstract

:
This paper describes an original method for forming a stable coating on a polypropylene yarn. The use of this method provides this yarn with barrier antimicrobial properties, reducing its electrical resistance, increasing its strength, and achieving extremely high chemical resistance, similar to that of fluoropolymer yarns. The method is applied at the melt-spinning stage of polypropylene yarns. It is based on forming an ultrathin, continuous, and uniform coating on the surface of each of the yarn filaments. The coating is formed from polytetrafluoroethylene doped with magnetite nanoparticles stabilized with sodium stearate. The paper presents the results of a study of the effects of such an ultrathin polytetrafluoroethylene coating containing stabilized magnetite particles on the mechanical and electrophysical characteristics of the polypropylene yarn and its barrier antimicrobial properties. It also evaluates the chemical resistance of the polypropylene yarn with a coating based on polytetrafluoroethylene doped with magnetite nanoparticles.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Single-use materials (medical wear, masks, drapes and pads, sheets, etc.) are now often used in medical practice. A very important quality of such products is their antimicrobial properties, i.e., their ability to suppress the development of pathogenic microorganisms and protect the patients and doctors who come in contact with such microorganisms. One of the most widely applied methods of providing fibrous materials with antimicrobial properties is the use of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] in antimicrobial preparations since they become attached to the surface of natural fibers with an enormous number of functional groups. Polypropylene (PP) fiber has a chemically inert smooth surface with no pores on it, and it is very hard to attach metal or metal oxide nanoparticles to the surface of such a fiber. However, it is known [8,9,10,11,12,13,14] that nanoparticles retain their antimicrobial properties even when they are immobilized inside this polymer. Therefore, PP fibers can also be provided with antimicrobial properties by immobilizing metal-containing nanoparticles in their inner cavities. A major problem with the introduction of nanoparticles into the polymer matrix during the melt spinning of fibers is that it is natural for nanoparticles to aggregate because even a slight aggregation of the fillers may adversely affect the strength of the fibers. It is rather difficult to prevent the aggregation of nanosized fillers during the melt spinning of nanomodified synthetic filaments because the formation of nanoparticle aggregates is the result of the metastability of the nanoparticles with excessive surface energy. The proposed solutions to this problem are mainly based on lowering the surface energy of nanosized fillers by treating their surfaces with special agents [14,15]. Different works [16,17,18,19] propose a different approach to solving this problem. This approach consists of the introduction of a polymer composite based on antimicrobial iron-, manganese-, and silver-containing nanoparticles stabilized by polyolefins into a polypropylene melt during yarn formation. When this method is applied, the nanoparticles are uniformly distributed throughout the fiber and are firmly kept within it. However, the stabilization method for metal-containing nanoparticles in their introduction into a polyolefin matrix during the synthesis procedure is rather complicated, which is an obstacle to their application in the preparation of modified PP yarns with antimicrobial properties. However, the use of unstabilized metal-containing nanoparticles for these purposes reduces yarn strength and, in case of large aggregate formation, leads to the clogging of the spinnerettes and yarn breakage.
The aim of this work was to attach nanoparticles firmly to the PP yarn surface instead of immobilizing them inside the yarn. In this way, we can exclude the negative effects of the aggregated nanoparticles on the strength of the yarn and can increase the antimicrobial effect by localizing the biologically active nanoparticles on the surface. To do this, we introduced nanoparticles into the thin polymer coatings formed on the yarns.
There are various methods of forming thin and elastic polymer coatings on fibrous materials for the direct change of their properties: in situ polymerization, vapor deposition, dipping in a solution, etc. [20,21,22]. We had earlier proposed a fundamentally new approach to obtaining PP yarns with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) coating [23,24,25]. According to this approach, PTFE adhesion to the surface of a thermoplastic yarn is achieved by depositing a suspension of finely dispersed PTFE on the surface of a semi-solidified yarn at the stage of its formation on the polymer (oiling stage). At the orientational drawing state, the coating then becomes much thinner due to the fluoroplastic pseudofluidity and high coefficient of thermal expansion, which causes the coating to become uniform and oriented. Such a continuous and uniform PTFE coating makes the yarn extremely chemoresistant, similar to a fluoroplastic yarn. We supposed that the introduction of a small number of antimicrobial metal-containing nanoparticles into the PTFE coating structure could provide the yarn with additional functional characteristics: the yarn could become antimicrobial, retaining its high chemoresistance. Moreover, the introduction of metal-containing nanoparticles into the coating structure might reduce the electrical resistance of the yarn surface. To achieve this effect, we introduced a controlled number of biologically active magnetite (FeO·Fe2O3) nanoparticles into a PTFE suspension. To prevent the formation of large aggregates of magnetite nanoparticles, we stabilized them with a surfactant in advance. Since the orientational drawing of the yarn is carried out at temperatures up to 250 °C, we chose sodium stearate (NaC18H35O2) for the magnetite stabilization, as preliminary studies had shown that it is a thermally stable surfactant. The obtained composition was deposited on a semi-solidified PP yarn and then subjected to orientational drawing.

2. Materials and Methods

The following materials and reagents were used in this work: granulated “Balen 01250” polypropylene with a melt index of 25 g/10 min and a melting point of 169 °C (Ufa, Ufaorgsintez, technical requirements No. 2211-015-00203521-99); sodium stearate (NaC18H35O2), “pure”; ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4∙7H2O), “chemically pure” (Moscow, Chimmed); iron trichloridehexahydrate (FeCl3∙6H2O), “pure” (Moscow, Chimmed); ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), 25%, “pure”; and a suspension of CΦ-4Д (SF-4D) polytetrafluoroethylene (AO Galopolymer, Russia). In some of the experiments, we used a film made of 30 µm thick “Balen 01250” isotactic polypropylene (Europack-Ivanovo Ltd.» Ivanovo, Russia) as the PP yarn model.
The magnetite nanoparticles were prepared by codepositioning. For that purpose, we first prepared a solution of two salts containing 7.08 g FeSO4∙7H2O (C = 0.5 M) and 3.75 gFeCl3∙6H2O (C = 0.3 M), heated it to 80 °C and while mixing this solution, slowly added an excessive amount 15 mL (C = 1.5 M) of ammonia solution, NH4OH, to it. The stabilization resulted in the production 1.0% NaC18H35O2. Mixing the solution led to the appearance of black ultrafine particles. The mixture was then repeatedly washed with distilled water until the ammonia smell disappeared. The suspension of the stabilized magnetite was then dried in air until a powder was produced. The powder was sifted through a filter and dried for 24 h in a vacuum at a temperature of 60 °C.
The composition for coating the PP yarns was obtained from a finely dispersed suspension of SF-4D PTFE by mixing the components at a temperature of 80–90 °C. The composition contained a PTFE suspension-10%, sodium stearate-1.0%; magnetite-1%; and water-88%. To make the aggregates of the stabilized magnetite particles smaller, we subjected them to ultrasonic (US) treatment in a low-frequency ultrasonic sonicator of the USDN-2T type in a temperature-controlled container at a frequency of f = 22 kHz. The exposure lasted for 2 min.
The PP yarns were prepared using a laboratory bench for the SFPV-1 synthetic fibre spinning. The orientational drawing of the spun PP yarns was performed on an OSV-1 synthetic fiber orientation bench. Such benches can simulate the conditions of the industrial processes for yarn melt-spinning and orientational drawing. The images and schemes of the benches are presented in previous works [16,25].
The SFPV-1 spinning bench is equipped with an automated control panel for managing the spinning process, an extruder in which the polymer melts, a spinnerette with 24 holes (Ø = 0.4 mm) for the formation of fine jets of liquid from the melt, godet wheels, and a fibre collecting drum for winding the spun yarn onto a spindle. During the experiment, the temperature values in the extruder zones were different: in the preheating zone, T1 = 200 °C; in the melting zone, T2 = 225 °C; in the melt stabilization, zone T3 = 236 °C; and in the extrusion head heating zone, T4 = 236 °C. The melt was fed at a rate of 20 g/min. The godet wheels operated at 100 m/min.
The composition containing a PTFE suspension and magnetite nanoparticles stabilized by a thermally stable surfactant was deposited on the PP yarn surface from the first and second godets at the oiling stage.
After the extrusion and deposition of the PTFE composition, the PP yarns were subjected to orientational drawing and were thermally stabilized on an OSV-1 bench. The process was carried out for the standard PP yarn at the following temperatures in the stretching zones: T1 = 118–120 °C (the upper heated godet wheel), T2 = 120–122 °C (the lower heated godet wheel), and T3 = 123–125 °C (the thermoelectric plasticizer) at a rate of 3–20 m/min. The coated yarns were stretched at higher temperatures: T1 = 120–135 °C, T2 = 123–140 °C, and T3 = 125–155 °C. Complex yarns composed of 24 filaments with a diameter of 15 µm were obtained. The coating thickness was 0.18 ± 0.5 μm. The characteristics of the PTFE coating are described in detail in [25,26].
In some of the experiments, the composition was deposited on the surface of a polypropylene film produced in industrial conditions from 30 µm thick “Balen” 01250 polypropylene (Europack, Ivanovo, Russia). The film became 5 times longer after being stretched on the OSV-1 bench at 120 °C.
The size of the magnetite particles in the suspensions and powders was determined with the Analysette 22 Compact, a laser light scattering particle size analyzer. The particle size range was 0.3–300 µm.
The basic mechanical characteristics of the PP yarns were determined by stretching the yarns once until breakage on a modernized 2099-P-5 tensile testing machine (“Tochpribor”, OAO, Russia) in accordance with GOST 6611.2-73 (ISO 2062-72, ISO 6939-88).
The micrographs of the PP yarns were obtained using an optical microscope (equipped with a webcam (1.3 MP)) produced by “Biomed” (Russia). The surface structure was studied on a JSM 6380LA scanning electron microscope produced by JEOL.
The IR spectra were recorded on an Avatar ESP 360 type spectrometer (produced by the Nicolett company) with the method of multiple attenuated total reflectance (MATR) using a zinc selenide crystal with a 12-fold reflection in the range from 600 to 1600 cm−1. This region contains the reflection band characteristics of PTFE and PP.
To make sure that the coating is resistant to abrasion, we used a PP film as a model of the PP yarn. The measurement was made on a PT-4 apparatus, a special machine for determining dye resistance to friction, according to the procedure described in [15]. The schematic diagram of the PT-4 apparatus is shown in Figure 1. The abrasive effect occurred during the simultaneous action of the normal applied load and the shear load produced by the application of a horizontal force. A film sample (1) was placed on the apparatus stage (2) and abraded with a calico piece fixed onto the protruding rubber stopper (3). The friction was the result of shifting the stage by 10 cm by pulling the stage handle (4) forward and backward a required number of times. The total force applied by the stopper to the stage was 9.8 N.
The surface electrical resistance of the yarns (R) was determined with an IESN-1 apparatus, in which the measurements were made by a E6-13A teraohmmeter. The distinguishing feature of this apparatus is that one layer of the yarn is wound closely onto the sensor before the measurements. The sensor with a yarn wound onto it is mounted onto a dielectric support and is connected to the teraohmmeter. The electrical resistance measurements were made in accordance with ΓOCT 19806-74 (GOST 19806-74: a method of electric resistance determination using chemical threads). The specific surface electrical resistance was calculated by the formula:
ρ s = k R γ 2 T γ
where k is a constant; for the IESN-1 apparatus, k = 903.5 g3/mm8;
  • T is the linear density of the yarns, tex;
  • γ is the yarn density, mg/mm3;
  • R is the average electrical resistance value, ohm.
The effect of the modified fibrous material on the activity of pathogenic microorganisms was evaluated using typical test cultures: Staphylococcus aureus 6538-P ATCC=209-P FDA and Escherichia coli, strain M-17—Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial cultures, respectively, and Candida albicans CCM 8261 (ATCC 90028), a yeast-like microscopic fungi. A standard yarn sample was placed into a physiological solution containing a certain number of microbial colonies in the form of a suspension [27]. We kept the vials at room temperature for 24 h with constant shaking. The number of microbial colonies that the solution contained was determined by the changes in the solution transmission coefficient (the reference sample was assumed to have a 100% transmission coefficient), which was obtained by measuring the solution turbidity depending on the number of the colonies it contained. The reduction in the microbial contamination of the test objects relative to that of the reference object (saline) was evaluated in points: 1 point (0.0–0.1%) indicated that there was no antimicrobial effect; 2 points (0.1–90%)—a slight decrease in the number of microorganism colonies, an insufficient antimicrobial effect; 3 points (90–94%)—a significant reduction in the number of microorganism colonies, a good antimicrobial effect; 4 points (95–98%)—a significant reduction in the number of microorganism colonies, a very good antimicrobial effect; and 5 points (99% and higher)—a strong reduction in the number of microorganism colonies, an excellent antimicrobial effect.
The chemical resistance of a PP yarn with a PTFE coating was evaluated by measuring its tensile strength after it was exposed to aggressive liquids—a concentrated solution of sodium hydroxide (5 mol/L) at a temperature of 100 °C for 3 h and concentrated nitric acid (69%), also acting as a strong oxidizer, at a temperature of 25 °C for 24 h.
The resistance of a PP yarn with a PTFE coating to washing was assessed by the change in its specific tensile strength after repeated washings by being stirred in a solution of oleic soap (85%)—5 g/L and Na2CO3—2 g/L. The duration of each wash was 30 min, the temperature of each wash was 60 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

The supramolecular structure of melt-spun PP yarns is known to depend on the conditions of their spinning and orientational drawing [28,29,30]. Spinning leads to the formation of folded lamellar crystallites [30,31], which means that the resulting non-oriented yarns have extremely low strength and high (up to 1000%) elongation. At the orientational drawing stage, they become oriented, and the molecular chains in the lamellae completely unfold, forming fibrillar crystallites from the extended chains [32]. The better oriented the fibrils along the filament axes, the higher the yarn strength is. A yarn with a “perfect” and highly oriented structure and high strength can only be obtained by intensive orientational drawing. Its implementation, to a large extent, depends on the temperature and surface properties of the yarn. Depositing a PTFE coating on a PP yarn makes it possible to carry out its orientational drawing at higher temperatures than those used for a standard PP yarn. This makes the yarn strength parameters better [25,26]. However, it is necessary to find out how doping the PTFE coating with magnetite particles, namely the size of these particles, affects the yarn strength.
Smaller particles are known to have higher surface energy. This leads to the strong aggregation of the nanoparticles during their spinning and use. Such aggregates lead to the deterioration of a number of properties, in particular, they reduce the biological activity of nanosized particles. To avoid this, we stabilized the nanoparticles with a surfactant. When selecting the surfactant, we took into account that a PP yarn with a coating containing magnetite nanoparticles is subjected to orientational drawing at a temperature above 250 °C. For this reason, we chose sodium stearate, which is known to decompose at 300 °C and is resistant to oxidation. The stabilizer effect on the magnetite particle size and size distribution was determined based on the data given in Figure 2.
It was found that the air drying of magnetite that is synthesized without a stabilizer leads to intensive particle aggregation. The measurement of the particle size distribution (Figure 2a) showed that the formed aggregates were up to 275 µm in size. Most of them were 150 µm in size. The use of sodium stearate as the stabilizer during the magnetite synthesis led to a considerable reduction (to 60–75 µm) in the average size of the aggregates that were formed (Figure 2b).
To make the aggregated particles of the magnetite even smaller, the magnetite suspension in water containing a surfactant was subjected to ultrasonic (US) treatment. The size distribution of the magnetite particles after the US treatment is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 shows that additional US treatment of the magnetite particles stabilized by sodium stearate reduces the average size of the aggregates to 15–25 µm, which can have a positive effect on the magnetite particle distribution in the PTFE coating.
To evaluate the effect of the magnetite particle sizes on the basic mechanical characteristics of the PP yarns, we measured the specific tensile strength and relative breaking elongation of the yarns coated with magnetite particles doped with non-stabilized and stabilized sodium stearate. For comparison, we also present the mechanical characteristics of the coated yarns after US treatment. The obtained data are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 shows that doping coating with magnetite somewhat lowers the strength of the yarns. This phenomenon is associated with the fact that the composition contains magnetite aggregates that build into the coating structure, leading to the formation of microdefects in the coating. In the presence of a stabilizer, the strength reduction is not as great as it is without it, which is caused by smaller size of the magnetite aggregates. Ultrasonic treatment of the composition makes the magnetite aggregates even smaller. Consequently, the magnetite does not produce a negative effect on the strength of the yarn with a PTFE coating. A detailed analysis of the mechanical characteristics of the PP yarns with PTFE coating containing stabilized magnetite particles is presented in our previous work [33].
An additional confirmation of the fact that the composition after US treatment does not contain large magnetite aggregates is the micrographs shown in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows that the coating formed by the composition that has not been subjected to UV treatment (a) contains small aggregates (of up to several µm in size) of magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate. The small sizes of the aggregates are the result of the preliminary stabilization of the magnetite particles by sodium stearate. UV treatment of such composition (b) leads to aggregate destruction. The resulting coating has a uniform structure without any inclusions.
Figure 5 shows a scanning electron microscopy image of the coating containing PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate formed by the UV-treated composition. The image also indicates that the coating structure is uniform and does not have any noticeable foreign inclusions.
Materials made from PP and PTFE are known to become strongly electrified while being processed and utilized. That is why we assumed that the introduction of even a small number of conductive magnetite particles into a PTFE coating could reduce the surface electrical resistance of PP yarns and films and, consequently, lower their ability to become electrified.
Table 2 shows the results of the surface electrical resistance measurement in the PP films with the PTFE coatings containing magnetite.
As Table 2 shows, the inclusion of large unstabilized magnetite particles in the PTFE coating structure does not lower the electrical resistance of the film structure. At the same time, the films with a PTFE coating doped with stabilized magnetite particles have a much lower surface electrical resistance than the PP films and films with an undoped PTFE coating.
An important thing to note is that the minimum surface electrical resistance is characteristic of films with a coating formed by a US-treated composition, i.e., the one containing magnetite particles of the minimum size. This composition was used in the further experiments.
One of the most important properties of the PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite nanoparticles is their ability to suppress the activity of pathogenic microorganisms. Stabilized magnetite particles build themselves into the coating structure and cannot diffuse outside of it. That is why we evaluated the antimicrobial properties of the coated yarns using the calculation procedure normally used for determining the antimicrobial properties of nonmigrating preparations [27]. The reduction in microbial contamination of the test objects in comparison to the same indicator in the reference object (physiological solution) was evaluated in points. The results of the evaluation of the activity of the PP yarn with a PTFE coating containing magnetite particles against the test Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are shown in Table 3.
Table 3 shows that the formation of a PTFE coating with high anti-adhesion characteristics provides the PP yarn with weak antimicrobial properties. The introduction of magnetite nanoparticles into the coating structure significantly strengthens the antimicrobial activity of the yarn. The coated yarns considerably reduce the number of pathogenic bacterial communities, i.e., the yarns with a PTFE coating containing magnetite particles exhibit excellent antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli—a type of Gram-negative bacteria—and Staphylococcus aureus—a type of Gram-positive bacteria. The yarn also produces a satisfactory inhibiting effect on the activity of the Candida albicans microfungi. It should be said that the antimicrobial action of a modified yarn is triggered by its direct contact with microorganisms, i.e., PP fibrous materials with a PTFE coating containing stabilized magnetite particles possess barrier antimicrobial properties.
As is known, during its formation, processing, and role in goods production, a yarn is subjected to severe mechanical effects. One of the most important effects is aging. That is why it is necessary to evaluate the coating resistance to abrasion.
Since a single filament of a PP yarn has a small diameter (~15 µm) and its surface is characterized by a great curvature, the PP substrate interaction with a PTFE coating was studied on a model object—a PP film with a PTFE coating doped with stabilized magnetite. To study the coating resistance to abrasion, we subjected the films to abrasion on a PT-4 apparatus. The residual amounts of the coating on the film were determined by the presence of intensive bands associated with the CF2 group vibrations (1211 and 1154 cm−1) in the spectra [34], using the IR-spectroscopy method (MATR). Figure 6 shows the IR-spectra (MATR) of the PP films with PTFE coatings doped with magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate after subjecting the films to abrasion a different number of times.
As Figure 6 shows, the spectra of all of the films subjected to abrasion have bands that are characteristic of PTFE. Figure 5 shows that the magnetite particles are built into the coating structure and make up its integral parts. Thus, it can be concluded that even after intensive abrasion, the films retain their fluoroplastic coating doped with stabilized magnetite. Applying the baseline method, we calculated the PTFE content on the film surface subjected to abrasions of different intensities. The internal standard for isotactic polypropylene was the band at 1460 cm−1 [35], and for measuring the PTFE content—the band at 1211 cm−1. The results of the calculation are given in Table 4.
An analysis of the data presented in Table 4 shows that the coating is highly resistant to abrasion. Even after 500 cycles of abrasive action, the fluoroplastic layer thickness becomes only slightly thinner.
To determine whether the PP yarn with a PTFE coating retained its extremely high chemical resistance after the introduction of a small amount of stabilized magnetite into the coating structure, we measured the changes in its tensile strength after long-time exposure of the yarns to aggressive liquids—concentrated solutions of sodium hydroxide and nitric acid, with the latter acting as a strong oxidizer at the same time. The obtained data are given in Table 5.
Table 5 shows that the strength of a standard PP yarn subjected to the action of concentrated alkalis and acids becomes 8–27% lower. The effect of aggressive liquids on the PP yarn with a PTFE coating does not lead to a loss in strength. Moreover, it makes the strength higher. As work [25] shows, the higher strength of the yarn after its exposure to chemically aggressive liquids is the result of removing the excessive amount of PTFE that is weakly bound to the PP substrate from it. As a result, it makes the coating structure even more uniform and its surface smoother. The chemical resistance of PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with stabilized magnetite is not lower than that of PP yarns with an undoped PTFE coating. Thus, a PP yarn with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite retains its extremely high resistance.
PP yarn with a PTFE coating, and therefore products made from it, have a very high resistance to washing. Tests have shown that the specific tensile strength of such yarns remains unchanged after 40 washes that are 30 min in duration.

4. Conclusions

The paper proposes an original method for forming a coating on a PP yarn surface, which provides the yarn with a number of new working characteristics. The novelty of this approach is the formation a stable ultrathin coating of PTFE doped with magnetite nanoparticles stabilized on the surface of a PP yarn by a thermally stable surfactant. The PTFE in the coating makes it possible to carry out orientational drawing at temperatures exceeding the standard ones, which considerably increases the strength of the yarn. The doping of the coating with magnetite nanoparticles possessing strong antimicrobial activity and electric conductivity provides the yarn with barrier antimicrobial properties and reduces the surface electrical resistance. A yarn with a PTFE coating doped with stabilized magnetite particles also exhibits extremely high chemical resistance similar to that of fluoropolymer yarns. The coating is characterized by a high resistance to abrasion, which means that it is durable.
All of the enumerated properties of the yarn with a PTFE coating doped with stabilized magnetite nanoparticles make it suitable for preparing interior materials that can be used in public transport and in other places with large gatherings of people, including those with weak immunity, physical development problems, elderly people as well as in kindergartens, nursing homes, and hospitals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, N.P.; data curation, software, investigation, visualization, S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (state contract No. 01201260484).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank O.Yu. Kuznetsov (Ivanovo State Medical Academy) for his assistance in the microbiological studies and I.V. Kholodkov (Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology) for his assistance in the scanning electron microscopy studies. The work was conducted using equipment belonging to the Center for Joint Use of Scientific Equipment at “The Upper Volga Region Center of Physico-Chemical Research” and the Center for Joint Use of Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nadtochenko, V.F.; Radtsig, M.A.; Khmel, I.A. Antimicrobial effect of metallic and semiconductor nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2010, 5, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Palza, H. Antimicrobial Polymers with Metal Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 2099–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kon, K.; Rai, M. Metallic nanoparticles: Mechanism of antibacterial action and influencing factors. J. Comp. Clin. Path. Res. 2013, 2, 160–174. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, H.; Zakirov, A.; Yuldashev, S.U.; Lee, J.; Fu, D.; Kang, T. ZnO films grown on cotton fibers surface at low temperature by simple two-step process. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 1316–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Borkow, G.; Gabbay, J. Copper, an ancient remedy returning to fight microbial and viral infections. Curr. Chem. Biol. 2009, 3, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M.; Zoroddu, M.A. Medical uses of silver: History, myths, and scientific evidence. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 5923–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Afraz, N.; Uddin, F.; Syed, U.; Mahmood, A. Antimicrobial finishes for textiles. Curr. Trends Fashion Technol. Text. Eng. 2019, 4, 555646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Delgado, K.; Quijada, R.; Palma, R.; Palza, H. Polypropylene with embedded copper metal or copper oxide nanoparticles as a novel plastic antimicrobial agent. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 53, 50a–54a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palza, H.; Gutie’rrez, S.; Delgado, K.; Salazar, O.; Fuenzalida, V.; Avila, J.I.; Figueroa, G.; Quijada, R. Toward Tailor-Made Biocide Materials Based on Poly(propylene)/Copper Nanoparticles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ziąbka, M.; Dziadek, M. Long lasting examinations of surface and structural properties of medical polypropylene modified with silver nanoparticles. Polymers 2018, 11, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mania, S.; Cie’slik, M.; Konzorski, M.; Swiecikowski, P.; Nelson, A.; Banach, A.; Tylingo, R. The synergistic microbiological effects of industrial produced packaging polyethylene films incorporated with zinc nanoparticles. Polymers 2020, 12, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Q.-S.; He, H.-W.; Fan, Z.-Z.; Zhao, R.-H.; Chen, F.-X.; Zhou, R.; Ning, X. Preparation and performance of ultra-fine polypropylene antibacterial fibers via melt electrospinning. Polymers 2020, 12, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gawish, S.M.; Mosleh, S. Antimicrobial polypropylene loaded by silver nano particles. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, G.; Xiao, Y.; Yan, J.; Xie, N.; Liu, R.; Zhang, Y. Ultraviolet light-degradation behavior and antibacterial activity of polypropylene/ZnO nanoparticles fibers. Polymers 2019, 11, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Geller, V.E. Prospects for preparing nanocomposite textile yarn (review). Fibre Chem. 2014, 45, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Biryukova, M.I.; Yurkov, G.Y.; Buznik, V.M. Modification of polypropylene filaments with metal containing nanoparticles immobilized in a polyethylene matrix. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2014, 9, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Kuznetsov, O.Y.; Buznik, V.M. Antimicrobial properties of polypropylene yarn modified by metal nanoparticles stabilized by polyethylene. Nanotechnol. Russ. 2015, 10, 732–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Biryukova, M.I.; Yurkov, G.Y.; Buznik, V.M. Polypropylene threads modified by iron-containing nanoparticles stabilized in polyethylene. Fibre Chem. 2016, 47, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prorokova, N.P.; Buznik, V.M. New methods of modification of synthetic fibrous materials. Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 2017, 87, 1371–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Urvashi, M.; Subhankar, M.; Arobindo, C. Polypyrrole-silk electro-conductive composite fabric by in situ chemical polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 41336–41345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maity, S.; Chatterjee, A.; Singh, B.; Pal Singh, A. Polypyrrole based electro-conductive textiles for heat generation. J. Text. Inst. 2014, 105, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Villanueva, R.; Ganta, D.; Guzman, C. Mechanical, in-situ electrical and thermal properties of wearable conductive textile yarn coated with polypyrrole/carbon black composite. Mater. Res. Express. 2019, 6, 016307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Kumeeva, T.Y.; Moryganov, A.P.; Buznik, V.M. Synthetic Yarns with High Chemical Resistance and Low Coefficient of Friction. RU Patents 2522337, 10 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  24. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Kumeeva, T.Y.; Moryganov, A.P.; Buznik, V.M. Method for Producing Synthetic Yarns. RU Patents 2522338, 10 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Bouznik, V.M. A novel technique for coating polypropylene yarns with polytetrafluoroethylene. J. Fluorine Chem. 2017, 204, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y. Bulk and surface modification of polypropylene filaments at the stage of their formation from a melt. Fibre Chem. 2018, 50, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM E2149—10 Standard Test Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Contact Conditions. USA. 2001. Available online: https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14338807/ASTM%20E2149 (accessed on 8 July 2021).
  28. Fujiyama, M.; Wakino, T.; Kawasaki, Y.J. Structure of the skin layer in injection molded polypropylene. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1988, 35, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kolb, R.; Seifert, S.; Stribeck, N.; Zachmann, H.G. Simultaneous measurements of small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering during low speed spinning of poly(propylene) using synchrotron radiation. Polymer 2000, 41, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zavadskii, A.E.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Prorokova, N.P. X-ray Analysis of the texture of freshly spun polypropylene threades. Fiber Chem. 2013, 45, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zavadskii, A.E.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Prorokova, N.P. Orientation processes in crystalline and amorphous regions of polypropylene during yarn spinning. Fibre Chem. 2017, 49, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zavadskii, A.E.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Prorokova, N.P. X-Ray diffraction of the supramolecular structure of polypropylene yarns. Fiber Chem. 2014, 46, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prorokova, N.P.; Vavilova, S.Y.; Bouznik, V.M. Mechanical characteristics of polytetrafluoroethylene coated polypropylene yarns made by new technology. Khimicheskaya Tekhnologiya 2020, 9, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ignateva, L.N.; Buznik, V.M. IR-spectroscopic examination of polytetrafluoroethylene and its forms. Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 2009, 79, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dechant, J.; Danz, R.; Kimmer, W.; Schmolke, R. Ultrarotspektroskopische Untersuchungen an Polymeren; Akademie-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1972. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the PT-4 apparatus: 1, a film sample; 2, the apparatus stage; 3, the rubber stopper; 4, the stage handle.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of the PT-4 apparatus: 1, a film sample; 2, the apparatus stage; 3, the rubber stopper; 4, the stage handle.
Coatings 11 00830 g001
Figure 2. Size distribution of the magnetite particles synthesized (a) without a stabilizer; (b) using sodium stearate as the stabilizer.
Figure 2. Size distribution of the magnetite particles synthesized (a) without a stabilizer; (b) using sodium stearate as the stabilizer.
Coatings 11 00830 g002
Figure 3. Size distribution after US treatment of magnetite particles synthesized using sodium stearate as the stabilizer.
Figure 3. Size distribution after US treatment of magnetite particles synthesized using sodium stearate as the stabilizer.
Coatings 11 00830 g003
Figure 4. Micrographs of the film with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and stabilized magnetite: (a) without US treatment; (b) after US treatment. Optical microscopy method. The magnification is 1000 times.
Figure 4. Micrographs of the film with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and stabilized magnetite: (a) without US treatment; (b) after US treatment. Optical microscopy method. The magnification is 1000 times.
Coatings 11 00830 g004
Figure 5. Image of the film with a coating formed by a US-treated composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate.
Figure 5. Image of the film with a coating formed by a US-treated composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate.
Coatings 11 00830 g005
Figure 6. IR-spectra (MATR) of PP films with PTFE coatings doped with magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate and subjected to abrasion a different number of times: 1, without a coating; 2, with a coating; 3, with a coating subjected to abrasion 10 times; 4, with a coating subjected to abrasion 50 times; 5, with a coating subjected to abrasion 500 times.
Figure 6. IR-spectra (MATR) of PP films with PTFE coatings doped with magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate and subjected to abrasion a different number of times: 1, without a coating; 2, with a coating; 3, with a coating subjected to abrasion 10 times; 4, with a coating subjected to abrasion 50 times; 5, with a coating subjected to abrasion 500 times.
Coatings 11 00830 g006
Table 1. Tensile strength and elongation of PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite particles.
Table 1. Tensile strength and elongation of PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite particles.
Components of the Composition, %Specific
Tensile
Strength,
MPa
Relative
Breaking
Elongation, %
PTFEMagnetiteSodium Stearate
Standard PP yarn
000583 ± 2333.6 ± 3.7
PP yarn with a PTFE coating
10.000643 ± 1638.6 ± 2.7
PP yarn with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and unstabilized magnetite
10.01.00466 ± 1448.7 ± 4.4
PP yarn with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate
10.01.01.0578 ± 1539.7 ± 4.5
PP yarn with a coating formed by a US-treated composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate
10.01.01.0658 ± 2332.0 ± 1.7
Table 2. Surface electrical resistance of PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite particles.
Table 2. Surface electrical resistance of PP yarns with a PTFE coating doped with magnetite particles.
Components of the Composition, %Surface Electrical Resistance, Ohm
PTFEMagnetiteSodium Stearate
Standard PP yarn
0004.5·1014
PP yarn with a PTFE coating
10.000exceeds the apparatus measurement range
PP yarn with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and unstabilized magnetite
10.01.003.4·1014
PP yarn with a coating formed by a composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate
10.01.01.03.8·1010
PP yarn with a coating formed by a US-treated composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate
10.01.01.05.7·108
Table 3. Antimicrobial properties of a PP yarn with a PTFE coating containing stabilized magnetite particles.
Table 3. Antimicrobial properties of a PP yarn with a PTFE coating containing stabilized magnetite particles.
PP Yarn TypeInhibition of Activity of Pathogenic Microorganisms, Points/%
Escherichia coliStaphylococcus aureusCandida albicans
Standard PP yarn2/392/462/41
PP yarn with a PTFE coating3/903/933/90
PP yarn with a PTFE coating containing 1.0% of stabilized magnetite5/994/973/94
Table 4. Effects of abrasion on the PTFE content on the surface of an oriented PP film (according to the IR spectra).
Table 4. Effects of abrasion on the PTFE content on the surface of an oriented PP film (according to the IR spectra).
Number of Abrasive Effects, Cycle.Ratio of the Height of the Band at 1211 to That at 1450 cm−1
Film without a coating0.1
011.9
1011.4
5011.0
2508.5
5008.4
Table 5. Tensile strength and elongation of PP yarns with a PTFE coating after boiling in a sodium hydroxide solution (5 mol/L) for 3 h and storage in concentrated nitric acid for 24 h at a temperature of 25 °C.
Table 5. Tensile strength and elongation of PP yarns with a PTFE coating after boiling in a sodium hydroxide solution (5 mol/L) for 3 h and storage in concentrated nitric acid for 24 h at a temperature of 25 °C.
Without TreatmentAfter Boiling in a NaOH Solution (Concentrated)After Storage in HNO3 (Concentrated)
Specific Tensile Strength, MPaRelative
Breaking Elongation,
%
Specific Tensile Strength, MPaRelative
Breaking Elongation,
%
Specific Tensile Strength, MPaRelative
Breaking Elongation,
%
Standard PP yarn
583 ± 2333.6 ± 3.7539 ± 2152.0 ± 4.8428 ± 2240.4 ± 4.1
PP yarn with a PTFE coating
643 ± 1638.6 ± 2.7728 ± 1944.9 ± 3.3748 ± 1927.0 ± 2.9
PP yarn with a coating formed by a US-treated composition of PTFE and magnetite stabilized by sodium stearate
658 ± 2332.0 ± 1.7720 ± 1745.2 ± 3.1761 ± 2524.3 ± 1.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prorokova, N.; Vavilova, S. Properties of Polypropylene Yarns with a Polytetrafluoroethylene Coating Containing Stabilized Magnetite Particles. Coatings 2021, 11, 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070830

AMA Style

Prorokova N, Vavilova S. Properties of Polypropylene Yarns with a Polytetrafluoroethylene Coating Containing Stabilized Magnetite Particles. Coatings. 2021; 11(7):830. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prorokova, Natalia, and Svetlana Vavilova. 2021. "Properties of Polypropylene Yarns with a Polytetrafluoroethylene Coating Containing Stabilized Magnetite Particles" Coatings 11, no. 7: 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop