Next Article in Journal
Learning from Italian Typology- and Morphology-Led Planning Techniques: A Planning Framework for Yingping, Xiamen
Next Article in Special Issue
Identifying Shared Strategies and Solutions to the Human–Giant Tortoise Interactions in Santa Cruz, Galapagos: A Nominal Group Technique Application
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial–Temporal Analysis of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: An Analytical Framework in Terms of Economic Transition and Spatiality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Arguments Used in the Creation of Protected Areas of Sustainable Use in Brazil: A Case Study from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado
Open AccessConcept Paper

Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains

1
Department of Life Cycle Engineering, University of Stuttgart, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany
2
Department of Life Cycle Engineering, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 70563 Stuttgart, Germany
3
Department of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Bochum University of Applied Sciences, 44801 Bochum, Germany
4
Max-Weber-Kolleg, University of Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071841
Received: 20 February 2019 / Revised: 14 March 2019 / Accepted: 19 March 2019 / Published: 27 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability, Biodiversity, and Conservation)
Land use and land use change are among the main drivers of the ongoing loss of biodiversity at a global-scale. Although there are already Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods to measure this impact, they are still rarely used by companies and municipalities in the life cycle assessment of products and processes. Therefore, this paper highlights four main requirements for a biodiversity methodological framework within LCIA in order to facilitate biodiversity assessments: first, to consider the global uneven distribution of biodiversity and its risks with respect to vulnerability and irreplaceability; second, to account for the need to regionalize the impacts of land use; third, to consider the specific impacts that different land use types have on biodiversity; and fourth, to analyze the biodiversity impacts of different land use management parameters and their influence on the intensity of land use. To this end, we provided a review of existing methods in respect to conformity and research gaps. The present publication describes the development of a new methodological framework that builds on these requirements in a three-level hierarchical framework, which enables the assessment of biodiversity in LCA at a global-scale. This publication reveals research gaps regarding the inclusion of proactive and reactive conservation concepts as well as methods of land management into LCIA methodology. The main objective of this concept paper is therefore to describe a new methodological framework for the assessment of biodiversity in the LCA that could fill some of the research gaps, including compilation and suggestion of suitable data sets. The conclusion discusses both the benefits and limitations of this framework. View Full-Text
Keywords: biodiversity; LCA; LCIA; methodology; regionalization; land use; transformation; occupation; land management parameter; vulnerability; irreplaceability; proactive; reactive biodiversity; LCA; LCIA; methodology; regionalization; land use; transformation; occupation; land management parameter; vulnerability; irreplaceability; proactive; reactive
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Maier, S.D.; Lindner, J.P.; Francisco, J. Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1841.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop