Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments 1. The goal is too general it needs to be clarified otherwise it covers too many processes. 2. Shorten the abstract. Show the applied research methods and main achievements. 3. In the analysis and in the conclusions, indicate the role of the institution in the understanding of the new institutional economics to which the authors refer. This should be completed especially in research. 4. The conclusions relate more to production structures than to institutional issues. 5. Why, as the authors indicate in the research, producers do not see the potential for the development of the organic production market? The experiences of other countries confirm that such potential exists for countries with similar per capita incomes. 6. Unclear OY axis in Figure 5. One can guess, but it's better to clarify it.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I would consider once again keywords

Tiem rage should be indicated in the abstract and/or in the introduction

The introduction part should be broader - discussing all parts of the following paper

The size of table 1 should be adjusted

Citation direct answers of respondents were an interesting part of the article

Figures 6 - there is typing mistake with import

line 745- subject should be hidden

The limitations part should be broader

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx