Next Article in Journal
Seed Location Impacts Whole-Brain Structural Network Comparisons between Healthy Elderly and Individuals with Alzheimer’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
In Search of Sleep Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease: K-Complexes Do Not Discriminate between Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Controls
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Hybrid Mental Spelling Application Based on Eye Tracking and SSVEP-Based BCI
 
 
Brief Report
Peer-Review Record

Brief Report: Using the Internet to Identify Persons with Cognitive Impairment for Participation in Clinical Trials

Brain Sci. 2017, 7(4), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040036
by Lindsay F. Morra * and Jason Brandt
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Brain Sci. 2017, 7(4), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040036
Submission received: 10 February 2017 / Revised: 31 March 2017 / Accepted: 31 March 2017 / Published: 5 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Risk Factors for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Very unusually, I have no criticisms to give of this paper. It is novel, interesting, important, and relevant. I think it should be published as is. 

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors confirm in this report the feasibility of using DRA (Dementia Risk Assessment) for the identification of persons with cognitive impairments. Internet-based tests are emerging as powerfull and time-saving instruments for the selection of clinical trials participants. The results of this study, that involved more than 9000 persons over a period of 22 months, are presented in a clear and efficient way. Main rules applied in results interpretetion are described, such as exclusion criteria. Limitations of DRA-based recruitment are discussed, which adds to the value of the report. A critic analysis of DRA might guide in a correct use of these computer-based tools. Summarizing, I recommend this article for publication. The report confirms the utility of DRA and interestingly discusses  its limitations. A follow-up of the study and possible recruitment of persons in clinical trials, if possible, are encouraged.

Back to TopTop