This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
The Restorative Power of Biophilic Urbanism: A Bibliometric Synthesis of Plant–Human Interactions and Mental Health Outcomes
1
College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Faculty of Humanities and Arts, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China
3
Research Center for Digital Innovation Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
4
Jin Pu Research Institute, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
5
Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
6
School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(8), 1500; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081500 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 February 2026
/
Revised: 24 March 2026
/
Accepted: 3 April 2026
/
Published: 11 April 2026
Abstract
As global urbanization accelerates, biophilic urbanism has emerged as a key nature-based strategy for enhancing public health. While plants are critical active agents for psychological restoration, the specific pathways through which vegetation characteristics influence human–environment interactions remain fragmented. This knowledge gap hinders the evidence-based translation of biophilic principles into actionable urban design and governance. This study conducts a systematic bibliometric analysis of 443 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2025) at the intersection of restorative landscapes, urban settings, and plant-based interventions retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Employing multiple visualization tools (VOSviewer, bibliometrix, and CiteSpace), we map publication trends, international collaborations, and thematic evolution. The results demonstrate a significant shift in the field, moving beyond the validation of foundational restorative theories (e.g., ART and SRT) to a more precise, implementation-oriented framework. This shift is characterized by the operationalization of vegetation attributes as controllable design variables, increasingly relating biophilic principles to broader nature-based solutions (NbS) agendas and evidence-informed urban governance. Thematic clustering analysis identified three core knowledge domains: (1) the role of plants as active exposure agents and behavioral mediators in psychological restoration; (2) the impact of specific plant characteristics—such as canopy structure, species diversity, and seasonal variation—on therapeutic outcomes; and (3) the integration of urban green spaces into broader governance frameworks to promote health equity and inclusive well-being. Our analysis highlights that plant-based interventions are evolving from aesthetic ornaments into precision design levers for fostering human–nature interactions. This study provides a science-based foundation for developing practical design guidelines and policy frameworks, shifting biophilic urbanism toward a robust governance strategy for creating equitable, restorative, and resilient cities.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wu, S.; Ju, F.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, Q.
The Restorative Power of Biophilic Urbanism: A Bibliometric Synthesis of Plant–Human Interactions and Mental Health Outcomes. Buildings 2026, 16, 1500.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081500
AMA Style
Wu S, Ju F, Wu Y, Zhu Z, Jiang Q.
The Restorative Power of Biophilic Urbanism: A Bibliometric Synthesis of Plant–Human Interactions and Mental Health Outcomes. Buildings. 2026; 16(8):1500.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081500
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wu, Sulan, Fei Ju, Yuchen Wu, Zunling Zhu, and Qianling Jiang.
2026. "The Restorative Power of Biophilic Urbanism: A Bibliometric Synthesis of Plant–Human Interactions and Mental Health Outcomes" Buildings 16, no. 8: 1500.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081500
APA Style
Wu, S., Ju, F., Wu, Y., Zhu, Z., & Jiang, Q.
(2026). The Restorative Power of Biophilic Urbanism: A Bibliometric Synthesis of Plant–Human Interactions and Mental Health Outcomes. Buildings, 16(8), 1500.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081500
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.