Next Article in Journal
Effects of Climate Change on the Habitat Suitability and Distribution of Endemic Freshwater Fish Species in Semi-Arid Central Anatolian Ecoregion in Türkiye
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Use in Australian Irrigated Agriculture—Sentiments of Twitter Users
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Spring Maize Drought in Songnen Plain, Northeast China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Buried Straw Layer Coupling Film Mulching Regulates Soil Salinity of Coastal Tidal Soil and Improves Maize (Zea mays L.) Growth
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of the Eating Habits of Romanian Residents on the Water Footprint

Water 2023, 15(8), 1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081622
by Teodora Maria Rusu *, Tania Mihăiescu, Antonia Odagiu and Laura Paulette
Reviewer 1:
Water 2023, 15(8), 1622; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081622
Submission received: 26 March 2023 / Revised: 14 April 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have liked reading the paper and I think it's worth of pubblication. Just few things are to be changed, as well as some minor mistakes regarding English. Only the introduction chapter needs to be implemented, the others are fine to me.

There was no numbering for the lines and this does not help the review. Please fix it for the next time.

Please find the file attached for further comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article addresses a topic that is currently relevant but not new, the water footprint in food. It is a study without field work based on secondary data obtained mainly from two previous studies.

The abstract and keywords are adequate and reflect the subsequent content of the article.

The introduction to the topic of the water footprint is acceptable without delving into technical components that explain the concept

The methodology used is simple but correctly used, a basic comparative descriptive statistical analysis.

The results obtained lack an academic foundation, but it is due to the type of methodology used and the nature of the calculations.

The discussion is well justified and the conclusions based on the results obtained and on the subsequent discussion.

In the conclusions section, I think it is necessary to include a section with the limitations that this type of research poses.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop