RE-HAK: A Novel Refurbish-to-Host Solution Using AI-Driven Blockchain to Advance Circular Economy and Revitalize Japan’s Akiyas
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
- Opacity in Property Transactions: Municipal databases often lack real-time updates, discouraging investment [11].
- Incentive Misalignment: Subsidies (e.g., ¥600,000 for urban-to-rural migration [12]) are one-time and lack long-term engagement mechanisms.
- Fragmented Accountability: Renovation projects suffer from disputes over milestone completion and quality [13].
1.2. RE-HAK’s Novelty
- Dynamic Incentives: Rent-free occupancy tied to verifiable refurbishment milestones resolves participation barriers.
- Transparent Governance: Immutable records of progress (e.g., waste recycled, energy upgrades) mitigate disputes [14].
- Scalability: Modular design accommodates diverse skill levels, from basic maintenance (Case Study 1) to expert-led heritage restoration (Case Study 3).
1.3. Insufficient Measures by the Japanese Government
1.4. The Connection of Akiyas with Sustainable Lifestyles
1.5. The Need for Innovative and Sustainable Solutions: RE-HAK
1.6. Expected Contribution
2. Literature Review
2.1. Refurbishing in the Circular Economy
2.2. Smart Contracts Automated by AI and Refurbishment in Circular Economy
2.3. Expected Impacts
3. Methodology
4. Design of the RE-HAK
- “Property Information” and “Duration” fields provide essential context about the Akiya, including its condition and location, which are crucial factors in determining the scope and feasibility of the refurbishment project, aligned with Kanayama and Sadayuki (2021) and Yap et al. (2019), who highlight the importance successful refurbishment initiatives [62,63].
- For culturally significant Akiyas, RE-HAK’s smart contracts can optionally include historical documentation protocols. Qualifying properties must meet either: (1) age (50+ years minimum) or (2) contain traditional architectural elements (e.g., minka timber framing, kura storehouses). The system requires photographic documentation of original features before refurbishment, with records stored immutably on the blockchain. Specific preservation requirements would align with existing municipal heritage guidelines, ensuring compliance while maintaining flexibility. Such documentation could later support heritage tourism or educational initiatives, adding value to refurbished properties while preserving their historical identity. Documentation templates would be provided through the RE-HAK platform to standardize the process.
- The inclusion of “Post-Refurbishment Options” and “Subsidies” fields is a crucial factor, particularly with the “Option to buy” after a certain completion degree (%), given the recent trend with countless YouTube results (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=restore+akiya, accessed on 10 May 2025) on how to restore Akiyas. This approach aligns with research by Wuyts et al. (2020), who discuss [2] the importance of financial incentives and clear post-refurbishment plans in addressing the Akiya problem.
- The “Means of Verification” ensures accountability and allows for remote monitoring of progress, which is particularly relevant given the rural location of many Akiya properties, aligned with emerging trends in remote project management and verification, as discussed by Bredillet et al. (2018) on digital transformation in project management, and by Keena et al. (2025) using digital tools for a CE in urban residential buildings [64,65].
- Finally, the last fields of resolution keep a transparent track and validation of the process to make sure the information is available at every moment to mitigate any disputes between the host and the landlord.
AKIYA PROJECT INFORMATION | |
Property Information: | Name/Owner info/Location/Square meters/Construction year/Condition (rate 0 “ruin” to 10 “excellent”) |
Project Duration: | Total time allocated for refurbishment from 1 month to a maximum of 24 months |
Refurbish Expertise Required: | No/Supervision of external companies only/Previous refurbishing skills required (demonstrable) |
Inclusion of Utilities: | No/Partially (specify cost limits)/Yes |
TASKS (ONE SUB-TABLE PER EACH TASK (N)) | |
Task (n) description(s): | Description/Instructions/Duration (months)/Percentage of project completion between 1% and 100% |
Post-Refurbishment Options: | No/Free Stay/Rent/Buy (specify which percentage of project completion between 1% and 100%) |
Subsidies: | No/Financial support from local governments linked to any task (n) (specify conditions and percentage) |
Means of Verification: | Sending pictures/Video call/Signed declaration of honor/In-person visit (describe details) |
Circular Economy Metrics: | For instance, energy efficiency targets, waste reduction goals, and the use of eco-friendly materials |
RESOLUTION | |
Date of Completion of Task (n) | In time and satisfactory/Not in time (period of grace of x days granted)/Not satisfactory (reject project) |
Date of Project Completion | General opinion about the process and the host, with a description of positive outcomes/Final signatures |
Post-Refurbishment Benefits | No/Rental for ¥x/Purchase for ¥x/Free stay (donation to the host) |
5. Results
5.1. Case Study 1: Short-Term Stays with No Refurbishing Expertise to Slightly Renovating the Akiya
5.2. Case Study 2: Extended Stay with Professional Skill to Renew the Akiya in Pursuit of a Discounted Purchase
5.3. Case Study 3: Long-Term Residency with Expert Supervision to Revitalize a Historic Akiya
- Case Study 1 offers a low-barrier entry point for individuals looking for short-term engagement with minimal skill requirements. While it may not lead to significant property improvements, it can help maintain Akiyas and provide temporary occupancy.
- Case Study 2 presents a more intensive engagement, offering the potential for property ownership. However, it also carries higher risks, as evidenced by the project’s rejection due to poor quality work.
- Case Study 3 showcases how the framework can be applied to larger, culturally significant projects with government involvement. This approach has the potential for broader community impact but requires more specialized skills and longer-term commitment.
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yu, H.; Lee, J. Analysis of factors affecting the occurrence of vacant houses according to vacant house classification: Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan. Appl. Geogr. 2023, 151, 102872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuyts, W.; Sedlitzky, R.; Morita, M.; Tanikawa, H. Understanding and Managing Vacant Houses in Support of a Material Stock-Type Society—The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baba, H.; Hino, K. Factors and tendencies of housing abandonment: An analysis of a survey of vacant houses in Kawaguchi City, Saitama. Jpn. Arch. Rev 2019, 2, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagaya. Taxes Related to “Akiya” Abandoned Houses in Japan. Wagaya Japan. 2023. Available online: https://wagaya-japan.com/en/journal_detail.php?id=8397 (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Olsson, J. Mapping Out the Problem of Vacant Houses in Japan: A Case Study of Kochi Prefecture. Master’s Thesis, Lund University, Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund, Sweden, 2023. Available online: https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9126092&fileOId=9126095 (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Blair, G. Akiya Houses: Why Japan Has Nine Million Empty Homes. The Guardian. 2024. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/may/01/akyia-houses-why-japan-has-nine-million-empty-homes (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Lian, J. Population Aging in Japan: Stylized Facts, Causes, and Consequences. Highlights Bus. Econ. Manag. 2024, 36, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van, H.T.; Ha, T.V.; Asada, T.; Arimura, M. Vacancy Dwellings Spatial Distribution—The Determinants and Policy Implications in the City of Sapporo, Japan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakatani, H. Ageing and shrinking population: The looming demographic challenges of super-aged and super-low fertility society starting from Asia. Glob. Health Med. 2023, 5, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inoue, T.; Inoue, N. The Future Process of Japan’s Population Aging: A Cluster Analysis Using Small Area Population Projection Data. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2024, 43, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OHJ (Old Houses Japan). Why Akiya Banks Are Essential for Revitalizing Rural Japan. Old Houses Japan. 2024. Available online: https://www.oldhousesjapan.com/post/why-akiya-banks-are-essential-for-revitalizing-rural-japan (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Kyodo News. 2024. Available online: https://nordot.app/1201087279478374870?c=39550187727945729 (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Turk, Ž.; Klinc, R. Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia Eng. 2017, 196, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Xie, S.; Dai, H.N.; Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Weng, J.; Imran, M. An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 105, 475–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrador, M.; de Jong, W.; Nasu, K.; Granrath, L. The rising phenomenon of circular cities in Japan: Case studies of Kamikatsu, Osaki and Kitakyushu. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 894, 165052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Greenwood, D.; Kassem, M. Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Autom. Constr. 2019, 102, 288–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrador, M.; de Jong, W.; Nasu, K.; Granrath, L. Circular economy and zero-carbon strategies between Japan and South Korea: A comparative study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 820, 153274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Herrador, M.; de Jong, W.; Nasu, K.; Granrath, L. Designing a circular cities declaration for Japan building on the European Union’s case study. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 358, 120819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wijkman, A.; Skånberg, K. The Circular Economy and Benefits for Society: Jobs and Climate, Clear Winners in an Economy Based on Renewable Energy and Resource Efficiency. The Club of Rome. 2017. Available online: https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-circular-economy-and-benefits-for-society/ (accessed on 10 May 2025).
- Van Laar, B.; Greco, A.; Remøy, H.; Gruis, V.; Hamida, M.B. Towards desirable futures for the circular adaptive reuse of buildings: A participatory approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 122, 106259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy—A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, A.; Haas, W.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Krausmann, F.; Nuss, P.; Blengini, G.A. Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring Framework for Economy-Wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 62–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, W.; Siva, V.; Bäckstrand, J.; Sarius, N.; Sundberg, H.-Å. Circular economy: Extending end-of-life strategies. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 51, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopp, M.; Petit-Boix, A.; Leipold, S. Municipal circular economy indicators: Do they measure the cities’ environmental ambitions? Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 50, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khedmati-Morasae, E.; Zils, M.; Hopkinson, P.; Nolan, R.; Charnley, F.; Okorie, O.; Abu-Bakar, H. Advancing the discourse: A next-generation value chain-based taxonomy for circular economy key performance indicators. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 48, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zepa, I.; Grudde, V.Z.; Bening, C.R. Legitimising technologies for a circular economy: Contested discourses on innovation for plastics recycling in Europe. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2024, 50, 100811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrador, M. Assessment of the first-ever circular economy framework of Cambodia: Barriers, international opportunities and recommendations. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 438, 140778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herrador, M.; Dat, T.T.; Truong, D.D.; Hoa, L.T.; Łobacz, K. The unique case study of circular economy in Vietnam remarking recycling craft villages. SAGE Open 2023, 13, 21582440231199939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, J.; Ferrão, P. A New Framework for Circular Refurbishment of Buildings to Operationalize Circular Economy Policies. Environments 2023, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment–What does the evidence say? J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 181, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Z.; Lu, W. Developing efficient circularity for construction and demolition waste management in fast emerging economies: Lessons learned from Shenzhen, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 724, 138264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, M.S.; Ali, Y.; Petrillo, A.; De Felice, F. Risk assessment of circular economy practices in construction industry of Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 868, 161418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghisellini, P.; Ripa, M.; Ulgiati, S. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 618–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-Y.; Wargocki, P.; Chan, Y.-H.; Chen, L.; Tham, K.-W. How does indoor environmental quality in green refurbished office buildings compare with the one in new certified buildings? Build. Environ. 2020, 171, 106677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, R.; Surra, E.; Quelhas, B.; Costa, A.A.; Lapa, N.; Delerue-Matos, C. Advantages of structural inspection and diagnosis for traditional buildings’ refurbishment: A Life Cycle Assessment perspective. Build. Environ. 2022, 223, 109485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacios-Munoz, B.; Peuportier, B.; Gracia-Villa, L.; López-Mesa, B. Sustainability assessment of refurbishment vs. new constructions by means of LCA and durability-based estimations of buildings lifespans: A new approach. Build. Environ. 2019, 160, 106203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akanbi, L.A.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akinade, O.O.; Ajayi, A.O.; Delgado, M.D.; Bilal, M.; Bello, S.A. Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walters, J.P.; Véliz, K.; Vargas, M.; Busco, C. A systems-focused assessment of policies for circular economy in construction demolition waste management in the Aysén region of Chile. Sustain. Futures 2024, 7, 100186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghose, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Dowdell, D.; Phipps, R. Environmental assessment of deep energy refurbishment for energy efficiency-case study of an office building in New Zealand. Build. Environ. 2017, 117, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Silva, S.; Samarakoon, S.M.K.; Haq, M.A.A. Use of circular economy practices during the renovation of old buildings in developing countries. Sustain. Futures 2023, 6, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkinson, P.; Chen, H.-M.; Zhou, K.; Wang, Y.; Lam, D. Recovery and reuse of structural products from end-of-life buildings. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Eng. Sustain. 2019, 172, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittri, H.; Godawatte, G.A.G.R.; Esangbedo, O.P.; Antwi-Afari, P.; Bao, Z. Exploring Barriers to the Adoption of Digital Technologies for Circular Economy Practices in the Construction Industry in Developing Countries: A Case of Ghana. Buildings 2025, 15, 1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiarda, M.; Coenen, T.B.J.; Doorn, N. Operationalizing contested problem-solution spaces: The case of Dutch circular construction. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2023, 48, 100752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Zailani, S.; Rejeb, K.; Treiblmaier, H.; Keogh, J.G. Modeling enablers for blockchain adoption in the circular economy. Sustain. Futures 2022, 4, 100095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathews, M.; Robles, D.; Bowe, B.J. BIM+Blockchain: A Solution to the Trust Problem in Collaboration? In Proceedings of the CITA BIM Gathering 2017, Dublin, Ireland, 23–24 November 2017. [CrossRef]
- Ouyang, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, F.-Y. Intelligent contracts: Making smart contracts smart for blockchain intelligence. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2022, 104 Pt B, 108421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kibert, C.J. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-es/Sustainable+Construction%3A+Green+Building+Design+and+Delivery%2C+5th+Edition-p-9781119706458 (accessed on 27 May 2025).
- Ness, D.A.; Xing, K. Toward a Resource-Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 572–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, I.B.; Pozas, B.M. Following the Circular Economy in European rural municipalities through the Spanish Urban Agenda. Ecol. Econ. 2024, 224, 108263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Z.; Dai, T. Circular economy strategies research for Beijing buildings in a low-carbon future. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 116, 105894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TCG (The Climate Group). Built Environment. Smarter Energy Use in Towns and Cities. The Climate Group. 2024. Available online: https://www.theclimategroup.org/built-environment (accessed on 27 May 2025).
- Wang, N.; Bai, Y.; Guo, Z.; Fan, Y.; Meng, F. Synergies between the circular economy and carbon emission reduction. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 951, 175603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maierhofer, D.; van Karsbergen, V.; Potrč Obrecht, T.; Ruschi Mendes Saade, M.; Gingrich, S.; Streicher, W.; Erb, K.-H.; Passer, A. Linking forest carbon opportunity costs and greenhouse gas emission substitution effects of wooden buildings: The climate optimum concept. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 51, 612–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zenbird. Reusing Japan’s Vacant Akiya Homes for Sustainable Living. Zenbird. 2021. Available online: https://zenbird.media/reusing-japans-vacant-akiya-homes-for-sustainable-living/ (accessed on 27 May 2025).
- Huuhka, S.; Vestergaard, I. Building conservation and the circular economy: A theoretical consideration. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 10, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Power, A. Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability? Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4487–4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahapatra, K.; Gustavsson, L.; Haavik, T.; Aabrekk, S.; Svendsen, S.; Vanhoutteghem, L.; Paiho, S.; Ala-Juusela, M. Business models for full service energy renovation of single-family houses in Nordic countries. Appl. Energy 2013, 112, 1558–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; He, J.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Peng, S.; Cao, H.; Wang, Y. An overview of blockchain smart contract execution mechanism. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2024, 41, 100674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macrinici, D.; Cartofeanu, C.; Gao, S. Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: A systematic mapping study. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 2337–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reshi, I.; Khan, M.; Shafi, S.; Sholla, S.; Assad, A.; Shafi, H. AI-Powered Smart Contracts: The Dawn of Web 4. TechRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanayama, Y.; Sadayuki, T. What types of houses remain vacant? Evidence from a municipality in Tokyo, Japan. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 2021, 62, 101167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, J.B.H.; Chow, I.N.; Shavarebi, K. Criticality of construction industry problems in developing countries: Analyzing Malaysian projects. J. Manag. Eng. 2019, 35, 04019016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bredillet, C.; Tywoniak, S.; Tootoonchy, M. Exploring the dynamics of project management office and portfolio management co-evolution: A routine lens. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2018, 36, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keena, N.; Friedman, A.; Parsaee, M.; Mussio, M.; Klein, A.; Pomasonco-Alvis, M.; Pinheiro, P. Housing Passport knowledge graph: Promoting a circular economy in urban residential buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 119, 106050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barros, M.V.; Salvador, R.; Pieroni, M.; Piekarski, C.M. How to measure circularity? State-of-the-art and insights on positive impacts on businesses. Environ. Dev. 2024, 50, 100989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghisellini, P.; Ulgiati, S. Chapter 1: Evolution and current development of the circular economy concept with insights from worldwide cities and regions. In Regions, Cities and the Circular Economy; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrard, N.; Kumar, A.; Văn Đạo, Đ.; Kohlitz, J.; Retamal, M.; Taron, A.; Neemia, N.; Willetts, J. 8Rs for circular water and sanitation systems: Leveraging circular economy thinking for safe, resilient and inclusive services. Environ. Dev. 2024, 52, 101093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almulhim, A.I.; Al-Saidi, M. Circular economy and the resource nexus: Realignment and progress towards sustainable development in Saudi Arabia. Environ. Dev. 2023, 46, 100851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertolucci Paes, L.A.; Bezerra, B.S.; Jugend, D.; Agudo, F.L. Navigating challenges and opportunities in urban circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review and future directions. Environ. Dev. 2024, 51, 101039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, M.; Hino, K.; Muto, S. Negative externalities of long-term vacant homes: Evidence from Japan. J. Hous. Econ. 2022, 57, 101856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gocer, O.; Boyacioglu, D.; Karahan, E.E.; Shrestha, P. Cultural tourism and rural community resilience: A framework and its application. J. Rural Stud. 2024, 107, 103238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuroda, N. Conservation Design for Traditional Agricultural Villages: A Case Study of Shirakawa-go and Gokayama in Japan. Built Herit. 2019, 3, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ochiai, M. Rural Development in Japan. In Sustainable Development Disciplines for Society; Urata, S., Akao, K.I., Washizu, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khargotra, R.; Alam, T.; Thu, K.; Sebestyén, V.; András, K.; Singh, T. Experimental study of eco-friendly insulating materials for solar thermal collectors: A sustainable built environment. Results Eng. 2024, 21, 101681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ietto, B.; Rabe, J.; Muth, R.; Pascucci, F. Blockchain for citizens’ participation in urban planning: The case of the city of Berlin. A value sensitive design approach. Cities 2023, 140, 104382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isoaho, K.; Valkama, P. Understanding circular city policies as a discontinuation strategy: Policy insights from circular construction. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2024, 52, 100897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prendeville, S.; Cherim, E.; Bocken, N. Circular cities: Mapping six cities in transition. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2018, 26, 171–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falah, N.; Falah, N.; Solis-Guzman, J.; Marrero, M. An indicator-based framework of circular cities focused on sustainability dimensions and sustainable development goal 11 obtained using machine learning and text analytics. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 121, 106219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budayan, C.; Okudan, O. Assessment of Barriers to the Implementation of Smart Contracts in Construction Projects—Evidence from Turkey. Buildings 2023, 13, 2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajid, Z.W.; Aftab, U.; Ullah, F. Barriers to adopting circular procurement in the construction industry: The way forward. Sustain. Futures 2024, 8, 100244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
AKIYA PROJECT INFORMATION | |
Property Information: | Kame House/Rina Matsumoto (rina_mat@yahoo.jp)/Aya/148 sqm/year 1983/Condition: 7 |
Project Duration: | 3 months |
Refurbish Expertise Required: | No |
Inclusion of Utilities: | No |
TASKS (ONE SUB-TABLE PER EACH TASK (N)) | |
Task (n) description(s): | Cleaning (month 1–30%), interior painting (month 2–30%), garden maintenance (month 3–40%) |
Post-Refurbishment Options: | No |
Subsidies: | No—any tools and materials (e.g., for gardening or painting) should be purchased by the host |
Means of Verification: | Sending 10 pictures for each of the rooms cleaned and painted, and 10 pictures of the garden |
Circular Economy Metrics: | Sending 10 pictures of the waste sorted in bags purchased, eco-friendly paint, and composted garden waste |
RESOLUTION | |
Date of Completion of Task (n) | In time and satisfactory |
Date of Project Completion | “Responsible host, thus, the Akiya is ready the enjoy our winter holidays”/Signed by Ana and Rina |
Post-Refurbishment Benefits | No |
AKIYA PROJECT INFORMATION | |
Property Information: | Aoi Temple/Yuri Akai (yuri_akai@gmail.com)/Ine/1408 sqm/year 1935/Condition: 6 |
Project Duration: | 12 months |
Refurbish Expertise Required: | Yes, carpenter |
Inclusion of Utilities: | Yes, up to ¥10,000 per month for water, electricity, and gas |
TASKS (ONE SUB-TABLE PER EACH TASK (N)) | |
Task (n) description(s): | Entrance renewal (month 2–20%), 1st floor renewal (month 10–60%), basement renewal (month 12–20%) |
Post-Refurbishment Options: | Purchase for ¥8 million upon reaching 80% completion |
Subsidies: | The landlord provides the wood but not the tools |
Means of Verification: | The landlord will do a video call every month to verify the quality of the refurbishment process |
Circular Economy Metrics: | The wood is from sustainable and maintainable forestry practices (e.g., reuse) with a seal of eco-friendliness |
RESOLUTION | |
Date of Completion of Task (n) | Not satisfactory (reject project): The quality of the execution of the entrance in month 2 was poor |
Date of Project Completion | “The host tried his best but his technique is for smaller projects”/Signed by Hoang and Yuri |
Post-Refurbishment Benefits | No |
AKIYA PROJECT INFORMATION | |
Property Information: | Historical Prison/Urban Department (urb_dept@aso.gov.co.jp)/Aso/8040 sqm/year 1893/Condition 3 |
Project Duration: | 18 months |
Refurbish Expertise Required: | Supervision of external companies only |
Inclusion of Utilities: | Yes |
TASKS (ONE SUB-TABLE PER EACH TASK (N)) | |
Task (n) description(s): | The historical prison of Aso requires a person to supervise and advise the construction companies |
Post-Refurbishment Options: | Rent for 20% of the price, in return, must perform basic building maintenance duties to be ready for tourists |
Subsidies: | The municipality will sub-contract all the construction companies to perform the duties |
Means of Verification: | In-person visit (describe details): the Urban Department of Aso will visit the building every 3 months |
Circular Economy Metrics: | Chikako must advise the construction companies about how to make their practices align with the 8Rs |
RESOLUTION | |
Date of Completion of Task (n) | In time and satisfactory |
Date of Project Completion | “Excellent results; ready to receive tourists”/Signed by Chikako and the Urban Department of Aso |
Post-Refurbishment Benefits | Rental of a designated house not for tourist visits for ¥60,000 (80% funded, not funded was ¥300,000) |
ASPECT | CASE STUDY 1 | CASE STUDY 2 | CASE STUDY 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Participant | Spanish retiree (Ana) | Vietnamese carpenter (Hoang) | Japanese architect (Chikako) |
Duration | 3 months | 12 months | 18 months |
Expertise Required | None | Carpentry | Supervision |
Main Tasks | Basic cleaning, painting, and gardening | Full wood renewal | Supervising historic building renewal |
Post-Refurbishment Option | None | Option to buy for ¥8M | Subsidized rent (80% off) for ¥60,000 |
Circular Economy Focus | Waste sorting, eco-friendly paint, composting | Sustainable wood sourcing | Advising on circular 8Rs practices |
Verification Method | Photos | Monthly video calls | Quarterly in-person visits |
Outcome | Successful completion | Project rejected due to poor quality | Successful completion |
Pros | Short-term commitment Low skill requirement Suitable for travelers or retirees | Opportunity for property ownership Utilizes specific skills Longer-term engagement | Professional development Cultural heritage preservation Government involvement |
Cons | Limited impact on property value No long-term benefit for the participant Less appealing due to no “post” options | High skill requirement Risk of project failure Significant time commitment | Requires specialized knowledge Longer time commitment Dependent on government funding |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Herrador, M.; de Jong, W.; Nasu, K.; Granrath, L. RE-HAK: A Novel Refurbish-to-Host Solution Using AI-Driven Blockchain to Advance Circular Economy and Revitalize Japan’s Akiyas. Buildings 2025, 15, 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111883
Herrador M, de Jong W, Nasu K, Granrath L. RE-HAK: A Novel Refurbish-to-Host Solution Using AI-Driven Blockchain to Advance Circular Economy and Revitalize Japan’s Akiyas. Buildings. 2025; 15(11):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111883
Chicago/Turabian StyleHerrador, Manuel, Wil de Jong, Kiyokazu Nasu, and Lorenz Granrath. 2025. "RE-HAK: A Novel Refurbish-to-Host Solution Using AI-Driven Blockchain to Advance Circular Economy and Revitalize Japan’s Akiyas" Buildings 15, no. 11: 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111883
APA StyleHerrador, M., de Jong, W., Nasu, K., & Granrath, L. (2025). RE-HAK: A Novel Refurbish-to-Host Solution Using AI-Driven Blockchain to Advance Circular Economy and Revitalize Japan’s Akiyas. Buildings, 15(11), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111883