Next Article in Journal
Perceptions of Urban Community Resilience: Beyond Disaster Recovery in the Face of Climate Change
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Distributed Energy Storage Planning-Scheduling Strategy of Regional Power Grid Considering Demand Response
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Hype to Reality: Unveiling the Promises, Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain in Supply Chain Systems
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Smart Farming Revolution: Farmer’s Perception and Adoption of Smart IoT Technologies for Crop Health Monitoring and Yield Prediction in Jizan, Saudi Arabia

Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14541; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914541
by Abdoh Jabbari 1,*, Abdulmalik Humayed 1, Faheem Ahmad Reegu 1, Mueen Uddin 2, Yonis Gulzar 3,* and Muneer Majid 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2023, 15(19), 14541; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914541
Submission received: 22 July 2023 / Revised: 1 September 2023 / Accepted: 22 September 2023 / Published: 7 October 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall, the work is systematic and it is highly needed for the smart farming. 

The graph needs caption and it needs to be redrawn with some graphic tool for maintaining high quality.

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Response file is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Sir/Madam

I study article about Smart Farming Revolution: Farmer’s Perception and Adoption of Smart IoT Technologies for Crop Health Monitoring and Yield Prediction in Jizan, Saudi Arabia. The article is well organized but its overall form is more like a thesis. In my opinion, the content should be summarized in all sections. Objectives and hypotheses should be written in short sentences. The final conclusion is also very long.

Author Response

Response file is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is original and will make contributions to the literature. However, making the following revisions can make the manuscript better.

 

1.       Jizan's location in Saudi Arabia can be shown on a map.

2.       Are there agricultural policies in Saudi Arabia that support the use of these technologies? If so, they should be explained.

3.       What does the espressivon "LAIT" mean?

4.       For clarity, the abbreviations used in the study can be added as a table. Or it can be added to the relevant places where the objectives of the study are written (objective 1, objective 2, objective 3)

5.       The methods used to analyze the data should be written more clearly.

6.       Have the prerequisites for conducting ANOVA been tested (such as the condition of normal distribution of data and homogeneity test)? If these tests have been done, they should be added to the manuscript, if not, they should be done.

7.       Writing the results as "results of the first hypothesis", "results of the second hypothesis" and "results of the third hypothesis" can facilitate follow-up.

8.       In terms of farmers' adoption of innovations, referring to the following studies can contribute to the manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00767-1

 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08534-w

A native speaker may read the manuscript.

Author Response

Response file is attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop