Review Reports
- Jose Cuesta1,*,
- Liang Cai2 and
- Lucia Madrigal3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Chinh Luu Reviewer 2: Liang Wang Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please find the comments in the attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please find response in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The research methods in section 2 should be clearly stated for describing the entire research process.
2. The conclusion should be revised for revealing the academic contributions of this study.
3. The research gaps of the previous study should be fully analyzed in section 1 introduction.
4. English language should be checked.
Author Response
Please find response in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Some sentences in the text are very long. This makes the reader lose the thread of the reading at certain moments.
I recommend shorter and more concise sentences. Affirm and justify, in this order.
Author Response
Please find response in the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
All my concerns have been addressed.
Author Response
Thank you very much for your comment.