Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper contains some interesting ideas. However, its current presentation is not adequate for a scientific journal. There are many typos and the English needs to be improved.

Author Response

Point 1: The paper contains some interesting ideas. However, its current presentation is not adequate for a scientific journal. There are many typos and the English needs to be improved.

 

Response 1: Thank you very much for your helpful comments. Based on your suggestion, we have modified in the paper for grammar errors and typos.

For example:

 

a)      In Lines 131–133, we have reformulated that sentence to “From Definition 2.4 and the special cases of MM operator mentioned-above, we can know that the advantage of the MM operator is that it can capture the overall interrelationships among the multiple input arguments and it is a generalization of some existing aggregation operators.”

 

b)      In Decision-making, we have changed “Procedure” to “Step”.

 

c)      We corrected some misspelled words.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please find attached a file containing the review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your helpful comments. Based on your suggestion, we have done some modification.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Referee report for Symmetry Manuscript – Symmetry-430220 “Multi-criteria decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic Schweizer-Sklar Muirhead mean aggregation operators “ The paper is concerned the relevant topic of the multi-criteria decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic Schweizer-Sklar Muirhead mean aggregation operators. In particular, the Authors give some properties of them and some particular cases about various parameter values. They also propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method based on WSVNSSMM operator in SVNS. The topic of the paper could certainly be of great interest for the readers of Symmetry. However, in the present form is not adequate to be publishable in the journal. In fact, there are some parts which should be much improved or clarified. I divide my comments in two Major issues, as reported in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your helpful comments. Based on your suggestion, we have done some modification.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have taken into account all referees' recommendations. Thus, the paper is ready for publication.

Reviewer 3 Report

Referee report for Symmetry

Manuscript – Symmetry-430220-rev1

 

“Multi-criteria decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic Schweizer-Sklar Muirhead mean aggregation operators “

 

The paper is concerned the relevant topic of the multi-criteria decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic Schweizer-Sklar Muirhead mean aggregation operators. In particular, the Authors give some properties of them and some particular cases about various parameter values. They also propose a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method based on WSVNSSMM operator in SVNS.

The topic of the paper could certainly be of great interest for the readers of Symmetry. 

Since the first version, Authors have improved the manuscript by better identifying its original contribution, and, moreover, have greatly improved the quality of presentation and english language.