Next Article in Journal
Isolation of Monascus purpureus HC-5 and Optimization of Solid-State Fermentation for High-Yield Pigment Production
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Different Crop Rotations on Microbial Diversity and Enzyme Activities in Brassica napus Rhizosphere Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Fungal Community Responses to Natural Humus Amendment Potentially Facilitate the Enhancement of Saline–Alkali Soil Multifunctionality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Endophytic Fungi and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Microbial Community Function and Metabolic Pathways in the Rhizosphere Soil of Festuca rubra
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Responses of Soil Microbial Communities and Anthracnose Dynamics to Different Planting Patterns in Dalbergia odorifera

1
Key Laboratory for Non-Wood Forest Cultivation and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Control of Forest Diseases and Pests, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
3
The National Key Laboratory of Woody Oil Resources Utilization, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
4
Yuelushan Laboratory Non-Wood Forests Variety Innovation Center, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2876; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122876
Submission received: 15 November 2025 / Revised: 11 December 2025 / Accepted: 14 December 2025 / Published: 18 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant–Soil–Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

Anthracnose is one of the major diseases affecting Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen. However, the soil microbial mechanisms underlying D. odorifera responses to anthracnose remain largely unexplored. This study investigated three planting systems: a Dalbergia odorifera monoculture (J); a mixed plantation of D. odorifera and Pterocarpus macrocarpus (JD); and a composite mixed plantation of D. odorifera, P. macrocarpus, and Clinacanthus nutans (JDY). Using amplicon sequencing technology for soil microbial analysis and combining soil physical and chemical properties with disease severity, we comprehensively analyzed changes in soil microbial community structure and function across different planting modes. The results showed that the diverse mixed mode (JD, JDY) significantly improved soil physicochemical properties and promoted soil nutrient cycling. Redundancy analysis (RDA) indicated that soil organic matter (SOM) and disease severity, quantified by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), were the primary environmental drivers of microbial community variation. Genera positively correlated with SOM and negatively correlated with AUDPC were significantly enriched in JDY and JD, whereas genera showing opposite relationships were predominantly enriched in J. Functional predictions revealed enhanced nutrient-cycling capacities in JD and JDY, with JDY uniquely harboring functional groups such as Arbuscular Mycorrhizal, Epiphyte, and Lichenized taxa. In contrast, microbial functions in the J plantation were mainly limited to environmental amelioration. Co-occurrence network analysis further showed that as planting patterns shifted from J to JDY, microbial communities evolved from competition-dominated networks to cooperative defensive networks, integrating efficient decomposition with strong pathogen suppression potential. The study demonstrates that complex mixed planting systems regulate soil properties, enhance the enrichment of key functional microbial taxa, reshape community structure and function, and ultimately enable ecological control of anthracnose disease. This study provides new perspectives and theoretical foundations for ecological disease management in plantations of rare tree species and for microbiome-based ecological immunization strategies.

1. Introduction

Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen, commonly known as Hainan huanghuali, is a semi-evergreen tree of the genus Dalbergia (Fabaceae) and is listed as a nationally protected Class II rare and endangered species in China [1]. Owing to its exceptional wood quality, D. odorifera is widely used in high-end furniture, delicate handicrafts, valuable musical instruments, and decorative artwork. Its heartwood is listed in the official Chinese Pharmacopoeia and exhibits notable pharmacological properties, including therapeutic effects on cardiovascular diseases and potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor activities [2,3]. Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum spp., typically results in characteristic black necrotic lesions on leaves, stems, and fruits, accompanied by premature defoliation and fruit rot. Severe infections can lead to plant decline and substantial yield losses [4]. In recent years, anthracnose outbreaks have occurred frequently across major D. odorifera-producing regions in southern China. Several Colletotrichum pathogens have been identified on D. odorifera, including C. brevisporum, C. gigasporum, and C. karstii. These pathogens infect hosts via conidia, producing brown to grayish-white lesions on leaves, young shoots, and fruits. Dark acervuli or orange conidial masses are often visible at lesion centers, with dark concentric rings and occasionally yellow halos at the margins. Lesions commonly develop along leaf margins, and severe infections cause extensive leaf blight, defoliation, and even whole-plant mortality. Such damage suppresses the growth of young D. odorifera trees, deteriorates wood quality, and leads to substantial economic loss [1,5,6]. Currently, D. odorifera plantations predominantly employ monoculture systems. Although monocultures facilitate short-term management and yield control, long-term implementation often leads to impoverished understory vegetation, increased risk of disease transmission, and reduced ecosystem stability [7,8]. Moreover, intensified intraspecific competition within monocultures suppresses vigorous tree growth and high-quality wood formation [7], imposing significant constraints on the sustainable development of the D. odorifera industry [9].
Diversified mixed-planting systems offer pronounced advantages in ecological stability and disease suppression. The interactions include various types, such as competition, mutualistic symbiosis, facilitation, and antagonism. Among them, mutualistic symbiosis, promoting effects, and “dilution effects” are of great significance in inhibiting pathogens in diverse communities [10]. Diversified planting reduces the spread of pathogens between single hosts through ecological niche complementarity and resource allocation, forming a natural “dilution effect” that effectively reduces pathogen spread and colonization and significantly reduces the incidence of fungal diseases [11,12], and effectively suppresses disease outbreaks [13]. Different planting patterns alter litter composition and root exudation (e.g., organic acids, phenolics), thereby modulating soil C, N, and P cycling and associated enzyme activities (e.g., urease, phosphatase, chitinase), ultimately reshaping microbial community structure [14]. Root exudates are chemically complex, comprising organic acids, sugars, phenolics, flavonoids, aliphatic compounds, and secondary metabolites [15]. Their composition and relative abundance vary substantially across plant species, genotypes, developmental stages, and environmental conditions [16]. Rhizobium acts as a key regulatory microorganism in legume rhizospheres, supplying nitrogen through symbiotic fixation and enhancing plant growth and biomass accumulation [17]. Beyond increasing nitrogen use efficiency, Rhizobium secretes diverse signaling molecules—such as IAA, Nod factors, and ACC deaminase—to regulate root development, induce systemic resistance, promote beneficial microbial colonization, and indirectly suppress pathogens [18]. It can also further enhance plant resilience to stress and disease through multiple mechanisms, including phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and the secretion of antimicrobial compounds [19]. Plant–plant interactions modulate rhizosphere microbial communities and their gene expression by altering root exudation profiles. For instance, in a Solanum lycopersicumAllium cepa intercropping system, flavonoids (e.g., taxifolin) secreted by A. cepa roots promote the enrichment of Bacillus in the tomato rhizosphere, thereby enhancing resistance to Fusarium wilt [20]. Root exudates not only shift microbial community composition but also regulate the expression of genes involved in metabolism, transport, regulation, and stress responses in beneficial bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, thereby reinforcing their antagonistic activity against pathogens [15]. Additionally, Rhizobium–legume symbiosis modulates the expression of functional genes in rhizosphere microbiomes through signaling molecules, thereby enhancing nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, and disease resistance [19]. Mixed planting of D. odorifera with other tree species optimizes nutrient cycling and rhizosphere interactions, improves stand structure and microbial stability, and effectively suppresses pathogen spread and infection [21]. Mixed planting of D. odorifera with Santalum album L. significantly enhances nitrogen mineralization and reduces nitrogen leaching by more than 25% [22], while intercropping with Eucalyptus spp. increases soil microbial activity and nitrogen-cycling enzyme activity, thereby improving nitrogen uptake and biomass accumulation [23].
Soil microorganisms serve as essential regulators and executors in maintaining plant health [24]. Microbe-induced systemic resistance (ISR) has become increasingly recognized for its crucial role in protecting plants against pathogens. Beneficial bacteria, such as Bacillus, secrete lipopeptides (e.g., surfactin and fengycin) that can directly suppress pathogens and activate plant defense systems [25]. These lipopeptides enhance broad-spectrum resistance by modulating plant defense signaling pathways (e.g., jasmonic acid and ethylene) and regulating the expression of multiple defense-related genes [26]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic associations with plant roots, improving nutrient and water uptake while inducing ISR to enhance host health [27,28]. Diversified planting communities drive the reshaping of microbial community structure and functional networks by changing resource inputs and microenvironmental conditions, thereby forming key functional microbial alliances with specific ecological functions [29]. Environmental factors act as functional filters, playing pivotal roles in microbial community assembly and ecosystem stability [30]. The mechanism of “environmental filtering—community restructuring—network stability—ecological immunity” is regarded as a key biological process for maintaining the health and disease resistance of forest ecosystems. [31]. Environmental gradients—such as soil pH, nutrient status, and vegetation structure—shape microbial community assembly and ecological functions through functional filtering [14]. Soil microbial communities not only reflect ecosystem conditions but also actively drive ecological restoration and disease suppression [29].
At present, no studies have reported how soil microbial communities in tropical plantations of the rare tree species D. odorifera respond to pathogens under different planting patterns. Therefore, this study focused on D. odorifera plantations with varying planting patterns, integrating soil physicochemical properties, anthracnose disease severity, and high-throughput sequencing data to assess changes in soil microbial community structure and function comprehensively. Based on this objective, we hypothesize that planting patterns drive functional reassembly of microbial communities by altering soil properties, and that the enrichment of key responsive taxa mediates ecological suppression of diseases. The study aims to elucidate how different planting patterns influence soil physicochemical properties, thereby reshaping microbial community structure and function to achieve ecological suppression of anthracnose. The findings are expected to provide novel insights for ecological disease management in plantations of rare tree species and offer both theoretical foundations and practical guidance for harnessing microbial community reassembly to achieve ecological immunity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Sample Plot Selection

This study was conducted in the state-owned Chengmai Forest Farm, Chengmai County, China (19°67′ N, 110°01′ E). The region has a typical tropical monsoon climate, with an annual mean temperature of 24.8 °C and an annual precipitation of approximately 149 mm (https://www.weather.com.cn). Based on species diversity gradients, three representative D. odorifera plantation sites were selected (Table 1). The stand age of D. odorifera in all selected plots was 12 years. The soil is red and has a sandy loam texture. All sites were managed uniformly throughout the study period.

2.2. Anthracnose Disease Survey and Soil Sample Collection

Disease survey: The investigation began in January 2024. In each plot, the five-point sampling method was used, with standard trees randomly selected in the east, south, west, north, and central areas. All selected trees were tagged and numbered for subsequent monitoring. From January to December 2024, the incidence of anthracnose disease was surveyed monthly. Disease severity was recorded according to standardized grading criteria. The disease incidence and disease index (DI) were calculated for each plot using the methods described by [32,33]. Anthracnose disease severity was classified as follows: Grade 0, no symptoms; Grade 1, lesions covering less than 20% of the leaf area; Grade 2, lesions covering 20–50% of the leaf area; Grade 3, lesions covering 51–75% of the leaf area; Grade 4, lesions covering 76–100% of the leaf area.
The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was used to quantify the overall severity of anthracnose [34]. This index integrates disease information across the entire observation period, providing a more reliable measure of cumulative disease pressure than single-point assessments, and has been widely applied in studies of plant–microbe interactions [35,36]. The AUDPC was calculated as follows:
A U D P C = i = 1 n 1 [ y i + y i + 1 2 × ( t i + 1 t i ) ]
n = total number of surveys; i = the i-th survey (starting from 1); yi = disease severity recorded during the i-th survey; ti = time of the i-th survey.
Soil sampling: In November 2024, four 5 m × 5 m plots were established within each site where disease surveys had been conducted. Sterilized soil augers (3.5 cm in diameter) were used to randomly collect four soil cores (0–20 cm depth) within each quadrat. The four cores from the same quadrat were thoroughly mixed to form one composite sample. The collected soil samples were placed in sterile bags, homogenized, immediately stored on dry ice, and rapidly transported to the laboratory. One sample was stored at −80 °C for subsequent soil microbial DNA extraction and high-throughput sequencing analysis [37]. In contrast, another sample was air-dried in sterile Petri dishes, sieved through a 2 mm mesh, and used for soil physicochemical analyses. The experiment included three plots, each with four replicates, for a total of 12 soil samples across all three plots.

2.3. Soil High-Throughput Sequencing

The collected soil samples were subjected to high-throughput sequencing by Novogene Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Total microbial DNA was extracted from soil using the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA concentration and purity were determined using a NanoDrop® ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [38]. DNA libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (Cat. No. E7645B; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA).
The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) for bacterial community analysis [39]. The ITS1 region was amplified using primers 1737F (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) and 2043R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) for fungal community profiling [40]. PCR amplification was performed in a 30 μL reaction containing 15 μL Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix, 0.2 μM of each primer, and 10 ng of genomic DNA template. The PCR cycling parameters included an initial denaturation at 98 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were purified using magnetic beads and pooled in equimolar concentrations. Using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform for PE250 mode sequencing with NovaSeq 6000 [41].

2.4. Soil Physicochemical Property Analysis

Soil physicochemical parameters were determined as follows: pH was measured using a potentiometric method with a soil-to-water ratio of 1:2.5; soil organic matter (SOM) by the potassium dichromate oxidation–external heating method; total nitrogen (TN) by the Kjeldahl method; available nitrogen (AN) by the alkali diffusion method; total potassium (TK) by the sodium hydroxide fusion–flame photometric method; available potassium (AK) by the ammonium acetate extraction–flame photometric method; total phosphorus (TP) by the sodium hydroxide fusion–molybdenum–antimony colorimetric method; and available phosphorus (AP) by the sodium bicarbonate extraction–molybdenum–antimony colorimetric method. Each soil sample was analyzed in four replicates, and the mean values were used for further statistical analysis [42].

2.5. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw sequencing reads were quality-filtered using Fastp (version 0.23.1) and merged with FLASH (version 1.2.11). Denoising and amplicon sequence variant (ASV) clustering were performed using the DADA2 plugin in QIIME2 (version 2022.11) [43]. The filtering criteria were as follows: (i) sequences shorter than 15 bp or containing more than five ambiguous bases (N) were removed; (ii) sequences with more than 40% of bases having a quality score below Q15 were trimmed, and those shorter than 15 bp after trimming were discarded. Taxonomic assignments were conducted using the Silva database (version 138.1) for 16S rRNA genes [44] and the UNITE database (version 9.0) for ITS sequences [45]. High-throughput sequencing data analysis was conducted on the Novogene cloud platform in Beijing (https://magic-plus.novogene.com) (accessed on 26 September 2025). To minimize noise from extremely rare taxa, only genera with a mean relative abundance ≥ 0.01% and occurring in at least two samples were retained for downstream analyses [46,47]. To identify microbial taxa responding to environmental gradients during community reassembly, redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to assess associations between bacterial/fungal communities and environmental variables, including soil physicochemical properties and AUDPC. Genera were then ranked based on their combined contributions along the RDA1 and RDA2 axes (i.e., their explanatory power in ordination space), and the top 25 taxa were defined as “key genera” [48,49] for subsequent functional prediction, correlation analyses, and co-occurrence network construction.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Alpha diversity indices (coverage, Chao1, Simpson, and Shannon) were compared among groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Beta diversity of microbial communities was assessed using Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance matrices, and statistical significance of group differences was tested via permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Redundancy analysis (RDA) was conducted to explore the constraining effects of environmental factors on microbial community composition. A microbial co-occurrence network was constructed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient, with selection criteria set at |r| ≥ 0.3 and p < 0.05. Network topology parameters were calculated using the igraph package (v1.5.1) and evaluated through node degree, betweenness centrality, average clustering coefficient, and modularity index. Functional potentials of bacterial and fungal communities were predicted and annotated using the FAPROTAX (version 1.2.4) and FUNGuild databases (version 1.2), respectively. Differences in microbial genus-level abundances among treatments were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test (p < 0.05). For genera showing significant differences (p < 0.05), Dunn’s post hoc multiple comparisons were performed to identify specific treatment contrasts. Significance of differences among groups was further evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test, with a threshold of p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed in the R environment (v4.5.2).

3. Results

3.1. Differences in Anthracnose Severity and Soil Physicochemical Characteristicss

The severity of anthracnose varied among different planting patterns (Figure 1). Both the JDY and JD planting patterns exhibited lower anthracnose severity compared to the J pattern. Disease severity was highest in the J pattern, with the maximum AUDPC values. In contrast, the JDY pattern exhibited the lowest disease severity and AUDPC values, and the JD pattern showed intermediate severity.
Significant differences in soil physicochemical properties were observed among D. odorifera plantations under different planting patterns. Soil physicochemical parameters in the JDY and JD patterns were significantly higher than those in the J pattern. Among the three patterns, the J pattern exhibited the lowest values for all measured parameters, with more substantial soil acidity and lower fertility. The JD pattern showed optimal values for several key parameters, including pH, TN, TK, AK, and AP. The JDY pattern exhibited the highest values for SOM, AN, and TP (Table 2).

3.2. Effects of Planting Patterns on Soil Microbial Community Structure

Alpha diversity indices of soil microbial communities under the three planting patterns were evaluated (Table 3). The community coverage across all samples reached 1, indicating that the sequencing results were sufficient to capture the microbial diversity in the study samples. For bacterial communities, the JD treatment showed the highest Chao, Simpson, and Shannon indices, both significantly higher than those in the J and JDY treatments. In contrast, fungal diversity exhibited no consistent trend among planting patterns: the Chao index was highest in JD, the Shannon index was highest in J, and the Simpson index peaked in JDY. These results suggest that fungal communities responded in a more complex manner, with distinct response mechanisms compared with those of bacteria.
Beta diversity was assessed using Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distance matrices at both ASV and genus levels. The analysis further confirmed that planting patterns had significant effects on soil microbial community composition, with all three patterns markedly reshaping community structure (Figure 2 and Figure S1). The three planting modes showed significant separation at different levels, and the PERMANOVA test showed highly significant differences between groups (ASV level: bacteria: R2 = 0.801, p = 0.001; Fungi: R2 = 0.658, p = 0.002; Genus level: bacteria: R2 = 0.823, p = 0.001; Fungi: R2 = 0.782, p = 0.001). These results suggest that planting patterns may drive microbial community assembly.

3.3. Effects of Environmental Factors (Including AUDPC) on Soil Microbial Community Structure and Identification of Key Microbial Taxa

Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil microorganisms revealed significant differences among planting patterns and among environmental factors (Figure 3). The correlation between microbial community structure under different planting patterns and environmental factors was evaluated using quadrant distributions, arrow lengths, and angles between microbial taxa and environmental factors. As shown in the figure, the selected environmental factors explained 79% of the variation in bacterial community composition affected by planting patterns (RDA1 accounted for 42.5%, RDA2 for 36.5%) and 80.3% of the variation in fungal community composition (RDA1 accounted for 56.3%, RDA2 for 24%). The main environmental factors affecting bacterial community structure were SOM, AUDPC, and pH, in order. The main environmental factors affecting fungal community structure were SOM, TK, AUDPC, and AK, in order. Notably, the AUDPC vector points in the opposite direction to the distribution of JD and JDY samples, aligns with the clustering area of J samples, and forms large obtuse angles with vectors of soil health indicators such as SOM. This intuitively indicates that poorer soil health is associated with higher disease occurrence.
To further identify the microbial taxa exerting the most significant influence during community shifts, the top 25 bacterial and fungal genera with the highest combined contributions to the RDA axes were selected, based on the 79% and 80.3% of community variation explained by the RDA models (Figure 4). The spatial distribution of these key taxa in the RDA ordination clearly reflected their close associations with specific environmental gradients. The five genera with the highest cumulative contributions exhibited distinct planting-pattern preferences: Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia, Acidibacter, and Rozellomycota_gen_Incertae_sedis were associated with the JDY plots; Flavobacterium, Humicola, and Zoopagales_gen_Incertae_sedis were associated with JD; whereas Streptomyces, Fungi_gen_Incertae_sedis, and Natipusillaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis were closely associated with the J monoculture.

3.4. Responses of Key Microbial Taxa to Different Planting Patterns

Correlation heatmaps were used to examine the associations between key microbial taxa and environmental factors, as well as their relative abundances under different planting patterns. SOM and AUDPC, representing soil health and disease severity, respectively, were selected as the primary indicators for correlation analysis (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
Among the key bacterial taxa, SOM showed a highly significant positive correlation with unidentified_Alphaproteobacteria, Aquicella, and Acidibacter, all of which displayed higher relative abundances in the JD and JDY plots, with the highest levels observed in JDY. In contrast, AUDPC was strongly positively correlated with Streptomyces, Mycobacterium, Actinocatenispora, Sphingomonas, RB41, Pseudonocardia, and Acidothermus, which were most abundant in the J monoculture. Notably, Bacillus and Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia were significantly enriched in JDY, and both taxa were positively correlated with SOM but negatively correlated with AUDPC (Figure 5 and Table S1).
Among the key fungal taxa, SOM showed a highly significant positive correlation with Chloridium, Saitozyma, Rozellomycota_gen_Incertae_sedis, Fusarium, and Staphylotrichum. These genera displayed higher relative abundances in the JD and JDY plots, with JDY exhibiting the highest levels. AUDPC was strongly positively correlated with Knufia, Scytinopogon, Torula, Latoruaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis, Hydnodontaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis, and Phialomyces, all of which were most abundant in the J monoculture. Notably, Trichoderma was significantly enriched in JDY and exhibited a positive correlation with SOM but a highly significant negative correlation with AUDPC (Figure 6 and Table S2).

3.5. Functional Prediction of Key Microbial Taxa

Functional predictions of the selected key microbial taxa were performed using the FAPROTAX and FUNGuild databases, revealing apparent functional differences among the planting patterns (Figure 7).
A total of 16 functional groups were identified among the key bacterial taxa, with Aerobic Chemoheterotrophy being the dominant category. In the JDY plots, functions related to nitrogen and carbon cycling—such as Denitrification, Fermentation, Nitrification, Methane Metabolism, and Ureolysis—showed high abundance. The JD plots exhibited higher levels of Sulfate Reduction and Methane Metabolism, which are associated with sulfur and carbon cycling. In contrast, the J monoculture primarily exhibited functions associated with environmental modification, such as Chitinolysis and Sulfide Oxidation. Notably, pathogen-associated functions were more abundant in both the J and JD treatments.
Fourteen functional groups were identified among the key fungal taxa, with Saprotrophic guilds (Soil, Wood, and Litter Saprotrophs) being dominant. The JDY plots showed higher abundances of Endophyte, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal, Epiphyte, and Lichenized fungi, the latter three occurring exclusively in JDY, suggesting enhanced soil development and fertility. In the JD plots, Dung Saprotroph, Wood Saprotroph, Fungal Parasite, and Litter Saprotroph were more prominent. The J monoculture exhibited higher abundances of Soil Saprotrophs, Mycoparasites, and Orchid Mycorrhizal fungi.

3.6. Co-Occurrence Network Analysis

To elucidate the interaction patterns of microbial communities across different planting modes, co-occurrence networks were constructed from the identified key microbial taxa (Figure 8 and Figure 9).
In the J network, strains such as Streptomyces, Mycobacterium, Sphingomonas, RB41, Pseudonocardia, and Acidothermus are primarily located in the central area of the network diagram; its network betweenness is Haliangium; and Aquicella and Acidibacter are both found in marginal areas. In the JD and JDY networks, as plant species diversity increases, Aquicella and Acidibacter gradually enter the network’s central region, and the positive correlations between Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia and Bacillus gradually strengthen, reaching the highest level in JDY. BCP is strongly positively correlated with Bacillus, and core biocontrol bacterial genera are strongly positively correlated with functional bacterial genera, with the interaction relationship showing a clear functional orientation. The Betweenness of the JD and JDY networks is unidentified_Subgroup_2 and Lysobacter, respectively (Figure 8).
The co-occurrence network correlations of key fungal groups and the average abundance of genera showed significant differences. Although the strains that significantly correlated with SOM and AUDPC did not show movement in or out of the network diagram, the number of positive-correlation connections in the JDY network increased significantly. The average abundance of each genus in the JD and JDY networks was significantly higher than that in the J network. The biocontrol fungus Trichoderma gradually strengthened its role in all three networks and simultaneously moved toward the network center. The Betweenness in the J network was Latoruaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis, while the Betweenness in both the JD and JDY networks was Scytinopogon (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

The occurrence and severity of plant diseases are not isolated events but are often tightly coupled with specific soil environmental conditions and the associated microbial communities [50]. In this study, we found that compared with the Dalbergia odorifera monoculture (J), both the D. odorifera–Pterocarpus macrocarpus mixed forest (JD) and the D. odorifera–P. macrocarpus–Clinacanthus nutans complex mixed forest (JDY) exhibited significantly reduced anthracnose severity, with the JDY system showing the lowest AUDPC value. Soil physicochemical analyses further revealed that both the JD and JDY planting systems significantly enhanced soil nutrient status. These findings suggest a potential link between soil health and the severity of anthracnose disease. Deng, Yong et al. analyzed microbial enrichment processes in the rhizosphere of plants with different health conditions and demonstrated that soil physicochemical properties are the key drivers determining whether beneficial microorganisms or pathogens are preferentially enriched in the rhizosphere, thereby directly influencing disease development [51]. Zheng, Yanfen et al. further showed that beneficial keystone taxa isolated from disease-suppressive soils serve as crucial biological sources conferring suppressive capacity to the soil [52]. Tao, Chengyuan et al. demonstrated that manipulating soil environmental conditions to enrich indigenous beneficial Pseudomonas populations markedly enhances the soil’s ability to suppress soil-borne diseases [53]. To further elucidate the relationships among planting patterns, microbial community assembly, and disease variation, redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that planting patterns drive microbial community assembly, explaining 79% and 80.3% of the variation in bacterial and fungal community composition, respectively. The primary environmental factors influencing bacterial community composition were SOM, AUDPC, and pH, whereas SOM, TK, AUDPC, and AK were the dominant drivers shaping fungal community structure. The AUDPC vector was oriented opposite to vectors representing SOM and other soil health indicators (angle > 90°), indicating a negative correlation. It also pointed in the opposite direction of the JD and JDY samples, while aligning with the J cluster. This visually demonstrates that poorer soil health is associated with higher disease severity. Mixed-species planting enhances litter diversity and root complementarity, thereby improving soil structure and nutrient availability, promoting the accumulation and redistribution of key elements such as carbon and nitrogen, and creating favorable conditions for microbial community development. These improvements enhance soil fertility and overall soil health, ultimately reducing the incidence of plant diseases [8,54].
When plants are subjected to pathogen stress, their roots may release specific “cry-for-help” signals that actively recruit or enrich beneficial microorganisms with antagonistic, growth-promoting, or colonization-resistance functions, thereby establishing disease-suppressive microbial communities and enhancing systemic plant resistance [55]. Although root exudates were not directly measured in this study, the synchronous changes observed between microbial community structure and disease indicators are consistent with this framework. To identify beneficial microorganisms whose abundance is driven by planting patterns, this study selected the 25 key genera exhibiting the strongest responses to environmental drivers based on RDA. Correlation with environmental factors and differential abundance analyses revealed that the enrichment of these genera differed significantly across planting patterns (Tables S1 and S2). Genera such as Aquicella, Acidibacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia, Chloridium, Saitozyma, Staphylotrichum, and Trichoderma, which were positively correlated with SOM and negatively correlated with AUDPC, exhibited significantly higher abundance in the JDY system compared to the J system. In the JD system, genera including Aeromonas, Nitrospira, Anaeromyxobacter, Zoopagales_gen_Incertae_sedis, Meruliaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis, and Humicola, which were positively correlated with soil pH, TK, and AK, were significantly enriched. These beneficial genera may enhance the health of D. odorifera through multiple mechanisms. (1) One is directly antagonizing pathogens or inducing resistance, thereby reducing anthracnose incidence. Trichoderma, a well-known biocontrol fungus, can directly antagonize a wide range of foliar pathogens, significantly decreasing leaf disease incidence [56]. Bacillus has been extensively demonstrated to control forest diseases via the production of antimicrobial compounds, niche competition, and induction of systemic resistance in plants, and it has been widely applied in the biocontrol of tree pathogens [57]. Certain members of Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia can suppress pathogenic fungi through the production of volatile sulfur compounds and other metabolites [58]. Notably, Burkholderia strains have been repeatedly isolated from D. odorifera root nodules and have been confirmed to form effective symbioses, significantly promoting plant growth and nitrogen accumulation, representing a key symbiotic nitrogen-fixing resource for Dalbergia odorifera [59]. Related strains, such as Paraburkholderia, can colonize multiple leguminous hosts and possess multifaceted functions, including growth promotion and stress resistance, demonstrating high ecological adaptability and considerable application potential [60]. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria are ubiquitously present and play essential roles in nodule development and function. Through symbiotic interactions with plants, they mediate biological nitrogen fixation from atmospheric N2, constituting a key microbial community for nodule formation and functional nitrogen fixation [61]. Extensive studies have demonstrated that nitrogen-fixing bacteria include not only the classical Rhizobium but also various non-rhizobial diazotrophs. These bacteria collectively enhance nodule development and nitrogen-fixation efficiency through multiple mechanisms, such as modulating plant hormones and promoting mineral uptake, further highlighting the diversity and ubiquity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in nodule formation [62,63]. (2) Another mechanism is promoting soil nutrient cycling and environmental improvement, thereby indirectly reducing disease incidence. Acidibacter and Nitrospira primarily regulate soil pH and nitrogen cycling, optimizing the rhizosphere microenvironment and indirectly enhancing plant health and disease resistance [64]. Aeromonas can improve soil structure by secreting extracellular polysaccharides, thereby promoting plant growth, nutrient uptake, and enhancing soil health and crop productivity [65]. Saitozyma secretes extracellular enzymes, such as lipases, that participate in the decomposition of lipids and organic matter, promoting soil organic carbon mineralization and cycling [66]. Anaeromyxobacter, as a typical metal-reducing bacterium, along with Aquicella, plays an important role in iron cycling and the turnover of multiple soil nutrients [67,68]. (3) A further mechanism is promoting plant growth and enhancing stress tolerance. Humicola and Staphylotrichum can improve plant growth and confer greater resilience to environmental stressors [69,70]. In summary, the microbial communities enriched under the JDY system exhibit a more diverse set of functional pathways, combining direct pathogen antagonism, growth promotion, environmental amelioration, and enhanced plant resistance. In contrast, the communities enriched in the JD system primarily maintain D. odorifera health by promoting nutrient cycling and enhancing plant resilience.
Functional prediction further revealed a significant differentiation in the primary ecological functions of microbial communities across planting patterns, particularly among fungi. The JDY system uniquely exhibited three functional types: Arbuscular Mycorrhizal, Epiphytic, and Lichenized. Numerous studies have confirmed that these functions collectively improve soil and environmental conditions through multiple mechanisms, including enhancing plant nutrition and resistance, directly antagonizing pathogens, and producing novel antimicrobial compounds, thereby significantly enhancing plant disease resistance and ecosystem stability [71,72,73]. In bacterial functional predictions, the JDY system showed that the bacterial community was more oriented toward carbon and nitrogen cycling. In contrast, the JD system was more closely associated with sulfur and carbon cycling. Previous studies have demonstrated that diverse mixed-species forests can significantly enhance soil nutrient cycling rates, thereby improving plant resistance to diseases [74,75]. In contrast, the monoculture (J) community primarily maintained basic soil environmental functions yet exhibited higher pathogen-related functional potential, indicating an elevated latent risk of disease. It should be noted that the function predictions in this study, based on taxonomic annotation, have inherent limitations. They primarily rely on mapping known taxa to known functions, whereas microbial functions are often strain-specific and environmentally dependent; even within the same genus, members may include pathogenic, nonpathogenic, and antagonistic strains. To address this limitation, future studies could integrate metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to dissect the composition of functional genes and metabolic pathways within microbial communities. The application of MAGs not only greatly expands genomic resolution for uncultivated microbes but also unveils their metabolic potential and ecological roles in key biogeochemical cycles, such as carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur, providing a solid foundation for understanding microbial contributions to environmental stability and ecosystem services [76]. Additionally, RNA-seq allows real-time capture of functionally active genes and metabolic pathways during disease onset and progression. Advanced approaches such as dual RNA-seq can simultaneously analyze pathogen and host transcriptome dynamics, revealing pathogen gene regulation during infection and molecular interactions with the host, providing a powerful tool to unravel disease mechanisms and identify novel control targets [77]. Therefore, integrating multi-omics approaches that combine MAGs and RNA-seq will facilitate comprehensive elucidation of microbial community functions from the genomic to the transcriptomic levels, encompassing disease progression, nutrient cycling, and other ecological processes.
Co-occurrence network analysis further validated this ecological optimization pathway from a microbial interaction perspective. As the stand structure shifted from J to JDY, the fungal network exhibited a clear transition from an unstable community to an efficient decomposition system and ultimately to a robust defense-oriented assemblage. In the J network, the core hub was the functionally unknown Latoruaceae_gen_Incertae_sedis, suggesting that the system’s stability and functional regulatory capacity are difficult to predict. In the JD network, the central taxa shifted toward Scytinopogon, a lignin-degrading fungus, suggesting a transition toward more efficient nutrient cycling [78]. In the JDY network, Scytinopogon continued to occupy the central position, while functional linkages involving potent biocontrol fungi, such as Trichoderma, became increasingly strengthened. A comprehensive review by Sood, Monika et al. demonstrated the diverse biological functions of Trichoderma spp., confirming its role as a versatile biocontrol agent [79]. The JDY system formed a mature, stable network that integrates both efficient decomposition capacity and strong pathogen suppression. Changes in the bacterial networks revealed a functional shift in the microbial community from “internal competition” to “cooperative defense”. In the J system, the core hub was the predatory bacterium Haliangium. Previous studies have demonstrated that Haliangium, as a unique functional taxon with active predatory capabilities, often dominates ecological interactions characterized by predation and competition [80]. Therefore, the J network is inferred to be primarily governed by competitive interactions. In the JD system, the core taxon shifted to the functionally uncharacterized unidentified_Subgroup_2, suggesting that the microbial community may be undergoing structural reorganization. In the JDY stage, the biocontrol bacterium Lysobacter became the central hub. It formed positive cooperative associations with Flavobacterium, Gaiella, and other taxa, thereby establishing a highly effective defense network centered on pathogen suppression. Drenker, Christian et al. demonstrated that Lysobacter exhibits broad-spectrum antagonistic activity against diverse plant-pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes and provides disease control efficacy comparable to that of conventional chemical pesticides across multiple crop species [81]. Nishioka, Tomoki et al. confirmed, through rhizosphere isolation and inoculation experiments, that Flavobacterium can significantly suppress cucumber wilt disease, and microscopic imaging further revealed its ability to inhibit the proliferation of pathogenic fungi in soil [82]. Wei, Chengjian et al. verified, through multi-omics analyses and correlation experiments, that Gaiella is closely associated with the synthesis of antimicrobial metabolites and plays an important role in shaping disease-suppressive microbial networks in healthy soils [83]. Moreover, the strong positive association between Burkholderia–Caballeronia–Paraburkholderia and Bacillus indicates a functionally oriented interaction between core biocontrol taxa and functional microbial groups, collectively contributing to the maintenance of soil health and ecological balance.
Notably, in the JDY system—which exhibited the most substantial disease-suppressive effect—Fusarium showed a relatively high abundance. Although Fusarium is commonly regarded as a typical soil-borne pathogenic genus, studies have demonstrated that numerous non-pathogenic and even biocontrol-competent strains exist within this genus. These strains can act as antagonistic or symbiotic fungi, contributing to the development of suppressive soils [84]. Therefore, the elevated abundance of Fusarium in JDY soils more likely reflects the enrichment of non-pathogenic or functionally specialized members of the genus, rather than an increased risk of disease. Future studies integrating MAGs with RNA-seq-based multi-omics approaches may elucidate the ecological significance underlying the high abundance of Fusarium, from genomic potential to functional expression. Moreover, isolation, pathogenicity assays, and functional validation will be essential for dissecting the specific ecological roles of these Fusarium members.

5. Conclusions

By characterizing the responses of soil microbiomes to anthracnose under different planting patterns of D. odorifera, this study demonstrates that planting pattern is a key driver of soil microbial community reassembly and a significant determinant of disease outcomes. Mixed forests (JD), particularly the composite mixed system (JDY), substantially improved soil physicochemical properties and enhanced nutrient cycling processes. These improvements reshaped the soil microbiome’s functional profiles and gave rise to unique beneficial functional groups, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. At the same time, beneficial genera such as Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia, Bacillus, and Trichoderma were significantly enriched, and the microbial communities across the three planting modes evolved from competitive to collaborative defense, forming a steady-state network that integrates nutrient decomposition and pathogen inhibition functions. In summary, the composite mixed planting system modulates soil properties and promotes the enrichment of key functional microbial taxa, thereby achieving ecological suppression of anthracnose. In the establishment or restoration of D. odorifera plantations, adopting the JDY composite mixed system and targeting beneficial taxa enriched therein—such as Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia and Trichoderma—could serve as strategic indicators of soil health and disease-suppression potential. The research provides new ideas and theoretical support for guiding the ecological management of rare tree species, the establishment of artificial forests, and the ecological prevention and control of diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13122876/s1, Figure S1. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on genus-level compositions of bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities revealed distinct overall community structures among the different planting systems. Table S1. Analysis of differences in the abundance of key bacteria in soil under different planting modes. Table S2. Analysis of the differences in the abundance of key fungi in soil under different planting methods.

Author Contributions

Methodology, L.X.; Software, L.X. and K.L.; Validation, L.X. and K.L.; Investigation, Y.Z.; Resources, G.Z.; Data curation, Y.Z. and K.L.; Writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; Writing—review and editing, L.X. and G.Z.; Supervision, J.L.; Project administration, J.L.; Funding acquisition, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R & D Program of China (2023YFD1401304).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, X.Z.; Yang, Q.; Wan, Z.; Zhou, G.Y.; Liu, J.A. First report of Colletotrichum brevisporum causing anthracnose of Dalbergia odorifera in China. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, X.; Wang, C.; Meng, H.; Yu, Z.; Yang, M.; Wei, J. Dalbergia odorifera: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology, and quality control. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 248, 112328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ninh The, S. A review on the medicinal plant Dalbergia odorifera species: Phytochemistry and biological activity. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 7142370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boufleur, T.R.; Ciampi-Guillardi, M.; Tikami, Í.; Rogério, F.; Thon, M.R.; Sukno, S.A.; Massola Junior, N.S.; Baroncelli, R. Soybean anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum species: Current status and future prospects. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 393–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wan, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, G. First report of Colletotrichum gigasporum causing anthracnose on Dalbergia odorifera in China. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, J.; Sun, J.; Li, M.; Gong, D.; Yang, J.; He, Y.; Liu, Z.; Hu, M. First report of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum karstii on Dalbergia odorifera in China. Plant Dis. 2024, 108, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, C.L.C.; Kuchma, O.; Krutovsky, K.V. Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018, 15, e00419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, J.; Kneeshaw, D.; Peng, C.; Wu, Y.; Feng, L.; Qu, X.; Wang, W.; Pan, C.; Feng, H. Positive effects of species mixing on biodiversity of understory plant communities and soil health in forest plantations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2418090122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Tang, W.; Hong, S.; Wang, J. Investigation and Reflection of Hainan Huanghuali (Dalbergia odorifera T.C. Chen) Industry. World J. For. 2022, 11, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Losapio, G. Contextualizing the ecology of plant–plant interactions and constructive networks. AoB Plants 2023, 15, plad035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, M.; García-Guzmán, G.; Gilbert, G.S.; Zhou, S. Dilution effect of plant diversity on infectious diseases: Latitudinal trend and biological context dependence. Oikos 2020, 129, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Keesing, F.; Ostfeld, R.S. Dilution effects in disease ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2021, 24, 2490–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, X.; Lyu, S.; Zhou, S.; Bradshaw, C.J. Warming and fertilization alter the dilution effect of host diversity on disease severity. Ecology 2016, 97, 1680–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhu, L.; Luan, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, S.; Zou, W.; Han, X.; Duan, Y.; Zhu, B.; Li, Y. Community assembly of organisms regulates soil microbial functional potential through dual mechanisms. Glob. Change Biol. 2024, 30, e17160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mavrodi, O.V.; McWilliams, J.R.; Peter, J.O.; Berim, A.; Hassan, K.A.; Elbourne, L.D.; LeTourneau, M.K.; Gang, D.R.; Paulsen, I.T.; Weller, D.M. Root exudates alter the expression of diverse metabolic, transport, regulatory, and stress response genes in rhizosphere Pseudomonas. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 651282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Seitz, V.A.; McGivern, B.B.; Daly, R.A.; Chaparro, J.M.; Borton, M.A.; Sheflin, A.M.; Kresovich, S.; Shields, L.; Schipanski, M.E.; Wrighton, K.C. Variation in root exudate composition influences soil microbiome membership and function. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e00226-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lan, Y.; Liao, L.; Yao, X.; Ye, S. Synergistic effects of nitrogen and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on the growth, physiological traits and nutrient absorption of intercropped Eucalyptus urophylla × Eucalyptus grandis and Dalbergia odorifera. Trees 2023, 37, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jaiswal, S.K.; Dakora, F.D. Maximizing Photosynthesis and Plant Growth in African Legumes Through Rhizobial Partnerships: The Road Behind and Ahead. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jaiswal, S.K.; Mohammed, M.; Ibny, F.Y.; Dakora, F.D. Rhizobia as a source of plant growth-promoting molecules: Potential applications and possible operational mechanisms. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 4, 619676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Rahman, M.K.U.; Gao, D.; Wei, Z.; Wu, F.; Dini-Andreote, F. Interspecific plant interaction via root exudates structures the disease suppressiveness of rhizosphere microbiomes. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 849–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiang, L.-S.; Miao, L.-F.; Yang, F. Drought and nitrogen application modulate the morphological and physiological responses of Dalbergia odorifera to different niche neighbors. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 664122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.F.; Yang, Z.J.; Xu, D.; Cui, Z.; Liu, X. Effects of weeding and fertilization on soil nitrogen mineralization and leaching in the mixed forest of Dalbergia odorifera and Santalum album. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 2575–2582. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yao, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, H.; Nong, Z.; Ye, S.; Deng, Q. Introduction of Dalbergia odorifera enhances nitrogen absorption on Eucalyptus through stimulating microbially mediated soil nitrogen-cycling. For. Ecosyst. 2021, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aqeel, M.; Ran, J.; Hu, W.; Irshad, M.K.; Dong, L.; Akram, M.A.; Eldesoky, G.E.; Aljuwayid, A.M.; Chuah, L.F.; Deng, J. Plant-soil-microbe interactions in maintaining ecosystem stability and coordinated turnover under changing environmental conditions. Chemosphere 2023, 318, 137924. [Google Scholar]
  25. Mo, S.; Zhao, W.; Wei, Y.; Su, Z.; Li, S.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X.; Qu, Y.; Wang, P.; Dong, L. Defense Responses Stimulated by Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 Through Salicylate-and Jasmonate-Dependent Signaling Pathways Protect Cotton Against Verticillium Wilt. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, S.; Jiang, H.; Ding, T.; Xu, Q.; Chai, W.; Cheng, B. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 represses plant miR846 to induce systemic resistance via a jasmonic acid-dependent signalling pathway. Mol. Plant Pathol 2018, 19, 1612–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bollmann-Giolai, A.; Malone, J.G.; Arora, S. Diversity, detection and exploitation: Linking soil fungi and plant disease. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2022, 70, 102199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, T.; Hao, L.; Bai, S. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation in response to shrub planting patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2024, 200, 105449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qiao, Y.; Wang, T.; Huang, Q.; Guo, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, Q.; Shen, Q.; Ling, N. Core species impact plant health by enhancing soil microbial cooperation and network complexity during community coalescence. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 188, 109231. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bledsoe, R.B.; Goodwillie, C.; Peralta, A.L. Long-term nutrient enrichment of an oligotroph-dominated wetland increases bacterial diversity in bulk soils and plant rhizospheres. Msphere 2020, 5, 10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, C.; Lei, S.; Wu, H.; Liao, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Wang, G.; Fang, L.; Song, Z. Simplified microbial network reduced microbial structure stability and soil functionality in alpine grassland along a natural aridity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 191, 109366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Madden, L.; Hughes, G. Sampling for plant disease incidence. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 1088–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ma, Z.; Zhu, J.; Sun, Z.; Liang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Sun, L.; Li, W. The influences of biotic and abiotic factors on the occurrence and severity of poplar canker disease in Qingfeng County, China and the management implications. J. For. Res. 2015, 26, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Campbell, C.L.; Madden, L.V. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeger, M.; Viljanen-Rollinson, S. The use of the area under the disease-progress curve (AUDPC) to assess quantitative disease resistance in crop cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Holb, I.; Heijne, B.; Withagen, J.; Gáll, J.; Jeger, M. Analysis of summer epidemic progress of apple scab at different apple production systems in the Netherlands and Hungary. Phytopathology 2005, 95, 1001–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castle, S.C.; Samac, D.A.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Rosen, C.J.; Gutknecht, J.L.; Kinkel, L.L. Impacts of sampling design on estimates of microbial community diversity and composition in agricultural soils. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 78, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Lozupone, C.A.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Fierer, N.; Knight, R. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, J.; Rodriguez, J.; Martens-Habbena, W. Fine-scale evaluation of two standard 16S rRNA gene amplicon primer pairs for analysis of total prokaryotes and archaeal nitrifiers in differently managed soils. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1140487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Ryberg, M.; Hartmann, M.; Branco, S.; Wang, Z.; Godhe, A.; De Wit, P.; Sánchez-García, M.; Ebersberger, I.; de Sousa, F. Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS 2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2013, 4, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Modi, A.; Vai, S.; Caramelli, D.; Lari, M. The Illumina sequencing protocol and the NovaSeq 6000 system. In Bacterial Pangenomics: Methods and Protocols; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 15–42. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bao, S. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, M.; Shao, D.; Zhou, J.; Gu, J.; Qin, J.; Chen, W.; Wei, W. Signatures within esophageal microbiota with progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2020, 32, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. McLaren, M.R.; Callahan, B.J. Silva 138.1 prokaryotic SSU taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2. Zenodo 2021, 10, 5281. [Google Scholar]
  45. Einarsson, S.V.; Rivers, A.R. ITSxpress version 2: Software to rapidly trim internal transcribed spacer sequences with quality scores for amplicon sequencing. Microbiol. Spectr. 2024, 12, e0060124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lima, J.; Manning, T.; Rutherford, K.; Baima, E.; Dewhurst, R.; Walsh, P.; Roehe, R. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions. J. Microbiol. Methods 2021, 186, 106235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Risely, A.; Gillingham, M.A.; Béchet, A.; Brändel, S.; Heni, A.C.; Heurich, M.; Menke, S.; Manser, M.B.; Tschapka, M.; Wasimuddin. Phylogeny-and abundance-based metrics allow for the consistent comparison of core gut microbiome diversity indices across host species. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 659918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Banerjee, S.; Schlaeppi, K.; Van Der Heijden, M.G. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Toju, H.; Peay, K.G.; Yamamichi, M.; Narisawa, K.; Hiruma, K.; Naito, K.; Fukuda, S.; Ushio, M.; Nakaoka, S.; Onoda, Y. Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 247–257, Erratum in Nat Plants. 2018, 4, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, H.; Li, J.; Xiao, Y.; Gu, Y.; Liu, H.; Liang, Y.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Meng, D.; Yin, H. An integrated insight into the relationship between soil microbial community and tobacco bacterial wilt disease. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deng, Y.; Kong, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, T.; Chen, M.; Zhu, L.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, C. Rhizosphere microbial community enrichment processes in healthy and diseased plants: Implications of soil properties on biomarkers. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1333076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zheng, Y.; Han, X.; Zhao, D.; Wei, K.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.-S. Exploring biocontrol agents from microbial keystone taxa associated to suppressive soil: A new attempt for a biocontrol strategy. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 655673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tao, C.; Li, R.; Xiong, W.; Shen, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Ruan, Y.; Geisen, S.; Shen, Q.; Kowalchuk, G.A. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression. Microbiome 2020, 8, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, W.; Xie, L.; Xu, Y.; Yang, M. Effect of mixed planting on soil nutrient availability and microbial diversity in the rhizosphere of Parashorea chinensis plantations. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1464271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rolfe, S.A.; Griffiths, J.; Ton, J. Crying out for help with root exudates: Adaptive mechanisms by which stressed plants assemble health-promoting soil microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 49, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sirikamonsathien, T.; Kenji, M.; Dethoup, T. Potential of endophytic Trichoderma in controlling Phytophthora leaf fall disease in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis). Biol. Control 2023, 179, 105175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ajuna, H.B.; Lim, H.-I.; Moon, J.-H.; Won, S.-J.; Choub, V.; Choi, S.-I.; Yun, J.-Y.; Ahn, Y.S. The prospect of hydrolytic enzymes from Bacillus species in the biological control of pests and diseases in forest and fruit tree production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Carrión, V.J.; Cordovez, V.; Tyc, O.; Etalo, D.W.; de Bruijn, I.; de Jager, V.C.; Medema, M.H.; Eberl, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Involvement of Burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils. ISME J. 2018, 12, 2307–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lu, J.; He, X.; Huang, L.; Kang, L.; Xu, D. Two Burkholderia strains from nodules of Dalbergia odorifera T. Chen in Hainan Island, southern China. New For. 2012, 43, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Esmaeel, Q.; Miotto, L.; Rondeau, M.; Leclère, V.; Clément, C.; Jacquard, C.; Sanchez, L.; Barka, E.A. Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN-plants interaction: From perception to the induced mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, J.; Yang, F.; Wang, S.; Ma, H.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. Co-existence of rhizobia and diverse non-rhizobial bacteria in the rhizosphere and nodules of Dalbergia odorifera seedlings inoculated with Bradyrhizobium elkanii, Rhizobium multihospitium–like and Burkholderia pyrrocinia–like strains. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hnini, M.; Aurag, J. Prevalence, diversity and applications potential of nodules endophytic bacteria: A systematic review. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1386742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Etesami, H.; Santoyo, G. Boosting Rhizobium-legume symbiosis: The role of nodule non-rhizobial bacteria in hormonal and nutritional regulation under stress. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 297, 128192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, L.; Yang, X.; Tong, B.; Wang, D.; Tian, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, J.; Xiao, X.; Wang, S. Rhizobacterial compositions and their relationships with soil properties and medicinal bioactive ingredients in Cinnamomum migao. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1078886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Naveen, S.; Balachandar, D. Extracellular polymeric substances of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria modulate the positive plant-soil feedback in maize via soil conditioning. Sci. Total Environ. 2025, 975, 179256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, L.; Xia, T.; Yang, H. Seasonal patterns of rhizosphere microorganisms suggest carbohydrate-degrading and nitrogen-fixing microbes contribute to the attribute of full-year shooting in woody bamboo Cephalostachyum pingbianense. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1033293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, K.; Jia, R.; Li, L.; Jiang, R.; Qu, D. Community structure of Anaeromyxobacter in Fe (III) reducing enriched cultures of paddy soils. J. Soils Sediments 2020, 20, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gao, P.; Sun, X.; Xiao, E.; Xu, Z.; Li, B.; Sun, W. Characterization of iron-metabolizing communities in soils contaminated by acid mine drainage from an abandoned coal mine in Southwest China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 9585–9598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tripathi, P.; Khare, P.; Barnawal, D.; Shanker, K.; Srivastava, P.K.; Tripathi, R.D.; Kalra, A. Bioremediation of arsenic by soil methylating fungi: Role of Humicola sp. strain 2WS1 in amelioration of arsenic phytotoxicity in Bacopa monnieri L. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 716, 136758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, X.; Du, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Zeng, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Jia, Y. Metal pollution-induced alterations in soil fungal community structure and functional adaptations across regional scales. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 494, 138553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Umer, M.; Anwar, N.; Mubeen, M.; Li, Y.; Ali, A.; Alshaharni, M.O.; Liu, P. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth and disease management for sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1616273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bruisson, S.; Zufferey, M.; L’Haridon, F.; Trutmann, E.; Anand, A.; Dutartre, A.; De Vrieze, M.; Weisskopf, L. Endophytes and epiphytes from the grapevine leaf microbiome as potential biocontrol agents against phytopathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jamilano-Llames, L.C.; dela Cruz, T.E.E. Comparative Antagonistic Activities of Endolichenic Fungi Isolated from the Fruticose Lichens Ramalina and Usnea. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, Y.; Ding, K.; Sun, Q.; Lu, M.; Liu, Q.; Yang, Q.; Tong, Z.; Zhang, J. Soil multifunctionality and nutrient cycling-related genes in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations: Metagenomic perspective insights into ecological restoration. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222, 119608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhou, X.; Liu, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Z.; Huang, X. High carbon resource diversity enhances the certainty of successful plant pathogen and disease control. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 1333–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mirete, S.; Sánchez-Costa, M.; Díaz-Rullo, J.; González de Figueras, C.; Martínez-Rodríguez, P.; González-Pastor, J.E. Metagenome-Assembled Genomes (MAGs): Advances, Challenges, and Ecological Insights. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Westermann, A.J.; Förstner, K.U.; Amman, F.; Barquist, L.; Chao, Y.; Schulte, L.N.; Müller, L.; Reinhardt, R.; Stadler, P.F.; Vogel, J. Dual RNA-seq unveils noncoding RNA functions in host–pathogen interactions. Nature 2016, 529, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Del Cerro, C.; Erickson, E.; Dong, T.; Wong, A.R.; Eder, E.K.; Purvine, S.O.; Mitchell, H.D.; Weitz, K.K.; Markillie, L.M.; Burnet, M.C. Intracellular pathways for lignin catabolism in white-rot fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2017381118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sood, M.; Kapoor, D.; Kumar, V.; Sheteiwy, M.S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Landi, M.; Araniti, F.; Sharma, A. Trichoderma: The “secrets” of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants 2020, 9, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, L.; Huang, X.; Zhou, J.; Ju, F. Active predation, phylogenetic diversity, and global prevalence of myxobacteria in wastewater treatment plants. ISME J. 2023, 17, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Drenker, C.; El Mazouar, D.; Bücker, G.; Weißhaupt, S.; Wienke, E.; Koch, E.; Kunz, S.; Reineke, A.; Rondot, Y.; Linkies, A. Characterization of a disease-suppressive isolate of Lysobacter enzymogenes with broad antagonistic activity against bacterial, oomycetal and fungal pathogens in different crops. Plants 2023, 12, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nishioka, T.; Marian, M.; Kobayashi, I.; Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Tamaki, H.; Suga, H.; Shimizu, M. Microbial basis of Fusarium wilt suppression by Allium cultivation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wei, C.; Liang, J.; Wang, R.; Chi, L.; Wang, W.; Tan, J.; Shi, H.; Song, X.; Cui, Z.; Xie, Q. Response of bacterial community metabolites to bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum: A multi-omics analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1339478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yuan, X.; Hong, S.; Xiong, W.; Raza, W.; Shen, Z.; Wang, B.; Li, R.; Ruan, Y.; Shen, Q.; Dini-Andreote, F. Development of fungal-mediated soil suppressiveness against Fusarium wilt disease via plant residue manipulation. Microbiome 2021, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Anthracnose disease severity index curves and area under disease progress curves (AUDPC) of D. odorifera plantations under three different planting patterns. (a) Disease index curves show monthly changes in anthracnose severity. Data points represent the disease index values from monthly surveys. (b) AUDPC reflects the overall severity of the disease, with lower values indicating better disease control. Data are from monthly anthracnose surveys from January to December 2024.
Figure 1. Anthracnose disease severity index curves and area under disease progress curves (AUDPC) of D. odorifera plantations under three different planting patterns. (a) Disease index curves show monthly changes in anthracnose severity. Data points represent the disease index values from monthly surveys. (b) AUDPC reflects the overall severity of the disease, with lower values indicating better disease control. Data are from monthly anthracnose surveys from January to December 2024.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g001
Figure 2. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on ASV-level bacterial (a) and fungal (b) community composition, showing overall differences in community structure among different planting patterns. The R2 and p values shown in the figure were obtained from PERMANOVA to assess statistical significance.
Figure 2. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on ASV-level bacterial (a) and fungal (b) community composition, showing overall differences in community structure among different planting patterns. The R2 and p values shown in the figure were obtained from PERMANOVA to assess statistical significance.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g002
Figure 3. RDA of environmental factors (including AUDPC) and soil microbial communities. (a) Community-level RDA of soil bacteria; (b) Community-level RDA of soil fungi. The longer the arrow, the stronger the explanatory power, indicating a greater influence of the variable on the RDA space. Conversely, shorter arrows indicate weaker explanatory power. The angle between two arrows reflects their correlation. An angle of 0° represents a perfect positive correlation, 90° represents no correlation, and 180° represents a perfect negative correlation. The blue triangle indicates genus information.
Figure 3. RDA of environmental factors (including AUDPC) and soil microbial communities. (a) Community-level RDA of soil bacteria; (b) Community-level RDA of soil fungi. The longer the arrow, the stronger the explanatory power, indicating a greater influence of the variable on the RDA space. Conversely, shorter arrows indicate weaker explanatory power. The angle between two arrows reflects their correlation. An angle of 0° represents a perfect positive correlation, 90° represents no correlation, and 180° represents a perfect negative correlation. The blue triangle indicates genus information.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g003
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of environmental factors (including AUDPC) and key microbial groups. (a) RDA of key soil bacterial microorganisms at the community level; (b) RDA of key soil fungal microorganisms at the community level. Arrows indicate the weight of the corresponding variables. Longer arrows indicate stronger explanatory power, meaning the variable has a greater effect on the RDA space; shorter arrows indicate weaker explanatory power. The angle between two arrows reflects their correlation. 0° indicates a perfect positive correlation, 90° indicates no correlation, and 180° indicates a perfect negative correlation. The blue triangle indicates genus information.
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of environmental factors (including AUDPC) and key microbial groups. (a) RDA of key soil bacterial microorganisms at the community level; (b) RDA of key soil fungal microorganisms at the community level. Arrows indicate the weight of the corresponding variables. Longer arrows indicate stronger explanatory power, meaning the variable has a greater effect on the RDA space; shorter arrows indicate weaker explanatory power. The angle between two arrows reflects their correlation. 0° indicates a perfect positive correlation, 90° indicates no correlation, and 180° indicates a perfect negative correlation. The blue triangle indicates genus information.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g004
Figure 5. Correlation analysis of key bacterial taxa with environmental factors (including AUDPC) and their relative abundances under different planting patterns. (a) Heatmap showing correlations between key bacterial genera and environmental factors. Red and blue boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the relative abundances of key bacterial taxa under different planting patterns. The height of each bar represents the mean relative abundance of each taxon within the corresponding treatment group.
Figure 5. Correlation analysis of key bacterial taxa with environmental factors (including AUDPC) and their relative abundances under different planting patterns. (a) Heatmap showing correlations between key bacterial genera and environmental factors. Red and blue boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the relative abundances of key bacterial taxa under different planting patterns. The height of each bar represents the mean relative abundance of each taxon within the corresponding treatment group.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g005
Figure 6. Correlation analysis of key fungal taxa with environmental factors (including AUDPC) and their relative abundances under different planting patterns. (a) Heatmap showing correlations between key fungal genera and environmental factors. Red and blue boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the relative abundances of key fungal taxa under different planting patterns. The height of each bar represents the mean relative abundance of each taxon within the corresponding treatment group.
Figure 6. Correlation analysis of key fungal taxa with environmental factors (including AUDPC) and their relative abundances under different planting patterns. (a) Heatmap showing correlations between key fungal genera and environmental factors. Red and blue boxes indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the relative abundances of key fungal taxa under different planting patterns. The height of each bar represents the mean relative abundance of each taxon within the corresponding treatment group.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g006
Figure 7. Functional prediction of key soil microbial taxa. (a) Stacked bar plot showing the predicted functional potentials of key bacterial taxa based on FAPROTAX. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the predicted functional potentials of key fungal taxa based on FUNGuild. The height of each bar represents the relative strength of functional potential.
Figure 7. Functional prediction of key soil microbial taxa. (a) Stacked bar plot showing the predicted functional potentials of key bacterial taxa based on FAPROTAX. (b) Stacked bar plot showing the predicted functional potentials of key fungal taxa based on FUNGuild. The height of each bar represents the relative strength of functional potential.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g007
Figure 8. Co-occurrence networks of key bacterial taxa under different planting modes. (a) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the J planting mode; (b) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the JD planting mode; (c) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the JDY planting mode. Red edges indicate positive correlations, while blue edges indicate negative correlations. Thicker edges represent stronger correlations.
Figure 8. Co-occurrence networks of key bacterial taxa under different planting modes. (a) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the J planting mode; (b) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the JD planting mode; (c) Co-occurrence network of key bacterial taxa in the JDY planting mode. Red edges indicate positive correlations, while blue edges indicate negative correlations. Thicker edges represent stronger correlations.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g008
Figure 9. Co-occurrence networks of key fungal taxa under different planting modes. (a) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the J planting mode; (b) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the JD planting mode; (c) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the JDY planting mode. Red edges indicate positive correlations, while blue edges indicate negative correlations. Thicker edges represent stronger correlations.
Figure 9. Co-occurrence networks of key fungal taxa under different planting modes. (a) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the J planting mode; (b) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the JD planting mode; (c) Co-occurrence network of key fungal taxa in the JDY planting mode. Red edges indicate positive correlations, while blue edges indicate negative correlations. Thicker edges represent stronger correlations.
Microorganisms 13 02876 g009
Table 1. Basic information of the D. odorifera plantation sample plot.
Table 1. Basic information of the D. odorifera plantation sample plot.
Plot NumberPlanting PatternSpecies Composition
JMonoculture plantingD. odorifera
JDBinary mixed plantingD. odorifera + Pterocarpus macrocarpus
JDYTernary composite mixed plantingD. odorifera + P. macrocarpus + Clinacanthus nutans
J: D. odorifera pure forest; JD: D. odorifera and P. macrocarpus mixed forest; JDY: D. odorifera and P. macrocarpus mixed forest with interplanted C. nutans.
Table 2. Physicochemical enzyme activity properties of soil in different planting patterns of D. odorifera.
Table 2. Physicochemical enzyme activity properties of soil in different planting patterns of D. odorifera.
Plot NumberpHSOM
(g/kg)
TN
(g/kg)
AN
(mg/kg)
TK
(g/kg)
AK
(mg/kg)
TP
(g/kg)
AP
(mg/kg)
J4.30 ±
0.01 c
7.45 ±
0.21 c
0.11 ±
0.00 c
30.25
± 1.33 c
2.06
± 0.03 c
37.02
± 0.90 c
0.27
± 0.04 c
19.66
± 1.92 c
JD5.60 ±
0.11 a
15.16 ±
0.14 b
0.31
± 0.01 a
37.31
± 0.77 b
3.16
± 0.04 a
57.45
± 0.85 a
0.37
± 0.04 b
31.54
± 0.67 a
JDY5.17 ±
0.03 b
16.77 ±
0.18 a
0.20
± 0.02 b
44.34
± 1.09 a
2.22
± 0.02 b
48.00
± 0.55 b
0.52
± 0.02 a
27.51
± 0.67 b
Data in the table are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between treatments, and the Tukey test was used for post hoc comparison to identify differences between group means. Different letters within each column indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05); the same letter denotes no significant difference between treatments, while different letters indicate significant differences. A longitudinal analysis was performed on the data. The following abbreviations are used: SOM, soil organic matter; TN, total nitrogen; AN, available nitrogen; TK, total potassium; AK, available potassium; TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus.
Table 3. Sequencing data and community diversity review.
Table 3. Sequencing data and community diversity review.
Group NameBacterial TaxaFungal Taxa
JJDJDYJJDJDY
Coverage1.00
± 0.000 a
1.00
± 0.000 a
1.00
± 0.000 a
1.00
± 0.000 a
1.00
± 0.000 a
1.00
± 0.000 a
Chao192.5
± 1.000 b
208
± 12.437 a
164
± 1.155 c
124
± 2.160 b
154.25
± 6.702 a
133.5
± 5.972 b
Simpson0.968
± 0.001 b
0.976
± 0.002 a
0.961
± 0.002 c
0.908
± 0.023 ab
0.863
± 0.032 b
0.911
± 0.008 a
Shannon4.087
± 0.022 b
4.332
± 0.034 a
3.932
± 0.020 c
3.269
± 0.139 a
2.9985
± 0.172 ab
2.924
± 0.100 b
The table displays data as mean ± standard deviation, with a one-way ANOVA used to analyze group differences, followed by Tukey’s test to separate statistically significant means. Different letters within each row indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05); the same letter denotes no significant difference between treatments, whereas different letters indicate significant differences. Row-wise analysis is performed on the data.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, L.; Long, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Liu, J. Responses of Soil Microbial Communities and Anthracnose Dynamics to Different Planting Patterns in Dalbergia odorifera. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122876

AMA Style

Xu L, Long K, Zhang Y, Zhou G, Liu J. Responses of Soil Microbial Communities and Anthracnose Dynamics to Different Planting Patterns in Dalbergia odorifera. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Long, Kexu Long, Yichi Zhang, Guoying Zhou, and Junang Liu. 2025. "Responses of Soil Microbial Communities and Anthracnose Dynamics to Different Planting Patterns in Dalbergia odorifera" Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122876

APA Style

Xu, L., Long, K., Zhang, Y., Zhou, G., & Liu, J. (2025). Responses of Soil Microbial Communities and Anthracnose Dynamics to Different Planting Patterns in Dalbergia odorifera. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122876

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop