Next Article in Journal
Combined Effect of NZVI and H2O2 on the Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa: Performance and Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Melting Process of Shell-and-Tube PCM Thermal Energy Storage Unit Using Modified Tube Design
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Oleylamine on the Surface Chemistry, Morphology, Electronic Structure, and Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Excellent Catalytic Performance of ISOBAM Stabilized Co/Fe Colloidal Catalysts toward KBH4 Hydrolysis
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Excimer Laser-Deposited Na2/3Ni1/4Mn3/4O2 Film Cathode for Stable Sodium-Ion Battery

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(17), 3018; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12173018
by Bailin Lin 1, Wei Dai 2, Junhui Tao 1,3, Jie Li 1,3, Chuanhui Wang 1,3, Yang Zhao 1, Yiping Li 1 and Xinqi Chen 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(17), 3018; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12173018
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Materials for Energy Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript describes the excimer laser deposition of Na2/3Ni1/4Mn3/4O2 layered cathode for sodium-ion batteries. Overall, the thin film strategy introduced in this manuscript benefits scientific society, making this manuscript publishable to this journal. However, I found that the following comments are necessary to improve the scientific value of this manuscript:

1. This manuscript controls the partial pressure of oxygen gas during the deposition. The highest performances were obtained for the highest partial pressure of 65 Pa; this necessitates further investigation at increased partial pressure to see if further enhancement is possible there.  

2. The manuscript requires English editing service; there is a grammatical error from the first sentence of the abstract. 

3. Conclusion part needs improved structure; for example the first sentence of the present conclusion is not adequate for the opening of the paragraph. 

Author Response

Thank you for the reviewer’s comments. We have made modifications one by one according to your opinions. Please see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please, find the attached report 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Thank you for the reviewer’s comments. We have made modifications one by one according to your opinions. Please see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript was corrected according to the comments. 

Back to TopTop