You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Ricardo Piña1,
  • Isabel Acosta-Galeana2 and
  • Abraham Rosas-Arellano3,*

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is a polite reply to the comment by Dr. Sheval on the review titled “Ten Approaches that Improve Immunostaining: A Review of the Latest Advances for the Optimization of Immunofluorescence”. The authors explain their point of view and  thank Dr. Sheval for his clarification.

In my opinion the reply may be published in the present form.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors' replay to Sheval's comment is appropriate, well focused and justified.