Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review this research. It is indeed very interesting and necessary. 

I believe it can be published, but a number of changes need to be made first. 

-The theoretical framework contextualises the research problem very well. It is noted that most of the quotations are current. In addition, the thread is logical and coherent. As a point of improvement, I suggest breaking down the general objective. It is very broad, therefore the introduction of specific objectives helps to better understand the purpose of the study. Also, add the research hypotheses before the objectives.

The methodological section of the study is impeccable. Relevant sample data (body mass, height, etc.) are provided. It would be necessary to establish the inclusion and exclusion criteria, as these are nowhere to be seen. In addition, the study design is very well explained and provides a lot of detail. The data for de cohen's are not clear (Lines 268-269). 

In the limitations refer to the sample used. We do not know whether athletes from other countries have the same characteristics. 

Author Response

please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you very much for the opportunity to review the paper. Congratulations to the authors on the work done. I have attached a Word document with some suggestions for improvement before publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

See attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

See attached file

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors. 

The requested changes have been implemented. The research can be published. 

Author Response

thank you on your comments , they helped us improve the text.  

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the changes. I am attaching a document with minor modifications to be made. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I appreciate the author's attention to the reviewer's comments.  Other than the spelling of the word lottery, I feel the manuscript's grammar is much improved.  

Author Response

we changed the spelling of word , now stands as lottery.

thank you for valuable comments.