Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

The topic is intriguing. However, the presentation of the paper is not good. Some typos can be found anywhere, and the authors do not adhere to the journal format. My specific remarks are listed below.

1.      The figures are too small if compared to the margin. Also, please replace the figures with higher resolution

2.      Figure 11-15. Include a discussion of why there is noise. What was the cause?

3.      Table 2. Use consistent writing for a significant number. In certain instances, authors use one number after the point, whereas in other instances, they use three numbers after the bullet. Be consistent to avoid misunderstanding.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached file. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached file. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf