Next Article in Journal
Working with Goals and Trauma in Youth Mental Health
Previous Article in Journal
Neurodevelopment Outcome in Children with Fetal Growth Restriction at Six Years of Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dynamic Game Analysis of Enterprise Green Technology Innovation Ecosystem under Double Environmental Regulation

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 11047; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711047
by Yan Li * and Yi Shi
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 11047; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711047
Submission received: 19 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 31 August 2022 / Published: 3 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Anthropogenic Circularity)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors construct a tripartite evolutionary game model of enterprises, governments and financial institutions, and use evolutionary game theory and MATLAB simulation to analyze the evolutionary process of the interaction of the subjects of green technology innovation of enterprises under the dual environmental regulation. I suggest moving all the calculations to a specific mathematical appendix. Also to describe more in details the characteristics of the model and Matlab simulation.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please discuss the differences between your paper and the paper:An Evolutionary Game Analysis on Green Technological Innovation of New Energy Enterprises under the Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation Perspective, Sustainability 202214(10), 6340 because there is a high rate of similarity between this paper and the paper mentioned above.

 

Reduce the similarity rate. Cite the article mentioned and explain the difference between them. There's similarity and one-on-one quotation at every stage, including methodology

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Corrections are made following the critiques in the previous round. I am happy with the final version and my recommendation is positive.   

Back to TopTop