Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Comparative Studies of Glucose Oxidase Immobilized on Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles Using Different Coupling Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
The Transformation of 0-D Carbon Dots into 1-, 2- and 3-D Carbon Allotropes: A Minireview
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Screen Printed Carbon Electrode (N-rGO/SPCE) as Hydrogen Peroxide Sensor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polymethyl(1–Butyric acidyl)silane–Assisted Dispersion and Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation Separation of Single–Walled Carbon Nanotubes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/nano12142444
Review Report
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Photoluminescence and Fluorescence Quenching of Graphene Oxide: A Review

Nanomaterials 2022, 12(14), 2444; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142444
by Xinzhe Xiao, Yumin Zhang, Lei Zhou, Bin Li * and Lin Gu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(14), 2444; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12142444
Submission received: 26 June 2022 / Revised: 7 July 2022 / Accepted: 15 July 2022 / Published: 17 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Nanocarbon Derivatives: From Synthesis to Application)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have done a good effort elaborating this review. The main point missing and that it is really important in this field is the definition of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), i.e. the criteria for being GO and rGO according with the oxidation degree. They can check in papers working with GO and rGO in which authors provide the XPS elemental analysis O/C.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions and affirmation of our work. We have made significant revisions and improvements to this paper based on your comments. In particular, the difference between GO and rGO you mentioned, as well as the relevant XPS data references, we have mentioned in the revised article and annotated with red pen (in Section 2.1 and Ref 18).

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors should include more references in many places, in Introduction and other sections,  

Like "One of the major topics on GO is the photoluminescence (PL) and quenching of GO and its quantum dots (GOQDs) and graphene quantum dots (GQDs)."

 "The PL is theoretically impossible to achieve for the graphene material due to the zero band gap" Need references".  

Also, the author missed many important references that should be must include, like 1. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606755; 

2. DOI: 10.1039/c9bm01341e; 

3. DOI: 10.1002/advs.201600217; 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions and affirmation of our work. According to your opinions, we have supplemented the relevant references in the corresponding part of the article (Ref. 10, 11, 12, 19). In addition, we seriously read the literature you recommended and agreed that this literature has a lot of enlightening significance for our current and future work. In addition, we also cited this article in the revision (Ref. 87, 91, 107). The above modification information is marked in red pen in the revised manuscript for you to consult again.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop