Review Reports
- Pablo Benavides1,*,
- Zulma Nancy Gil1 and
- Luis Eduardo Escobar1
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsSee attached PDF file
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for the valuable corrections and suggestions to improve the paper
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease see attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for the valuable corrections and suggestions to improve the paper
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsIncluded in the PDF file attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Included in the PDF file attached.
Author Response
Thank you for the valuable corrections and suggestions to improve the paper
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsNow this manuscript was improved by authors. Questions, comments and suggestions from the first round review of this manuscript were addressed by authors. I believe, this manuscript may be accepted for publication.
Good job!
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe authors have satisfactorily addressed all the points raised in the previous version. The revised manuscript is better structured, easier to read, and the presentation of the results is much clearer. No further comments.
Reviewer 3 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThe manuscript improved significantly, and it is now in good shape for publication.
Comments on the Quality of English LanguageMuch better