Next Article in Journal
Tax Evasion and Incomplete Tax Transparency
Next Article in Special Issue
Who’s Talking About Us Without Us? A Survivor Research Interjection into an Academic Psychiatry Debate on Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in Ireland
Previous Article in Journal
Here to Stay: The Evolution of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in International Human Rights Law
Previous Article in Special Issue
Paradigm Shift or Paradigm Paralysis? National Mental Health and Capacity Law and Implementing the CRPD in Scotland
Open AccessArticle

Towards Changing Compulsory Community Mental Health Treatment in New Zealand: Shining Light on How Community Treatment Orders Are Produced

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 March 2018 / Revised: 3 August 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 14 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Concerns, Contradictions and Reality of Mental Health Law)
In this paper, we use a constructed scenario to illustrate making a compulsory community treatment order in the New Zealand context. Drawing on publicly available documentation, we outline the existing mental health law framework that produces community treatment orders and emerging complex problems of their high, increasing and disproportionate use. We provide examples of human rights, indigenous and clinical effectiveness research that appear to be destabilising the existing mental health law framework. We argue assemblage theory (Deleuze & Guattari) is a useful theoretical tool to unpack the making and continued use of compulsory community treatment orders in the context of complex destabilising and stabilising influences. This is followed by an outline of the concept of assemblage with reference to the constructed scenario, focusing on processes, practices, places, types of knowledge, roles, documents and how they connect to produce certain effects that both enable and constrain participants’ actions. In the New Zealand context, we examine the potential for assemblage theory to generate new ways of thinking about compulsory mental health treatment in community settings by challenging perceived limitations and revealing opportunities for participants to act otherwise. We conclude with a proposal for further research shaped by this theory that explores the making of actual community treatment orders to reveal where there is potential to change existing relations towards more positive effects for participants. View Full-Text
Keywords: community mental health; compulsory treatment order; assemblage theory; mental health law; social policy; human rights community mental health; compulsory treatment order; assemblage theory; mental health law; social policy; human rights
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schneller, A.; Thom, K.; Adams, P. Towards Changing Compulsory Community Mental Health Treatment in New Zealand: Shining Light on How Community Treatment Orders Are Produced. Laws 2018, 7, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop