Next Article in Journal
An Air Heat Tracing System of Firefighting Pipeline in Cold Region Highway Tunnel
Next Article in Special Issue
Co-Application of Inorganic Fertilizers with Charcoal and Sago Bark Ash to Improve Soil Nitrogen Availability, Uptake, Use Efficiency, and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum Cultivated on Acid Soils
Previous Article in Journal
Information Sharing Game and Value Analysis for the Following Enterprise Applications of Blockchain Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Influencing Earthworm Fauna in Parks in Megacity Beijing, China: An Application of a Synthetic and Simple Index (ESI)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Double-Rice Yield and Bacterial Community in Paddy Soil

Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 16061; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316061
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 30 November 2022 / Published: 1 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Health Restoration and Environmental Management)

Abstract

Fertilizer regimes have profound effects on crop yield, soil fertility, and microbial community structure. However, the impacts of partially substituting mineral nitrogen (N) with organic N and/or controlled-release mineral N and combining with micronutrient fertilizers on soil properties and microbial communities are still unclear in double-rice systems. The objective of this study was to compare rice yield, soil nutrient condition, and bacterial alpha and beta diversity in paddy soil that had been subjected to four fertilizer treatments from 2012 to 2016. The treatments were FP: farmers’ practice with 100% urea N; T1: 64% urea N + 16% manure N; T2: T1 + micronutrient fertilizers; and T3: 40% urea N + 24% controlled-release N + 16% manure N + micronutrient fertilizers. The results showed that there were no considerable differences between rice yields under fertilizer treatments, meaning that reducing farmers’ practice N by 20% did not decrease rice yield. Soil organic matter, total N, pH, and microbial biomass receiving manure did not increase significantly compared with FP. Bacterial beta diversities did not alter under the four treatments. Only two (Verrucomicrobia and Aminicenantes) out of eleven dominant phyla considerably varied under manure treatments. These results indicate that 20% reduction and partial substitution of mineral fertilizer with manure can maintain double-rice yield in paddy soil with limited effects on soil properties and bacterial community structure.
Keywords: mineral fertilizer; manure; silicon fertilizer; controlled-release urea; straw return; soil microbiome; zinc fertilizer mineral fertilizer; manure; silicon fertilizer; controlled-release urea; straw return; soil microbiome; zinc fertilizer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Guo, K.; Zhang, J. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Double-Rice Yield and Bacterial Community in Paddy Soil. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316061

AMA Style

Li G, Zhang X, Zhang H, Guo K, Zhang J. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Double-Rice Yield and Bacterial Community in Paddy Soil. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Guihua, Xueling Zhang, He Zhang, Kangli Guo, and Jianfeng Zhang. 2022. "Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Double-Rice Yield and Bacterial Community in Paddy Soil" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316061

APA Style

Li, G., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Guo, K., & Zhang, J. (2022). Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Double-Rice Yield and Bacterial Community in Paddy Soil. Sustainability, 14(23), 16061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop