Next Article in Journal
Is There Any Difference in the Effect of Different R and D Sources on Carbon Intensity in China?
Next Article in Special Issue
Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains
Previous Article in Journal
Efficiency and Multifractality Analysis of the Chinese Stock Market: Evidence from Stock Indices before and after the 2015 Stock Market Crash
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating On-Farm Biodiversity: A Comparison of Assessment Methods
Open AccessArticle

Effectiveness of Arguments Used in the Creation of Protected Areas of Sustainable Use in Brazil: A Case Study from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado

1
Department of Rural Economy, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
2
Department of Geography, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa MG 36570-900, Brazil
3
Independent Researcher, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(6), 1700; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061700
Received: 11 February 2019 / Revised: 3 March 2019 / Accepted: 13 March 2019 / Published: 21 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability, Biodiversity, and Conservation)
Studies on the effectiveness of the discourse motivating the creation of protected areas (PAs) and their empirical reality are scarce. The lack of knowledge in this area affects programs and policies on the maintenance and creation of protected areas. Thus, we investigated this matter using the case study of the Nascente Geraizeiras Sustainable Development Reserve (NGSDR) in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. The reserve comprises a transition area between Cerrado and the Atlantic Forest, two critical biomes in the world of biodiversity and the only two hotspots in Brazil. Changes in land use were identified over a period of 30 years, from 1987 to 2017, based on a compilation of the arguments associated with the creation of the PA, geographic information system (GIS) techniques, remote sensing (RS) data, and landscape ecology indices. Seven types of land use were identified using Random Forest classifier R software: native forest, silviculture, pasture, bare soil, rocky outcrop, watercourses, and agriculture. The overall mean accuracy of the classification was 90% for all five periods. The results demonstrated that the creation of protected areas is supported by contexts of land use still based on traditional. The case study showed the discourse served as a fundamental strategy in the beginning of the mobilization that culminated in the creation of the NGSDR, in the containment of forestry, in an increase in native forest areas, and in reduced fragmentation, leading to an improvement in the conservation status of the landscape. The present study encourages future researchers to apply the evaluated approach and demonstrates its potential in assessing the formulation of programs and policies on protected areas worldwide, providing valid indicators for the improvement of ecosystem services. View Full-Text
Keywords: hotspots; reserve of sustainable use; socioenvironmental discourse; sustainable use; sustainable development hotspots; reserve of sustainable use; socioenvironmental discourse; sustainable use; sustainable development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Roque, M.P.B.; Ferreira Neto, J.A.; Faria, A.L.L.; Ferreira, F.M.; Teixeira, T.H.; Coelho, L.L. Effectiveness of Arguments Used in the Creation of Protected Areas of Sustainable Use in Brazil: A Case Study from the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1700.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop