Next Article in Journal
Response of the Stream Geomorphic Index to Fault Activity in the Lianfeng–Ningnan Segment (LNS) of the Lianfeng Fault on the Eastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Development of Strong Storm-Induced Ionospheric Perturbations during 25–27 August 2018
Previous Article in Journal
Research Progress, Hotspots, and Evolution of Nighttime Light Pollution: Analysis Based on WOS Database and Remote Sensing Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving the Detection Accuracy of Underwater Obstacles Based on a Novel Combined Method of Support Vector Regression and Gravity Gradient
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

A Double-Adaptive Adjustment Algorithm for Ionospheric Tomography

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(9), 2307; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092307
by Debao Wen *, Yinghao Tang, Xi Chen and Yucong Zou
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(9), 2307; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15092307
Submission received: 19 March 2023 / Revised: 14 April 2023 / Accepted: 24 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Space Geodesy and Cartography Methods II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached reviews

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript develops a double-adaptive adjustment algorithm to reconstruct a 3D ionosphere density distribution model.  I recommend accepting it after minor revision.

I have some minor comments:

1) eq (8) and (9) looks similar, please double-check.

2) Pls make sure formatting consistently.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I thank the authors for their careful consideration of my questions and comments. I think the manuscript has been significantly improved by addressing all the reviewers' comments and questions and recommend its publication in this revised form.

Back to TopTop