Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Residual Feed Intake and Its Relevant Measurements in Two Varieties of Japanese Quails (Coturnixcoturnix japonica) under High Environmental Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Sweet Potato Vine on the Onset of Puberty and Follicle Development in Chinese Meishan Gilts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Frequency of Errors in Determining Age Based on Selected Features of the Incisors of Icelandic Horses

Animals 2019, 9(6), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060298
by Jarosław Łuszczyński, Magdalena Pieszka *, Weronika Petrych and Monika Stefaniuk-Szmukier
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Animals 2019, 9(6), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060298
Submission received: 23 April 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 24 May 2019 / Published: 30 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Equids)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting topic which should be of interest to horse practitioners and veterinary/clinical professionals world wide.   The paper requires some tidying up in terms of phrasing, wording and some structural issues.  These are highlighted in the attached file.


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for the detailed review. We have corrected the manuscript (file attached) according to your suggestions. Please, take under consideration that in the manuscript there are also amendments for Reviewer 2.

We would like to explain that coldblooded horses are the subline of Døle Horse (citation from Bjørnstad, G.; Røed, K.H. Breed demarcation and potential for breed allocation of horses assessed by microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 2001, 32, 59–65.)

All your suggestions and comments helped us a lot and they improved the quality of our work.

Kind regards

Authors


Reviewer 2 Report

Review

The frequency of errors in determining age based on 2 selected features of the incisors of Icelandic horses

A nice simple study, well executed and generally clearly presented. I have made some suggestions that I feel would improve the manuscript further and support the reader less experienced in equine aging to understand the study for the authors to consider.  

Simple summary

Line 15: please change ‘it’ suggest amending to ‘However, this method can play an auxiliary role in identifying age in horses of unknown origin’ to improve clarity

Line 18: suggest amending ‘The’ to ‘This study’

Line 20: I don’t think you need to include the start of the sentence, suggest removing ‘It can be stated that’ and just have ‘Determining the age of…’ to improve flow

Line 24: stray space between incisors and , - please remove

Abstract

Line 28: suggest replacing ‘it’ with ‘this’

Line 32:  suggest replacing ‘The study’ to ‘This study’

Line 34: suggest rephrasing to ‘Age was determined on the inspection of the teeth and was compared …’

Line 38: it would be good to provide the reader with both the mean under / overestimation and the standard deviation here to show the variation in estimates recorded

Line 38: suggest replacing ‘considering’ with ‘within’ to improve synthesis

Line 47: I am not familiar with the use of noble breeds as common vernacular related to horse breeds, suggest replacing with different terminology which is more common across global audience of the journal (would this phrase relate to warmbloods and / or Thoroughbreds?)

Line 48: suggest starting sentence with ‘These results suggest that patterns…’

Keywords: age determining is a little odd – maybe change to ageing horses or horse age and scope to also include equine as a key word

Introduction

Line 54: century should be capitalised

Line 71: I wonder if there is scope to summarise some of the key morphological characteristics if equine teeth here as not all readers will be familiar with equine dentition

Line 74: suggest replacing ‘it’ with ‘which’ -  I would also recommend outlining how age is determined here for a standard horse (in a simplified manner) or refer to an appropriate source for further information to support readers less familiar with this process / species. As you provide this in method, maybe summarise here and refer to table or move table 1 to here as better fit for introducing how to do this.

Line 83: amend ‘the study’ to ‘this study’

Method

Lines 97 to 99: amend to past tense

Line 100: please provide details of the extensive experience of the experimenter – qualifications etc

Line 111: insert ‘was’ before determined and insert ‘and’ between teeth and was

Line 114: suggest replacing ‘was used to show’ to ‘identified if significant differences …’

Line 115: please amend to ‘Analysis was undertaken using…’

Table 1: please include a legend and identify abbreviations at end of title or in legend to enable table to stand alone

Within your method, you should state how you determined the actual age of the horses in the sample (e.g. passport?) to demonstrate that these were accurate in the first place

Results

At the author’s discretion: given your sample was of mixed sex, it would be really interesting to also calculate and include results across mares and geldings independently as well as the across the total cohort for comparison.

Lines 125 to 127: please provide standard deviation as well as mean for over and underestimation of age

Table 2: I would like to see the actual P values for your results – could you integrate these into table 2 as an additional column perhaps

Tables 2 and 3: please include legends and outline of abbreviations used to enable these to stand alone

Within Table 3 could you also integrate the number of horses in each age group, suggest adding (n=xx) after info provided in age group (years) column

Line 136: advise replacing ‘considering’ with ‘within’

Line 165 and 166: remove commas

Results – did you take any photos of the horse’s teeth and characteristics? If you did it would be beneficial to the reader if you included some examples to provide visual cues which could support the text results and could illustrate the features you are describing

Discussion

at the moment your discussion is a little limited and focuses on your results in context of prior research but misses opportunities to consider some of the wider discussion points such as why these differences occur between breeds, should we be manually aging horses, what are the implications to under / over estimation of age for horse management, welfare etc - would suggest incorporating discussion of these into your manuscript 

Line 178: include ‘was’ between horses and not

Line 186: please replace noble horses with more commonly used terminology

Lines 177 to 195: in this paragraph, I would consider adding in some discussion of why breed related dentition could occur, this could be linked to selective breeding for type and purpose then related to differences in management aligned with these

Line 206: replace noble as per earlier comments

Line 220: suggest replacing ‘they attrition’ with ‘ which attrition occurs’

Line 227: remove ‘an’ superfluous

Lines 196 to 254: this paragraph would benefit from discussion of why age related developmental differences may occur in Icelandic horses for those readers less familiar with this breed

Conclusion

Line 256: in conclusion is not required

Line 259: please replace noble horses with alternative terminology

Line 260: suggest changing ‘this’ to the Icelandic breed’

Line 263: remove extra space before comma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

thank you very much for the detailed review. We have corrected the manuscript (file attached) according to your suggestions. Please, take under consideration that in the manuscript there are also amendments for Reviewer 1.

We would like to explain that study taking under consideration additional factor (sex of studied horses)  would be very interesting, however, due to the small size of the studied cohort, the introduction of an additional factor to statistical analyzes would result in a reduction in the size of groups hindering statistical analysis. The photos we took during the tests turned out to be technically very weak because the horses were constantly moving during the examination. Unfortunately, these photos are not suitable for publication.

All your suggestions and comments helped us a lot and they improved the quality of our work.

Kind regards

Authors


Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank the authors for the clarity with which they have identified how they have revised the manuscript, which have addressed by feedback and I feel the additional sections have added to the discussion and will support readers less familiar with equine dentition to get the most from the paper. Subject to a couple of minor amendments below, I am happy to recommend publication - really interesting read.


Line 81: suggest change ‘on grass’ to ‘on natural forage’

Line 191: suggest influence not influences


Back to TopTop