Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see please attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Dear editor and reviewer#1:

                  Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is well structured and interesting. It would need some small improvements for its publication:

It would be very interesting to add the doi in the references. In this way, it is easier and faster to search and access.
There are too many references in Chinese language. Would it be possible to add other similar references in English? It becomes difficult to follow the recommended literature.

There are some typos, like in line 83, 201, 210 and others. Please, it is necessary to review the entire document.

When authors are named in the text (as in lines 78, 93, 96 and others), it is recommended to put only last names as it facilitates reading.

Author Response

Dear editor and reviewer#2:

                  Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I accept all improvements you made. Only one exemption. The eq (4) still is written incorrectly. Looks like it is missprinting. In right part still is written -d/dx(.....)-d/dx(....)+I.      Must be -d/dx(.....)- d/dz(....)+I. The equation (4) is for 2-D (X,Z) space

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

         Thank you so much for reminding us of the mistake in eq (4)，and we have corrected "-d/dx(.....)-d/dx(....)+I" on the right side of the equation to "-d/dx(.....)- d/dz(....)+I"（Modified in Line 235）.Finally, we would like to sincerely thank you for your recognition of our manuscript and the revisions made.