Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The comments and suggestion for authors are included in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The quality of the english language is good

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

see attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed all the comments made in the previous review and the article has improved considerably.

However, some minor comments remain:

In the caption to Figure 2, there is an error in the application of the brush (b) and spray (c) coating.

There should be an error on page 10 line 414 where the authors say "The images, provide a visual comparison 414 between the uncoated sample (Figure 6a), the coated sample (Figure 6b), and the coated samples 415 after accelerated aging (Figure 6c)" talking about the contact angle measurements, but in this figure, the coated samples are shown during accelerated aging. 

Can the white material in figure 8 after STT be attributed to the salts formed during ageing or to the coating? A comment on the effect of the coating application procedure on the formation of salts would be interesting.

Author Response

Reply to reviewer

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. Please find the responses below and the corresponding revisions/corrections highlighted/in track changes in the re-submitted files.

The authors have addressed all the comments made in the previous review and the article has improved considerably.

However, some minor comments remain:

In the caption to Figure 2, there is an error in the application of the brush (b) and spray (c) coating.

The caption of the figure was revised

There should be an error on page 10 line 414 where the authors say "The images, provide a visual comparison 414 between the uncoated sample (Figure 6a), the coated sample (Figure 6b), and the coated samples 415 after accelerated aging (Figure 6c)" talking about the contact angle measurements, but in this figure, the coated samples are shown during accelerated aging.

Thank you for the suggestion the text was revised.

Can the white material in figure 8 after STT be attributed to the salts formed during ageing or to the coating? A comment on the effect of the coating application procedure on the formation of salts would be interesting.

Thank you for the useful comments and suggestion, the text was revised.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf