Next Article in Journal
Clinicopathological and Genomic Characterization of a Simmental Calf with Generalized Bovine Juvenile Angiomatosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Camelina Oil Supplementation Improves Bone Parameters in Ovariectomized Rats
Previous Article in Journal
The Reported Use of Tongue-Ties and Nosebands in Thoroughbred and Standardbred Horse Racing—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Programming Effect of the Parental Obesity on the Skeletal System of Offspring at Weaning Day
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Relationship between Bone Quality, Egg Production and Eggshell Quality in Laying Hens at the End of an Extended Production Cycle (105 Weeks)

Animals 2021, 11(3), 623; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030623
by Clara Alfonso-Carrillo 1, Cristina Benavides-Reyes 2, Jon de los Mozos 1, Nazaret Dominguez-Gasca 2, Estefanía Sanchez-Rodríguez 2, Ana Isabel Garcia-Ruiz 1,* and Alejandro B. Rodriguez-Navarro 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Animals 2021, 11(3), 623; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030623
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Gut and Bone in Health and Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This work is of great significance for understanding the relationship between layer bone quality and egg production performance. The aim of the experiment is relatively clear, and the materials & methods are clearly described. I recommend publishing this article after minor revisions.

 

  1. Please check the whole manuscript, a space should be added before and after “<”,”=”and ”>”。
  2. In Table 2, is it necessary to be accurate to "<0.0001"? As far as I know, it is sufficient when the p value is less than 0.001. Please explain this.

Author Response

We have made the recommended changes as described below:

  1. Please check the whole manuscript, a space should be added before and after “<”,”=”and ”>”。Answer: We have added the spaces as requested.
  2. In Table 2, is it necessary to be accurate to "<0.0001"? As far as I know, it is sufficient when the p value is less than 0.001. Please explain this.  Answer: We agree with the reviewer and we have changed this value to 0.001

Reviewer 2 Report

Some minor changes will improve the readability of the manuscript:

Line 46: insert “in the” in front of “diet”

Line 47: change “start” to “starts”

Line 50: insert “the” in front of “night”

Line 53: change “specially” to “especially”

Line 63: insert “are” after “There”

Line 64: change “decreases” to “decrease”

Line 68: change “egg” to “eggs”

Line 70: change “makes” to “make”

Line 73: change “hens” to “hens’”

Line 75: change “On contrary” to “In contrast”

Line 100: delete “flock”

Line 105: In English, “fissured” would more likely be called “cracked”

Line 106: change “Two” to “two”

Line 154: change “weighted” to “weighed”

Line 159: give ATR in full first time used:  attenuated total reflectance (ATR)

Line 167: change “calculate” to “calculated”

Line 182: change “being these values” to “these values being”

Line 230: change “show” to “shows”

Line 236: change “seems” to “seem”

Table 4:  change “Thinckness” to “Thickness”

Line 326: delete “with”

Line 389: change “deteriorates” to “deteriorate”

Line 425, reference 3:  Is this reference formatted correctly?

Author Response

We appreciated the seggestions and have done all corrections indicated by the referee:

Some minor changes will improve the readability of the manuscript:

Line 46: insert “in the” in front of “diet”

Line 47: change “start” to “starts”

Line 50: insert “the” in front of “night”

Line 53: change “specially” to “especially”

Line 63: insert “are” after “There”

Line 64: change “decreases” to “decrease”

Line 68: change “egg” to “eggs”

Line 70: change “makes” to “make”

Line 73: change “hens” to “hens’”

Line 75: change “On contrary” to “In contrast”

Line 100: delete “flock”

Line 105: In English, “fissured” would more likely be called “cracked”

Line 106: change “Two” to “two”

Line 154: change “weighted” to “weighed”

Line 159: give ATR in full first time used:  attenuated total reflectance (ATR)

Line 167: change “calculate” to “calculated”

Line 182: change “being these values” to “these values being”

Line 230: change “show” to “shows”

Line 236: change “seems” to “seem”

Table 4:  change “Thinckness” to “Thickness”

Line 326: delete “with”

Line 389: change “deteriorates” to “deteriorate”

Answer: We have done all suggested changes.

Line 425, reference 3:  Is this reference formatted correctly? Answer: The reference format was not correct and has been modified.

Back to TopTop