Next Article in Journal
Rethinking Winter Heating in University Classrooms in China’s Hot Summer and Cold Winter Regions: Setpoint–Preference Mismatches, Pre-Heating, and Comfort Assessment
Next Article in Special Issue
Trash to Treasure for Housing Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review of Community-Based Waste-to-Resource Innovations in the Built Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal Comfort Assessment and Climate-Adaptive Design Strategies for Public Spaces in Traditional Villages of Wuxi
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Deconstruction, Disassembly, or Selective Demolition: A Review of Terminology and Conceptual Challenges in Literature

by
Stephanie Therkelsen Salling
1,*,
Søren Wandahl
1 and
Cristina Toca Pérez
2
1
Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Aarhus University, Inge Lehmanns Gade 10, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
2
Think in Lean Sociedad Limitada, Calle Rio Jucar, 2, 12006 Castellón de la Plana, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(7), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071302
Submission received: 21 January 2026 / Revised: 11 March 2026 / Accepted: 23 March 2026 / Published: 25 March 2026

Abstract

Despite substantial research conducted over the past decades, the transition to a circular construction industry remains in its infancy. The deconstruction of buildings to recover materials for reuse is recognized as a promising strategy for advancing circularity. However, terminological ambiguity and a lack of conceptual consensus continue to lead to misinterpretation and may impede theoretical and practical progress. Based on a systematic literature review of 51 academic and non-academic sources, this paper analyzes the use of core terminology related to deconstruction processes. Ten central terms and expressions are identified, among which ‘demolition’ and ‘deconstruction’ are the most consistently applied, whereas ‘selective demolition’ is used with varying interpretations. To further document the current state of terminology in the field, a glossary of general terms commonly employed is also presented. Clear communication and the explicit definition of applied terms are essential to ensure efficient on-site construction processes and the relevance and value of future studies in this field. To this end, this study aims to enhance transparency and contribute to coherence within the terminological landscape of deconstruction research.
Keywords: deconstruction; demolition; construction; sustainability; terminology; systematic review deconstruction; demolition; construction; sustainability; terminology; systematic review
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salling, S.T.; Wandahl, S.; Pérez, C.T. Deconstruction, Disassembly, or Selective Demolition: A Review of Terminology and Conceptual Challenges in Literature. Buildings 2026, 16, 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071302

AMA Style

Salling ST, Wandahl S, Pérez CT. Deconstruction, Disassembly, or Selective Demolition: A Review of Terminology and Conceptual Challenges in Literature. Buildings. 2026; 16(7):1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salling, Stephanie Therkelsen, Søren Wandahl, and Cristina Toca Pérez. 2026. "Deconstruction, Disassembly, or Selective Demolition: A Review of Terminology and Conceptual Challenges in Literature" Buildings 16, no. 7: 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071302

APA Style

Salling, S. T., Wandahl, S., & Pérez, C. T. (2026). Deconstruction, Disassembly, or Selective Demolition: A Review of Terminology and Conceptual Challenges in Literature. Buildings, 16(7), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop