Next Article in Journal
Metal Complexes in Diagnosis and Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Bispecific Antibody-Based Immune-Cell Engagers and Their Emerging Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Immunotherapy
Previous Article in Journal
Plasma Proteomic Profile of Patients with Tick-Borne Encephalitis and Co-Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comment on Piña et al. Ten Approaches That Improve Immunostaining: A Review of the Latest Advances for the Optimization of Immunofluorescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1426
 
 
Reply
Peer-Review Record

Reply to Sheval, E.V. Comment on “Piña et al. Ten Approaches That Improve Immunostaining: A Review of the Latest Advances for the Optimization of Immunofluorescence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1426”

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084375
by Ricardo Piña 1, Isabel Acosta-Galeana 2 and Abraham Rosas-Arellano 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4375; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084375
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is a polite reply to the comment by Dr. Sheval on the review titled “Ten Approaches that Improve Immunostaining: A Review of the Latest Advances for the Optimization of Immunofluorescence”. The authors explain their point of view and  thank Dr. Sheval for his clarification.

In my opinion the reply may be published in the present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors' replay to Sheval's comment is appropriate, well focused and justified.

Back to TopTop