Next Article in Journal
Monitoring the Environmental Impact of the Bioeconomy: Indicators and Models for Ex-Post and Ex-Ante Evaluation in Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Climate Sensitivity Transition Matrix Growth Model of Liaodong Oak Stand in Qingyang City
Previous Article in Special Issue
Method of Management and Determination of Quality of Waste from Green Areas for the Production of Pellets Used for Fertilization Purposes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Circular Perspective for Utilization of Industrial Wastewaters via Phytoremediation

by
Piotr Rybarczyk
1,*,
Jacek Antonkiewicz
2,
Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda
3,
Stanisław Mec
4 and
Andrzej Rogala
1,5
1
Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland
3
Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lódź, Poland
4
Department of Molecular and Industrial Biotechnology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, Wólczańska 171/173, 90-530 Lódź, Poland
5
SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Stanford University and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(23), 10865; https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310865
Submission received: 25 September 2025 / Revised: 26 November 2025 / Accepted: 28 November 2025 / Published: 4 December 2025

Abstract

Wastewater generated in municipal rendering facilities requires multi-step treatment, but it may also serve as a source of nutrients and water and thus may be valorized before or instead of the necessary wastewater treatment operations. In this work, wastewaters from a composting plant were utilized to support the growth of Miscanthus x giganteus, known as both a remediation plant and an energy biomass source. A pot experiment was established to compare the effects of different wastewater doses (0, 50, 100, and 200 mL per pot per week) on the miscanthus biomass yield, phytoextraction of heavy metals, biomass heat of combustion, and plant condition. The increase in the wastewater dose resulted in increases in both biomass yield (from about 44 to 139%) and biomass heat of combustion (from 7 to 17%) when compared to the control sample, with no adverse effects on plant physiological parameters. The highest concentrations of metals were found in miscanthus grown with the highest dose of wastewaters. It was found that higher wastewater dose correlates to both higher phytoextraction and phytorecovery of metals from plant substrate and wastewaters. The highest metal uptake was identified for Fe (431 mg·pot−1), followed by Al, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ni, Cr. The lowest metal uptake was noted for Pb, Co and Cd (0.88, 0.11, and 0.95 mg·pot−1, respectively). The results indicate that miscanthus can be recommended for industrial wastewater treatment. In addition, due to high absorption efficiency of the substrate components, miscanthus can be used as a remediation tool, e.g., for the ecological stabilization of remediation of metal-polluted soils, especially in municipal facilities like rendering plants. This presents a circular perspective for the valorization of post-fermentation wastewaters with subsequent growth of energy crops, with other potential benefits for the environment, such as soil treatment, absorption of CO2, and air purification.

1. Introduction

Municipal waste management affects the local environment in many aspects (e.g., emission of odors, noise, land occupation) and produces secondary waste like wastewaters that need to be properly managed. Additionally, rendering facilities are usually designed to operate for tens of years; thus, their territories (especially soil) can be historically polluted and require remediation actions. Typical rendering facilities operate a set of installations including waste segregation, a hermetic composting plant, a point for selective collection of household waste, a landfill, and a wastewater treatment plant for preliminary treatment of landfill, leachates, and technological wastewaters before directing these streams to the municipal wastewater treatment plant. The rendering plant’s installation is designed to recover materials for further reuse according to the BAT (Best Available Technology) approach or safely landfill the waste materials if no recycling is possible [1,2].
Municipal wastes are selectively collected and sorted to separate recyclable materials (such as plastics, metals, glass, and paper) from compostable ones. This biodegradable fraction is directed to a hermetic composting plant. As a result of anaerobic decomposition of biodegradable waste, a solid product of commercial value is produced, i.e., a soil improver. The soil improver must fulfill defined physicochemical requirements for organic and mineral fertilizers and amendments, thereby improving soil quality, as stipulated by legal regulations [3,4].
During the composting of biodegradable waste, a large volume of post-process leachate is collected and further mixed and treated with the technological wastewater in the treatment plant. Such leachates and wastewaters contain—in addition to harmful chemicals such as heavy metals, chlorides, petroleum substance and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [5,6]—valuable components in the form of potential biogenic compounds (e.g., nitrogen, phosphorus), organic matter, and microelements (Table A1), and thus may be regarded as a material for possible environmental application.
Currently, much attention in the EU countries is paid to promoting and contributing to sustainable development through the cyclical use of materials and resources [7,8]. This approach is known as the circular economy, and it is based on reducing the demand for source materials by reusing undesirable products, while simultaneously minimizing waste generation to sustain economic growth through the use of natural resources [9]. These can be achieved, for example, by retaining the value of renewable resources and increasing circularity in material cycles [10]. Taking into consideration the ideas of circular economy and the assumptions of green deal policy, wastewaters from a composting plant can be recycled for the recovery of biogenic substances (nitrogen, phosphorus) as well as other components [11].
Physicochemical and biological processes are the most popular technologies for wastewater treatment. However, high costs and increasingly stringent limits of nutrients emissions to wastewaters resulted in the development of new biotechnologies for wastewater treatment. For example, autotrophic denitrification enables the recovery of nutrients from wastewaters for potential further reuse [12]. In addition, recovery of biogenic compounds with simultaneous treatment and environmental-cleaning from micro-pollutants may be realized using plants, e.g., via phytoremediation [13,14]. This approach appears to be of importance, especially in the context of the need to degrade toxic and bioavailable components of post-composting leachates into non-hazardous and stable forms, which can be achieved through plant-based remediation technologies during the process of phytostabilization [15,16]. Furthermore, proper management of harvested biomass—which may contain elements of economic value after phytoremediation, such as metals—as well as the energetic valorization of biomass, can further enhance the benefits of the circular economy approach [17,18].
The utilization of plants for treating post-composting wastewater was investigated by Justin et al. [19]. It was found that using a composting leachate can be a promising approach for irrigating poplar clones and willows, allowing for enhanced biomass production compared to the control water treatments. Phragmites australis and Ceratophyllum demersum have been applied to treat the landfill leachate in four municipal waste treatment facilities in Poland [20]. Recently, Bhagwat and co-workers investigated the relation between the leachate composition and effects on phytoremediation with a focus on heavy metal uptake from soil [21]. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-polluted wastewaters by using a Miscanthus sp. Goedae-Uksae 1 was studied by Bang et al., showing the potential of this plant towards its utilization for the remediation of marginally contaminated ecosystems [22]. Treatment of landfill soil contaminated with trace elements using miscanthus was investigated by Pidlisnyuk and co-workers, showing enhancement of phytoremediation efficacy by applying synergistic plant growth-promoting bacteria [23]. Recently, Andrić et al. suggested Miscanthus as a suitable plant to treat landfill leachate [24].
The environmental utilization of post-process wastewaters generated in rendering plants can be beneficial, not only due to their potential use in supporting vegetation and biological remediation of closed landfill sites, but also as a source of water during drought episodes [25]. Additionally, if energy plants are utilized for the remediation of the landfill sites, the biomass growth can be supported and enhanced, increasing the possible energy recovery. What is more, another product of biodegradable waste composting, i.e., soil improver, can be utilized for enhanced plant growth [26,27,28]. Such an approach of beneficial use of products and by-products of waste processing lies within the ideas of circular economy and sustainable development, as well as answers the current challenges related to climate change issues.
There is evidence in the literature on utilizing plants for wastewater treatment, including post-composting or landfill leachates, but few papers can be found that investigate such an approach for real substrate samples with additional use of a soil improver from biodegradable waste composting. In this work, an attempt was made to combine nutrient recovery from post-processing wastewaters with the simultaneous environmental and energetic valorization of Miscanthus x giganteus. Effects of using the wastewaters on the energetic potential of generated biomass, as well as the plant’s physiology and composition of both biomass and plant substrates, are discussed. In addition, the proposed circular perspective of valorizing waste or waste-originating products for enhanced plant growth offers other environmental benefits, including uptake of CO2, green barriers for emission of odors, and air phytoremediation potential.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Conditions

The research on the effects of applying wastewaters to plants (giant miscanthus) and substrates was conducted in summer 2022 as pot experiments in the vegetation greenhouse conditions. The greenhouse was located on the territory of Waste Utilization Facility Ltd. in Gdańsk, Poland (54°19′12.107″ N, 18°32′23.62″ E).

2.2. Plant Characterization

Giant miscanthus seedlings were purchased from the Nursery of Ornamental Plants (Starogard Gdański, Poland, company traceability code: PW/6/01/2020/12736). One-year giant miscanthus seedlings with the RUOP registration code PL-22/13/77 were used. The country of origin was Poland.

2.3. Substrates for Plant Cultivation

The following substrates were used in the pot experiments: construction sand (Sa) and soil improver (SK-9). Construction sand used in the experiments was yellow in color and was sieved through a sieve with a mesh diameter of about 1–3 mm, with a dominant fraction of sand particles with a diameter of 2 mm. The construction sand is classified as very light soil according to the Polish Soil Classification [29]. No other mineral fraction or organic matter was identified in the sand. The following values of pH of the sand were determined: pHH2O = 7.0 ± 0.2 and pHKCl = 6.9 ± 0.2.
Soil improver (SK-9) is a product of Waste Utilization Facility Ltd. in Gdańsk, obtained during processing of biodegradable waste in the hermetic composting tunnel and further stabilization and aeration operations in the open field. The SK-9 product is legally allowed to be used as a soil-enriching agent, improving the physicochemical properties of all types of soil, including the cultivation of ornamental plants, as well as in the plant-based restoration of degraded areas [30]. SK-9 soil improver fulfills the requirements for organic fertilizers according to regulations [3,31,32]. Selected physicochemical parameters of the soil improver are given in Table A2.

2.4. Wastewater for Plant Irrigation

Wastewaters used for irrigation of plants were taken from the collection point for mixed technological wastewaters and landfill leachates as a concentrate after the reverse osmosis treatment. According to the law regulations, no exceedances were found for the permissible values of pollutant indicators introduced into the industrial sewage systems [33]. Selected parameters of the wastewaters are given in Table A1.

2.5. The Scheme and Conditions of the Experiment

The one-factor experiment was carried out in triplicate in 8 kg polyethylene pots filled with a construction sand and a soil improver SK-9, which were thoroughly mixed in a 1:1 weight ratio. The experiment design included five objects, i.e., only sand, only soil improver, and a mixture of sand and soil improver, as well as differing in the irrigation pattern using industrial wastewaters, dosed according to the experimental scheme (Table 1). Following doses of wastewaters per pot per week were used: 50, 100 and 200 mL. The wastewater doses were selected due to high nutrients requirement of miscanthus due to its high biomass growth. Due to high salinity, wastewaters were diluted with distilled water on order to limit the problem of low nutrient uptake in highly saline conditions.
Total volume of liquid, i.e., either pure water (H2O) or wastewaters (W), diluted with water, was always 500 mL. The test plant, i.e., Miscanthus x giganteus, was selected due to its high resistance and high tolerance to pollutants present in the industrial wastewaters. In addition, miscanthus, as a monocotyledonous plant, is characterized by a large increase in biomass in a relatively short time [34]. Miscanthus was planted in pots in the form of seedlings in mid-April 2022. The miscanthus vegetation period lasted from 1 May 2022, to 30 September 2022.
For the first two weeks after starting the pot experiments, the seedlings were watered only with distilled water in order to acclimate the plant to the greenhouse conditions and the substrate type. After two weeks, during the growing season, the plants were watered according to the experimental scheme (Table 1), once a week with distilled water and industrial wastewaters, maintaining soil moisture at 60% of the maximum water capacity. When necessary, water losses were replenished by distilled water to a constant mass of the substrate. The doses of the wastewaters are related to the nutritional requirements of the miscanthus. This plant requires high doses of nutrients due to its high biomass production. In addition, the applied wastewater streams were diluted with distilled water in order to limit the high salinity of the waste streams, which can hinder the nutrient uptake from the solutions used for miscanthus irrigation. In the pot experiments, mineral fertilization (NPK) was not used, as the applied soil improver and industrial wastewater were assumed to be sources of nutrients and pollutants that could potentially impact the growth and development of the test plant. The average temperature during the experiment was 28 ± 5 °C.

2.6. Analytical Procedures

After a vegetation period, the aboveground parts of miscanthus were collected from all pots. The plant material was dried in a laboratory dryer at 105 °C to a constant weight (SLN 32 SMART, PRO-EKO APARATURA, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland). The dried plant material was weighed (laboratory balance AS220.R2, RADWAG, Radom, Poland). Biomass yield for dry samples was determined for each experimental pot. Dry plant material was ground on an ultra-centrifugal mill (ZM 200, RETSCH, Haan, Germany) to obtain particles with a diameter less than 1 mm.
Plant materials were further processed for analysis. One part of the collected biomass was dry-mineralized in a muffle furnace at 550 °C [35]. The obtained ash was dissolved in 5 mL of an aqueous solution of 35–38% HCl (1:1 v/v), then the liquid was evaporated and the residue was treated with 5 mL of HNO3 (1:2 v/v) and evaporated over a sand bath. Again, the residue was treated with 5 mL of HNO3 (1:2 v/v) and heated under the watch glass. Then, the content of the evaporator was filtered through a filter paper to a 50 mL measuring flask. The evaporator and the residue on the filter was washed multiple times with hot distilled water, to the volume of 50 mL. Upon cooling, the flask content was filled up to 50 mL with distilled water and thoroughly mixed. Such prepared samples were subjected to further analyses, i.e., selected elemental composition (P, K, Ca, Mg, Na, C, N, S).
The other part of plant material was subjected to microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry analyses (4210 MP-AES, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for the determination of selected elements, i.e., Al, Fe, Mn, Co, Zn, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb. The mineralization of plant samples was carried out using 65% HNO3 solution (Avantor Performance Materials S.A., Gliwice, Poland) and a microwave-assisted system (Magnum II, Ertec, Wrocław, Poland). More details of this analytical procedure are available in another paper [27].
Substrate materials, i.e., sand and soil improver, after sieving through a sieve with a mesh diameter of 2 mm, were subjected to determination of dry matter content [36], pH [37], electrical conductivity, total organic carbon (TOC) content by the Tiurin method, and total nitrogen by Kjeldhal method [38]. Mineralization of soil samples, excluding the samples subjected to MP-AES, was performed using a 3:2 v/v mixture of 70% HClO4 and 65% HNO3 (POCH, Avantor Performance Materials S.A., Gliwice, Poland) [39]. The procedure for substrate sample preparation for MP-AES determination of Al, Fe, Mn, Co, Zn, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb is similar to that given above for the plant material [27].
Determination of elements in mineralized samples of plant material and substrates was performed using atomic emission spectrometry, ICP-OES technique (OPTIMA 7300 DV, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) [40,41]. Quality assurance protocols included analysis of certified reference materials and processing blanks in parallel with samples. Method validation showed recovery rates exceeding 95%, with method detection limits established at 0.1 μg·kg−1 for all analyzed elements. The limit of quantification was three times higher than the limit of detection.
Determination of the heat of combustion for the collected plant materials was performed using an automatic calorimeter with a calorimetric bomb (KL-14, PRECYZJA-BIT, Bydgoszcz, Poland). A total of 1 g of pelletized plant material sample was subjected to analysis. Three runs were performed for each analyzed sample, and average values of the heat of combustion are given.
All of the chemicals were of analytical grade.

2.7. Evaluation of Plant Physiological Activity

The physiological activity, growth, and chemical properties of plants were assessed according to methodologies developed based on national standards and previous studies conducted at the University of Lodz and State Institute of Horticulture, Poland [42,43,44,45].
During the pot experiments in greenhouse conditions, the plants were subjected to various agrotechnical treatments, and their evaluation was based on the physiological activity observed during the month of August. As part of the evaluation, gas exchange (net photosynthesis, transpiration, intercellular CO2 concentration, stomatal conductance), chlorophyll content index, and chlorophyll fluorescence were analyzed. These measurements were carried out on fully expanded leaves located in the upper part of the plant. Ten plant specimens were randomly selected from each experimental variant, and one leaf was taken from each plant to be assessed for physiological activity.
The gas exchange in leaves, including net photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and the concentration of intercellular CO2, was determined using the TPS-2 Portable Photosynthesis System (PP Systems; Amesbury, MA, USA; Operation Manual Software Version 2.00) [46]. The chlorophyll content index in leaves was determined utilizing the Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) [44,45,46].
Analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence was conducted using a Handy PEA fluorometer from Hansatech Instruments Ltd. (Pentney, United Kingdom; software PEA+—Version 1.13). Comparing the fluorescence of the sample in darkness to its maximum fluorescence (maximum PSII photosystem efficiency, Fv/Fm) enabled the establishment of the correlation between the structure and functionality of the photosynthetic apparatus and estimated the vitality of the plants. Leaves of plants were acclimatized in darkness to ensure that all reaction centers in photosystem II were opened (oxidized) and prepared to receive electrons before measurement. This analysis of the physicochemical parameter suggests the potential utilization of chlorophyll fluorescence as an indicator of plant response to various environmental factors [44,45].
The results of each physiological characteristic were averaged and input into the ClustVis tool (Shiny, version 0.10.2.1.; pheatmap version 0.7.7.) The program utilizes several R language packages and borrows code from BoxPoltR, analyzing and comparing the provided data to output the effect in the form of a table of colored squares. The color is directly correlated with the deviation from a variable calculated by the program, such as the median or average. This graphical representation of differences in each physiological characteristic helps to visualize correlations between each experimental variant [47]. Moreover, to further visualize the comparison of physiological states observed in the studied objects, a radar chart was created using Apache ECharts, (Apache ECharts, version 5.4.2) which provided sufficient adjustability for this task.

2.8. Quality Control

The determinations for each of the analyzed samples were performed in triplicate. The accuracy of the analytical methods was verified based on certified reference materials: CRM IAEA/V/V-10 Hay (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria), CRM-CD281-Rey Grass (Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Geel, Belgium), CRM023-050-Trace Metals-Sandy Loam 7 (RT Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Pelletized benzoic acid (POCH, Gliwice, Poland) was used as a reference during the determination of the heat of combustion.

2.9. Calculations, Statistical Analysis of the Results, and Graphics

In order to determine the phytorecovery of elements from industrial wastewaters, the following parameters were selected:
  • Biomass dry matter yield (BY, g∙pot−1 D.M.);
  • Yield tolerance index (TI, -) defined as the ratio of the yield of plants (i.e., biomass dry yield) grown on substrates watered with industrial wastewaters to the yield of plants from control objects (i.e., grown without watering with wastewaters) [48];
  • Concentration of elements in collected biomass (C, mg∙kg−1 D.M.);
  • Concentration index (Cin, -) of elements in biomass, calculated as the ratio of metal concentration in plants grown on substrates watered with industrial wastewaters to the concentration of metals in plants from control objects;
  • Bioconcentration factor (BCF, -) defined as the ratio of the metal concentration in the plant to the metal concentration in the substrate on which the plant was grown [48];
  • Metal uptake (U, mg∙pot−1), calculated as the product of biomass dry matter yield and metal concentration.
Statistical analysis of the research results was carried out using Microsoft Office Excel 2013 spreadsheet and Statistica 13 PL package. One-way analysis of variance was used to assess the statistical significance of the analyzed sources of variability. The significance of differences between the mean values was verified based on Tukey’s HSD test, with the significance level α ≤ 0.01. In this work, the dispersion between the measurements in the chemical analysis was assumed to be a maximum of 5%.
Principal component analysis was performed using RStudio (v. 2023.06.0 + 421) software [49] using R [50].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physico-Chemical Properties of Materials Used in Experiments

In the pot experiment, construction sand with a mesh diameter of 1–3 mm was used as the substrate component. The sand used in the experiment was washed with a solution of hydrochloric acid (10% concentration) and then with tap water to wash out chlorides. A compost (SK-9) was used in the substrates as well, which was a source primarily of organic matter and nutrients, as well as toxic substances, including heavy metals (Table A2). The content of heavy metals in the compost was below the permissible values for organic fertilizers, organic-mineral fertilizers and soil improvement agents [31,32].
The necessary condition for the natural management of a landfill is to create a reclamation layer, which eliminates or reduces the impact of waste from the landfill on the surrounding environment and creates conditions for plant adaptation to the landfill under reclamation [51,52]. European Union, as well as the national legislation, allows the use and composition of remediation layers from various waste materials, provided that they do not pose an ecological risk to the environment [53,54]. The use of sand as a substrate component was intended to increase permeability and, at the same time, to improve the infiltration conditions of the substrate in the context of industrial wastewater management. The compost used was a source of organic matter and nutrients for the plants being tested. Composing such a substrate (reclamation layer) from materials with different physicochemical properties (sand and compost) allowed for assessing the possibility of using industrial wastewaters and their impact on plants in the perspective of natural management of such wastewaters at a municipal rendering plant.
In landfill remediation, it is possible to use wastewaters to irrigate and fertilize remediation plants. However, significant limitations may be the high salinity of the soil and the accumulation of toxic substances, which prevent the proper growth and development of remediation plants [51,52]. Therefore, future field testing at a landfill is recommended and the studies will allow for the assessment of the effectiveness of the above remediation treatments.

3.2. Giant Miscanthus Yield in the Pot Experiment

The yield of miscanthus grown in the conditions of the pot experiment in the greenhouse depended on the type of substrate and the dose of the industrial sewage (Table 2). The yield analysis shows that the only mixture of quartz sand with compost used (object 2) significantly increased the yield, which amounted to over 11% compared to the control. The increase in yield in this object is explained by the improvement of the physicochemical properties of the substrate and the increased availability of nutrients from the applied compost [26,54].
The application of industrial sewage in doses of 50, 100, and 200 mL per week per pot to sand and compost mixtures (objects 3–5) increased the yield of miscanthus. The increase in the yield in these objects was over 44, 68, and 139%, respectively, compared to the control (Table 2). From the point of view of phytoextraction potential, the highest yield of miscanthus biomass was obtained in the object where the highest doses of industrial sewage were applied (object 5). Own studies confirm that industrial sewage, despite containing a high concentration of chemical pollutants, is a potential source of nutrients that promote the growth and development of plants [15,55]. In addition, the increase in miscanthus biomass yield with increased doses of wastewater is likely related to the plant’s high ability to overcome osmotic stress caused by high salinity [23]. The effect was, however, positive within the studied range of concentrations, but became toxic at higher concentrations. Studies on the fertilizing usefulness of industrial sewage indicate that nutrients also occur in easily soluble, bioavailable forms that can decrease or eliminate the toxic effects of heavy metals on plants [5,7].

3.3. Yield Tolerance Index

In this study, an attempt was made to assess the toxicity of industrial sewage based on the yield tolerance index (TI), which was estimated as the ratio of the yield obtained in the objects with sewage doses to the yield obtained in the control object (Table 2). The yield tolerance index (TI) has been recognized in recent years as the most reliable factor in determining the toxicity of a stress factor to plants [48,56]. The yield tolerance index can take the values TI < 1, TI = 1, and T > 1. If the index is lower than one, it means inhibition of plant growth and sometimes their complete death, equal to one—indicates no effect of pollution on yield, and higher than 1 indicates the ‘stimulating’ (positive) effect of pollution on plant growth and development. The values of the yield tolerance index (TI) show that only the mixture of sand and compost used (object 2) had a stimulating effect on the yield of miscanthus (Table 2). On the other hand, the introduction of industrial sewage to this mixture in the amounts of 50, 100, and 200 mL per week per pot (objects 3–5) resulted in greater stimulation of yield, and the value of the tolerance index was 1.4, 1.7, and 2.4, respectively. The obtained values of the yield tolerance index, i.e., above one, confirm that industrial sewage containing nutrients stimulates the growth and development of plants [57].

3.4. Biomass Heat of Combustion

The study attempted to assess the impact of industrial sewage on the calorific value of miscanthus biomass. The applied mixture of sand and compost (object 2) significantly increased the heat of combustion of the tested miscanthus biomass (Table 2). The increase in the heat of combustion of the miscanthus biomass can be explained by the improvement of the physicochemical properties of the substrate, which affects the lower moisture content of the tested plant. Industrial sewage applied in doses of 50, 100, and 200 mL per week per pot to sand and compost mixtures (objects 3–5) had an even greater impact on the increase in the heat of combustion of miscanthus biomass, compared to the results from object 2. The conducted studies showed that the highest value of the biomass heat of combustion was obtained in the object with the highest dose of industrial sewage, and the increase in the heat of combustion was over 17% compared to the control (object 1), (Table 2). This study indicates that the applied industrial sewage affects the production of a crop with less moisture content and a fast–drying tendency [58,59,60]. The research results indicate not only the possibility of using industrial wastewater for fertigation (i.e., irrigation and fertilization) of miscanthus, but also the possibility of obtaining more energy from the combustion of this biomass. Additionally, when considering both the increase in biomass yield and the increase in the calorific value of giant miscanthus samples, there is a significant rise in the overall biomass energy potential. For example, compare objects 2 and 5, which have biomass yields of 276 and 594 g per pot, and heats of combustion of 15.4 and 17.0 MJ·kg−1, respectively (Table 2).
However, when considering the practical application of energy recovery from post-remediation miscanthus, one must be aware of the technical and environmental drawbacks. Incineration of the metal-rich biomass results on the formation of alkaline ash, which leads to the corrosion of the combustion boiler. In addition, metal emission to atmosphere is possible [61].

3.5. Concentrations of Elements in Substrates and Plants

The content of elements in the substrates and miscanthus was varied and depended on the type of substrate and the dose of industrial sewage. In the substrates in which miscanthus was grown, the content of elements was significantly higher than the content in plants. The higher content of elements in the substrates resulted mainly from the chemical composition of the substrate components used, i.e., compost obtained from the processing of organic-mineral waste and the applied doses of industrial sewage (Table 1 and Table A1). Among the analyzed elements, the highest concentrations of elements in the substrates were found in the case of Fe, then Al, Zn, Mn, Pb, Cu, Cr, Ni, Co, and the lowest in the case of Cd. In the experiment, the lowest content of the analyzed elements in the substrates was found in the control object (object 1), in which only sand was used, and only distilled water was used to maintain the humidity of the plants. On the other hand, the highest content of elements was found in the object in which the maximum dose of industrial sewage was used (object 5, Table 3). The research shows that the compost and industrial sewage used were a potential source of elements for cultivated plants. Studies by other authors confirm that industrial sewage from waste processing is a potential source of not only organic pollutants, but also nutrients and trace elements, including microelements [14,15,18,62].
The content of the analyzed elements in the miscanthus biomass was also varied, and the highest contents were found in the object with the highest dose of industrial sewage (object 5), and the lowest in the control object, in which only sand was used (object 1). Among the analyzed elements, the highest concentrations in the miscanthus biomass were found for Fe (725 mg∙kg−1 D.M.), then Al, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, Co, and the lowest for Cd (0.08 mg∙kg−1 D.M.). The above series of elements in the miscanthus biomass was arranged similarly to the series of elements in the substrates, which indicates the possibility of their availability and uptake by the root system of the tested plant.
In the object with the highest dose of industrial sewage (object 5), the highest increase in the metal content in miscanthus was recorded for Cd and was over 10 times higher than the control, then Pb (4.4), Al (2.5), Cu (2.1), Ni (1.8), Co (1.7), Cr (1.6), Fe (0.8), Mn (0.6), and the lowest for Zn and was over 0.5 times higher than the control. Own studies and those of other authors confirm that industrial sewage is often characterized by high solubility of components and, at the same time, their high availability to plants [60,61]. Moreover, the miscanthus used in the experiment was characterized by a large, bundle-shaped root system capable of intensively absorbing harmful substances from the industrial sewage used [14,34].
In this work, bioaccumulation factor values (BCF) were calculated, which describe the potential of miscanthus to accumulate elements from the substrate. The higher the value of this factor, the greater the potential to accumulate the element in the plant biomass [61]. The highest BCF values were observed in the control object, indicating that the sand used in the experiment did not limit the uptake of elements by plants (Table 3). The sand used in the experiment was devoid of organic matter, so it could not absorb elements in the substrate, and thus made them available to the tested plants. Some of the elements were also likely absorbed from atmospheric dust settling on the plants [63,64].
Bioaccumulation factors (BCF) of elements varied significantly and depended on the object. The highest BCF value was found for Ni (0.40–0.60), then Mn (0.28–0.36), Zn (0.28–0.34), Cu (0.22–0.26), Cr (0.16–0.23), Fe (0.12–0.14), Co (0.08–0.88), Cd (0.08–0.67), Pb (0.04–0.06), and the lowest for Al (0.01–0.03). The studies show that aluminum, despite its high content in the substrate, is not intensively taken up by plants, which probably results from the fact that plants do not show a high demand for this element [65,66]. However, the BCF values for Ni, Mn, Zn, and Cu were much higher, which indicates that these elements play an important role in the plant’s metabolic processes and in the removal of reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced under stress conditions caused by chemical pollutants [59,67,68].

3.6. Metal Uptake by Plants

The uptake of elements by Miscanthus depended on the yield and the content of these elements in the biomass (Table 4). The lowest uptake of elements was found in the control object, where miscanthus was grown basically on “clean” sand, without the addition of compost and mineral fertilization (object 1). In the object, where sand was mixed with compost (object 2), an increase in the amount of element uptake was found. The source of these elements was the used compost (SK-9), originating from the processing of municipal waste [27,30]. Increasing doses of industrial sewage (objects 3–5) resulted in an increase in the amount of elements taken up by Miscanthus. The highest amounts of elements taken up were found in the object with the highest dose of industrial sewage (object 5). Among the elements analyzed, the highest uptake was achieved by Fe (431 mg∙pot−1), then Al, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ni, and Cr. The lowest uptakes were obtained by Pb, Co, and Cd (respectively: 0.88, 0.11, 0.05 mg∙pot−1).
In the object with the highest dose of industrial sewage (object 5), the highest increase in uptake was recorded for Cd and was over 27 times higher than the control. This is followed by Pb (11.9), Al (7.4), Cu (6.3), Ni (5.7), Co (5.4), Cr (5.3), Fe (3.3), and Mn (2.7). Conversely, lowest increase in uptake was recorded for Zn and was over 2.6 times higher than the control. Studies by other authors confirm that industrial sewage is a good solvent, especially for trace elements that may have a toxic effect on plants during fertigation and phytoremediation [15,62]. Among the pollutants analyzed in sewage, cadmium was found to be an element that is highly soluble in the soil environment, especially in acidic conditions [13,67]. Regardless of the pH of the soil, plants easily uptake this metal. The results of this study confirm that industrial wastewater, despite its specific chemical composition and salinity, affects the more intensive uptake of these components by plants, which results in higher yields and the use of nutrients and trace elements in the environment [15]. Higher uptake of elements from the substrate supplied with industrial sewage qualifies Miscanthus for the group of remediation plants, as well as for the group of energy plants, recommended for cultivation in landfills and post-industrial areas [14,34]. Studies show that miscanthus is a plant resistant to salinity and chemical pollution and can be used to recycle industrial wastewater, which is important in a circular economy [23,26].

3.7. Selected Physiological Parameters of Plants

The results of chlorophyll index analysis indicate an increase in chlorophyll concentration in two of the samples studied compared to the control object (Figure 1a). Plants grown in soil improver with quartz sand and watered with pure water (object 2) exhibited the highest chlorophyll concentration (16.1% rise) in the biomass, suggesting superior plant health. A smaller increase of 8.4% was also observed in plants watered with the wastewater solution of the highest concentration (object 5). Other variants (objects 3, 4) had no significant impact on the chlorophyll index of the studied specimens compared to the control (object 1). Moreover, the fluorescence values did not fluctuate from the control in a significant manner. Therefore, the results suggest that the photosystem II activity of giant miscanthus is not significantly affected by the conditions of the experiment. Murchie and coworkers report that the optimal chlorophyll fluorescence value for unstressed, healthy plants is approximately 0.83 [68]. Most studies in this respect are related to Miscanthus sp. [65,69] and did not achieve control values above 0.78. Considering that all the values acquired in the study were above 0.80 and sometimes reaching 0.85, very good health of the studied plants can be concluded, indicating no apparent stress reaction (Figure 1b).
Figure 1. The chlorophyll index (a) and chlorophyll fluorescence (b) of greenhouse cultivated Miscanthus x giganteus grown in objects 1–5. The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation of the measurements. In the gas exchange assay, the results of which are presented in Figure 2, all plants supplemented with the studied compost showed a significant change in physiological parameters. The net photosynthesis values increased in all experimental variants. Although all the tests have shown somewhat similar results, the highest increase from control values was observed in plants grown on a mixture of sand and soil improver without further supplementation (Figure 2a; object 2), where the increase was about 15.3%. This effect was somewhat reduced for objects 3, 4, and 5 (the increases in net photosynthesis were by 13.2%, 12.4%, and 13.8%, respectively). Transpiration values also increased in the fertilized samples, except for object 2, where the transpiration rate dropped by 13.4% compared to the control (Figure 2b). Plants treated with industrial wastewater solutions showed no trend of increase, but the highest concentration provided the best results. Both stomatal conductance (St) and intercellular CO2 concentration (ICC) showed the best results in the plants watered with pure water (13.1% increase and 10.0% decrease, for St and ICC, respectively), while the addition of industrial sewage improved the values according to the concentration (Figure 2c,d). In their work on sorghum ash, Romanowska-Duda and co-workers achieved similar or higher values of net photosynthesis, depending on the experimental variant [44,45]. However, the average values of transpiration and stomatal conductance in this study were similar. From a physiological standpoint, the healthiest plants were the ones grown in a mixture of quartz and soil improver, untreated with wastewater, and those treated with the highest concentration (object 5). Moreover, plants treated with 100 mL of wastewater weekly (object 4) showed somewhat decreased physiological state values compared to other variants [70].
Figure 1. The chlorophyll index (a) and chlorophyll fluorescence (b) of greenhouse cultivated Miscanthus x giganteus grown in objects 1–5. The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation of the measurements. In the gas exchange assay, the results of which are presented in Figure 2, all plants supplemented with the studied compost showed a significant change in physiological parameters. The net photosynthesis values increased in all experimental variants. Although all the tests have shown somewhat similar results, the highest increase from control values was observed in plants grown on a mixture of sand and soil improver without further supplementation (Figure 2a; object 2), where the increase was about 15.3%. This effect was somewhat reduced for objects 3, 4, and 5 (the increases in net photosynthesis were by 13.2%, 12.4%, and 13.8%, respectively). Transpiration values also increased in the fertilized samples, except for object 2, where the transpiration rate dropped by 13.4% compared to the control (Figure 2b). Plants treated with industrial wastewater solutions showed no trend of increase, but the highest concentration provided the best results. Both stomatal conductance (St) and intercellular CO2 concentration (ICC) showed the best results in the plants watered with pure water (13.1% increase and 10.0% decrease, for St and ICC, respectively), while the addition of industrial sewage improved the values according to the concentration (Figure 2c,d). In their work on sorghum ash, Romanowska-Duda and co-workers achieved similar or higher values of net photosynthesis, depending on the experimental variant [44,45]. However, the average values of transpiration and stomatal conductance in this study were similar. From a physiological standpoint, the healthiest plants were the ones grown in a mixture of quartz and soil improver, untreated with wastewater, and those treated with the highest concentration (object 5). Moreover, plants treated with 100 mL of wastewater weekly (object 4) showed somewhat decreased physiological state values compared to other variants [70].
Sustainability 17 10865 g001
A comparison of the physiological characteristics of each experimental variant is represented in Figure 3a. As the comparison shows, the effects on the physiology of plants grown in objects 4 and 5 were deemed similar. The same is true for the control object 1 and object 3. This suggests that a fraction of approximately 10% industrial sewage has minimal effect on the plants. Moreover, the heatmap indicates that plants grown in the mixture of sand and soil improver without wastewater supplementation showed results more akin to the heavily supplemented ones than to the control.
In the visualization of the overall physiological states presented in Figure 3b, each axis in the chart represents one of the parameters analyzed in the study. The health of the plants can be evaluated by comparing the areas enclosed by the respective figures for each group. An exception is the intercellular CO2 concentration axis, where values further from the center indicate a greater retention of CO2 that is not utilized in photosynthesis, reflecting lower photosynthetic efficiency. The chart clearly demonstrates that the control group (red) performed worse compared to the experimental groups in almost all cases. The best results were observed in plants watered with a 200 mL effluent solution (green) and those watered with pure water (orange), both grown in a mixture of sand and soil improver. However, the addition of 200 mL effluent solution significantly increased transpiration intensity, which was not observed in the group treated with pure water only.

3.8. Principal Component Analysis

Principal component analysis was performed for 15 selected parameters, including biomass yield (BY), heat of combustion (HC), physiological parameters: chlorophyll index (CI), chlorophyll fluorescence (CF), net photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration (Tr), stomatal conductance (St) and intercellular CO2 concentration (ICC) as well as for metals concentration, including aluminum, iron, zinc, chromium, copper, manganese and nickel (Figure 4a). Based on the scree plot in Figure 4b, the first two components can be considered the most significant, as they explain 83.5% of the total data information. The biplot, based on the first two principal component axes (Figure 4c), suggests multiple dependencies between the investigated parameters, showing a strong positive correlation, for example, between stomatal conductance and heat of combustion for the 1st principal component, while a strong negative correlation with this component was found for intercellular CO2 concentration.
The PCA distinguished (Figure 4d) five groups of combinations, according to the objects of investigation. Figure 4d presents a clear separation of the experimental groups of objects, which confirms that these groups are statistically different from each other in terms of the studied parameters. Analyzing the position of the groups in Figure 4d and the variable vectors (Figure 4c), it can be determined that object 1 is distinguished by a different content of metals (especially Ni, Cr, Fe, Mn, and Cu). The differences between objects 2–5 are visible mainly in the content of aluminum (Al) and in the biomass yield (BY). The values of aluminum concentration and biomass yield increase with the increase in the dose of the wastewaters. A similar relationship can be observed for the chlorophyll index (CI) value. For objects 2–5, an increase in the CI parameter with the increase in the wastewater dose coincides with an increase in the biomass yield. In addition to biomass yield and metal content, the PCA also revealed relationships among physiological parameters. The first principal component (PC1), which explained 50.2% of the total variance, was mainly associated with parameters related to gas exchange and photosynthetic activity. Stomatal conductance (St) and transpiration rate (Tr) showed a strong positive loading on PC1, indicating that these traits contribute significantly to the differentiation of the samples. At the same time, intercellular CO2 concentration (ICC) exhibited a strong negative loading, suggesting that higher photosynthetic efficiency (higher Pn and CF) is accompanied by a lower ICC, typical for plants with more efficient CO2 assimilation.
The second component (PC2; 33.3% of variance) was primarily influenced by chlorophyll-related parameters, including the chlorophyll index (CI) and chlorophyll fluorescence (CF), reflecting differences in the photosynthetic apparatus condition and pigment concentration between treatments. The positive correlation of CI and CF with biomass yield (BY) along PC2 supports the conclusion that physiological activity and pigment status directly contribute to growth efficiency.
The PCA demonstrated that the physiological parameters (Pn, Tr, St, CF, CI, and ICC) form coherent groups reflecting the plants’ adaptive responses to increasing wastewater doses. Enhanced chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal activity in higher wastewater treatments likely indicate stimulated physiological metabolism, resulting in higher biomass yield.

3.9. Limitations of the Study

This work explores the potential for environmental management of post-industrial wastewater streams generated by composting plants within waste treatment facilities. These streams were valorized in the perspective of mainly (a) wastewater treatment and (b) its use for enhancing plant growth. The study presents the results of preliminary investigations of the effects of wastewater utilization on plant condition, biomass yield and chemical composition. The context of the work focuses on the potential future applications in waste treatment facilities, particularly for the reclamation of wastewater streams for landfill use or for watering purposes during drought episodes. One of the most important issues regarding the environmental management of landfills is the evaluation of the materials used for such purposes. For example, material evaluation may consider microbial activity tests, bioavailability of heavy metals and their leaching capacity. Both national and EU regulations require evaluation of the metal as well as other pollution leaching capacity of the material from the perspective of soil and water pollution prevention. It is recommended that the research presented in this work be supplemented with the evaluation of the biological and chemical toxicity of both the leachate solutions and biomass. This will enable the inclusion of the proposed approach to landfill reclamation within the circular economy. In addition, open-field experiments on a real landfill reclamation site should be performed on a larger scale, which can present the scalability of the idea, including real environmental conditions and their effects on plant growth and wastewater management potential. However, it must be stressed that there is a need for continuous monitoring of physicochemical parameters of both the plant substrates and the wastewaters. When the allowable limits are exceeded, the wastewaters must be directed to wastewater treatment plant in order to prevent secondary pollution of environment [1].

4. Conclusions

Application of diluted, post-composting wastewaters to giant miscanthus resulted in the increased plant growth, with the highest biomass yield for the highest dose of the wastewater solution (200 mL diluted with water to 500 mL per week per pot). The increase in the wastewater dose resulted in an increase in the heat of combustion of miscanthus biomass. The increase in the heat of combustion was about 17% when compared to the control sample, suggesting that the application of sewage is beneficial from an energetic biomass production perspective. Elemental analyses of both soil and biomass samples were performed. The highest content metals found in the biomass of miscanthus were Fe, followed by Al, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, and Co, with the lowest content being found for Cd. The above series of elements in the biomass of miscanthus was arranged similarly to the series of elements in the substrates, indicating the potential availability and uptake by the root system of plants.
The use of post-composting soil improver and the application of industrial sewage increased the uptake of elements by miscanthus, which indicates that this species can be a good extractant of pollutants from the substrate and can be recommended for recycling pollutants from the composting of biodegradable waste. The best physiological characteristics achieved in the greenhouse pot experiments are those for the plants watered with pure water and industrial sewage of the highest concentration (200 mL per week per pot). The watering with lower doses of sewage, i.e., 50 and 100 mL per week per pot, seems to have no significant effect on selected plant characteristics, although the overall effect of even low concentrations was beneficial.
The use of energy plants for the natural management of industrial wastewaters at the territories of waste treatment facilities can induce increased biomass yields, thus increasing the potential for energy recovery. The use of soil improver from composting organic waste can improve the growth conditions of energy plants, leading to enhanced soil purification and reclamation of degraded lands. This approach consisting of the beneficial use of waste treatment products and byproducts aligns with the concepts of a circular economy and sustainable development and also addresses the current challenges of climate change.

Author Contributions

P.R.: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; J.A.: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, resources; Z.R.-D.: investigation, writing—original draft, resources; S.M.: investigation, writing—original draft; A.R.: project administration, software, writing—review and editing, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript was prepared within the scope of the Baltic Phytoremediation (BAPR) project, co-financed by the Interreg South Baltic Program 2014–2020 under project number STHB.02.02.00-SE-0155/18, and published as part of an international project co-financed by the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education entitled “PMW” in 2021–2022, Baltic Phytoremediation (BAPR) under contract no. 5247/SBP 2014–2020/2021/2. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of its authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union, the Managing Authority, or the Joint Secretariat of the Interreg South Baltic Programme 2014–2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Bartłomiej Cieślik, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, for his assistance and help in MP-AES analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BCFbioconcentration factor
BYbiomass yield
Cconcentration of element in biomass
CFchlorophyll fluorescence
CIchlorophyll index
Cinconcentration index
D.M.dry mass
HCheat of combustion
ICCintercellular CO2 concentration
PCAprincipal component analysis
Pnnet photosynthesis
Ssand
SK-9soil improver
Ststomatal conductance
TIyield tolerance index
Trtranspiration
Umetal uptake
Wwastewaters

Appendix A

Table A1. Values of selected parameters of wastewaters (based on Annual Environmental Monitoring Report for Landfill in municipal rendering plant in Gdańsk, 2023).
Table A1. Values of selected parameters of wastewaters (based on Annual Environmental Monitoring Report for Landfill in municipal rendering plant in Gdańsk, 2023).
ParameterUnitValue
pH 6.7 ± 0.2
Electrical conductivityμS∙cm−138,000 ± 120
TurbidityNTU895 ± 10
Odor TON>1000 ± 10
Suspensionsmg∙L−11790 ± 36
Dissolved substancesmg∙L−137,630 ± 40
Dry residuemg∙L−139,400 ± 80
BOD5mg∙L−117,050 ± 40
CODCrmg∙L−134,800 ± 56
Permanganate indexmg∙L−12360 ± 45
Ammonium nitrogenmg∙L−13120 ± 64
Nitrate nitrogenmg∙L−11.81 ± 0.10
Total nitrogenmg∙L−13355 ± 30
Chloridesmg∙L−18340 ± 105
Sulfatesmg∙L−111,500 ± 235
Fluoridesmg∙L−11630 ± 20
Phosphatesmg∙L−1329 ± 24
Sulfidesmg∙L−134.6 ± 4.8
Phenol indexmg∙L−13.35 ± 0.05
Substance extractable with petroleum ethermg∙L−1290 ± 8
Copper (Cu)mg∙L−10.184 ± 0.02
Zinc (Zn)mg∙L−16.11 ±0.05
Lead (Pb)mg∙L−1<0.010
Cadmium (Cd)mg∙L−1<0.005
Chromium (VI) mg∙L−1<0.010
Chromium—Total (Cr)mg∙L−11.56 ± 0.05
Nickel (Ni)mg∙L−10.87 ± 0.04
Iron–Total (Fe)mg∙L−141.2 ± 0.4
Manganese (Mn)mg∙L−113.8 ± 1.1
Mercury (Hg) mg∙L−1<0.0005
Potassium (K)mg∙L−12960 ± 36
Sodium (Na) mg∙L−12654 ± 16
Calcium (Ca)mg∙L−11790 ± 24
Magnesium (Mg) mg∙L−1357 ± 1
General hardnessmmol∙L−165.4 ± 4.5
PAHsμg∙L−10.059 ± 0.005
TOCmg∙L−110,750 ± 50
Table A2. Selected physicochemical parameters of SK-9 soil improver.
Table A2. Selected physicochemical parameters of SK-9 soil improver.
ParameterUnitsValue
pHH2O-7.3 ± 0.2
pHKCl-7.2 ± 0.2
Electrical conductivity, μS∙cm−11740 ± 35
Carbon (organic), g∙kg−1 D.M.221.1 ± 6.0
Nitrogen (N) g∙kg−1 D.M.5.30 ± 0.50
Phosphorus (P) g∙kg−1 D.M.1.42 ± 0.35
Potassium (K) g∙kg−1 D.M.4.82 ± 0.24
Calcium (Ca) g∙kg−1 D.M.26.26 ± 1.50
Magnesium (Mg) g∙kg−1 D.M.1.81 ± 0.05
Sodium (Na) g∙kg−1 D.M.0.71 ± 0.05
Aluminum (Al) mg∙kg−1 D.M.3539 ± 607
Iron (Fe) mg∙kg−1 D.M.1458 ± 85
Zinc (Zn) mg∙kg−1 D.M.134 ± 14
Cadmium (Cd) mg∙kg−1 D.M.1.8 ± 0.3
Chrome (Cr) mg∙kg−1 D.M.54.2 ± 8.5
Cobalt (Co) mg∙kg−1 D.M.5.2 ± 1.1
Copper (Cu) mg∙kg−1 D.M.85.2 ± 7.0
Lead (Pb) mg∙kg−1 D.M.115.3 ± 8.7
Manganese (Mn) mg∙kg−1 D.M.58.4 ± 4.0
Nickel (Ni)mg∙kg−1 D.M.29.2 ± 3.0

References

  1. Regulation of the Minister of Environment on Landfill Site Dated 30 April 2013. Journal of Laws of Poland, Dz.U. 2013 poz. 523. 2013. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20130000523 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  2. Waste Act Dated 14th December 2012. Journal of Laws of Poland, Dz.U. 2013 poz. 21. 2012. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=wdu20130000021 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  3. Act on Fertilizers and Fertilization Dated 10th July 2007. Journal of Laws of Poland, Dz.U. 2007 nr 147 poz. 1033. 2007. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20071471033 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  4. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 Laying Down Rules on the Making Available on the Market of EU Fertilising Products and Amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regula. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1009/oj (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  5. Liu, M.; Lv, J.; Qin, C.; Zhang, H.; Wu, L.; Guo, W.; Guo, C.; Xu, J. Chemical fingerprinting of organic micropollutants in different industrial treated wastewater effluents and their effluent-receiving river. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, J.; Qiu, Y.; Muhmood, A.; Zhang, L.; Wang, P.; Ren, L. Appraising co-composting efficiency of biodegradable plastic bags and food wastes: Assessment microplastics morphology, greenhouse gas emissions, and changes in microbial community. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 875, 162356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vaverková, M.D.; Adamcová, D.; Winkler, J.; Koda, E.; Petrželová, L.; Maxianová, A. Alternative method of composting on a reclaimed municipal waste landfill in accordance with the circular economy: Benefits and risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 137971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Srivastava, N.; Maurya, V.K.; Bee, Z.; Singh, N.; Khare, S.; Singh, S.; Agarwal, N.; Rai, P.K. Green Solutions for a blue planet: Harnessing bioremediation for sustainable development and circular economies. In Biotechnologies for Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery: Current Trends and Future Scope; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 283–296. ISBN 9780443273766. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pauliuk, S. Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001:2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Temmes, A.; Peck, P. Do forest biorefineries fit with working principles of a circular bioeconomy? A case of Finnish and Swedish initiatives. For. Policy Econ. 2020, 110, 101896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parilament. The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions, Closing the Loop-An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. 2015; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015DC0614 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  12. Kiskira, K.; Papirio, S.; Pechaud, Y.; Matassa, S.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Esposito, G. Evaluation of Fe(II)-driven autotrophic denitrification in packed-bed reactors at different nitrate loading rates. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 142, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bhat, S.A.; Bashir, O.; Ul Haq, S.A.; Amin, T.; Rafiq, A.; Ali, M.; Américo-Pinheiro, J.H.P.; Sher, F. Phytoremediation of heavy metals in soil and water: An eco-friendly, sustainable and multidisciplinary approach. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Polińska, W.; Kotowska, U.; Kiejza, D.; Karpińska, J. Insights into the use of phytoremediation processes for the removal of organic micropollutants from water and wastewater; A review. Water 2021, 13, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kataki, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Vairale, M.G.; Dwivedi, S.K.; Gupta, D.K. Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate). J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 283, 111986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Radziemska, M.; Bęś, A.; Gusiatin, Z.M.; Cerdà, A.; Jeznach, J.; Mazur, Z.; Brtnický, M. Assisted phytostabilization of soil from a former military area with mineral amendments. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 188, 109934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khan, A.H.A.; Kiyani, A.; Santiago-Herrera, M.; Ibáñez, J.; Yousaf, S.; Iqbal, M.; Martel-Martín, S.; Barros, R. Sustainability of phytoremediation: Post-harvest stratagems and economic opportunities for the produced metals contaminated biomass. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mustafa, H.M.; Hayder, G.; Mustapa, S.I. Circular Economy Framework for Energy Recovery in Phytoremediation of Domestic Wastewater. Energies 2022, 15, 3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Justin, M.Z.; Pajk, N.; Zupanc, V.; Zupančič, M. Phytoremediation of landfill leachate and compost wastewater by irrigation of Populus and Salix: Biomass and growth response. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wdowczyk, A.; Szymańska-Pulikowska, A. Micro-and Macroelements Content of Plants Used for Landfill Leachate Treatment Based on Phragmites australis and Ceratophyllum demersum. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhagwat, A.; Ojha, C.S.P.; Pant, A.; Kumar, R. Interaction among Heavy Metals in Landfill Leachate and Their Effect on the Phytoremediation Process of Indian Marigold. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 2023, 27, 04022039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bang, J.; Kamala-Kannan, S.; Lee, K.J.; Cho, M.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Bae, J.H.; Kim, K.H.; Myung, H.; Oh, B.T. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals in Contaminated Water and Soil Using Miscanthus sp. Goedae-Uksae 1. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2015, 17, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pidlisnyuk, V.; Mamirova, A.; Pranaw, K.; Stadnik, V.; Kuráň, P.; Trögl, J.; Shapoval, P. Miscanthus × giganteus Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Trace Elements as Influenced by the Presence of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Agronomy 2022, 12, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andrić, S.; Knežević, G.; Maletić, S.; Rončević, S.; Kragulj Isakovski, M.; Zeremski, T.; Beljin, J. An Experimental Assessment of Miscanthus x giganteus for Landfill Leachate Treatment: A Case Study of the Grebača Landfill in Obrenovac. Processes 2025, 13, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Regmi, T.; Ghimire, M.; Shrestha, S.M. Impact evaluation with potential ecological risk of dumping sites on soil in Baglung Municipality, Nepal. Environ. Challenges 2022, 8, 100564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Frirsche, U.; Brunori, G.; Chiaramonti, D.; Galanakis, C.; Matthews, R.; Panoutsou, C.; Avraamides, M.; Borzacchiello, M.; Sanchez Lopez, J. Future Transitions for the Bioeconomy Towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy-Publications Office of the EU; Avraamides, M., Borzachciello, M., Sanchez Lopez, J., Eds.; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2021; ISBN 978-92-76-28413-0. [Google Scholar]
  27. Grzegórska, A.; Czaplicka, N.; Antonkiewicz, J.; Rybarczyk, P.; Baran, A.; Dobrzyński, K.; Zabrocki, D.; Rogala, A. Remediation of soils on municipal rendering plant territories using Miscanthus × giganteus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 22305–22318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rizzo, S.; Le Pera, A.; Sellaro, M.; Lombardo, L.; Bruno, L. Separately Collected Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste Compost as a Sustainable Improver of Soil Characteristics in the Open Field and a Promising Selective Booster for Nursery Production. Agronomy 2025, 15, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; Greinert, A.; Hulisz, P.; Jaknowski, M.; Jonczak, J.; Łabaz, B.; et al. Polish Soil Classification; Publishing House of Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences: Wrocław, Poland, 2019; ISBN 978-83-7717-321-3. [Google Scholar]
  30. Soil Improver Certificate SK-9. Available online: https://zut.com.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/decyzja-G-1128_22.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  31. Regulation of the Minister for Agriculture and Rural Development of 18 June 2008 on the Implementation of Certain Provisions of the Act on Fertilisers and Fertilisation, Dz. U. 2008, 119, poz. 765. 2008. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20081190765 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  32. Regulation of the Minister of Agricultural and Rural Development Dated 21 December 2009 Amending Regulation Concerning the Implementation of Certain Provisions of the Act on Fertilizers and Fertilization, Dz. U. 2009, 224, poz. 1804. 2009. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20092241804 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  33. Announcement of the Minister of Infrastructure and Construction of 28 September 2016 on the announcement of the consolidated text of the regulation of the Minister of Construction on the manner of fulfilling the obligations of industrial wastewater, Dz. U. 2016, poz. 1757. 2016. Available online: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20160001757 (accessed on 2 September 2025).
  34. Pidlisnyuk, V.; Herts, A.; Khomenchuk, V.; Mamirova, A.; Kononchuk, O.; Ust’ak, S. Dynamic of morphological and physiological parameters and variation of soil characteristics during miscanthus × giganteus cultivation in the diesel-contaminated land. Agronomy 2021, 11, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ostrowska, A.; Gawliński, S.; Szczubiałka, Z. Methods of Analysis and Assessment of Soil and Plant Properties; A Catalogue; Institute of Environmental Protection–National Research Institute: Warsaw, Poland, 1991. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  36. PN-EN 12880:2004; Characterization of Sludges. Determination of Dry and Water Content. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2004.
  37. PN-ISO-10390-1997; Soil Quality-Determination Of pH. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1997.
  38. PN ISO 11261:2002; Soil Quality-Determination of Total Nitrogen-Modified Kjeldahl Method. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2002.
  39. Jones, J.B.; Case, V.W. Sampling, Handling, and Analyzing Plant Tissue Samples. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis; Westerman, R.L., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 1990; Volume 3, pp. 389–427. [Google Scholar]
  40. EN 13656:2020; Soil, Treated Biowaste, Sludge and Waste-Digestion with a Hydrochloric (HCl), Nitric (HNO3) and Tetrafluoroboric (HBF4) or Hydrofluoric (HF) Acid Mixture for Subsequent Determination of Elements. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/e747bff6-394f-44c3-806a-e8e1d39b5a83/en-13656-2020?srsltid=AfmBOorS6Uh8TE8XEnmyxIpqd6J6ruoG1xVJF6cCekTUY_0YUhg8KJzv (accessed on 6 August 2025).
  41. EN 16170:2016; Sludge, Treated Biowaste and Soil-Determination of Elements Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/c359e442-fd27-4e82-830e-318685e45172/en-16170-2016?srsltid=AfmBOootJPj4vT-nPT9-ZnQbu5XLVygRCnbnuwZhKcvzn9MAeXI6H31X (accessed on 6 August 2025).
  42. Szufa, S.; Piersa, P.; Adrian, Ł.; Sielski, J.; Grzesik, M.; Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Piotrowski, K.; Lewandowska, W. Acquisition of torrefied biomass from Jerusalem artichoke grown in a closed circular system using biogas plant waste. Molecules 2020, 25, 3862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Szufa, S.; Grzesik, M.; Piotrowski, K.; Janas, R. The promotive effect of cyanobacteria and chlorella sp. Foliar biofertilization on growth and metabolic activities of willow (salix viminalis L.) plants as feedstock production, solid biofuel and biochar as C carrier for fertilizers via torrefaction process. Energies 2021, 14, 5262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Piotrowski, K.; Szufa, S.; Sklodowska, M.; Naliwajski, M.; Emmanouil, C.; Kungolos, A.; Zorpas, A.A. Valorization of Spirodela polyrrhiza biomass for the production of biofuels for distributed energy. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 16533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Janas, R.; Grzesik, M.; van Duijn, B. Valorization of sorghum ash with digestate and biopreparations in the development biomass of plants in a closed production system of energy. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Grzesik, M.; Janas, R. Ash from Jerusalem artichoke and biopreparations enhance the growth and physiological activity of sorghum and limit environmental pollution by decreasing artificial fertilization needs. Int. Agrophys. 2020, 34, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Metsalu, T.; Vilo, J. ClustVis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W566–W570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Murphy, A.; Taiz, L. A New Vertical Mesh Transfer Technique for Metal-Tolerance Studies in Arabidopsis (Ecotypic Variation and Copper-Sensitive Mutants). Plant Physiol. 1995, 108, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. RStudio 2024. Integrated Development Environment for R. Available online: http://www.rstudio.com/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
  50. R 2024: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 21 July 2024).
  51. Antonkiewicz, J.; Gworek, B. Remediation of Contaminated Soils and Lands; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zadroga, B.; Oleńczuk-Neyman, K. Protection and Reclamation of the Subsoil; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej: Gdańsk, Poland, 2001; ISBN 8388007955. [Google Scholar]
  53. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02008L0098-20240218 (accessed on 6 August 2025).
  54. Krzyżak, J.; Rusinowski, S.; Sitko, K.; Szada-Borzyszkowska, A.; Stec, R.; Jensen, E.; Clifton-Brown, J.; Kiesel, A.; Lewin, E.; Janota, P.; et al. The Effect of Different Agrotechnical Treatments on the Establishment of Miscanthus Hybrids in Soil Contaminated with Trace Metals. Plants 2023, 12, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, Q.; Zhao, R.; Li, Q.; Ma, Y.; Chen, J.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, D.; An, S. Elemental composition and microbial community differences between wastewater treatment plant effluent and local natural surface water: A Zhengzhou city study. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Audet, P.; Charest, C. Heavy metal phytoremediation from a meta-analytical perspective. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Estrella-González, M.J.; López-González, J.A.; Suárez-Estrella, F.; López, M.J.; Jurado, M.M.; Siles-Castellano, A.B.; Moreno, J. Evaluating the influence of raw materials on the behavior of nitrogen fractions in composting processes on an industrial scale. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dubis, B.; Jankowski, K.J.; Załuski, D.; Sokólski, M. The effect of sewage sludge fertilization on the biomass yield of giant miscanthus and the energy balance of the production process. Energy 2020, 206, 118189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. von Gehren, P.; Gansberger, M.; Pichler, W.; Weigl, M.; Feldmeier, S.; Wopienka, E.; Bochmann, G. A practical field trial to assess the potential of Sida hermaphrodita as a versatile, perennial bioenergy crop for Central Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 122, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Seleiman, M.F.; Santanen, A.; Jaakkola, S.; Ekholm, P.; Hartikainen, H.; Stoddard, F.L.; Mäkelä, P.S.A. Biomass yield and quality of bioenergy crops grown with synthetic and organic fertilizers. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 59, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Islam, M.J.; Granollers Mesa, M.; Osatiashtiani, A.; Taylor, M.J.; Manayil, J.C.; Parlett, C.M.A.; Isaacs, M.A.; Kyriakou, G. The effect of metal precursor on copper phase dispersion and nanoparticle formation for the catalytic transformations of furfural. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 273, 119062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khalil, J.; Jaafar, A.A.K.; Habib, H.; Bouguerra, S.; Nogueira, V.; Rodríguez-Seijo, A. The impact of olive mill wastewater on soil properties, nutrient and heavy metal availability–A study case from Syrian vertisols. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 351, 119861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zayed, A.; Gowthaman, S.; Terry, N. Phytoaccumulation of Trace Elements by Wetland Plants: I. Duckweed. J. Environ. Qual. 1998, 27, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Popek, R.; Mahawar, L.; Shekhawat, G.S.; Przybysz, A. Phyto-cleaning of particulate matter from polluted air by woody plant species in the near-desert city of Jodhpur (India) and the role of heme oxygenase in their response to PM stress conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 70228–70241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kołodziej, B.; Antonkiewicz, J.; Bielińska, E.J.; Witkowicz, R.; Dubis, B. Recovery of microelements from municipal sewage sludge by reed canary grass and giant miscanthus. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2023, 25, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, N.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Weeda, S.; Ren, S.; Guo, Y.D. Roles of melatonin in abiotic stress resistance in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Murchie, E.H.; Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: A guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3983–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kao, W.Y.; Tsai, T.T.; Chen, W.H. The responses of photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence to changes of irradiance and temperature in two species of Miscanthus. Photosynthetica 1997, 34, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tomaškin, J.; Tomaškinová, J.; Theuma, H. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a criterion for the diagnosis of abiotic environmental stress of miscanthus x giganteus hybrid. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 30, 3269–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Głowacka, K.; Jezowski, S.; Kaczmarek, Z. Gas exchange and yield in Miscanthus species for three years at two locations in Poland. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 93, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. The gas exchange parameters of greenhouse cultivated Miscanthus x giganteus grown in objects 1–5: Pn, net photosynthesis (a); Tr, transpiration (b); St, stomatal transpiration (c), and ICC, intercellular CO2 concentration (d). The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation of the measurements.
Figure 2. The gas exchange parameters of greenhouse cultivated Miscanthus x giganteus grown in objects 1–5: Pn, net photosynthesis (a); Tr, transpiration (b); St, stomatal transpiration (c), and ICC, intercellular CO2 concentration (d). The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation of the measurements.
Sustainability 17 10865 g002
Figure 3. (a) The ClustVis-generated heat map and (b) the radar chart for comparison of the physiological effects of different experimental conditions for objects 1–5: CI—chlorophyll index, CF—chlorophyll fluorescence, Pn—net photosynthesis, Tr—transpiration, St—stomatal conductance, ICC—intercellular CO2 concentration.
Figure 3. (a) The ClustVis-generated heat map and (b) the radar chart for comparison of the physiological effects of different experimental conditions for objects 1–5: CI—chlorophyll index, CF—chlorophyll fluorescence, Pn—net photosynthesis, Tr—transpiration, St—stomatal conductance, ICC—intercellular CO2 concentration.
Sustainability 17 10865 g003
Figure 4. Results of principal component analysis: correlation plot (a), scree plot (b), variables (c), and PCA graph (d); circles—object 1; rectangles—object 2; triangles—object 3; rhombus—object 4; inverted triangles—object 5.
Figure 4. Results of principal component analysis: correlation plot (a), scree plot (b), variables (c), and PCA graph (d); circles—object 1; rectangles—object 2; triangles—object 3; rhombus—object 4; inverted triangles—object 5.
Sustainability 17 10865 g004
Table 1. Scheme of the experiments.
Table 1. Scheme of the experiments.
Object
No.
Substrate *Dose of Water/Wastewater,
mL∙pot−1∙Week−1
pHH2O (Substrate)
1Control: Sa500 H2O7.8 ± 0.2
2Sa: SK-9 (1/1 v/v)500 H2O7.5 ± 0.2
3Sa: SK-9 (1/1 v/v)1 May—15: 500 H2O
16 May—30 September: 50 W + 450 H2O
8.2 ± 0.2
4Sa: SK-9 (1/1 v/v)1 May—15: 500 H2O
16 May—30 September: 100 W + 400 H2O
7.7 ± 0.2
5Sa: SK-9 (1/1 v/v)1 May—15: 500 H2O
16 May—30 September: 200 W + 300 H2O
7.7 ± 0.2
* Sa—Sand; SK-9—Soil improver; W—wastewaters.
Table 2. Biomass yield (BY), tolerance index (TI) and heat of combustion (HC) for giant miscanthus.
Table 2. Biomass yield (BY), tolerance index (TI) and heat of combustion (HC) for giant miscanthus.
Object No.Dose of Industrial Sewage, mL∙pot−1Biomass Yield
g∙pot−1 D.M.
Tolerance IndexHeat of Combustion MJ∙kg−1 D.M. *
10249 ± 7 **-14.5 ± 0.4
20276 ± 111.115.4 ± 0.2 S
350358 ± 11 S1.415.6 ± 0.2 S
4100419 ± 12 S1.716.3 ± 0.2 S
5200594 ± 13 S2.417.0 ± 0.3 S
CV % ***3632.71.0
LSD α ≤ 0.01 ****29-0.2
* D.M.—Dry Matter; ** SD—Standard deviation; *** CV—Variability Coefficient; **** LSD—Least Significant Differences; S—Significant.
Table 3. Content of elements in substrates and miscanthus (mg∙kg−1 D.M.) and bioconcentration factor (BCF).
Table 3. Content of elements in substrates and miscanthus (mg∙kg−1 D.M.) and bioconcentration factor (BCF).
Object
No. *
Dose of Industrial Sewage, mL∙pot−1AlFe
SubstratePlant BCFSubstratePlantBCF
102268 ± 3724 ± 10.012835 ± 212399 ± 220.14
202936 ± 106 S32 ± 50.013879 ± 211 S478 ± 31 S0.12
3503062 ± 102 S44 ± 40.014078 ± 216 S529 ± 31 S0.13
41003087 ± 46 S72 ± 10 S0.024734 ± 213 S551 ± 31 S0.12
52003134 ± 94 S86 ± 10 S0.035118 ± 278 S725 ± 33 S0.14
LSD α ≤ 0.0121318-58978-
MnCo
1081.0 ± 0.822.9 ± 0.00.280.08 ± 0.010.07 ± 0.010.88
2088.8 ± 0.9 S27.8 ± 0.2 S0.312.18 ± 0.11 S0.18 ± 0.01 S0.08
35089.2 ± 0.5 S29.1 ± 0.3 S0.332.21 ± 0.07 S0.18 ± 0.01 S0.08
410091.1 ± 1.4 S32.8 ± 0.1 S0.362.21 ± 0.04 S0.18 ± 0.02 S0.08
5200103.1 ± 0.8 S35.5 ± 0.1 S0.342.22 ± 0.03 S0.19 ± 0.02 S0.08
LSD α ≤ 0.012.40.4 0.160.03
NiZn
103.9 ± 0.62.3 ± 0.30.6078 ± 127.0 ± 0.30.34
2012.0 ± 0.5 S4.8 ± 0.3 S0.40111 ± 5 S30.7 ± 0.2 S0.28
35012.2 ± 0.1 S5.2 ± 0.2 S0.43116 ± 3 S32.6 ± 0.5 S0.28
410013.0 ± 0.5 S6.1 ± 0.4 S0.47120 ± 6 S36.7 ± 0.3 S0.31
520013.4 ± 0.4 S6.5 ± 0.3 S0.49121 ± 3 S41.3 ± 0.4 S0.34
LSD α ≤ 0.011.10.8 101
CdPb
100.01 ± 0.0000.01 ± 0.010.674.8 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.00.06
200.75 ± 0.09 S0.06 ± 0.02 S0.0832.9 ± 2.5 S1.4 ± 0.0 S0.04
3500.75 ± 0.03 S0.07 ± 0.01 S0.0933.2 ± 0.6 S1.4 ± 0.0 S0.04
41000.77 ± 0.01 S0.07 ± 0.01 S0.1033.4 ± 0.1 S1.4 ± 0.1 S0.04
52000.79 ± 0.02 S0.08 ± 0.01 S0.1033.7 ± 0.5 S1.5 ± 0.1 S0.04
LSD α ≤ 0.010.110.03 3.00.1
CrCu
107.0 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.20.239.6 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.40.26
2021.7 ± 0.1 S3.6 ± 0.2 S0.1630.4 ± 0.9 S6.6 ± 0.5 S0.22
35021.9 ± 0.1 S3.7 ± 0.1 S0.1730.7 ± 0.6 S6.9 ± 0.2 S0.23
410022.1 ± 0.8 S4.2 ± 0.9 S0.1930.9 ± 0.5 S7.6 ± 0.2 S0.25
520022.5 ± 0.9 S4.3 ± 0.7 S0.1931.0 ± 0.3 S7.8 ± 0.3 S0.25
LSD α ≤ 0.011.41.4 1.60.9
* See Table 1; S—Significant.
Table 4. Metal uptake by Miscanthus (mg∙pot−1).
Table 4. Metal uptake by Miscanthus (mg∙pot−1).
Object No.*Dose of Industrial Sewage, mL∙pot−1AlFeMnCoNi
106.1 ± 0.199.3 ± 8.15.7 ± 0.20.017 ± 0.0020.58 ± 0.08
207.1 ± 0.9105.2 ± 7.66.1 ± 0.20.040 ± 0.003 S1.06 ± 0.09 S
35015.6 ± 0.8 S189.7 ± 16.3 S10.4 ± 0.4 S0.064 ± 0.003 S1.87 ± 0.06 S
410030.2 ± 3.5 S231.4 ± 19.7 S13.7 ± 0.5 S0.074 ± 0.008 S2.55 ± 0.25 S
520051.2 ± 5.2 S431.0 ± 29.4 S21.1 ± 0.5 S0.111 ± 0.007 S3.88 ± 0.12 S
LSD α ≤ 0.017.346.81.00.0130.36
ZnCdPbCrCu
106.7 ± 0.30.002 ± 0.0010.07 ± 0.010.40 ± 0.060.63 ± 0.10
206.8 ± 0.20.014 ± 0.003 S0.30 ± 0.01 S0.78 ± 0.081.46 ± 0.07 S
35011.7 ± 0.3 S0.025 ± 0.004 S0.49 ± 0.01 S1.34 ± 0.03 S2.49 ± 0.02 S
410015.4 ± 0.4 S0.031 ± 0.002 S0.58 ± 0.04 S1.75 ± 0.41 S3.18 ± 0.10 S
520024.5 ± 0.8 S0.048 ± 0.007 S0.88 ± 0.07 S2.53 ± 0.42 S4.62 ± 0.07 S
LSD α ≤ 0.011.20.010.090.690.20
* See Table 1; S—Significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rybarczyk, P.; Antonkiewicz, J.; Romanowska-Duda, Z.; Mec, S.; Rogala, A. Circular Perspective for Utilization of Industrial Wastewaters via Phytoremediation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 10865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310865

AMA Style

Rybarczyk P, Antonkiewicz J, Romanowska-Duda Z, Mec S, Rogala A. Circular Perspective for Utilization of Industrial Wastewaters via Phytoremediation. Sustainability. 2025; 17(23):10865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rybarczyk, Piotr, Jacek Antonkiewicz, Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda, Stanisław Mec, and Andrzej Rogala. 2025. "Circular Perspective for Utilization of Industrial Wastewaters via Phytoremediation" Sustainability 17, no. 23: 10865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310865

APA Style

Rybarczyk, P., Antonkiewicz, J., Romanowska-Duda, Z., Mec, S., & Rogala, A. (2025). Circular Perspective for Utilization of Industrial Wastewaters via Phytoremediation. Sustainability, 17(23), 10865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310865

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop