Next Article in Journal
UV-C Light-Based Decontamination of Transvaginal Ultrasound Transducer: An Effective and Fast Way for Patient Safety in Gynecology
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Bone Mineral Density, Total Body Composition and Joint Integrity in Long COVID: A 12-Month Longitudinal Feasibility Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minimizing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR: Current Strategies, Monitoring Pathways, and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Validation of the VALVEX Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Experience During the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Process

by
Miryam González-Cebrian
1,2,3,4,5,*,
Elena Calvo
5,6,7,
Sara Alonso Meléndez
1,2,
Héctor Gómez García
1,2,
Francisco Javier Rubio Gil
1,2,
Ignacio Cruz-González
1,2,3,4,5,
Pedro L. Sánchez
1,2,3,4,5,
Luis Miguel Rincón
1,2,3,4,5 and
José Luis Mendoza-García
8
1
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
3
Department of Nursing, Universidad de Salamanca (USAL), 37008 Salamanca, Spain
4
Department of Medicine, Universidad de Salamanca (USAL), 37008 Salamanca, Spain
5
CIBER-CV Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain
6
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, 08907 Barcelona, Spain
7
GRIN-IDIBELL, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
8
Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, University Hospital of Torrevieja, 03186 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8562; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238562 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 November 2025 / Revised: 26 November 2025 / Accepted: 1 December 2025 / Published: 2 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aortic Valve Implantation: Recent Advances and Future Prospects)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Degenerative aortic stenosis has become the most common primary valve lesion referred for intervention, with thousands of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures being performed annually. To date, there are no quantitative tools capable of evaluating patient experience adapted to percutaneous procedures of this nature. The goal of this study is to propose and validate the VALVEX questionnaire as the reference tool to assess patient experience throughout the TAVI process and to identify areas for improvement in healthcare. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study with a 30-day follow-up that included consecutive patients > 18 years of age undergoing elective TAVI in two Spanish hospitals. A multidisciplinary panel including patients was constituted to design, refine, and pilot the VALVEX questionnaire. During its completion 30 days after the procedure, the dimensions assessed were the care provided before, during, and after TAVI, as well as the facilities and overall patient satisfaction. Reliability, validity, and feasibility were analysed during the validation phase. Results: A total of 335 patients were enrolled and filled out the VALVEX questionnaire (mean age 81.1 ± 5 years, 52% female). Evaluation of feasibility showed a mean completion time of 7.8 ± 2.3 min, with a 2.1% rate of unanswered questions. Cronbach’s alpha index was 0.912, with high internal reliability measurements for all the assessed dimensions. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.851 was determined as an indicator of stability. The Delphi panel achieved a consensus of over 85% in clarity, coherence, relevance, and sufficiency. Conclusions: We have successfully validated the VALVEX questionnaire as the first quantitative tool specifically designed to measure and evaluate patient experience throughout the TAVI procedure and recovery. This questionnaire is a valid, reliable, simple, and easy-to-use resource that could be used as a reference tool to assess patient experience for TAVI or other percutaneous cardiac interventions.
Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; patient experience; patient-reported experience measures (PREMs); questionnaires; health care quality assessment aortic valve stenosis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; patient experience; patient-reported experience measures (PREMs); questionnaires; health care quality assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Cebrian, M.; Calvo, E.; Alonso Meléndez, S.; Gómez García, H.; Rubio Gil, F.J.; Cruz-González, I.; Sánchez, P.L.; Rincón, L.M.; Mendoza-García, J.L. Validation of the VALVEX Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Experience During the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Process. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 8562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238562

AMA Style

González-Cebrian M, Calvo E, Alonso Meléndez S, Gómez García H, Rubio Gil FJ, Cruz-González I, Sánchez PL, Rincón LM, Mendoza-García JL. Validation of the VALVEX Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Experience During the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Process. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(23):8562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238562

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Cebrian, Miryam, Elena Calvo, Sara Alonso Meléndez, Héctor Gómez García, Francisco Javier Rubio Gil, Ignacio Cruz-González, Pedro L. Sánchez, Luis Miguel Rincón, and José Luis Mendoza-García. 2025. "Validation of the VALVEX Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Experience During the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Process" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 23: 8562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238562

APA Style

González-Cebrian, M., Calvo, E., Alonso Meléndez, S., Gómez García, H., Rubio Gil, F. J., Cruz-González, I., Sánchez, P. L., Rincón, L. M., & Mendoza-García, J. L. (2025). Validation of the VALVEX Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Experience During the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Process. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(23), 8562. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238562

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop