Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Atopic Dermatitis on Health-Related Quality of Life in Bangladesh
Next Article in Special Issue
Inhibition and Calendar Age Explain Variance in Game Performance of Youth Soccer Athletes
Previous Article in Journal
Modification of Apremilast from Pills to Aerosol a Future Concept
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents

Department of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11594; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111594
Submission received: 24 August 2021 / Revised: 25 October 2021 / Accepted: 29 October 2021 / Published: 4 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Physical Activity on Cognitive Function in Young People)

Abstract

Exercise duration may influence the acute effects on cognition. However, only one study to date has explored the dose-response relationship between exercise duration and cognition in adolescents. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of differing durations of high-intensity intermittent running on cognition in adolescents. Thirty-eight adolescents (23 girls) completed three trials separated by 7 d: 30 min exercise, 60 min exercise, and rest; in a randomised crossover design. The exercise was a modified version of the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST), which elicited high-intensity intermittent exercise. Cognitive function tests (Stroop test, Sternberg paradigm, Flanker task) were completed 30 min pre, immediately post, and 45 min post exercise. Response times on the incongruent level of the Flanker task improved to a greater extent 45 min following the 30 min LIST, compared to rest (p = 0.009). Moreover, response times improved to a greater extent on the three-item level of Sternberg paradigm 45 min following the 30 min LIST, compared to the 60 min LIST (p = 0.002) and rest (p = 0.013), as well as on the five-item level 45 min following the 30 min LIST, compared to the 60 min LIST (p = 0.002). In conclusion, acute exercise enhanced subsequent cognition in adolescents, but overall, 30 min of high-intensity intermittent running is more favourable to adolescents’ cognition, compared to 60 min.
Keywords: exercise; physical activity; high-intensity; duration; attention; inhibitory control; working memory; cognition; adolescents exercise; physical activity; high-intensity; duration; attention; inhibitory control; working memory; cognition; adolescents

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hatch, L.M.; Dring, K.J.; Williams, R.A.; Sunderland, C.; Nevill, M.E.; Cooper, S.B. Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111594

AMA Style

Hatch LM, Dring KJ, Williams RA, Sunderland C, Nevill ME, Cooper SB. Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(21):11594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hatch, Lorna M., Karah J. Dring, Ryan A. Williams, Caroline Sunderland, Mary E. Nevill, and Simon B. Cooper. 2021. "Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 21: 11594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111594

APA Style

Hatch, L. M., Dring, K. J., Williams, R. A., Sunderland, C., Nevill, M. E., & Cooper, S. B. (2021). Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11594. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop