Next Article in Journal
Ecological, Historical, Economic, and Political Factors Shaping the Human–Gorilla Interface in the Mone-Oku Forest, Cameroon
Next Article in Special Issue
Dissolved Oxygen-And Temperature-Dependent Simulation of the Population Dynamics of Moon Jellyfish (Aurelia coerulea) Polyps
Previous Article in Journal
Do Roads Alter the Trophic Behavior of the Mesocarnivore Community Living Close to Them?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Observations on the Feeding of Drymonema dalmatinum in the Gulf of Trieste
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Population Structures and Levels of Connectivity for Scyphozoan and Cubozoan Jellyfish

Diversity 2021, 13(4), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040174
by Michael J. Kingsford *, Jodie A. Schlaefer and Scott J. Morrissey
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diversity 2021, 13(4), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/d13040174
Submission received: 9 March 2021 / Revised: 7 April 2021 / Accepted: 12 April 2021 / Published: 19 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Patterns and Ecology of Jellyfish in Marine Environment)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Review of manuscript by Kingsford et al

 

This work is a review of the knowledge available on population structure of scyphozoan and cubozoans jellyfishes. Differences between individual species, and among the two classes are discussed, as well as drivers of these differences.

 

Overall I think that the goal of this review is sensible but the presentation lacks accuracy and clarity.

 

The main weaknesses are

- missing definition of connectivity. There is no one single definition, See 

Pineda, Hare and Sponaugle, 2007)

In particular authors should differentiate realized and potential connectivity.

- the structure of the ms : there is a mix of causes (behavioral, hydrodynamic, presence of polyps) and consequences (population structure). I suggest to start from the observed population structure (through genetics and morphological/elemental analyses) and progress toward the potential causes.

- The introduction and conclusions of the review : too detailed introduction, and I do not really see a summary of the main points addressed, nor new avenues for research in conclusion.

 

Detailed comments

 

Abstract

L18 “we predict”: I guess posing a hypothesis and testing it is the appropriate way.

 

Introduction

 

L41 boney?

L43 affects? Effects.

L70 define connectivity

L75 incipient

L79 insular? What do you mean?

L82 Most jellyfish have a polyp stage; this should already be mentioned here.

L138-147: This paragraph should come earlier (near L91).

 

2 Evidence

L170 “and has” ??

 

L266: would coastal/oceanic character a useful discriminant for population structure?

 

L325: This table should come first as it shows the actual observation of population structure.

L368: I suggest changing to ‘hydrodynamic connectivity” rather than the method used to estimate it, which is biophysical modeling

 

L402. I think the question of this paragraph is interesting. However the polyp effect on population structure should be first stated as a hypothesis, then validated by the review of literature.

 

Table and Figures

 

Table 1

Cubozoan: center as scyphozoan

Table 2

I would not mix observed (genetics) and potential connectivity (from biophysical modeling) in the same framework.

Author Response

Thanks for your comments, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript a deep study about the population structures and levels of connectivity for scyphozoan and cubozoan jellyfish is presented. 

In my opinion this is a very interesting work in which a very extensive study of the population dynamics of scyphozoan and cubozoan jellyfish has been made, that will be very useful for other researchers.

The text is well written and easy to read, what I really appreciate as a reader.

Some errors have been detected and are shown in the text as comments and/or corrections.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks for your comments, please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

ms ok.

Back to TopTop