Ni, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yin, Y.; Sun, X.; Xie, H.; Zheng, J.; Dong, L.; Diao, J.;
et al. Comparative Analyses of Production Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbial Composition between Two Chinese Goose Breeds. Animals 2022, 12, 1815.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141815
AMA Style
Ni H, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Li Y, Yin Y, Sun X, Xie H, Zheng J, Dong L, Diao J,
et al. Comparative Analyses of Production Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbial Composition between Two Chinese Goose Breeds. Animals. 2022; 12(14):1815.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141815
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ni, Hongyu, Yonghong Zhang, Yuwei Yang, Yumei Li, Yijing Yin, Xueqi Sun, Hengli Xie, Jinlei Zheng, Liping Dong, Jizhe Diao,
and et al. 2022. "Comparative Analyses of Production Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbial Composition between Two Chinese Goose Breeds" Animals 12, no. 14: 1815.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141815
APA Style
Ni, H., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Yin, Y., Sun, X., Xie, H., Zheng, J., Dong, L., Diao, J., Sun, H., Zhang, Y., & Liang, S.
(2022). Comparative Analyses of Production Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbial Composition between Two Chinese Goose Breeds. Animals, 12(14), 1815.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12141815