Selection of Restoration Materials Based on Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Endangered Subalpine Conifer Taxus cuspidata, South Korea
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site and Plant Materials
2.2. DNA Extraction and Microsatellite Amplification
2.3. Genetic Diversity and Population Differentiation
2.4. Population Genetic Structure and Clustering Analyses
2.5. Isolation by Distance and Demographic History
2.6. Genetic Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Genetic Diversity and Population Genetic Differentiation
3.2. Population Genetic Structure and Clustering
4. Discussion
4.1. Genetic Diversity
4.2. Genetic Structure and Phylogeography
4.3. Conservation and Restoration Strategies
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Meteorological Organization (WMO). State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368; WMO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025; Available online: https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-global-climate-2024 (accessed on 16 February 2026).
- Sala, O.E.; Chapin, F.S., III; Armesto, J.J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parisod, C. Plant speciation in the face of recurrent climate changes in the Alps. Alp. Bot. 2022, 132, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stefani, S.; Champoud, L.; Fazan, L.; Ronikier, M.; Perret, M.; Kozlowski, G.; Christe, C. Genetic divergence of Clematis alpina in the Swiss Prealps: A tale of the margins. Alp. Bot. 2025, 135, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guisan, A.; Theurillat, J.P. Assessing alpine plant vulnerability to climate change: A modeling perspective. Integr. Assess. 2000, 1, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grabherr, G.; Gottfried, M.; Pauli, H. Climate change impacts in alpine environments. Geogr. Compass 2010, 4, 1133–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inouye, D.W. Effects of climate change on alpine plants and their pollinators. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1469, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekar, K.C.; Thapliyal, N.; Bhojak, P.; Bisht, K.; Pandey, A.; Mehta, P.; Negi, V.S.; Rawat, R.S. Early signals of climate change impacts on alpine plant diversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 2025, 34, 207–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilpin, M.E.; Soulé, M.E. Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. In Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, 1st ed.; Soulé, M.E., Ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 19–34. [Google Scholar]
- van Noordwijk, A.J. The interaction of inbreeding depression and environmental stochasticity in the risk of extinction of small populations. Conservation Genetics. EXS 1994, 68, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frankham, R. Genetics and extinction. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 126, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M.Y.; López-Pujol, J.; Chung, M.G. The role of the Baekdudaegan (Korean Peninsula) as a major glacial refugium for plant species: A priority for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 206, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naydenov, K.D.; Naydenov, M.K.; Alexandrov, A.; Vasilevski, K.; Hinkov, G.; Matevski, V.; Nikolic, B.; Goudiaby, V.; Riegert, D.; Paitaridou, D.; et al. Ancient genetic bottleneck and Plio-Pleistocene climatic changes imprinted the phylobiogeography of European Black Pine populations. Eur. J. For. Res. 2017, 136, 767–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, W.S.; Watts, D. The Plant Geography of Korea, 1st ed.; Geobotany; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993; Volume 19, pp. 1–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, W.S. Species composition and distribution of Korean alpine plants. J. Korean Geogr. Soc. 2002, 37, 357–370. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Korea National Arboretum. Rare Plants Data Book in Korea; GEOBOOK: Pocheon, Republic of Korea, 2009; pp. 1–296. Available online: https://kna.forest.go.kr/kfsweb/kfi/kfs/kna/application/publication/detailForm.do;jsessionid=BDMcwlO5INaSXRNFeuwgRniSpQFXZLC7HBaAQ3YJTZCw5QejloZa9MPnah41Y49L.frswas02_servlet_engine5;jsessionid=BDMcwlO5INaSXRNFeuwgRniSpQFXZLC7HBaAQ3YJTZCw5QejloZa9MPnah41Y49L.frswas02_servlet_engine5?seq=38362&mainCd=210103&searchCnd=varchar_570101&searchWrd=&mn=UKNA_04_10&orgId=&pageIndex=28&pageUnit=10 (accessed on 16 February 2026).
- National Institute of Biological Resources. Red Data Book of Endangered Vascular Plants in Korea, 5th ed.; Nature & Ecology: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2012; pp. 1–392. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E.S.; Lee, J.S.; Park, G.E.; Lim, J.H. Change of subalpine coniferous forest area over the last 20 years. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 2019, 108, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, G.E.; Kim, E.S.; Jung, S.C.; Yun, C.W.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, J.D.; Kim, J.; Lim, J.H. Distribution and stand dynamics of subalpine conifer species (Abies nephrolepis, A. koreana, and Picea jezoensis) in Baekdudaegan protected area. J. Korean Soc. For. Sci. 2022, 111, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.H.; Yoon, S.S.; Lee, J.S.; Seo, C.W. Assessing climate change impacts on subalpine plant habitat suitability in South Korea using SSP scenarios. GEO Data 2024, 6, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, E.S.; Kim, S.H.; Chun, J.H.; Woo, C.S.; Park, G.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Lim, J.H. Guideline for Investigation on Vulnerable Conifer Species in Subalpine Zone in Korea; National Institute of Forest Science: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2017; pp. 1–76. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Lim, J.H.; Kim, E.S.; Park, G.E.; Kim, Y.S.; Jang, G.C.; Han, J.; Jung, S.C.; Lee, B.; Song, W.K.; Cho, N.H.; et al. Current Status and Conservation Strategy of Vulnerable Conifer Species in Subalpine Zone in Korea; National Institute of Forest Science: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2019; pp. 1–194. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Chae, S.B.; Lim, H.I.; Kim, Y.Y. Selection of restoration material for Abies koreana based on its genetic diversity on Mt. Hallasan. Forests 2021, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, H.N.; Park, J.H.; Lim, H.I. Selection of Abies nephrolepis Materials for Restoration of Genetic Diversity in Mt. Gariwangsan Degraded Area. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, H.N.; Lim, H.I. Material selection for restoration of genetic diversity of Abies koreana on Mt. Jirisan in South Korea. For. Sci. Technol. 2024, 20, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, W.S. Species composition and distribution of native Korean conifers. J. Korean Geogr. Soc. 2004, 39, 528–543. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Korea National Arboretum. Silvics of Korea; Korea National Arboretum: Pocheon, Republic of Korea, 2019; Volume 3, pp. 1–335. [Google Scholar]
- Jeon, J.W.; Cho, B.G.; Moon, W.J.; Kim, D.I.; Chung, H.G.; Byun, S.Y. Taxol production in Taxus spp. cell culture: Semisynthesis of Taxol from baccatin III in cell cultures of Taxus baccata pendula. KSBB J. 1996, 11, 263–269. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- IUCN. Taxus cuspidata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed on 16 January 2026).
- Katsuki, T.; Luscombe, D. Taxus cuspidata. IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2013, e.T42549A2987373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korea National Arboretum. National Red List of Vascular Plants in Korea; Korea National Arboretum: Pocheon, Republic of Korea, 2021. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Kong, W.S. Selection of vulnerable indicator plants by global warming. J. Korean Meteorol. Soc. 2005, 41, 263–273. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- Chun, Y.M.; Hong, M.P.; Lee, N.Y.; Seo, E.K.; Lee, S.H. Structure and dynamics of Taxus cuspidata populations. Korean J. Plant Resour. 2012, 25, 123–131. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byun, J.G.; Jang, J.W.; Yang, J.C.; Lee, Y.M.; Jung, S.Y.; Ji, S.J.; Jang, J.; Lee, H.J.; Hwang, H.S.; Oh, S.H. The flora of vascular plants in Mt. Gariwang protected area for forest genetic resource conservation, South Korea. Korean J. Plant Resour. 2013, 26, 566–588. (In Korean) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, D.U.; Chon, J. System thinking in the resilience of the ecosystem and ecotourism of Mt. Gariwang based on the controversy around the venue construction for Pyeongchang 2018 Olympic. Korean Syst. Dyn. Rev 2014, 15, 61–79. (In Korean) [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Global Plan of Action for the Conservation, Sustainable Use and Development of Forest Genetic Resources, 2nd ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2025; pp. 1–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, M.G.; Oh, G.S.; Chung, J.M. Allozyme variation in Korean populations of Taxus cuspidata (Taxaceae). Scand. J. For. Res. 1999, 14, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakai, T. Indigenous species of conifers and taxads of Korea and Manchuria and their distribution. J. Korean For. Soc. 1938, 158, 39. [Google Scholar]
- So, S.; Hwang, Y.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, M.Y. Taxonomic position of Taxus cuspidata var. latifolia endemic to Ulleung Island. Korean J. Plant Taxon. 2013, 43, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Chen, G.; Su, Y.; Wang, Z. Microsatellite loci from Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae), an endangered and economically important tree species in China. Front. Biol. China 2009, 4, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoodi, P.; Khayam Nekouei, S.M.K.; Mardi, M.; Pirseyedi, S.M.; Ghaffari, M.R.; Ramroodi, M.; Siahsar, B.A. Isolation and characterization of new microsatellite marker in Taxus baccata L. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2010, 2, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Gao, L.M.; Li, D.Z.; Zhang, D.Q.; Möller, M. Cross-species amplification and development of new microsatellite loci for Taxus wallichiana (Taxaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2011, 98, e70–e73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Y.; Uchiyama, K.; Xu, G.; Ueno, S.; Han, W.; Xie, W.; Tsumura, Y. Cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci for the endangered conifer, Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae). Silvae Genet. 2012, 61, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, H.; Lu, C.H.; Wu, X.B. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Chinese yew Taxus chinensis var. mairei (Taxaceae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 1296–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gajurel, J.P.; Cornejo, C.; Werth, S.; Shrestha, K.K.; Scheidegger, C. Development and characterization of microsatellite loci in the endangered species Taxus wallichiana (Taxaceae). Appl. Plant Sci. 2013, 1, apps.1200281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, B.B.; Zheng, Y.Q.; Sun, Q.W. Genetic diversity and population structure of Taxus cuspidata in the Changbai Mountains assessed by chloroplast DNA sequences and microsatellite markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 63, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.; Yang, G.; Provan, J.; Liu, J.; Gao, L. Using MiddRAD-seq data to develop polymorphic microsatellite markers for an endangered yew species. Plant Divers. 2017, 39, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Oosterhout, C.; Hutchinson, W.F.; Wills, D.P.M.; Shipley, P.F. MICRO—CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, T.C.; Slate, J.; Kruuk, L.E.; Pemberton, J.M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7, 639–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peakall, R.; Smouse, P.E. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 2537–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goudet, J. FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities Andfixation Indices (Version 2.9.4). Electronic File. 2001. Available online: https://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm (accessed on 16 February 2026).
- Hedrick, P.W. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 2005, 59, 1633–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takezaki, N.; Nei, M.; Tamura, K. POPTREE2: Software for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing other population statistics with Windows interface. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.L.; Liu, J.X. Structureselector: A web-based software to select and visualize the optimal number of clusters using multiple methods. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2018, 18, 176–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piry, S.; Luikart, G.; Cornuet, J.M. Computer note. BOTTLENECK: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data. J. Hered. 1999, 90, 502–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smouse, P.E.; Peakall, R.O.D. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 1999, 82, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moriguchi, Y.; Kang, K.S.; Lee, K.Y.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, Y.Y. Genetic variation of Picea jezoensis populations in South Korea revealed by chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers. J. Plant Res. 2009, 122, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poudel, R.C.; Möller, M.; Li, D.Z.; Shah, A.; Gao, L.M. Genetic diversity, demographical history and conservation aspects of the endangered yew tree Taxus contorta (syn. Taxus fuana) in Pakistan. I Tree Genet. Genomes 2014, 10, 653–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazcano-Cruz, L.; Galván-Hernández, D.M.; Sánchez-González, A.; Ortiz-Pulido, R.; Octavio-Aguilar, P. Structure, genetic diversity, and bottlenecks in Taxus globosa populations: A Nearctic endangered species with fragmented distribution. Silvae Genet. 2025, 74, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hematzadeh, A.; Esmailzadeh, O.; Jalali, S.G.; Mirjalili, M.H.; Walas, Ł.; Yousefzadeh, H. Genetic diversity and structure of English yew (Taxus baccata L.) as a tertiary relict and endangered tree in the Hyrcanian forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 2023, 32, 1733–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nybom, H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13, 1143–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mable, B.K.; Adam, A. Patterns of genetic diversity in outcrossing and selfing populations of Arabidopsis lyrata. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 3565–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, J.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Hong, K.N. Genetic diversity and structure of Pinus densiflora Siebold & Zucc. populations in Republic of Korea based on microsatellite markers. Forests 2021, 12, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chybicki, I.J.; Oleksa, A. Seed and pollen gene dispersal in Taxus baccata, a dioecious conifer in the face of strong population fragmentation. Ann. Bot. 2018, 122, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zarek, M. Preliminary Studies on the Molecular Identification of Sex in Taxus baccata L.; Forest Research Institute: Sękocin Stary, Poland, 2016; Available online: https://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/9522 (accessed on 16 February 2026).
- Wright, S. Evolution and the genetics of populations. In Variability Within and Among Natural Populations; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1978; Volume 4, pp. 1–580. [Google Scholar]
- Meirmans, P.G.; Hedrick, P.W. Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, C.; Khant, N.A.; Jeon, Y.; Kim, H.; Lim, C. Geochemical characterization of intraplate magmatism from quaternary alkaline volcanic rocks on Jeju island, South Korea. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Potts, B.M.; Barbour, R.C.; Hingston, A.B.; Vaillancourt, R.E. Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools—Identifying the risks. Aust. J. Bot. 2003, 51, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKay, J.K.; Christian, C.E.; Harrison, S.; Rice, K.J. ‘How Local Is Local?’—A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2005, 13, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bischoff, A.; Steinger, T.; Müller-Schärer, H. The importance of plant provenance and genotypic diversity of seed material used for ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2010, 18, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Population | Code | N 1 | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude | Height | DBH 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mt. Seoraksan | SA | 62 | N38.18058 | E128.42013 | 1001 | 8.3 | 42.0 |
| Mt. Bangtaesan | BT | 17 | N37.89491 | E128.35563 | 1319 | 8.3 | 49.8 |
| Mt. Gyebangsan | GB | 34 | N37.72834 | E128.46541 | 1474 | 8.7 | 57.8 |
| Mt. Balwangsan | BW | 41 | N37.60811 | E128.67029 | 1419 | 7.9 | 58.2 |
| Mt. Joongwangsan | JW | 20 | N37.46366 | E128.52350 | 1286 | 8.0 | 65.8 |
| Mt. Gariwangsan | GW | 30 | N37.45138 | E128.57699 | 1420 | 7.5 | 50.5 |
| Mt. Duwi-bong | DU | 39 | N37.21239 | E128.75406 | 1417 | 7.7 | 56.5 |
| Mt. Taebaeksan | TB | 30 | N37.10813 | E128.93055 | 1413 | 5.5 | 26.7 |
| Mt. Sobaeksan | SB | 30 | N36.96144 | E128.48511 | 1347 | 4.5 | 27.6 |
| Mt. Deogyusan | DY | 33 | N35.86298 | E127.74542 | 1574 | 6.4 | 41.3 |
| Mt. Jirisan | JR | 31 | N35.33692 | E127.73066 | 1626 | 6.9 | 42.4 |
| Mt. Hallasan | HL | 19 | N33.36155 | E126.52963 | 1616 | 2.9 | 9.4 |
| Mt. Seonginbong | SG | 40 | N37.49772 | E130.86377 | 489 | 4.0 | 10.0 |
| Primer | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) | Repeat Motif | Product Size (bp) | Tm (°C) | PIC 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tach2 | F: GAACAAGTAGTTTTTCCATG R: CTCATTCACTTGGTCATATCC | (AC)34(AG)22 | 304–372 | 50 | 0.867 |
| Tach4 | F: CCGAAACTAATGTTATTCC R: GTGTGGTAGTTAGAAAAGATG | (TG)46 | 212–274 | 50 | 0.653 |
| Tc4 | F: GAATGCTTCCCACAATAG R: AAACATGGTGGCTACACT | (GT)11 | 112–152 | 55 | 0.375 |
| N-TC3 | F: TGCTATGGAATGAAGAATCCAA R: GTTTCCGTGTGTGTTGTGTGTTTT | (AC)5 | 157–165 | 55 | 0.308 |
| N-TC4 | F: ACATGGTGGCTACACTAGAGCAC R: CAACCTAGTGAGGATCATACTTTCA | (AC)5 | 99–109 | 55 | 0.365 |
| NTWJ9 | F: CCTGCTACGTGTTTACACAC R: CTTGTTAGGGCATTGAACAC | (ACAT)8 | 200–320 | 60 | 0.552 |
| T2 | F: AACGTTGTAAATCATTTGGACTCA R: CGGCATGAAATAGGATCAAAC | (AT)14 | 138–184 | 60 | 0.297 |
| T20 | F: TCTTAGCCCTTTGGTTCTACACA R: ATTCTAGAGGGTTGATGCGAGA | (TC)7 | 174–180 | 60 | 0.155 |
| T38 | F: CAGATTTCAAACCTTTCGTGAG R: ATCCATTTATGGCTTGGTGA | (CATA)10 | 113–186 | 60 | 0.266 |
| TB50 | F: ACAAAGACTATGAGCTATGC R: GAAAAGAGAATGTTGGGAG | (TC)8-(CT)13 | 270–330 | 60 | 0.896 |
| TG111 | F: TATCCCACATTTAGCATTAG R: ATAGAGCCGACCCATTCA | (CT)10 | 101–111 | 60 | 0.675 |
| TG34 | F: CGTTGATTCCTTGGGAGAT R: GTTGTCGTCGGAGAATACATC | (CT)10 | 256–258 | 60 | 0.511 |
| gr1114 | F: AGACCCATCCAATATTTATAAAATGGT R: AGAGACAACTTGAAAAGACCAGA | (TG)7–10 | 106–112 | 60 | 0.765 |
| gr5502 | F: AGCGGTGCAGAGTTTGATGA R: TTGTGGTCATTCGTTGGACA | (AGATA)5–6 | 104–109 | 60 | 0.321 |
| gr907 | F: CATTGCGCCTCTTTGGAGTC R: TGGCAGGCAGAATCAAAGGT | (CTT)6–7 | 113–116 | 60 | 0.274 |
| Population | N 1 | A | Ae | AR | Ho | He | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | 62 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 0.477 | 0.499 | 0.019 *** |
| BT | 17 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 0.515 | 0.540 | 0.056 * |
| GB | 34 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 0.549 | 0.527 | −0.057 |
| BW | 41 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 0.547 | 0.526 | −0.059 |
| JW | 20 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 0.437 | 0.480 | 0.050 * |
| GW | 30 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 0.551 | 0.515 | −0.060 |
| DU | 39 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 0.540 | 0.519 | −0.057 ** |
| TB | 30 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 4.2 | 0.479 | 0.532 | 0.135 *** |
| SB | 30 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.450 | 0.401 | −0.052 *** |
| DY | 33 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 0.514 | 0.485 | −0.068 |
| JR | 31 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 0.522 | 0.503 | −0.041 |
| HL | 19 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 0.350 | 0.356 | 0.026 |
| SG | 40 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 0.458 | 0.500 | 0.060 * |
| Mean ± SE | 32.4 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 0.491 ± 0.017 | 0.491 ± 0.016 | −0.004 ± 0.017 |
| SA | BT | GB | BW | JW | GW | DU | TB | SB | DY | JR | HL | SG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | – | 0.069 | 0.032 | 0.049 | 0.067 | 0.092 | 0.116 | 0.041 | 0.179 | 0.062 | 0.112 | 0.192 | 0.143 |
| BT | 0.027 | – | 0.087 | 0.047 | 0.100 | 0.070 | 0.090 | 0.033 | 0.173 | 0.090 | 0.115 | 0.268 | 0.165 |
| GB | 0.013 | 0.032 | – | 0.075 | 0.071 | 0.123 | 0.133 | 0.063 | 0.211 | 0.069 | 0.078 | 0.230 | 0.160 |
| BW | 0.017 | 0.022 | 0.024 | – | 0.093 | 0.064 | 0.073 | 0.048 | 0.134 | 0.076 | 0.104 | 0.233 | 0.131 |
| JW | 0.026 | 0.040 | 0.028 | 0.033 | – | 0.131 | 0.126 | 0.090 | 0.205 | 0.129 | 0.176 | 0.299 | 0.189 |
| GW | 0.029 | 0.028 | 0.037 | 0.022 | 0.044 | – | 0.097 | 0.077 | 0.184 | 0.125 | 0.141 | 0.250 | 0.177 |
| DU | 0.034 | 0.032 | 0.039 | 0.024 | 0.042 | 0.031 | – | 0.111 | 0.211 | 0.127 | 0.158 | 0.263 | 0.088 |
| TB | 0.017 | 0.020 | 0.023 | 0.019 | 0.034 | 0.027 | 0.034 | – | 0.192 | 0.054 | 0.089 | 0.204 | 0.129 |
| SB | 0.057 | 0.059 | 0.067 | 0.044 | 0.071 | 0.060 | 0.067 | 0.062 | – | 0.219 | 0.213 | 0.392 | 0.303 |
| DY | 0.022 | 0.033 | 0.024 | 0.026 | 0.044 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 0.022 | 0.072 | – | 0.078 | 0.242 | 0.121 |
| JR | 0.035 | 0.039 | 0.027 | 0.032 | 0.057 | 0.043 | 0.047 | 0.030 | 0.069 | 0.027 | – | 0.268 | 0.196 |
| HL | 0.067 | 0.093 | 0.078 | 0.079 | 0.108 | 0.085 | 0.089 | 0.071 | 0.147 | 0.085 | 0.092 | – | 0.179 |
| SG | 0.042 | 0.052 | 0.047 | 0.039 | 0.060 | 0.052 | 0.028 | 0.040 | 0.097 | 0.039 | 0.058 | 0.064 | – |
| Source of Variation | Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | Mean Squares | Estimated Variation | Percent of Variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 12 | 246.853 | 20.571 | 0.259 | 6 * |
| Within populations | 839 | 3169.996 | 3.778 | 3.778 | 94 |
| Total | 851 | 3416.849 | 4.037 | 100% |
| Population | Loci with Excess He | Wilcoxon p | Difference Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| SA | 7.70 | 0.0473 | T = 1.408, p = 0.07962 |
| BT | 8.03 | 0.0151 | T = 2.289, p = 0.01104 |
| GB | 8.06 | 0.0535 | T = 1.007, p = 0.15694 |
| BW | 8.08 | 0.0206 | T = 1.093, p = 0.13719 |
| JW | 8.02 | 0.1147 | T = 1.316, p = 0.09405 |
| GW | 7.88 | 0.0677 | T = 1.781, p = 0.03742 |
| DU | 7.41 | 0.0176 | T = 2.270, p = 0.01162 |
| TB | 8.24 | 0.0603 | T = 1.431, p = 0.07615 |
| SB | 7.92 | 0.7003 | T = −1.185, p = 0.11792 |
| DY | 8.08 | 0.5548 | T = −0.357, p = 0.36058 |
| JR | 7.88 | 0.0075 | T = 2.225, p = 0.01303 |
| HL | 7.31 | 0.3349 | T = 0.084, p = 0.46646 |
| SG | 7.79 | 0.4758 | T = −0.729, p = 0.23305 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Seo, H.-N.; Park, J.-H.; Ahn, J.-Y.; Lim, H.-I. Selection of Restoration Materials Based on Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Endangered Subalpine Conifer Taxus cuspidata, South Korea. Forests 2026, 17, 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020285
Seo H-N, Park J-H, Ahn J-Y, Lim H-I. Selection of Restoration Materials Based on Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Endangered Subalpine Conifer Taxus cuspidata, South Korea. Forests. 2026; 17(2):285. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020285
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeo, Han-Na, Jae-Hyun Park, Ji-Young Ahn, and Hyo-In Lim. 2026. "Selection of Restoration Materials Based on Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Endangered Subalpine Conifer Taxus cuspidata, South Korea" Forests 17, no. 2: 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020285
APA StyleSeo, H.-N., Park, J.-H., Ahn, J.-Y., & Lim, H.-I. (2026). Selection of Restoration Materials Based on Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Endangered Subalpine Conifer Taxus cuspidata, South Korea. Forests, 17(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020285

