Next Article in Journal
Strength, Drying Shrinkage, and Carbonation Characteristic of Amorphous Metallic Fiber-Reinforced Mortar with Artificial Lightweight Aggregate
Next Article in Special Issue
3D Hierarchical Nanocrystalline CuS Cathode for Lithium Batteries
Previous Article in Journal
Tailoring the Surface Morphology and the Crystallinity State of Cu- and Zn-Substituted Hydroxyapatites on Ti and Mg-Based Alloys
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phase Transformation of Doped LiCoPO4 during Galvanostatic Cycling
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

High-Voltage Lithium-Ion Battery Using Substituted LiCoPO4: Electrochemical and Safety Performance of 1.2 Ah Pouch Cell

Materials 2020, 13(19), 4450; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194450
by Dongqiang Liu 1,*, Chisu Kim 1, Alexis Perea 1, Dubé Joël 1, Wen Zhu 1, Steve Collin-Martin 1, Amélie Forand 1, Martin Dontigny 1, Catherine Gagnon 1, Hendrix Demers 1, Samuel Delp 1, Jan Allen 1, Richard Jow 2 and Karim Zaghib 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2020, 13(19), 4450; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194450
Submission received: 4 September 2020 / Revised: 24 September 2020 / Accepted: 2 October 2020 / Published: 7 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrochemical Materials in Batteries)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript reported the electrochemical and safety performance of 1.2 Ah pouch cell. A lot of electrochemical characterization methods of the resulting materials were made, also the electrochemical and thermal stability were studied. However, there are still some places that are not clear and some comments are made below for the authors to further enhance their paper before its possible publication.

  1. The subject of this work did not come-up properly in the introduction section. Therefore, introduction needs bit modification.
  2. The novelty must be supplemented, clearly, in the abstract.
  3. The reference [10] is used many times in the text, it will be better to explain that this work is continuation of your last work. Some information, particularly, for the experimental part are necessary to add it in this work. For example the section 2.1 authors must add all information of cell fabrication and electrochemical tests and then the reference, but mentioning just ‘’as described in ref[10]’’ is not appreciated for the reader.
  4. There are no coherence between the obtained resulted on TGA, DSC and XRD, also the scientific interpretation are weak, particularly for the XRD measurements, so a revision of this part is necessary to show and confirm between the obtained results, characterization and conclusion. It will be interesting to propose a mechanism or some scheme, explaining the results and performance of 1.2 Ah pouch cell. If not, the work risk being overlapped.
  5. In this paper, 1.2 Ah pouch cell showed high-performance on safety, stability and thermal stability. Please compare your results with those reported in the above listed literature.
  6. Finally, the conclusion must be logical outcome of results and discussion, showing the novelty of this work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors presented the fabrication of LiCoPO4-based high-voltage lithium-ion battery in the format of a 1.2Ah pouch cell that exhibited a highly stable cycle life at a cut-off voltage of 4.9 V. The high-voltage stability was achieved using a Fe-Cr-Si multi-ion-substituted LiCoPO4 cathode and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide in 1-methyl-1-propylpyrrolidinium bis(fluorosulfony)imide as the electrolyte.

It was evaluated the safety performance of the pouch cell under electrical abuse conditions and determined the thermal stability of delithiated LCP by accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses

The manuscript contains descriptions of studies that have been planned, carried out and interpreted. There are sufficient details given to replicate the proposed experimental procedures.

I recommend that the manuscript is published.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Row 38 Written as “…has been increased to 105 order [7]”. It seems to be correct to write down how …has been increased to 10^{5} order [7].

Row 77 Written as “…the frequency range 10 kHz to 50 mHz with…”. It seems to be correct to write down how … “…the frequency range 10 kHz to 50 MHz with…”

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have answered all my questions, revised paper can be accepted.

Back to TopTop