Next Article in Journal
Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Epithelial Nail Unit Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Performance of the LiquidArray® Gastrointestinal VER 1.0 Assay in Patients with Suspected Gastroenteritis
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Method for Assessing Risk-Adjusted Diagnostic Coding Specificity for Depression Using a U.S. Cohort of over One Million Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders

by
Diogo Telles-Correia
1,2
1
Clínica Universitária de Psiquiatria e Psicologia Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz MB, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
2
PSYLAB-Instituto de Saúde Ambiental, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz MB, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
Diagnostics 2024, 14(21), 2378; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212378
Submission received: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 October 2024 / Published: 25 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders)
One of the fundamental aspects of research in psychiatry, and what makes it such a complex area, is its methodological specificities. Without taking these specificities into account, the research results are null and of little use [1,2].
Mental disorders, like medical disorders in general, are situations that cause biological (death or risk of death) or psychosocial (distress and disability) harm to those who suffer from them, and which can, through tested methods (biological, psychotherapeutic) be attenuated or even eliminated [3,4,5].
However, there are some specificities in psychiatry that must be considered. These range from its models of causality (how neurobiological components and psychosocial variables contribute and interact) to the concepts themselves that are involved in this area (what a mental disorder is and what it means, what the classification of mental disorder is and what it means, etc.).
For this reason, research methods (epistemology) in psychiatry must differ, in some aspects, from those used for the study of medical disorders in general. They have specificities. Models imported directly from the rest of medicine, mainly based on methods used in natural sciences, cannot be fully replicated [1].
Regarding causality, there is increasing evidence that the factors that intervene in the causality of psychiatric disorders interact in a complex way and belong to different paradigms and levels of abstraction [6,7,8].
It is well established that psychosocial factors such as life experiences have a strong causal relationship with psychiatric illnesses. These should be explored through a different language that does not belong to natural sciences (ex neurosciences), but to social and human sciences [9].
On the other hand, biological factors may not act directly on psychiatric disorders but interact in a complex way together with psychosocial variables (e.g., life experiences, sociocultural environment). Genes can also have an indirect influence on the causality of certain psychiatric illnesses. For example, those that predispose individuals to a certain temperament or personality, which in turn can predispose individuals to depression [10,11].
Certain mental states, with complex causality, can also influence the environment and on other mental states. For example, a person with a personality prone to greater impulsivity may cause a more adverse relational environment, which in turn may predispose them to depression [5].
Culture, and the type of society where the person grows up or lives, may act as a determining factor in the onset of mental symptoms or mental disorders. For example, a society that devalues certain types of behavior or characteristics of a person, may favor the emergence of symptoms or mental disorders in that person [12,13,14,15].
Another essential feature is the tendency to accept that there is a continuity between mental states considered normal and the ones that are abnormal. What distinguishes a normal mental state from a non-normal one is not a biological variable, but a clinical assessment (values-dependent) [16,17].
In neurosciences, what we can find are the neurobiological correlates of these clinical situations (which cause distress/disability to patients). This does not mean that the distinction between normal and pathological in psychiatry is made through neurobiological markers [1].
Thus, biological correlates can be discovered for the behaviors considered disturbed and these conclusions can lead to the discovery of new drugs that can improve these conditions. But these should only be used in situations that are considered pathological by non-biological factors, as explained above.
In recent times, a critical look has been taken at the methods used in the diagnosis and research carried out in this area [18] and some more original strategies have been developed to overcome these issues [19,20].
It is essential that new ways of critical thinking and researching continue to be developed, to improve the results achieved in this area.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Telles-Correia, D. The mind-brain gap and the neuroscience-psychiatry gap. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2018, 24, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Badu, E.; O’Brien, A.P.; Mitchell, R. An integrative review on methodological considerations in mental health research—Design, sampling, data collection procedure and quality assurance. Arch. Public Health 2019, 77, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Telles Correia, D.; Stoyanov, D.; Rocha Neto, H.G. How to define today a medical disorder? Biological and psychosocial disadvantages as the paramount criteria. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2021, 28, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Telles-Correia, D. Mental disorder: Are we moving away from distress and disability? J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2017, 24, 973–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bolton, D. The sciences on mental order/disorder and related concepts. In What is Mental Disorder? An Essay in Philosophy, Science, and Values; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 47–101. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kendler, K.S. Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 2005, 162, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kendler, K.S.; Hettema, J.M.; Butera, F.; Gardner, C.O.; Prescott, C.A. Life event dimensions of loss, humiliation, entrapment, and generalized anxiety. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2003, 60, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Coronel-Santos, M.A.; Rodríguez-Macías, J.C. Integral definition and conceptual model of mental health: Proposal from a systematic review of different paradigms. Front. Sociol. 2022, 7, 978804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Daníelsdóttir, H.B.; Aspelund, T.; Shen, Q.; Halldorsdottir, T.; Jakobsdóttir, J.; Song, H.; Lu, D.; Kuja-Halkola, R.; Larsson, H.; Fall, K.; et al. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Adult Mental Health Outcomes. JAMA Psychiatry 2024, 81, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lee, P.H.; Feng, Y.-C.A.; Smoller, J.W. Pleiotropy and Cross-Disorder Genetics Among Psychiatric Disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 89, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Caspi, A.; Sugden, K.; Moffitt, T.E.; Taylor, A.; Craig, I.W.; Harrington, H.; McClay, J.; Mill, J.; Martin, J.; Braithwaite, A.; et al. Influence of life stress on depres- sion: Moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 2003, 301, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Telles-Correia, D.; Sampaio, D. Editorial: Historical roots of psychopathology. Front. Psych. 2016, 14, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Keel, P.K.; Klump, K.L. Are eating disorders culture-bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology. Psychol. Bull. 2003, 129, 747–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Heim, E.; Wegmann, I.; Maercker, A. Cultural values and the prevalence of mental disorders in 25 countries: A secondary data analysis. Soc. Sci. Med. 2017, 189, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kirkbride, J.B.; Anglin, D.M.; Colman, I.; Dykxhoorn, J.; Jones, P.B.; Patalay, P.; Pitman, A.; Soneson, E.; Steare, T.; Wright, T.; et al. The social determinants of mental health and disorder: Evidence, prevention and recommendations. World Psychiatry 2024, 23, 58–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Eaton, N.R.; Krueger, R.F.; South, S.C.; Simms, L.J.; Clark, L.A. Contrasting proptotypes and dimensions in the classification of personality pathol-ogy: Evidence that dimensions, but not prototypes are robust. Psychol. Med. 2011, 41, 1151–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wright, A.G.C.; Krueger, R.F.; Hobbs, M.J.; Markon, K.E.; Eaton, N.R.; Slade, T. The structure of psychopathology: Towards an expanded quantitative empirical model. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2013, 122, 281–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Neto, H.; Moreira, A.L.R.; Hosken, L.; Langfus, J.A.; Cavalcanti, M.T.; Youngstrom, E.A.; Telles-Correia, D. Inter-Rater Reliability between Structured and Non-Structured Interviews Is Fair in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorders—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Glass, A.; Melton, N.C.; Moore, C.; Myrick, K.; Thao, K.; Mogaji, S.; Howell, A.; Patton, K.; Martin, J.; Korvink, M.; et al. A Novel Method for Assessing Risk-Adjusted Diagnostic Coding Specificity for Depression Using a U.S. Cohort of over One Million Patients. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Riedl, D.; Kampling, H.; Nolte, T.; Lampe, A.; Beutel, M.E.; Brähler, E.; Kruse, J. Measuring Impairments of Mentalization with the 15-Item Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ) and Introducing the MZQ-6 Short Scale: Reliability, Validity and Norm Values Based on a Representative Sample of the German Population. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Telles-Correia, D. New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212378

AMA Style

Telles-Correia D. New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders. Diagnostics. 2024; 14(21):2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Telles-Correia, Diogo. 2024. "New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders" Diagnostics 14, no. 21: 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212378

APA Style

Telles-Correia, D. (2024). New Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mental Disorders. Diagnostics, 14(21), 2378. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212378

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop