Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study of the Planting Uniformity of Sugarcane Single-Bud Billet Planters
Previous Article in Journal
Growing Triticum aestivum Landraces in Rotation with Lupinus albus and Fallow Reduces Soil Depletion and Minimises the Use of Chemical Fertilisers
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Test and Analysis on Friction Characteristics of Major Cotton Stalk Cultivars in Xinjiang

Agriculture 2022, 12(7), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070906
by Bingcheng Zhang 1,2, Rongqing Liang 1,2, Jiali Li 1,2, Yaping Li 1,2, Hewei Meng 1,2 and Za Kan 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Agriculture 2022, 12(7), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12070906
Submission received: 17 May 2022 / Revised: 14 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The objective of topic was clearly understood. However, about items directly commented in your current version of manuscript should be reconsidered well. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find below my suggestions:

- L118-121: please specify more details related to the instruments used, as well as, JMB5003, etc., which the manufacturer? is not clear about;

- L193: the discussion of the data should be improved, taking into account previous research;

- The reference section should be improved.

  1.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

The article can not be read and analyzed properly since the very low quality image used and the unproper refecencing within the text. Unless this, it is not possible to further proceed with the reviewing process. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Reviewer confirmed the improvements of the manuscript for the revision items corresponding to the previous reviewer's comments.  However, the originality and novelty of the study is not high enough because the investigated test conditions and theoretical discussions were not new. The use of the results obtained will be limited.

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors improved the article according to the suggestions and it is clear and interesting to read

Back to TopTop