Next Article in Journal
Solar Reflectance Index of Building Envelope Materials: A Comparative Review of North American and European Standards and Long-Term Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on the Calculations of the Bottom Void Range of an Underground Pipe Gallery Structure Under the Action of Ground Fissure Dislocations
Previous Article in Journal
Revolutionising Green Construction: Harnessing Zeolite and AI-Driven Initiatives for Net-Zero and Climate-Adaptive Buildings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flexural Performance of RC Beams Strengthened with High-Strength Steel Wire Mesh and UHPC
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Retard-Bonded Prestressed UHPC Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratios

1
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
2
China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Zhengzhou 450004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(6), 887; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060887
Submission received: 2 February 2025 / Revised: 5 March 2025 / Accepted: 10 March 2025 / Published: 12 March 2025

Abstract

Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), functioning as a next-generation cementitious engineering material, demonstrates marked superiority over conventional concrete in critical performance metrics, with its groundbreaking characteristics primarily manifested through exceptional strength and enhanced durability parameters. To address structural demands for reduced self-weight, material efficiency, and simplified construction processes in large-span durable structures, this study proposes a retard-bonded prestressed UHPC (RBPU) beam combining UHPC with retard-bonded prestressing tendons (RBPTs). Three RBPU beam specimens, with varying reinforcement ratios, underwent flexural testing to quantitatively assess their bending performance characteristics, providing foundational references for design optimization. The test results show that the failure mode of RBPU beams is typical flexural failure, demonstrating good load-bearing capacity and excellent ductility. As the reinforcement ratio increases, the cracking moment (Mcr) is improved to some extent, while the ultimate moment (Mu) and ductility are significantly enhanced. The plastic influence coefficient of the section modulus (γ) in the calculation of the Mcr was revised, and the ultimate moment Mu was subsequently calculated. The comparison demonstrates good agreement between the experimental values and computational results. This study provides both experimental and theoretical references for further in-depth research and practical applications of RBPU beams.
Keywords: retard-bonded prestress; UHPC; flexural behavior; reinforcement ratio; load-bearing capacity calculation method retard-bonded prestress; UHPC; flexural behavior; reinforcement ratio; load-bearing capacity calculation method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, L.; Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Tang, X. Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Retard-Bonded Prestressed UHPC Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratios. Buildings 2025, 15, 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060887

AMA Style

Du L, Wu D, Wang J, Wang S, Zhao B, Tang X. Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Retard-Bonded Prestressed UHPC Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratios. Buildings. 2025; 15(6):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060887

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Lingfeng, Dongchang Wu, Jun Wang, Shaowei Wang, Boyi Zhao, and Xiufeng Tang. 2025. "Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Retard-Bonded Prestressed UHPC Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratios" Buildings 15, no. 6: 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060887

APA Style

Du, L., Wu, D., Wang, J., Wang, S., Zhao, B., & Tang, X. (2025). Experimental Study on Flexural Behavior of Retard-Bonded Prestressed UHPC Beams with Different Reinforcement Ratios. Buildings, 15(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15060887

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop